CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00652314ControlUpdated Mar 7, 2016Results posted

Evaluation of an Absorbable Surgical Hemostatic Agent: Thrombi-Gel® Versus Gelfoam-Thrombin

A Phase 4 interventional study of Thrombi-Gel in Operation Site Bleed, sponsored by Vascular Solutions LLC. Completed at 7 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-03-07.

Sponsored by Vascular Solutions LLC · Phase 4, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
97
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This trial is designed as a prospective, multi-center, randomized, feasibility clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Thrombi-Gel as an absorbable surgical hemostat.

Within this clinical evaluation, Thrombi-Gel will be compared to the current standard of care, a gelatin sponge (Gelfoam) plus Thrombin JMI, by using a 2:1 randomization ratio. Subjects will be randomized to one of two (2) treatment groups. One (1) group will be treated with Thrombi-Gel, while one (1) group will be treated with the gelatin sponge plus thrombin. All study data will be analyzed according to the subjects' assigned randomization group assignment, regardless of the treatment actually delivered.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, randomized, multi-center investigation with a minimum of seventy five (75) study subjects designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Thrombi-Gel product as an absorbable hemostat in the surgical patient population.

Subjects who are undergoing orthopedic/spinal, general, cardiac, hepatic or vascular surgical procedures should be considered for this investigation. Subjects can be pre-screened utilizing standard of care data for the specified inclusion/exclusion criteria to ensure that they are eligible for treatment in the investigation. If the subject appears to qualify for the investigation, the subject will then be asked to give his/her written informed consent. If, during surgery, the surgeon encounters a bleeding site that he or she is unable or unwilling to easily control due to failure or impracticality of conventional methods (sutures and/or cautery), the subject may be enrolled and randomized to receive either the investigational or control treatment. If the subject has multiple bleeding sites, each site to a maximum of 5 sites, may be treated with the assigned surgical hemostat. However, only the first site treated will be used to determine study objectives. All subjects will be followed through their hospitalization.

A follow-up evaluation will be conducted at approximately 30 and 60 days post-procedure to determine the long-term effectiveness of the hemostatic treatment received, incidence of late adverse events, and interim immunologic response to the study treatment device. Follow-up evaluations will include obtaining a blood specimen that evaluates for antibody development, coagulation, and Factor Va testing. Blood samples will be sent to independent labs for analysis.

From baseline to the final study exam, data pertaining to the investigational objectives will be recorded on the appropriate case report forms at the predetermined study intervals. The investigation will be conducted at a minimum of five (5) sites, but no more than fifteen (15) sites.

02

Conditions studied

  • Operation Site Bleed

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Hemostatic products
  • Surgical hemostasis
  • Thrombi-gel
  • Gelatin Sponge
  • Time to hemostasis
03

In context

Thrombosis

1,506 studies on the registry are indexed under Thrombosis; 238 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 97 is close to the median of 106 across 849 interventional studies indexed under Thrombosis.

Browse Thrombosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Vascular Solutions LLC is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. The subject is 18 years of age or older
  2. The subject is undergoing an orthopedic/spinal, general, cardiac, hepatic, or vascular surgical procedure (neurosurgical, ophthalmic or urological procedures must be excluded)
  3. The subject is willing and able to provide appropriate informed consent
  4. The subject is willing and able to comply with the requirements of the study protocol, including the predefined follow-up evaluations

Inclusion criteria to be determined during the surgical procedure:

  1. The subject has an intraoperative bleeding site which the surgeon is unable or unwilling to easily control with conventional methods (cautery, sutures)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The subject is known or suspected to be pregnant (verified in a manner consistent with institution's standard of care), or is lactating
  2. The subject has a known allergy to bovine derived products or any other materials used in the Thrombi-Gel product
  3. The subject has an active infection at the surgical site
  4. The use of hemostatic agents are contraindicated for the subject
  5. The subject has a known bleeding disorder (including thrombocytopenia [\< 100,000 platelet count], thrombobasthenia, hemophilia, or von Willebrand disease)
  6. The subject has received antibiotic solutions/powders at the intended application site
  7. The subject has had surgery at the intended application site ≤ 6 months before the current surgical procedure
  8. The subject is unavailable for follow-up
  9. The subject is currently participating in another investigational device or drug trial
  10. The subject has previously participated in this trial (Protocol 0307) or the Thrombi-Paste trial (Protocol 0507)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
97 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1 - Thrombi-gel treatment

    Thrombi-gel treatment

    Device: Thrombi-Gel

  • Active comparator
    2 - Gelatin Sponge (Gelfoam)

    Gelatin Sponge (Gelfoam) plus thrombin

    Device: Thrombi-Gel

Interventions

  • DeviceThrombi-Gel

    Applicaton of Hemostatic product during surgery

    Also known as: Gelatin Sponge (Gelfoam) plus thrombin

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Primary Objective of This Investigation is to Gather Information to Support the Effectiveness of Thrombi-Gel as Compared to a Gelatin Sponge (Gelfoam) Plus Thrombin as an Adjunct to Hemostasis in Multi-specialty Surgical Settings.

    Evaluation for hemostasis began immediately following application of the safety product. Hemostasis assessments were to be made every minute for the first 10 minutes post application. If hemostasis was not observed within 10 minutes, the treatment site was to be monitored and the research teams were asked to record the specific number of minutes until hemostasis was observed.

    Time frame: Time to hemostasis (minutes)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effectiveness: Device Success (Defined as the Number of Subjects With First Bleeding Site Applications for Which Hemostasis Was Obtained Within 6 Minutes of Study Device Application Without the Need for Adjunctive Treatment)

    Time frame: Procedure, up to 6 minutes post procedure

  2. Effectiveness: Hemostatic Handling Characteristics (Surgeon's Questionnaire)

    Ease of application to bleeding site as assessed by surgeon questionnaire for hemostatic handling characteristics.

    Time frame: Procedure (application through end of procedure)

  3. Safety: Incidence Rate of Device-related Adverse Events

    Time frame: Procedure, up to 60 days post procedure

  4. Safety: Immunological Testing for Factor Va Antibodies and Coagulation Parameters

    Time frame: 0 day, 30 day, and 60 days post procedure

07

Results

Posted Mar 7, 2016

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
Milestone1 - Thrombi-gel Treatment2 - Gelatin Sponge (Gelfoam) Plus Thrombin
Started6235
Completed5326
Not completed99

Outcome measures

PrimaryThe Primary Objective of This Investigation is to Gather Information to Support the Effectiveness of Thrombi-Gel as Compared to a Gelatin Sponge (Gelfoam) Plus Thrombin as an Adjunct to Hemostasis in Multi-specialty Surgical Settings.

Evaluation for hemostasis began immediately following application of the safety product. Hemostasis assessments were to be made every minute for the first 10 minutes post application. If hemostasis was not observed within 10 minutes, the treatment site was to be monitored and the research teams were asked to record the specific number of minutes until hemostasis was observed.

Time frame:
Time to hemostasis (minutes)
Reported as:
Mean · Time to hemostasis (minutes)
The Primary Objective of This Investigation is to Gather Information to Support the Effectiveness of Thrombi-Gel as Compared to a Gelatin Sponge (Gelfoam) Plus Thrombin as an Adjunct to Hemostasis in Multi-specialty Surgical Settings.
Time to hemostasis (minutes)1 - Thrombi-gel Treatment2 - Gelatin Sponge (Gelfoam) Plus Thrombin
The Primary Objective of This Investigation is to Gather Information to Support the Effectiveness of Thrombi-Gel as Compared to a Gelatin Sponge (Gelfoam) Plus Thrombin as an Adjunct to Hemostasis in Multi-specialty Surgical Settings.4.01 ± 4.153.72 ± 4.75
SecondaryEffectiveness: Device Success (Defined as the Number of Subjects With First Bleeding Site Applications for Which Hemostasis Was Obtained Within 6 Minutes of Study Device Application Without the Need for Adjunctive Treatment)
Time frame:
Procedure, up to 6 minutes post procedure
Reported as:
Number · participants
Effectiveness: Device Success (Defined as the Number of Subjects With First Bleeding Site Applications for Which Hemostasis Was Obtained Within 6 Minutes of Study Device Application Without the Need for Adjunctive Treatment)
participants1 - Thrombi-gel Treatment2 - Gelatin Sponge (Gelfoam) Plus Thrombin
Effectiveness: Device Success (Defined as the Number of Subjects With First Bleeding Site Applications for Which Hemostasis Was Obtained Within 6 Minutes of Study Device Application Without the Need for Adjunctive Treatment)5029
SecondaryEffectiveness: Hemostatic Handling Characteristics (Surgeon's Questionnaire)

Ease of application to bleeding site as assessed by surgeon questionnaire for hemostatic handling characteristics.

Time frame:
Procedure (application through end of procedure)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Effectiveness: Hemostatic Handling Characteristics (Surgeon's Questionnaire)
participants1 - Thrombi-gel Treatment2 - Gelatin Sponge (Gelfoam) Plus Thrombin
Ease of application to bleeding site - 1 (easy)5729
Ease of application to bleeding site - 254
Ease of application to bleeding site - 300
Ease of application to bleeding site - 400
Ease of application to bleeding site - 5 (hard)00
Conformance to tissue surfaces - 1 (well)4728
Conformance to tissue surfaces - 2154
Conformance to tissue surfaces - 301
Conformance to tissue surfaces - 400
Conformance to tissue surfaces - 500
Ease of delivery to hard to reach surfaces-1(easy)3824
Ease of delivery to hard to reach surfaces - 2145
Ease of delivery to hard to reach surfaces - 331
Ease of delivery to hard to reach surfaces - 400
Ease of delivery to hard to reach surfaces-5(hard)00
Ease of preparation for use - 1 (easy)5624
Ease of preparation for use - 243
Ease of preparation for use - 326
Ease of preparation for use - 400
Ease of preparation for use - 500
SecondarySafety: Incidence Rate of Device-related Adverse Events
Time frame:
Procedure, up to 60 days post procedure
Reported as:
Number · participants
Safety: Incidence Rate of Device-related Adverse Events
participants1 - Thrombi-gel Treatment2 - Gelatin Sponge (Gelfoam) Plus Thrombin
Serious20
Non-Serious10
SecondarySafety: Immunological Testing for Factor Va Antibodies and Coagulation Parameters
Time frame:
0 day, 30 day, and 60 days post procedure
Reported as:
Number · participants
Safety: Immunological Testing for Factor Va Antibodies and Coagulation Parameters
participants1 - Thrombi-gel Treatment2 - Gelatin Sponge (Gelfoam) Plus Thrombin
Bovine FV/Va (0 Day)113
Bovine FV/Va (30 Day)179
Bovine FV/Va (60 Day)117
Bovine Thrombin (0 Day)124
Bovine Thrombin (30 Day)157
Bovine Thrombin (60 Day)144
Human FV/Va (0 Day)97
Human FV/Va (30 Day)1210
Human FV/Va (60 Day)105
Human Thrombin (0 Day)32
Human Thrombin (30 Day)73
Human Thrombin (60 Day)43

Adverse events

Collected over 60-Day. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
1 - Thrombi-gel Treatment—11/62 (17.7%)33/62 (53.2%)
2 - Gelatin Sponge (Gelfoam) Plus Thrombin—5/35 (14.3%)22/35 (62.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
Event1 - Thrombi-gel Treatment2 - Gelatin Sponge (Gelfoam) Plus Thrombin
OtherGeneral disorders6/624/35
Abnormal ThrombosisBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/620/35
Infection/AbscessInfections and infestations2/621/35
HematomaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/620/35
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
Event1 - Thrombi-gel Treatment2 - Gelatin Sponge (Gelfoam) Plus Thrombin
OtherGeneral disorders32/6222/35
Foreign Body / Hypersensitivity Reaction / Allergic ReactionImmune system disorders1/622/35
Infection/AbscessInfections and infestations1/621/35
Tissue NecrosisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/621/35

Baseline characteristics

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(participants)1 - Thrombi-gel Treatment2 - Gelatin Sponge (Gelfoam) Plus ThrombinTotal
>= to 18 Years623597
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)1 - Thrombi-gel Treatment2 - Gelatin Sponge (Gelfoam) Plus ThrombinTotal
Female372158
Male251439
08

Study locations

7 sites
  • Southern Illinois University School of Medicine
    Springfield, Illinois 66702, United States
  • Lahey Clinic
    Burlington, Massachusetts 01805, United States
  • Michigan Vascular Research Center
    Flint, Michigan 48507, United States
  • Hackensack University Medical Center
    Hackensack, New Jersey 07601, United States
  • Sanford Clinic
    Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57104, United States
  • Southwest Regional Clinical Research
    Lubbock, Texas 79412, United States
  • Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
    Lubbock, Texas 79415, United States
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 7, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00652314
Lead sponsor
Vascular Solutions LLC
Collaborators
King Pharmaceuticals is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 3, 2008
Start date
Mar 2008
Primary completion
Oct 2009
Completion
Jan 2010
Results posted
Mar 7, 2016
Last update
Mar 7, 2016

Study contacts

Robert Dolan, MD
principal investigator · Lahey Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion