CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT00611780PROTECTION-IIUpdated Aug 27, 2008

Prospective Randomized Trial On RadiaTion Dose Estimates Of CT AngIOgraphy In PatieNts Scanned With A 100kV Protocol

A Phase 4 interventional study of tube voltage and tube voltage in Coronary Disease, sponsored by Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen. Status unknown at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2008-08-27.

Sponsored by Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen · Phase 4, Interventional, and Diagnostic

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Aug 2008), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
400
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to compare radiation dose of a 100kV scan protocol to the standard 120kV scan protocol. We hypothesize that the 100kV scan protocol is associated with a reduction in dose estimates of at least 20%, while the diagnostic image quality is not inferior.

Secondary endpoints of the study include quantitative image quality parameters, diagnostic accuracy for 120 vs.100kV studies compared to invasive angiography in patients who underwent subsequent invasive coronary angiography

Read the detailed description

All patients scheduled for a coronary CT scan are screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients are included if they have stable sinus rhythm (heart rate \<100 bpm) and a body weight \< 90 kg or a body mass index (BMI) \< 30. Informed signed consent is obtained from these patients and the CT scan is prepared. After topogram scan and the native scan for Ca-Scoring, patients are randomized in two groups with the use of sealed envelopes. After that contrast-enhanced coronary CT angiography is performed with the 120kV- or 100kV-protocol.

The CT examination is evaluated by two experienced investigators on a per-vessel basis and all results and study-related data are collected in a dedicated database. For assessment of image quality, a previously established 4-point score system is used and quantitative image quality parameters are measured.

A 30 day follow-up after the CT examination aims to evaluate if patients underwent invasive coronary angiography or were scheduled for a myocardial stress / perfusion test (such as stress-echocardiography, myocardial scintigraphy or stress perfusion imaging by MRI).

02

Conditions studied

  • Coronary Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Coronary CT angiography
  • Radiation dose estimates
03

In context

Coronary Disease

2,839 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Disease; 311 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 124 across 1,583 interventional studies indexed under Coronary Disease.

Browse Coronary Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen is the lead sponsor of 112 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • patients with an indication for a coronary CT angiography (planned evaluation of the coronary arteries)
  • stable sinus rhythm
  • patient weight \< 90kg or body mass index \< 30 kg/m2
  • signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • non-ECG triggered studies
  • non-coronary CTA studies, e.g. bypass graft CTAs, pre- or post EP studies, CABG planning studies
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
400 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    Reduced tube voltage of 100kV.

    Radiation: tube voltage

  • Active comparator
    2

    Standard tube voltage of 120kV.

    Radiation: tube voltage

Interventions

  • Radiationtube voltage

    standard 120 kV

  • Radiationtube voltage

    reduced voltage of 100 kV

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Compared with a 120kV protocol the use of a 100kV scan protocol is associated with a reduction in dose estimates of at least 20%, while the diagnostic image quality is not inferior.

    Time frame: 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. impact of the 100kV scan protocol on quantitative image quality parameters, e.g. image noise, signal and contrast intensity, signal- and contrast-to-noise-ratios

    Time frame: 30 days

  2. diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity as well as positive and negative predictive values) for 120kV vs. 100 kV studies when compared with invasive coronary angiography on a per-vessel based analysis.

    Time frame: 30 days

  3. frequency of non-diagnostic CTA studies when comparing 120kV and 100kV

    Time frame: 30 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
    Munich, 80636, Germany
    • Joerg Hausleiter, MD · Contact · hausleiter@dhm.mhn.de · +49 89 1218-0
    • Joerg Hausleiter, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hausleiter J, Martinoff S, Hadamitzky M, Martuscelli E, Pschierer I, Feuchtner GM, Catalan-Sanz P, Czermak B, Meyer TS, Hein F, Bischoff B, Kuse M, Schomig A, Achenbach S. Image quality and radiation exposure with a low tube voltage protocol for coronary CT angiography results of the PROTECTION II Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Nov;3(11):1113-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.08.016. PubMed 21070998 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 27, 2008, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00611780
Lead sponsor
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
First posted
Feb 11, 2008
Start date
Jan 2008
Primary completion
Dec 2008 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2009 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 27, 2008

Study contacts

Joerg Hausleiter, MD
Contact
hausleiter@dhm.mhn.de
+49 89 1218 ext. 1585
Tanja Meyer, MD
Contact
meyert@dhm.mhn.de
+49 89 1218 ext. 4500
Joerg Hausleiter, MD
principal investigator · Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2008. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion