ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00603889Updated Feb 23, 2012Results posted

Development of a Skin Test for the Na-ASP-2 Hookworm Antigen

An interventional study of Na-ASP-2 Skin Test Reagent in Hookworm Infection and Allergy, sponsored by Albert B. Sabin Vaccine Institute. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-02-23.

Sponsored by Albert B. Sabin Vaccine Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Na-ASP-2 is a protein expressed during the larval stage of the N. americanus hookworm life cycle. In a clinical study in previously hookworm-infected adults in Brazil, this protein induced urticarial reactions (rash) in a subset of volunteers. This study will evaluate solutions of varying concentrations of the protein in both a skin prick-puncture and intradermal test that will eventually be used to screen volunteers living in hookworm endemic areas who are being considered as potential participants in vaccine trials, to reduce the potential of inducing allergic reactions in those vaccinated with the Na-ASP-2 Hookworm Vaccine.

Read the detailed description
  • Study site: George Washington University Medical Center
  • Number of participants: up to 15
  • Study duration: up to 3 months; each participant will undergo a minimum of one screening visit and one study visit.
  • Each participant will have both skin prick-puncture and intradermal skin tests applied on the same study day. The prick-puncture and intradermal tests will be applied sequentially to the volar aspects of the participant's forearms:

    1. Skin prick-puncture: four different concentrations of Na-ASP-2 solution (1, 10, 100, and 1000 μg/mL) will be applied simultaneously in duplicate, to the left forearm.
    2. Intradermal: three different concentrations of Na-ASP-2 (10, 100, and 1000 μg/mL) will be injected simultaneously, in duplicate, to the right forearm.
    3. Allergen diluent and histamine solutions will be utilized as the negative and positive controls, respectively, for both the skin prick-puncture and intradermal tests.
    4. Participants will be observed in the study clinic for at least 30 minutes following application of the skin tests, and will be contacted via telephone 2 days following skin testing.
    5. Sizes of the wheal and erythema reactions for each application will be recorded and graded in comparison to the histamine positive control reaction.
  • Each participant will have blood collected via venipuncture (a maximum of 25 mL) immediately prior to application of the skin tests, in order to measure antibodies (particularly IgG and IgE) to Na-ASP-2 using an ELISA procedure.
02

Conditions studied

  • Hookworm Infection
  • Allergy

Keywords

  • Hookworm
  • Allergy
  • Vaccine
  • Skin test
03

In context

Hookworm Infections

39 studies on the registry are indexed under Hookworm Infections; 5 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 12 is below the median of 182 across 36 interventional studies indexed under Hookworm Infections.

Browse Hookworm Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Albert B. Sabin Vaccine Institute is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Males or females between 18 and 45 years of age, inclusive.
  • Good general health as determined by means of the screening procedure.
  • Willingness to participate in the study as evidenced by signing the document.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of previous infection with hookworm.
  • Prior extensive and continuous travel, work, or residence (> 1 month) in a hookworm-endemic region.
  • Pregnancy as determined by a positive urine hCG test (if female).
  • Evidence of neurologic, cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, rheumatologic, , or renal disease by history or physical examination.
  • Behavioral, cognitive, or psychiatric disease that in the opinion of the investigator affects the ability of the volunteer to understand and cooperate with the study protocol.
  • Other condition that in the opinion of the investigator would jeopardize the safety or rights of a volunteer participating in the trial or would render the subject unable to comply with the protocol.
  • Participation in an vaccine or drug trial within 14 days of starting this study.
  • Volunteer has had medical, occupational, or family problems as a result of alcohol or illicit drug use during the past 12 months.
  • History of a severe allergic reaction or anaphylaxis.
  • Known immunodeficiency syndrome.
  • Use of (excluding topical or nasal) or drugs within 30 days of starting this study.
  • History of a surgical splenectomy.
  • Extensive dermatitis precluding skin testing
  • Current use of a beta blocker (oral or topical) or anti-histamine medication. A volunteer may participate in the study if they agree to withhold use of an anti-histamine for at least 5 days prior to application of the skin test.
  • Use of a tricyclic anti-depressant within the past month.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Na-ASP-2 Hookworm Antigen Skin Test

    All participants will have the same number of concentrations of the Na-ASP-2 skin test reagent applied to their arms, using both the prick-puncture and intradermal techniques.

    Biological: Na-ASP-2 Skin Test Reagent

Interventions

  • BiologicalNa-ASP-2 Skin Test Reagent

    Na-ASP-2 Hookworm Skin Test Reagent, 1-1000 mcg/mL solution

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 100 Mcg/ml Na-ASP-2 Prick-puncture Skin Test

    Mean grade of wheal reaction after 2 applications of the skin test reagent per participant. For each skin test reaction, the grade of the test was determined based on the mean of the longest and orthogonal diameters, which was then compared to the equivalent measurements of a histamine solution positive control that was applied at the same time as the test. Grading was as follows: 0 no discernible wheal 1. \< ½ histamine diameter 2. ≥ ½ histamine; \< histamine diameter 3. = size of histamine control ± 1 mm 4. \> histamine diameter; \< 2x diameter 5. ≥ 2x histamine control

    Time frame: 15 minutes after skin test application

Secondary outcomes

  1. 1000 Mcg/ml Na-ASP-2 Prick-puncture Skin Test

    Mean grade of wheal reaction after 2 applications of the skin test reagent per participant. For each skin test reaction, the grade of the test was determined based on the mean of the longest and orthogonal diameters, which was then compared to the equivalent measurements of a histamine solution positive control that was applied at the same time as the test. Grading was as follows: 0 no discernible wheal 1. \< ½ histamine diameter 2. ≥ ½ histamine; \< histamine diameter 3. = size of histamine control ± 1 mm 4. \> histamine diameter; \< 2x diameter 5. ≥ 2x histamine control

    Time frame: 15 minutes after skin test application

  2. 100 Mcg/ml Na-ASP-2 Intradermal Skin Test

    Mean grade of wheal reaction after 2 applications of the skin test reagent per participant. For each skin test reaction, the grade of the test was determined based on the mean of the longest and orthogonal diameters, which was then compared to the equivalent measurements of a histamine solution positive control that was applied at the same time as the test. Grading was as follows: 0 no discernible wheal 1. \< ½ histamine diameter 2. ≥ ½ histamine; \< histamine diameter 3. = size of histamine control ± 1 mm 4. \> histamine diameter; \< 2x diameter 5. ≥ 2x histamine control

    Time frame: 15 minutes after skin test application

  3. 1000 Mcg/ml Na-ASP-2 Intradermal Skin Test

    Mean grade of wheal reaction after 2 applications of the skin test reagent per participant. For each skin test reaction, the grade of the test was determined based on the mean of the longest and orthogonal diameters, which was then compared to the equivalent measurements of a histamine solution positive control that was applied at the same time as the test. Grading was as follows: 0 no discernible wheal 1. \< ½ histamine diameter 2. ≥ ½ histamine; \< histamine diameter 3. = size of histamine control ± 1 mm 4. \> histamine diameter; \< 2x diameter 5. ≥ 2x histamine control

    Time frame: 15 minutes after skin test application

07

Results

Posted Feb 23, 2012

Participant flow

Recruitment occurred between March and May 2008, primarily by means of advertising the study in and around The George Washington University, where the study site is located.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneNa-ASP-2 Hookworm Antigen Skin Test
Started12
Completed12
Not completed0

Outcome measures

Primary100 Mcg/ml Na-ASP-2 Prick-puncture Skin Test

Mean grade of wheal reaction after 2 applications of the skin test reagent per participant. For each skin test reaction, the grade of the test was determined based on the mean of the longest and orthogonal diameters, which was then compared to the equivalent measurements of a histamine solution positive control that was applied at the same time as the test. Grading was as follows: 0 no discernible wheal 1. \< ½ histamine diameter 2. ≥ ½ histamine; \< histamine diameter 3. = size of histamine control ± 1 mm 4. \> histamine diameter; \< 2x diameter 5. ≥ 2x histamine control

Time frame:
15 minutes after skin test application
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
100 Mcg/ml Na-ASP-2 Prick-puncture Skin Test
Units on a scaleNa-ASP-2 Hookworm Antigen Skin Test
100 Mcg/ml Na-ASP-2 Prick-puncture Skin Test0 (0 to 0)
Secondary1000 Mcg/ml Na-ASP-2 Prick-puncture Skin Test

Mean grade of wheal reaction after 2 applications of the skin test reagent per participant. For each skin test reaction, the grade of the test was determined based on the mean of the longest and orthogonal diameters, which was then compared to the equivalent measurements of a histamine solution positive control that was applied at the same time as the test. Grading was as follows: 0 no discernible wheal 1. \< ½ histamine diameter 2. ≥ ½ histamine; \< histamine diameter 3. = size of histamine control ± 1 mm 4. \> histamine diameter; \< 2x diameter 5. ≥ 2x histamine control

Time frame:
15 minutes after skin test application
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
1000 Mcg/ml Na-ASP-2 Prick-puncture Skin Test
units on a scaleNa-ASP-2 Hookworm Antigen Skin Test
1000 Mcg/ml Na-ASP-2 Prick-puncture Skin Test0.21 (0 to 2)
Secondary100 Mcg/ml Na-ASP-2 Intradermal Skin Test

Mean grade of wheal reaction after 2 applications of the skin test reagent per participant. For each skin test reaction, the grade of the test was determined based on the mean of the longest and orthogonal diameters, which was then compared to the equivalent measurements of a histamine solution positive control that was applied at the same time as the test. Grading was as follows: 0 no discernible wheal 1. \< ½ histamine diameter 2. ≥ ½ histamine; \< histamine diameter 3. = size of histamine control ± 1 mm 4. \> histamine diameter; \< 2x diameter 5. ≥ 2x histamine control

Time frame:
15 minutes after skin test application
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
100 Mcg/ml Na-ASP-2 Intradermal Skin Test
units on a scaleNa-ASP-2 Hookworm Antigen Skin Test
100 Mcg/ml Na-ASP-2 Intradermal Skin Test0.17 (0 to 2)
Secondary1000 Mcg/ml Na-ASP-2 Intradermal Skin Test

Mean grade of wheal reaction after 2 applications of the skin test reagent per participant. For each skin test reaction, the grade of the test was determined based on the mean of the longest and orthogonal diameters, which was then compared to the equivalent measurements of a histamine solution positive control that was applied at the same time as the test. Grading was as follows: 0 no discernible wheal 1. \< ½ histamine diameter 2. ≥ ½ histamine; \< histamine diameter 3. = size of histamine control ± 1 mm 4. \> histamine diameter; \< 2x diameter 5. ≥ 2x histamine control

Time frame:
15 minutes after skin test application
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
1000 Mcg/ml Na-ASP-2 Intradermal Skin Test
units on a scaleNa-ASP-2 Hookworm Antigen Skin Test
1000 Mcg/ml Na-ASP-2 Intradermal Skin Test1.25 (0 to 2)

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Na-ASP-2 Hookworm Antigen Skin Test—0/12 (0%)2/12 (16.7%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventNa-ASP-2 Hookworm Antigen Skin Test
Delayed Skin Test ReactionSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders2/12

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Na-ASP-2 Hookworm Antigen Skin Test
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years12
>=65 years0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Na-ASP-2 Hookworm Antigen Skin Test
Female8
Male4
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Na-ASP-2 Hookworm Antigen Skin Test
United States12
08

Study locations

1 site
  • GWUMC Clinical Trials Unit
    Washington, District of Columbia 20037, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Fujiwara RT, Bethony J, Bueno LL, Wang Y, Ahn SY, Samuel A, Bottazzi ME, Hotez P, Mendez S. Immunogenicity of the hookworm Na-ASP-2 vaccine candidate: characterization of humoral and cellular responses after vaccination in the Sprague Dawley rat. Hum Vaccin. 2005 May-Jun;1(3):123-8. doi: 10.4161/hv.1.3.1924. Epub 2005 May 20. PubMed 17012856 ↗
  • Goud GN, Bottazzi ME, Zhan B, Mendez S, Deumic V, Plieskatt J, Liu S, Wang Y, Bueno L, Fujiwara R, Samuel A, Ahn SY, Solanki M, Asojo OA, Wang J, Bethony JM, Loukas A, Roy M, Hotez PJ. Expression of the Necator americanus hookworm larval antigen Na-ASP-2 in Pichia pastoris and purification of the recombinant protein for use in human clinical trials. Vaccine. 2005 Sep 15;23(39):4754-64. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.04.040. PubMed 16054275 ↗
  • Diemert DJ, Bethony JM, Hotez PJ. Hookworm vaccines. Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Jan 15;46(2):282-8. doi: 10.1086/524070. PubMed 18171264 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Mar 2008, a primary completion of May 2008 and a completion of May 2008. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Feb 2012, 3 years 9 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 17, 2008
First posted
Jan 29, 2008
Start
Mar 2008
Primary completionActual
May 2008
CompletionActual
May 2008
Results first posted
Feb 23, 2012
Last update
Feb 23, 2012
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 23, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00603889
Lead sponsor
Albert B. Sabin Vaccine Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 29, 2008
Start date
Mar 2008
Primary completion
May 2008
Completion
May 2008
Results posted
Feb 23, 2012
Last update
Feb 23, 2012

Study contacts

David Parenti, MD
principal investigator · GWUMC Medical Faculty Associates

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion