ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00610987Updated Jun 12, 2015Results posted

Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Orthopaedic Traumatology

An interventional study of cefazolin and Placebo in Fractures, Closed and Wounds and Injuries, sponsored by University of Missouri-Columbia. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-06-12.

Sponsored by University of Missouri-Columbia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
178
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

It has been established that providing antibiotic prophylaxis after closed fracture fixation with implants or prosthetic devices has beneficial effects. However, the optimal duration of antibiotic prophylaxis after orthopaedic trauma surgery is not well-defined. Most studies comparing single-dose prophylaxis with multiple-dose prophylaxis have not shown beneficial effects of additional doses. Our proposed study is intended to further define the appropriate duration of antibiotic (cefazolin) administration for surgical prophylaxis in the treatment of closed fractures. We will randomly assigned patients into two groups, hopefully differentiated only by the duration of antibiotic administration (single dose vs. 24 hours). We will follow these patients until fracture healing and determine if there is a difference in the incidence of infection.

Read the detailed description

The proposed study is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial intended to further define the appropriate duration of antibiotic (cefazolin) administration for surgical prophylaxis in the internal fixation of closed fractures. Our hypothesis is that there will be no difference in the incidence of infection between single-dose versus 24 hours of antibiotic prophylaxis. The null hypothesis is that multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis will have a decreased incidence of infection.

Research Design:

A prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial will be conducted to evaluate the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis. After investigators obtain Institutional Review Board approval, recruited patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. Both groups will receive 1 gram (g) of IV cefazolin prior to incision, per standard protocol at our institution. If a tourniquet is used, the cefazolin will be administered at least 10 minutes prior to inflation. A 2-g dose of cefazolin will be administered IV for patients weighing more than 80 kg. A second 1-g dose of cefazolin will be given three hours later if the patient is still in the operating room. Upon completion of the surgical procedure, Group I will receive 1-g doses of cefazolin every eight hours for the next 24 hours. Group II will receive no additional antibiotic. Instead, they will receive normal saline injection every eight hours as a placebo. Group assignments will not be disclosed to the evaluators responsible for clinical examination or to the patients until the end of the study.

Either an orthopaedic surgeon or nurse practitioner will evaluate the patients for the development of a wound infection. Follow-up will occur at 10-14 days, six weeks, 12 weeks, and every six to eight weeks thereafter until bony union occurs. Wound infection will be defined as one or more of the classic signs and symptoms of inflammation (rubor, calor, tumor, dolor) together with purulent drainage at the operative site. Wound infections will be classified either as superficial (infection of the skin or subcutaneous tissue, not communicating with the bone) or deep (infection that reached bone or material implanted for osteosynthesis). Bacteriological cultures will be obtained in the event of infectious complications, but wound infections will be diagnosed clinically.

Several studies have demonstrated that there are numerous patient-related and treatment-related factors that predispose to infectious complications. We will use several of these factors to assign a risk score to each of the enrolled patients. Each factor will be worth one point for a total score ranging from 0 (lowest risk) to 7 (highest risk). The risk factors are: 1) smoking; 2) age >65; 3) diabetes mellitus; 4) obesity (BMI >35); 5) duration of surgery >3 hours; 6) urinary catheterization (0=no catheter, 1=catheter \<48 hours, 2=catheter >48 hours).

Statistical evaluation will be conducted by Student's t-test for patient characteristics and chi square analysis for infection rates. The relation between wound infection and the various possible risk factors will be assessed by forward stepwise logistic regression analysis. Significance will be defined at the P \< 0.05 level.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fractures, Closed
  • Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Antibiotic Prophylaxis
03

In context

Fractures, Closed

44 studies on the registry are indexed under Fractures, Closed; 4 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 178 is above the median of 45 across 34 interventional studies indexed under Fractures, Closed.

Browse Fractures, Closed studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Missouri-Columbia is the lead sponsor of 365 studies on the registry; 69 are open to participants now.

Of its 43 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 29 (67%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients 18 years or older;
  • Scheduled for primary osteosynthesis or placement of a prosthetic device in the treatment of closed limb fractures;
  • Ability to give .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known to cephalosporins;
  • Antimicrobial use or symptoms of infection in the week before surgery;
  • Pregnancy;
  • treatment;
  • Inability to give .
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
178 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Cefazolin

    Group I will receive 1-g doses of cefazolin every eight hours for the next 24 hours after surgical repair of the closed limb fracture.

    Drug: cefazolin

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Group II will receive no additional antibiotic. Instead, they will receive normal saline injection every eight hours as a placebo, after the intraoperative dose(s) of cefazolin

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Both groups will receive 1 gram (g) of IV cefazolin prior to incision, per standard protocol at our institution. A 2-g dose of cefazolin will be administered IV for patients weighing more than 80 kg. A second 1-g dose of cefazolin will be given three hours later if the patient is still in the operating room. Upon completion of the surgical procedure, Group I will receive 1-g doses of cefazolin every eight hours for the next 24 hours.

    Also known as: cefazolin brand name = Kefzol

  • DrugPlacebo

    Patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. Both groups will receive 1 gram (g) of IV cefazolin prior to incision, per standard protocol at our institution. A 2-g dose of cefazolin will be administered IV for patients weighing more than 80 kg. A second 1-g dose of cefazolin will be given three hours later if the patient is still in the operating room. Upon completion of the surgical procedure, Group II will receive no additional antibiotic. Instead, they will receive normal saline injection every eight hours as a placebo.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Total Wound Infections

    The primary endpoint was infection.

    Time frame: at 10-14 days, six weeks, 12 weeks, and every six to eight weeks thereafter until bony union occurs.

07

Results

Posted Jun 12, 2015

Participant flow

After IRB approval, patients undergoing ORIF of closed fractures that had a planned postoperative stay of at least 23 hours were randomized to either receiving 23 hours of cefazolin or a placebo.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCefazolinPlacebo
Started7571
Completed7571
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Total Wound Infections

The primary endpoint was infection.

Time frame:
at 10-14 days, six weeks, 12 weeks, and every six to eight weeks thereafter until bony union occurs.
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Total Wound Infections
participantsCefazolinPlacebo
Number of Participants With Total Wound Infections49
Statistical analysis
  • Cefazolin vs Placebo · t-test, 1 sided · p = =0.12

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Cefazolin—18/75 (24%)0/75 (0%)
Placebo—22/71 (31%)0/71 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventCefazolinPlacebo
InfectionsInfections and infestations15/755/71
General disorders including deathGeneral disorders1/758/71
Urinary tract infectionRenal and urinary disorders0/753/71
traumaInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/752/71
implant problemsSurgical and medical procedures1/752/71
vascularVascular disorders0/752/71

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)CefazolinPlaceboTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years553792
>=65 years203454
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)CefazolinPlaceboTotal
Mean48.9 ± 19.150.5 ± 20.549.8 ± 19.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)CefazolinPlaceboTotal
Female303969
Male453277
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Missouri
    Columbia, Missouri 65212, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 12, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00610987
Responsible party
Brett Crist (Assistant Professor, Co-Director of Trauma Services, Co-Director Trauma Fellowship, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri-Columbia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 8, 2008
Start date
Jan 2008
Primary completion
Jan 2014
Completion
Jan 2014
Results posted
Jun 12, 2015
Last update
Jun 12, 2015

Study contacts

Brett D Crist, MD
principal investigator · University of Missouri-Columbia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Cefazolin

Start the discussion