CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT00624143Updated Feb 26, 2008

Antifungal Prophylaxis in Pediatric Acute Leukemia

A Phase 3 interventional study of ORAL VORICONAZOLE and IV Amphotericin B in Pediatric Acute Leukemia Induction, sponsored by All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi. Status unknown at 1 site in India. Open to participants aged Up to 15 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2008-02-26.

Sponsored by All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jan 2008), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 15 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Hypothesis:Oral Voriconazole will be as effective as intravenous Amphotericin B as antifungal prophylaxis in induction of acute leukemia (ALL, AML) in pediatric patients, with less toxicity and more convenience.

Read the detailed description

RATIONALE OF STUDY:

  • In induction chemotherapy for childhood acute leukemia, our experience and international studies has shown that 30% of ALL and approximately 50% of AML patients require antifungal therapy. Mortality rates associated with documented fungal infection due to opportunistic yeasts and filamentous fungi have been high, ranging from 50-90% despite use of therapeutic amphotericin B or voriconazole.
  • Currently licensed drug for use in pediatric patients are amphotericin B and its lipid derivatives; 5-flucytosine; azoles like fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole; and caspofungin.
  • Limitation with Fluconazole- inactive against Aspergilosis, C. glabrata, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis and filamentous fungi.
  • Limitation with Itraconazole- erratic oral absorption of capsule form, frequent drug interactions, non availability of oral suspension form for use in very small children who would not be able to take capsules.
  • Amphotericin B and Voriconazole both have proven activity against filamentous fungi and candida species.
  • There is no prospective, randomised trial comparing voriconazole and amphotericin B in prophylaxis of pediatric acute leukemia during induction.

Hence there is need to study their role in prophylaxis of this infection which has a high mortality despite therapy.

Study design: Prospective, Randomized, concealed, single institutional study.

Study population:

Pediatric patients of acute leukaemia who undergo induction chemotherapy at IRCH between Jan 2008 to Dec 2009 will be eligible for the study.

Inclusion criteria:

  • Patients age less than or equal to 15 years with de novo acute leukemia undergoing induction chemotherapy.
  • No evidence of fungal infection at randomization
  • No pneumonia at presentation.
  • No systemic antifungal therapy within 7 days before randomization.

Febrile patients with no pneumonia, systemic fungal infection and hemodynamically stable will be eligible for study.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patients with baseline pneumonia.
  • Laboratory evidence of significant hepatic or renal dysfunction (defined as a SGOT or SGPT more than 5 times, Total bilirubin more than 2 times and Serum creatinine more than 2 times upper limit of normal)

End points:

  • Proven or probable invasive fungal infection.
  • Initiation of full dose parental antifungal therapy for proven or probable invasive fungal infection.
  • Successful recovery of ANC more than 1000/cumm or completion of induction.

Study protocol:

  • After signing informed consent forms patients will be randomly assigned to a regimen of oral Voriconazole or IV low dose Amphotericin B.
  • Oral Voriconazole will be given in dose of 6mg/kg 12 hourly on day1 then 4mg/kg 12 hourly daily or IV Amphotericin B 0.5 mg/kg/day weekly thrice.
  • Patient will be started at the time of initiation of induction till completion of induction.

Evaluation:

  • Patients will be evaluated at baseline, twice weekly for duration of study and at completion of study.

Baseline evaluation:

  • History and physical examination.
  • Hemogram and biochemistry
  • Chest X ray

Evaluation of patients with baseline fever:

For the patient presenting with fever at baseline (randomization), blood and urine culture for fungus and bacteria will be send, X- ray chest to rule out consolidation at baseline will be done in all patients. The patients will be started on antibiotics as per the routine institutional policy. If patient becomes afebrile before day 5, then antibiotics will be continued for 5 days after becoming afebrile. If patient is still febrile at day 5, then empiric therapeutic antifungal therapy will be added.

Evaluation of patients with breakthrough fever:

In case of patient developing fever >38 degree C (axillary) during induction chemotherapy, patient will be evaluated by clinical examination, hemogram ,biochemistry, chest X ray, blood and urine culture for fungus and bacterial for three consecutive days. Patients with evidence of chest infection on chest X ray/signs and symptoms of chest infection/febrile even after receiving 5 days of appropriate antibiotics will be subjected to HRCT scan of chest. Patients showing consolidation , or signs of chest infection on chest CT will be subjected for broncoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage. The brochoalveolar lavage will be sent for microscopy (gram staining), culture for fungal and bacterial growth. Full dose therapeutic antifungal will be started earlier in case of development of pneumonia, hemodynamic instability even if before 5 days of antibiotics which will be considered as failure of prophylaxis. Whenever feasible (not mandatory) depending on the patient's clinical condition, we will try to obtain tissue sample for histology by FNAC/Biopsy from the suspected infected site.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pediatric Acute Leukemia Induction

Keywords

  • Antifungal prophylaxis, acute leukemia induction,
03

In context

Leukemia

5,441 studies on the registry are indexed under Leukemia; 636 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 38 across 4,247 interventional studies indexed under Leukemia.

Browse Leukemia studies →

Lead sponsor

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi is the lead sponsor of 146 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 15 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients age \</= 15 years with de novo acute leukemia (AML, ALL) undergoing induction chemotherapy.
  • No evidence of fungal infection at randomization
  • No pneumonia at presentation on CXR.
  • No systemic antifungal therapy within 7 days before randomization.

Febrile patients with no pneumonia, systemic fungal infection and hemodynamically stable will be eligible for study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with baseline pneumonia on CXR.
  • Laboratory evidence of significant hepatic or renal dysfunction (defined as a SGOT or SGPT >5 times, Total bilirubin>2 times and Serum creatinine > 2 times upper limit of normal)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    1

    Oral Voriconazole

    Drug: ORAL VORICONAZOLE and IV Amphotericin B

  • Active comparator
    2

    IV Amphotericin B

    Drug: ORAL VORICONAZOLE and IV Amphotericin B

Interventions

  • DrugORAL VORICONAZOLE and IV Amphotericin B

    Oral Voriconazole will be given in dose of 6mg/kg 12 hourly on day1 then 4mg/kg 12 hourly daily or IV Amphotericin B 0.5 mg/kg/day weekly thrice till the completion of induction or recovery of ANC \>1000/MM3 or development of fungal infection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Prevention of possible, probable or proven fungal infection.

    Time frame: Completion of Induction Chemotherapy or successful recovery of ANC > 1000/mm3

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences
    New Delhi, Delhi 110029, India
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mandhaniya S, Iqbal S, Sharawat SK, Xess I, Bakhshi S. Diagnosis of invasive fungal infections using real-time PCR assay in paediatric acute leukaemia induction. Mycoses. 2012 Jul;55(4):372-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2011.02157.x. Epub 2012 Mar 16. PubMed 22420668 ↗
  • Mandhaniya S, Swaroop C, Thulkar S, Vishnubhatla S, Kabra SK, Xess I, Bakhshi S. Oral voriconazole versus intravenous low dose amphotericin B for primary antifungal prophylaxis in pediatric acute leukemia induction: a prospective, randomized, clinical study. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2011 Dec;33(8):e333-41. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e3182331bc7. PubMed 22042283 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 26, 2008, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00624143
Lead sponsor
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
First posted
Feb 26, 2008
Start date
Feb 2008
Primary completion
Dec 2009 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 26, 2008

Study contacts

SAMEER BAKHSHI, MD
Contact
sambakh@hotmail.com
91-11-26588153
SAMEER BAKHSHI, MD
principal investigator · Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2008. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion