ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00616577Updated Apr 25, 2019Results posted

Preemptive Analgesia in Children Using Caudal Epidural Ropivacaine

An interventional study of Ropivacaine and Ropivacaine in Inguinal Herniorrhaphy and Orchiopexy, sponsored by Loma Linda University. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 2 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-25.

Sponsored by Loma Linda University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
PI is no longer here.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
26
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 2 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Caudal epidural analgesia (caudal block) is used in standard pediatric anesthesia practice. It has been shown to be effective in managing postoperative pain in children undergoing abdominal and infraumbilical surgery (Tobias et al 1994). Furthermore, studies have shown that children receiving caudal blocks have secondary benefits such as lower narcotic and anesthetic requirements, more rapid awakening from general anesthesia, decreased time to discharge home, and fewer pain-related behaviors postoperatively (Conroy et al 1993, Tobias et al 1995, Tobias 1996).

This proposed study involves the use of a caudal block in children undergoing elective inguinal herniorrhaphy or orchiopexy to evaluate the role of preemptive analgesia in pediatric pain management. We hypothesize that by inhibiting peripheral pain receptors with a caudal block before the onset of a painful stimulus, we can decrease central nervous system sensitization and reduce postoperative analgesic requirements.

02

Conditions studied

  • Inguinal Herniorrhaphy
  • Orchiopexy

Keywords

  • Caudal Epidural Ropivacaine
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Loma Linda University is the lead sponsor of 305 studies on the registry; 48 are open to participants now.

Of its 29 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 23 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 2 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 2 years or younger.
  • Weight 33 kg or less.
  • Scheduled for elective inguinal herniorrhaphy or orchiopexy.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists Class 1, 2 or 3.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age over 2 years.
  • Weight over 33 kg.
  • Allergy to ropivacaine.
  • Usual contraindications to caudal anesthesia (patient refusal, skeletal or spinal cord anomaly, coagulopathy, infection at insertion site, ongoing bacteremia)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
26 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group CB

    Subjects in this arm will receive caudal ropivacaine 0.25% at a dose of 1ml/kg (maximum 15ml) with 1:200,000 epinephrine after induction of general anesthesia prior to surgical incision.

    Drug: Ropivacaine

  • Active comparator
    Group CA

    Group CA (Caudal After-control group) will receive caudal ropivacaine 0.25% at a dose of 1ml/kg (maximum 15ml) with 1:200,000 epinephrine after completion of surgery but before emergence from anesthesia.

    Drug: Ropivacaine

  • Active comparator
    Group LIA

    Group LIA (Local Infiltration After-control group) will receive local infiltration of ropivacaine 0.25% up to 1ml/kg (maximum 15ml) around the surgery site at the conclusion of surgery but before emergence from anesthesia.

    Drug: Ropivacaine

Interventions

  • caudal ropivacaine 0.25% at a dose of 1ml/kg (maximum 15ml) with 1:200,000 epinephrine

  • caudal ropivacaine 0.25% at a dose of 1ml/kg (maximum 15ml) with 1:200,000 epinephrine

  • local infiltration of ropivacaine 0.25% up to 1ml/kg (maximum 15ml) around the surgery site

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Usage of Pain Medications

    Time frame: Over 24 hours

07

Results

Posted Apr 8, 2015

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGroup CBGroup CAGroup LIA
Started697
Completed697
Not completed000

Outcome measures

PrimaryUsage of Pain Medications
Time frame:
Over 24 hours

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Group CB———
Group CA———
Group LIA———

Baseline characteristics

PI left institution and records cannot be located

Age, Categorical
Age, CategoricalGroup CBGroup CAGroup LIATotal
<=18 years————
Between 18 and 65 years————
>=65 years————
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, MaleGroup CBGroup CAGroup LIATotal
Female————
Male————
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Group CBGroup CAGroup LIATotal
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Loma Linda University Medical Center
    Loma Linda, California 92354, United States
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Oct 2007, a primary completion of Sep 2010 and a completion of Sep 2010. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Apr 2015, 4 years 7 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 4, 2008
First posted
Feb 15, 2008
Start
Oct 2007
Primary completionActual
Sep 2010
CompletionActual
Sep 2010
Results first posted
Apr 8, 2015
Last update
Apr 25, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 25, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00616577
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 15, 2008
Start date
Oct 2007
Primary completion
Sep 2010
Completion
Sep 2010
Results posted
Apr 8, 2015
Last update
Apr 25, 2019

Study contacts

Charles Lee, M.D.
principal investigator · Loma Linda University Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Ropivacaine

Start the discussion