CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00630916Updated Sep 22, 2011Results posted

Clinical Investigation Of The Mitroflow Aortic Pericardial Heart Valve

An interventional study of Mitroflow Aortic Heart Valve in Heart Valve Diseases, sponsored by Sorin Group USA, Inc.. Completed at 26 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-09-22.

Sponsored by Sorin Group USA, Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
756
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a trial to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the Mitroflow Aortic Heart Valve when used to replace a diseased or dysfunctional aortic valve or aortic valve prosthesis.

Read the detailed description

Bioprosthetic heart valves offer several advantages over mechanical valves, the most important being freedom from the need for anticoagulation and a low rate of thromboembolic events. Pericardial bioprosthetic valves are known to have hemodynamic performance superior to porcine valves, and the excellent hemodynamic performance of pericardial valves is particularly relevant in patients with a small aortic root. However, long-term durability continues to be the main concern with use of pericardial valves. Although the first generation pericardial valves were withdrawn from the market due to poor durability, further research has indicated that structural failure of early pericardial valves was due to tissue preparation techniques and design failure rather than the pericardial tissue.The unique desing of the Mitroflow Aortic Heart Valve may provide superior hemodynamic performance over other tissue valves.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Valve Diseases

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Aortic valve insufficiency
  • Aortic valve
  • Aortic disease
  • Aortic incompetence
03

In context

Heart Valve Diseases

535 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Valve Diseases; 173 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 756 is above the median of 100 across 291 interventional studies indexed under Heart Valve Diseases.

Browse Heart Valve Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Sorin Group USA, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • The subject is male or female 18 years old or older
  • The subject or subject's legal representative is willing to sign the informed consent
  • A bioprosthesis is the most suitable alternative for replacement of a dysfunctional or diseased native aortic valve or prosthesis accord gin to the current medical practice for valve selection at the center
  • The subject is able to return for all follow-up evaluations for the duration of the study (i.e. geographically stable

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient has preexisting valve prosthesis in the mitral, pulmonary or tricuspid position
  • The patient requires a double or triple valve replacement
  • The patient had a Mitroflow Heart valve during the clinical study but who then had the valve explanted
  • The patient has active endocarditis
  • The subject is or will be participating in a concomitant research study of an investigational product
  • The subject is a minor, intravenous drug user, alcohol abuser, prisoner, institutionalized, or is unable to give informed consent
  • The patient has a major or progressive non-cardiac disease that, in the investigator's experience, results in a life expectancy of less than 1 year, or the implant of the device produces an unacceptable increased risk to the patient the patient is pregnant or lactating
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
756 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    A

    Device: Mitroflow Aortic Heart Valve

Interventions

  • DeviceMitroflow Aortic Heart Valve

    Replacement of the native aortic valve or a previously implanted prosthetic aortic valve

    Also known as: Mitroflow

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence Rate of Adverse Events and Mortality for the Mitroflow Aortic Heart Valve Repair

    Hazard rate calculated as the number of adverse events divided by the total follow-up in years. Calculation is based on cumulative events and follow-up occurring \>30 days after valve implant.

    Time frame: Late postoperative

  2. Mean Gradient

    Mean pressure across the Mitroflow aortic pericardial valve measured via echocardiography to assess ease of blood flow through the prosthetic valve for each valve size.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Effective Orifice Area

    Effective orifice area of the Mitroflow pericardial aortic valve measured via echocardiography to assess physiological area of blood flow through the prosthetic valve for each valve size.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Aortic Valve Regurgitation

    Measure the level of aortic insufficiency (severity of backflow) in the Mitroflow valve.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Results

Posted Sep 20, 2011

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMitroflow Aortic Pericardial Valve
Started756
Study cohort699
Completed546
Not completed210
Withdrew: Death110
Withdrew: Explant8
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up5
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject30
Withdrew: Protocol violation7
Withdrew: Physician decision47
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy3

Outcome measures

PrimaryIncidence Rate of Adverse Events and Mortality for the Mitroflow Aortic Heart Valve Repair

Hazard rate calculated as the number of adverse events divided by the total follow-up in years. Calculation is based on cumulative events and follow-up occurring \>30 days after valve implant.

Time frame:
Late postoperative
Reported as:
Mean · Percent occurrence per patient-year
Incidence Rate of Adverse Events and Mortality for the Mitroflow Aortic Heart Valve Repair
Percent occurrence per patient-yearMitroflow Aortic Pericardial Valve
All mortality7.1 (5.8 to 8.6)
Valve-related mortality1.27 (0.78 to 1.96)
Structural valve deterioration0.21 (0.06 to 0.56)
Major anticoagulant-related bleeding0.56 (0.27 to 1.06)
Thromboembolism1.34 (0.83 to 2.05)
Major thromboembolic event0.49 (0.22 to 0.97)
Valve thrombosis0 (0 to 0.17)
Endocarditis1.41 (0.89 to 2.13)
Non-structural valve dysfunction0.75 (0.40 to 1.29)
Perivalvular leak0.63 (0.31 to 1.16)
Hemolysis0 (0 to 0.17)
Valve reoperation0.85 (0.46 to 1.43)
Valve explant0.77 (0.41 to 1.34)
PrimaryMean Gradient

Mean pressure across the Mitroflow aortic pericardial valve measured via echocardiography to assess ease of blood flow through the prosthetic valve for each valve size.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Mean Gradient
mmHgMitroflow Aortic Pericardial Valve
Valve Size 1913.4 ± 5
Valve Size 2111.4 ± 4.4
Valve Size 2310.5 ± 4.2
Valve Size 258.6 ± 3.3
Valve Size 277.3 ± 2.7
Valve Size 297.3 ± 1.8
PrimaryEffective Orifice Area

Effective orifice area of the Mitroflow pericardial aortic valve measured via echocardiography to assess physiological area of blood flow through the prosthetic valve for each valve size.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · cm^2
Effective Orifice Area
cm^2Mitroflow Aortic Pericardial Valve
Valve Size 191.1 ± 0.2
Valve Size 211.2 ± 0.3
Valve Size 231.4 ± 0.3
Valve Size 251.6 ± 0.3
Valve Size 271.8 ± 0.3
Valve Size 292 ± 0.1
SecondaryAortic Valve Regurgitation

Measure the level of aortic insufficiency (severity of backflow) in the Mitroflow valve.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · Percent of participants
Aortic Valve Regurgitation
Percent of participantsMitroflow Aortic Pericardial Valve
None74.3
Trace16.2
Mild8.6
Moderate0.9
Severe0

Adverse events

Collected over All postop serious adverse events. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Mitroflow Aortic Pericardial Valve—351/699 (50.2%)430/699 (61.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 23
Most frequent serious events
EventMitroflow Aortic Pericardial Valve
Heart failureCardiac disorders59/699
Respiratory failure / disorderRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders35/699
Respiratory infectionsRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders35/699
Miscellaneous infectionsInfections and infestations34/699
Miscellaneous GI disordersGastrointestinal disorders32/699
Musculo-skeletal disordersMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders29/699
Sepsis / bacteremiaInfections and infestations29/699
Renal failure / insufficiencyRenal and urinary disorders28/699
Pleural effusionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders26/699
Cardiac arrhythmiasCardiac disorders24/699
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventMitroflow Aortic Pericardial Valve
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders156/699
Urinary tract infectionRenal and urinary disorders67/699
Pleural effusionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders60/699
Miscellaneous infectionsInfections and infestations53/699
Respiratory infectionsRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders45/699
Renal failure / insufficiencyRenal and urinary disorders40/699
ArrhythmiasCardiac disorders36/699
Heart failureCardiac disorders35/699

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Mitroflow Aortic Pericardial Valve
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years96
>=65 years603
Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)Mitroflow Aortic Pericardial Valve
Mean74.3 ± 8.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Mitroflow Aortic Pericardial Valve
Female302
Male397
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Mitroflow Aortic Pericardial Valve
United States556
Canada143
08

Study locations

26 sites
  • Banner Good Samaritan
    Phoenix, Arizona 85006, United States
  • The University of Arizona
    Tucson, Arizona 85724, United States
  • Sharp Memorial Hospital
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • Methodist Hospital
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46206, United States
  • Heart Center of Indiana
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46240, United States
  • Johns Hopkins Hospital
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
  • St. Joseph's Medical Center
    Towson, Maryland 21204, United States
  • Mayo Clinic
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • St. Luke's Hospital
    Kansas City, Missouri 53215, United States
  • Saint Michael's Med. Center
    Newark, New Jersey 07102, United States
  • Newark Beth Israel Med Ctr
    Newark, New Jersey 07112, United States
  • Westchester County Med Ctr
    Valhalla, New York 10595, United States
  • Providence St. Vincent
    Portland, Oregon 97225, United States
  • Hershey Medical Center
    Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, United States
  • Hospital of the Univ. of PA
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Lankenau Hospital
    Wynnewood, Pennsylvania 19096, United States
  • Baylor Univ. Medical Center
    Dallas, Texas 75246, United States
  • Denton Regional Medical
    Denton, Texas 76210, United States
  • Medical Center of Plano
    Plano, Texas 75075, United States
  • Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
    Norfolk, Virginia 23507, United States
  • St. Luke's Medical Center
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53215, United States
  • Foothills Medical Centre
    Calgary, Alberta T2N 2T9, Canada
  • Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre
    Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 3A7, Canada
  • Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre
    Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
  • Montreal Heart Institute
    Montreal, Quebec H1T 1C8, Canada
  • Hopital Laval
    Quebec, G1V 4G5, Canada
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Duran CM. Pericardium in valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993 Jul;56(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(93)90393-v. No abstract available. PubMed 8328836 ↗
  • Cosgrove DM, Lytle BW, Gill CC, Golding LA, Stewart RW, Loop FD, Williams GW. In vivo hemodynamic comparison of porcine and pericardial valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985 Mar;89(3):358-68. PubMed 3974271 ↗
  • Minami K, Boethig D, Mirow N, Kleikamp G, Koertke H, Godehardt E, Koerfer R. Mitroflow pericardial valve prosthesis in the aortic position: an analysis of long-term outcome and prognostic factors. J Heart Valve Dis. 2000 Jan;9(1):112-22. PubMed 10678383 ↗
  • Moggio RA, Pooley RW, Sarabu MR, Christiana J, Ho AW, Reed GE. Experience with the Mitroflow aortic bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994 Aug;108(2):215-20. PubMed 8041169 ↗
  • Jamieson WR, Pelletier LC, Gerein AN, Pomar J. The Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis. Comparison of early clinical performance in aortic and mitral positions. Can J Surg. 1992 Apr;35(2):159-64. PubMed 1562925 ↗
  • Loisance DY, Mazzucotelli JP, Bertrand PC, Deleuze PH, Cachera JP. Mitroflow pericardial valve: long-term durability. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993 Jul;56(1):131-6. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(93)90416-f. PubMed 8328843 ↗
  • Mazzucotelli JP, Bertrand PC, Loisance DY. Durability of the Mitroflow pericardial valve at ten years. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995 Aug;60(2 Suppl):S303-4. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00222-7. PubMed 7646177 ↗
  • Mazzucotelli JP, Bertrand PC, Loisance DY. The Mitroflow pericardial valve: clinical performance to 10 years. J Heart Valve Dis. 1995 Jul;4(4):407-13. PubMed 7582152 ↗
  • Pomar JL, Jamieson WR, Pelletier LC, Gerein AN, Castella M, Brownlee RT. Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis: clinical performance to ten years. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995 Aug;60(2 Suppl):S305-9; discussion S309-10. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00307-7. PubMed 7646178 ↗
  • Reber D, Birnbaum DE, Tollenaere P, Eschenbruch E. Long-term results after aortic valve replacement with the Mitroflow pericardial valve. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1996 Dec;37(6 Suppl 1):23-7. PubMed 10064343 ↗
  • Pomar JL, Jamieson WR, Pelletier LC, Castella M, Germann E, Brownlee RT. Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis experience in aortic valve replacement > or =60 years of age. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 Dec;66(6 Suppl):S53-6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)01129-1. PubMed 9930417 ↗
  • Gersh BJ, Fisher LD, Schaff HV, Rahimtoola SH, Reeder GS, Frater RW, McGoon DC. Issues concerning the clinical evaluation of new prosthetic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1986 Mar;91(3):460-6. No abstract available. PubMed 3512921 ↗
  • Grunkemeier GL, Johnson DM, Naftel DC. Sample size requirements for evaluating heart valves with constant risk events. J Heart Valve Dis. 1994 Jan;3(1):53-8. PubMed 8162217 ↗
  • Edmunds LH Jr, Clark RE, Cohn LH, Grunkemeier GL, Miller DC, Weisel RD. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. Ad Hoc Liaison Committee for Standardizing Definitions of Prosthetic Heart Valve Morbidity of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996 Sep;112(3):708-11. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(96)70055-7. No abstract available. PubMed 8800159 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 22, 2011, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00630916
Lead sponsor
Sorin Group USA, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 7, 2008
Start date
Nov 2003
Primary completion
Dec 2005
Completion
Dec 2007
Results posted
Sep 20, 2011
Last update
Sep 22, 2011

Study contacts

Mary Onxley
study director · Sorin Group USA, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2011. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion