CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00634543Updated Aug 12, 2013Results posted

A Study to Compare Safety and Efficacy of Tramadol Hydrochloride/Acetaminophen With Gabapentin in Participants With Diabetic Neuropathy

A Phase 4 interventional study of Tramadol hydrochloride/ Acetaminophen and Gabapentin in Diabetic Neuropathy, sponsored by Janssen Korea, Ltd., Korea. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-08-12.

Sponsored by Janssen Korea, Ltd., Korea · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
162
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tramadol hydrochloride (HCl) 37.5 miligram (mg)/acetaminophen 325 mg compared to gabapentin in participants with diabetic neuropathic (nerve disorder caused by diabetes mellitus) pain.

Read the detailed description

This is an open-label (a medical research study in which participants and researchers are told which treatments the participants are receiving, "unblinded"), multi-center and randomized (study drug is assigned by chance) study to compare the effectiveness and safety of tramadol HCl 37.5 mg/acetaminophen 325 mg with gabapentin in participants with diabetic neuropathy. The study will consist of 4 periods: Screening period (up to Day -14), Randomization period (Day 1), Dosage adjustment period (Day 15) and Maintenance period (Day 43). The participants will be randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 treatment groups: tramadol HCl 37.5 mg/acetaminophen 325 mg or gabapentin. Tramadol Hcl/acetaminophen group will receive 1 tablet for 3 days, then 1 tablet twice daily for 4 days followed by 1 tablet thrice daily for next 7 days. If there is no pain relief, the dosage can be increased up to 8 tablets per day for Day 15 to 28, and then the increased dosage will be maintained for Day 29 to 42. Gabapentin group will receive 300 mg on Day 1, 300 mg twice daily on Day 2, and 300 mg thrice daily for Day 3 to 7. Then for Day 8 to 14, participants will receive 300 mg in the morning, 300 mg in the midday and 600 mg in the evening. If there is no pain relief, gabapentin can be increased up to 3600 mg per day for Day 15 to 28, and then the increased dosage will be maintained for Day 29 to 42. Primarily, efficacy will be evaluated by pain intensity using numeric rating scale (NRS). Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetic Neuropathy

Keywords

  • Diabetic neuropathy
  • Ultracet
  • Tramadol hydrochloride
  • Acetaminophen
  • Gabapentin
03

In context

Peripheral Nervous System Diseases

1,003 studies on the registry are indexed under Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; 177 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 162 is above the median of 60 across 768 interventional studies indexed under Peripheral Nervous System Diseases.

Browse Peripheral Nervous System Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Janssen Korea, Ltd., Korea is the lead sponsor of 75 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants having painful symmetric neuropathy (a disturbance in the function of the brain or spinal cord that may affect the nerves and muscles of the body) in the lower limbs applicable to both of the following conditions: decreased sensation of leg to monofilament, none or decreased ankle reflexes or decreased vibratory sensation and pain symptoms such as numbness (loss of sensation), tingling, paresthesia (a skin sensation, such as burning, prickling, itching, or tingling, with no apparent physical cause), burning, shooting pain, stabbing or lancinating (characterized by a sensation of cutting, piercing, or stabbing) pain
  • Participants having painful diabetic neuropathy in the lower limbs for 3 months before randomization
  • Participants diagnosed with Type ll diabetes and stable blood sugar level controlled with an oral medication, insulin or diet therapy for 3 months before randomization
  • Participants with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) less than or equal to 10 percent
  • Participants with pain intensity score of greater than or equal to 4 on numeric rating scale (NRS) for the last 48 hours

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who have previously experienced failure of tramadol treatment or have discontinued tramadol administration due to adverse event
  • Participants who have received the prohibited medication before randomization (e.g., capsaicin, use of systemic steroids, steroid or local anesthetic injections, tramadol HCl or tramadol combination, gabapentin, opioid analgesics, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, alpha-lipoic acid, acupuncture, COX-2 selective inhibitors, long-acting NSAIDs, opioid analgesics, sedative-hypnotics, muscle relaxants, anxiolytics, antipsychotics, TENS, short-acting non-opioid analgesics)
  • Participants with neuropathic pain caused by other reasons (e.g., alcohol abuse, connective tissue disease, toxic exposure, infection, neoplasm, ischemia)
  • Participants suffering from painful diabetic neuropathy over 10 years
  • Participants with physical damage or disease which may cause abnormal absorption, excessive accumulation, metabolism or excretion disorder of the study medication
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
162 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Tramadol hydrochloride (HCl)/ Acetaminophen

    Participants will receive 1 tablet containing tramadol HCl 37.5 milligram (mg) and acetaminophen 325 mg once daily, at bed time on Days 1 to 3, 1 tablet twice daily on Days 4 to 7 and 1 tablet thrice daily on Day 8 to 14. If there is no pain relief, the dosage can be increased up to 8 tablets per day for Days 15 to 28. The increased dose will be maintained for Days 29 to 42.

    Drug: Tramadol hydrochloride/ Acetaminophen

  • Active comparator
    Gabapentin

    Participants will receive Gabapentin 300 mg once daily at bed time on Day 1, 300 mg twice daily on Day 2 and 300 mg thrice daily on Day 3. Gabapentin 300 mg will be administered twice daily (in the morning and midday) and gabapentin 600 mg in the evening on Day 8 to 14. If there is no pain relief, the dosage can be increased up to 3600 mg per day for Days 15 to 28. The increased dose will be maintained for Days 29 to 42.

    Drug: Gabapentin

Interventions

  • DrugTramadol hydrochloride/ Acetaminophen

    Participants will receive 1 tablet containing tramadol HCl 37.5 milligram (mg) and acetaminophen 325 mg once daily, at bed time on Days 1 to 3,. 1 tablet twice daily on Days 4 to 7 and 1 tablet thrice daily on Day 8 to 14. If there is no pain relief, the dosage can be increased up to 8 tablets per day for Days 15 to 28. The increased dose will be maintained for Days 29 to 42.

    Also known as: Ultracet

  • DrugGabapentin

    Participants will receive Gabapentin 300 mg once daily at bed time on Day 1, 300 mg twice daily on Day 2 and 300 mg thrice daily on Day 3. Gabapentin 300 mg will be administered twice daily (in the morning and midday) and gabapentin 600 mg in the evening on Day 8 to 14. If there is no pain relief, the dosage can be increased up to 3600 mg per day for Days 15 to 28. The increased dose will be maintained for Days 29 to 42.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity Score at Day 43

    Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point numerical rating scale ranging from 0=no pain to 10=pain as bad as you can imagine.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 43

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Pain Relief

    Pain relief was assessed on a scale ranging from -1 to 4, where -1=became worse, 0=no change, 1=relieved a little, 2=relieved moderately, 3=relieved a lot and 4=completely resolved.

    Time frame: Day 15, Day 29 and Day 43

  2. Overall Assessment of Study Medication by Participants

    Overall assessment of study medication was done by participants. Assessment was made on a scale of -2 to 2 where, -2=very bad, -1=bad, 0=no change, 1= good and 2=very good.

    Time frame: Day 43

  3. Overall Assessment of Study Medication by Investigator

    Overall assessment of study medication was done by Investigator. Assessment was made on a scale of -2 to 2 where, -2=very bad, -1=bad, 0=no change, 1= good and 2=very good.

    Time frame: Day 43

  4. Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Score at Day 43

    The BPI is a questionnaire designed to assess the severity and impact of pain on quality of life. Pain severity score is caculated by sum of all severity items (pain worst, pain least, pain average and pain now) divided by pain now. Total score for pain severity ranges from 0=no pain to 10=extreme pain. Pain interference score was calculated by sum of all interference items (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life) score. Total score for pain interference ranges from 0=no interference to 70= interferes completely.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 43

  5. Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Score at Day 43

    The SF-36 is designed to assess the health status of participants. The SF-36 includes 1 multi-item scale measuring physical health and mental health. Physical health includes physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, pain and general health. Mantal health includes role limitations due to emotional problems, energy/fatigue, emotional well being and social functioning. Each item is scored on a 0-100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100, respectively. All items are scored so that a high score defines a more favorable health state.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 43

07

Results

Posted Jul 16, 2013
Limitations and caveats
The study was a non-inferiority study to demonstrate that tramadol/acetaminophen did not have poorer ffectiveness as compared to gabapentin. However this could not be demonstrated because of error in the minimum significant difference set-up.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTramadol Hydrochloride/ AcetaminophenGabapentin
Started7884
Treated7680
Completed5963
Not completed1921
Withdrew: Other12
Withdrew: Protocol violation33
Withdrew: Adverse event1111
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject44
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up01

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Pain Intensity Score at Day 43

Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point numerical rating scale ranging from 0=no pain to 10=pain as bad as you can imagine.

Time frame:
Baseline and Day 43
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity Score at Day 43
Units on a scaleTramadol Hydrochloride/ AcetaminophenGabapentin
Baseline6.65 ± 1.606.30 ± 1.58
Change at Day 433.15 ± 1.832.76 ± 1.97
Statistical analysis
  • Tramadol Hydrochloride/ Acetaminophen vs Gabapentin · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.2143 · Mean difference (net): 0.39 · 95% CI -0.23 to 1.01P-value was calculated for change from baseline in pain intensity score at Day 43.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Pain Relief

Pain relief was assessed on a scale ranging from -1 to 4, where -1=became worse, 0=no change, 1=relieved a little, 2=relieved moderately, 3=relieved a lot and 4=completely resolved.

Time frame:
Day 15, Day 29 and Day 43
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Pain Relief
Percentage of ParticipantsTramadol Hydrochloride/ AcetaminophenGabapentin
Day 15: Became worse1.44.0
Day 15: No change12.714.5
Day 15: Relieved a little31.034.2
Day 15: Relieved moderately26.821.1
Day 15: Relieved a lot26.826.3
Day 15: Completely resolved1.40.0
Day 29: Became worse4.21.3
Day 29: No change9.910.5
Day 29: Relieved a little25.429.0
Day 29: Relieved moderately21.114.5
Day 29: Relieved a lot38.044.7
Day 29: Completely resolved1.40.0
Day 43: Became worse2.81.3
Day 43: No change7.011.8
Day 43: Relieved a little22.525.0
Day 43: Relieved moderately19.715.8
Day 43: Relieved a lot46.542.1
Day 43: Completely resolved1.44.0
Statistical analysis
  • Tramadol Hydrochloride/ Acetaminophen vs Gabapentin · Chi-squared · p = 0.7539P-value was evaluated for pain relief in tramadol hydrochloride/ acetaminophen versus gabapentin groups at Day 15.
  • Tramadol Hydrochloride/ Acetaminophen vs Gabapentin · Chi-squared · p = 0.5905P-value was evaluated for pain relief in tramadol hydrochloride/ acetaminophen versus gabapentin groups at Day 29.
  • Tramadol Hydrochloride/ Acetaminophen vs Gabapentin · Chi-squared · p = 0.7407P-value was evaluated for pain relief in tramadol hydrochloride/ acetaminophen versus gabapentin groups at Day 43.
SecondaryOverall Assessment of Study Medication by Participants

Overall assessment of study medication was done by participants. Assessment was made on a scale of -2 to 2 where, -2=very bad, -1=bad, 0=no change, 1= good and 2=very good.

Time frame:
Day 43
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Overall Assessment of Study Medication by Participants
Percentage of participantsTramadol Hydrochloride/ AcetaminophenGabapentin
Bad4.512.5
No change29.929.2
Good50.841.7
Very good14.916.7
Statistical analysis
  • Tramadol Hydrochloride/ Acetaminophen vs Gabapentin · Chi-squared · p = 0.3504P-value was evaluated for all categories (bad, no change, good and very good).
SecondaryOverall Assessment of Study Medication by Investigator

Overall assessment of study medication was done by Investigator. Assessment was made on a scale of -2 to 2 where, -2=very bad, -1=bad, 0=no change, 1= good and 2=very good.

Time frame:
Day 43
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Overall Assessment of Study Medication by Investigator
Percentage of participantsTramadol Hydrochloride/ AcetaminophenGabapentin
Bad02.8
No change31.330.6
Good50.851.4
Very good17.915.3
Statistical analysis
  • Tramadol Hydrochloride/ Acetaminophen vs Gabapentin · Chi-squared · p = 0.5690P-value was evaluated for all categories (bad, no change, good and very good).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Score at Day 43

The BPI is a questionnaire designed to assess the severity and impact of pain on quality of life. Pain severity score is caculated by sum of all severity items (pain worst, pain least, pain average and pain now) divided by pain now. Total score for pain severity ranges from 0=no pain to 10=extreme pain. Pain interference score was calculated by sum of all interference items (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life) score. Total score for pain interference ranges from 0=no interference to 70= interferes completely.

Time frame:
Baseline and Day 43
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Score at Day 43
Units on a scaleTramadol Hydrochloride/ AcetaminophenGabapentin
Baseline: Pain severity score (n=68, 73)4.5 ± 1.34.9 ± 1.8
Change at Day 43: Pain severity score (n=60, 60)0.1 ± 2.30.1 ± 1.9
Baseline: Pain interference score (n=71, 76)30.2 ± 14.829.8 ± 14.8
Change at Day 43:Pain interference score(n=63, 68)-11.0 ± 15.4-8.8 ± 14.7
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Score at Day 43

The SF-36 is designed to assess the health status of participants. The SF-36 includes 1 multi-item scale measuring physical health and mental health. Physical health includes physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, pain and general health. Mantal health includes role limitations due to emotional problems, energy/fatigue, emotional well being and social functioning. Each item is scored on a 0-100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100, respectively. All items are scored so that a high score defines a more favorable health state.

Time frame:
Baseline and Day 43
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Score at Day 43
Units on a scaleTramadol Hydrochloride/ AcetaminophenGabapentin
Baseline: Phiysical functioning (n=71,76)56.3 ± 24.160.6 ± 24.5
Change at Day 43: Physical functioning (n=63, 68))3.2 ± 19.73.2 ± 19.4
Baseline: Physical role limitation (n=71,76)42.3 ± 42.849.3 ± 41.6
Change at Day 43:Physical role limitation(n=62,68)13.7 ± 41.410.7 ± 43.3
Baseline: Pain (n=71,76)49.3 ± 20.950.8 ± 18.1
Change at Day 43: Pain (n=63, 68)15.6 ± 22.710.4 ± 22.2
Baseline: General health (n=71,76)38.0 ± 20.440.3 ± 17.8
Change at Day 43: General health (n=63, 68)4.6 ± 18.84.4 ± 14.1
Baseline: Emotional role limitation (n=71,76)46.9 ± 44.950.4 ± 45.7
Change at Day43:Emotional role limitation(n=63,68)12.7 ± 49.918.1 ± 47.3
Baseline: Energy/Fatigue (n=71,76)39.4 ± 22.142.6 ± 19.7
Change at Day 43: Energy/Fatigue (n=63, 68)5.7 ± 21.810.0 ± 17.8
Baseline: Emotional well-being (n=71,76)57.2 ± 22.061.4 ± 18.9
Change at Day 43: Emotional well being (n=63, 68)5.3 ± 23.37.0 ± 16.0
Baseline: Social functioning (n=71,76)68.3 ± 23.372.2 ± 24.5
Change at Dya 43: Social functioning (n=63, 68)9.9 ± 24.95.5 ± 24.9

Adverse events

Collected over Baseline up to Day 43. Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Tramadol Hydrochloride/ Acetaminophen—0/76 (0%)33/76 (43.4%)
Gabapentin—0/80 (0%)18/80 (22.5%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventTramadol Hydrochloride/ AcetaminophenGabapentin
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders14/764/80
DizzinessNervous system disorders13/7610/80
HeadacheNervous system disorders6/764/80
DyspepsiaGastrointestinal disorders6/763/80
SomnolenceNervous system disorders5/765/80

Baseline characteristics

Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomly assigned participants who met the eligibility criteria and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment data.

Age Continuous
Age Continuous(Years)Tramadol Hydrochloride/ AcetaminophenGabapentinTotal
Mean58.2 ± 7.456.6 ± 9.357.4 ± 8.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Tramadol Hydrochloride/ AcetaminophenGabapentinTotal
Female344579
Male373168
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 12, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00634543
Lead sponsor
Janssen Korea, Ltd., Korea
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 13, 2008
Start date
Dec 2006
Primary completion
Oct 2008
Completion
Oct 2008
Results posted
Jul 16, 2013
Last update
Aug 12, 2013

Study contacts

Janssen Korea, Ltd. Clinical Trial
study director · Janssen Korea, Ltd.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion