CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00592553Updated Apr 7, 2020Results posted

Phase 2B Study of PTC124 (Ataluren) in Duchenne/Becker Muscular Dystrophy (DMD/BMD)

A Phase 2 interventional study of Ataluren and Placebo in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and Becker Muscular Dystrophy, sponsored by PTC Therapeutics. Completed at 37 sites in 11 countries. Open to male participants aged 5 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-04-07.

Sponsored by PTC Therapeutics · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
174
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
5 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

DMD/BMD is a genetic disorder that develops in boys. It is caused by a mutation in the gene for dystrophin, a protein that is important for maintaining normal muscle structure and function. Loss of dystrophin causes muscle fragility that leads to weakness and loss of walking ability during childhood and teenage years. A specific type of mutation, called a nonsense (premature stop codon) mutation is the cause of DMD/BMD in approximately 13 percent (%) of boys with the disease. Ataluren is an orally delivered, investigational drug that has the potential to overcome the effects of the nonsense mutation. This study is a Phase 2b trial that will evaluate the clinical benefit of ataluren in boys with DMD/BMD due to a nonsense mutation. The main goals of the study are to understand whether ataluren can improve walking, activity, muscle function, and strength and whether the drug can safely be given for a long period of time.

Read the detailed description

This study is a Phase 2b, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, efficacy and safety study, designed to document the clinical benefit of ataluren when administered as therapy of patients with DMD/BMD due to a nonsense mutation (premature stop codon) in the dystrophin gene.

02

Conditions studied

  • Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
  • Becker Muscular Dystrophy

Keywords

  • Duchenne muscular dystrophy
  • Becker muscular dystrophy
  • Nonsense mutation
  • Premature stop codon
  • DMD/BMD
  • PTC124
03

In context

Muscular Dystrophies

548 studies on the registry are indexed under Muscular Dystrophies; 89 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 174 is above the median of 24 across 344 interventional studies indexed under Muscular Dystrophies.

Browse Muscular Dystrophies studies →

Lead sponsor

PTC Therapeutics is the lead sponsor of 65 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Of its 18 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 14 (78%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Ability to provide written informed consent (parental/guardian consent if applicable)/assent (if \<18 years of age).
  • Male sex.
  • Age ≥5 years.
  • Phenotypic evidence of DMD/BMD based on the onset of characteristic clinical symptoms or signs (that is, proximal muscle weakness, waddling gait, and Gowers' maneuver) by 9 years of age, an elevated serum CK level, and ongoing difficulty with ambulation.
  • Documentation of the presence of a nonsense point mutation in the dystrophin gene as determined by gene sequencing from a laboratory certified by the College of American Pathologists (CAP), the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act/Amendment (CLIA), or an equivalent organization.
  • Documentation that a blood sample has been drawn for confirmation of the presence of a nonsense mutation in the dystrophin gene.
  • Ability to walk ≥75 meters unassisted during the screening 6-minute walk test. Note: Other personal assistance or use of assistive devices for ambulation (for example, short leg braces, long leg braces or walkers) were not permitted.
  • Confirmed screening laboratory values within the central laboratory ranges (hepatic, adrenal, renal, and serum electrolytes parameters).
  • In participants who were sexually active, willingness to abstain from sexual intercourse or employ a barrier or medical method of contraception during the study drug administration and 6-week follow-up periods.
  • Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits, drug administration plan, study procedures, laboratory tests, and study restrictions. Note: Psychological, social, familial, or geographical factors that might preclude adequate study participation (in particular, the ability to satisfactorily perform the 6MWT) should have been considered.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment with systemic aminoglycoside antibiotics within 3 months prior to start of study treatment.
  • Initiation of systemic corticosteroid therapy within 6 months prior to start of study treatment or change in systemic corticosteroid therapy (for example, initiation, change in type of drug, dose modification not related to body weight change, schedule modification, interruption, discontinuation, or reinitiation) within 3 months prior to start of study treatment.
  • Any change (initiation, change in type of drug, dose modification, schedule modification, interruption, discontinuation, or reinitiation) in prophylaxis/treatment for congestive heart failure within 3 months prior to start of study treatment.
  • Treatment with warfarin within 1 month prior to start of study treatment.
  • Prior therapy with ataluren.
  • Known hypersensitivity to any of the ingredients or excipients of the study drug (Litesse® UltraTM [refined polydextrose], polyethylene glycol 3350, Lutrol® micro F127 [poloxamer 407], mannitol 25C, crospovidone XL10, hydroxyethyl cellulose, vanilla, Cab-O-Sil® M5P [colloidal silica], magnesium stearate).
  • Exposure to another investigational drug within 2 months prior to start of study treatment.
  • History of major surgical procedure within 30 days prior to start of study treatment.
  • Ongoing immunosuppressive therapy (other than corticosteroids).
  • Ongoing participation in any other therapeutic clinical trial.
  • Expectation of major surgical procedure (for example, scoliosis surgery) during the 12-month treatment period of the study.
  • Requirement for daytime ventilator assistance.
  • Clinical symptoms and signs of congestive heart failure (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Stage C or Stage D) or evidence on echocardiogram of clinically significant myopathy.
  • Prior or ongoing medical condition (for example, concomitant illness, psychiatric condition, behavioral disorder, alcoholism, drug abuse), medical history, physical findings, electrocardiogram findings, or laboratory abnormality that, in the investigator's opinion, could adversely affect the safety of the participant, makes it unlikely that the course of treatment or follow-up would be completed, or could impair the assessment of study results.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
174 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    High-Dose Ataluren

    Participants will receive ataluren suspension orally 3 times a day (TID), 20 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg) at morning, 20 mg/kg at midday, and 40 mg/kg at evening (total daily dose 80 mg/kg) for 48 weeks.

    Drug: Ataluren

  • Experimental
    Low-Dose Ataluren

    Participants will receive ataluren suspension orally TID, 10 mg/kg at morning, 10 mg/kg at midday, and 20 mg/kg at evening (total daily dose 40 mg/kg) for 48 weeks.

    Drug: Ataluren

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Participants will receive placebo matched to ataluren orally TID at morning, midday, and evening for 48 weeks.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugAtaluren

    Ataluren will be administered as per the dose and schedule specified in the respective arms.

    Also known as: PTC124

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo matching to ataluren will be administered as the schedule specified in the respective arm.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in 6MWD at Week 48

    The 6MWD test was performed in a 30 meters long flat corridor, where the participant was instructed to walk as far as possible, back and forth around two cones, with the permission to slow down, rest, or stop if needed. Ambulation was assessed via the 6MWD test following standardized procedures by measuring the 6MWD in meters. Participants were not permitted to use assistive devices (walker, long leg braces, or short leg braces) during the 6MWD test.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Time to Stand From Supine Position at Week 48

    If the time taken to perform this test exceeded 30 seconds or if a participant could not perform this test due to disease progression, a value of 30 seconds was used. Change from baseline data has been reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

  2. Change From Baseline in Time to Walk/Run 10 Meters at Week 48

    If the time taken to perform this test exceeded 30 seconds or if a participant could not perform this test due to disease progression, a value of 30 seconds was used. Change from baseline data has been reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

  3. Change From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs at Week 48

    If the time taken to perform this test exceeded 30 seconds or if a participant could not perform this test due to disease progression, a value of 30 seconds was used. Change from baseline data has been reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

  4. Change From Baseline in Time to Descend 4 Stairs at Week 48

    If the time taken to perform this test exceeded 30 seconds or if a participant could not perform this test due to disease progression, a value of 30 seconds was used. Change from baseline data has been reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

  5. Change From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, and Shoulder Abduction at Week 48, as Assessed by Myometry

    Upper and lower extremity myometry was performed using a myometer following standardized procedures. Muscle groups evaluated included knee flexors, knee extensors, elbow flexors, elbow extensors, and shoulder abductors. Bilateral assessments were done and 3 measurements were recorded from each muscle group on each side if possible. Mean values for the left and right sides were calculated.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

  6. Change From Baseline in Mean Activity Period/Day/Visit at Week 48, as Assessed by Step Activity Monitoring (SAM)

    The SAM is a pedometer (worn on the ankle) that continuously records the number of steps per time interval. Participants were instructed to continue to wear the SAM for at least 9 consecutive days. SAM was used to record the number of strides/minute following each visit. A stride is the leg motion that begins when the foot with SAM leaves the floor and ends when the same foot touches the floor again (that is, a stride generally equals 2 steps). Mean activity period/day/visit was computed for each participant. Mean obtained during Screening (Week -6 to -1) and following Week 1 visit were used as baseline data for analysis. For each day, an active period was defined as the first time after 3:00 AM that greater than (\>) 2 strides/minute were recorded to the last time prior to midnight that \>2 strides/minute were recorded. Days were deleted on which such an active period was less than (\<) 50 percent (%) of the mean active period across all days for that participant's visit.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

  7. Change From Baseline in Mean Total Step Count/Day/Visit During the Active Periods at Week 48, as Assessed by SAM

    The SAM is a pedometer (worn on the ankle) that continuously records the number of steps per time interval. Participants were instructed to continue to wear the SAM for at least 9 consecutive days. SAM was used to record the number of strides/minute following each visit. A stride is the leg motion that begins when the foot with SAM leaves the floor and ends when the same foot touches the floor again (that is, a stride generally equals 2 steps). Mean total step count/day/visit during the active periods was computed for each participant. Mean obtained during Screening (Week -6 to -1) and following Week 1 visit were used as baseline data for analysis. For each day, an active period was defined as the first time after 3:00 AM that \>2 strides/minute were recorded to the last time prior to midnight that \>2 strides/minute were recorded. Days were deleted on which such an active period was \<50% of the mean active period across all days for that participant's visit.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

  8. Change From Baseline in Mean Total Step Count/Hour During the Active Period at Week 48, as Assessed by SAM

    The SAM is a pedometer (worn on the ankle) that continuously records the number of steps per time interval. Participants were instructed to continue to wear the SAM for at least 9 consecutive days. SAM was used to record the number of strides/minute following each visit. A stride is the leg motion that begins when the foot with SAM leaves the floor and ends when the same foot touches the floor again (that is, a stride generally equals 2 steps). Mean total step count/hour during the active periods for the days in a visit was computed for each participant. Mean obtained during Screening (Week -6 to -1) and following Week 1 visit were used as baseline data for analysis. For each day, an active period was defined as the first time after 3:00 AM that \>2 strides/minute were recorded to the last time prior to midnight that \>2 strides/minute were recorded. Days were deleted on which such an active period was \<50% of the mean active period across all days for that participant's visit.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

  9. Change From Baseline in Maximum Continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute Total Step Count at Week 48, as Assessed by SAM

    SAM is a pedometer (worn on the ankle) that continuously records the number of steps per time interval. Participants were instructed to continue to wear the SAM for at least 9 consecutive days. SAM was used to record the number of strides/minute following each visit. A stride is the leg motion that begins when the foot with SAM leaves the floor and ends when the same foot touches the floor again (that is, a stride generally equals 2 steps). The maximum continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute total step counts were computed for each participant. Mean obtained during Screening (Week -6 to -1) and following Week 1 visit were used as baseline data for analysis. For each day, an active period was defined as the first time after 3:00 AM that \>2 strides/minute were recorded to the last time prior to midnight that \>2 strides/minute were recorded. Days were deleted on which such an active period was \<50% of the mean active period across all days for that participant's visit.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

  10. Change From Baseline in Percentage of Time During the Active Period Spent at Low Activity (Less Than or Equal to [≤] 15 Steps/Minute), Medium Activity (16-30 Steps/Minute), and High Activity (Greater Than [>]30 Steps/Minute) at Week 48

    SAM is a pedometer(worn on the ankle) that continuously records the number of steps per time interval. Participants were instructed to continue to wear the SAM for at least 9 consecutive days. SAM was used to record the number of strides/minute following each visit. A stride is the leg motion that begins when the foot with SAM leaves the floor and ends when the same foot touches the floor again. Proportion of time during active periods spent at low activity(≤15 steps/minute), medium activity(16-30 steps/minute), and high activity(\>30 steps/minute) were computed for each participant. Mean obtained during Screening and following Week 1 visit were used as baseline data for analysis. For each day, an active period was defined as first time after 3:00 AM that \>2 strides/minute were recorded to the last time prior to midnight that \>2 strides/minute were recorded. Days were deleted on which such an active period was \<50% of the mean active period across all days for that participant's visit.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

  11. Change From Baseline in Participant- Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48

    HRQL was measured via the PedsQL. The generic core module (including physical, emotional, social and school functioning scales) comprises 23 questions and the fatigue-specific module (including general fatigue, sleep/rest fatigue, and cognitive fatigue scales) comprises an additional 18 questions. The PedsQL was completed by both the participant and/or a parent/caregiver. Examples of items in each of the generic core module scales include: "It is hard for me to run"; "I feel sad or blue"; "I cannot do things that other kids my age can do;" and "It is hard to pay attention in class." Each of the generic core module items was scored on a 5-point likert response scale from 0 (never a problem) to 4 (almost always a problem). Scores were transformed on a scale from 0 to 100 (0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0), with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 48.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

  12. Change From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver- Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48

    HRQL was measured via the PedsQL. The generic core module (including physical, emotional, social and school functioning scales) comprises 23 questions and the fatigue-specific module (including general fatigue, sleep/rest fatigue, and cognitive fatigue scales) comprises an additional 18 questions. The PedsQL was completed by both the participant and/or a parent/caregiver. Examples of items in each of the generic core module scales include: "It is hard for me to run"; "I feel sad or blue"; "I cannot do things that other kids my age can do;" and "It is hard to pay attention in class." Each of the generic core module items was scored on a 5-point likert response scale from 0 (never a problem) to 4 (almost always a problem). Scores were transformed on a scale from 0 to 100 (0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0), with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 48.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

  13. Change From Baseline in Participant-Reported HRQL as Measured by the Total Fatigue Scale Score at Week 48

    HRQL was measured via the PedsQL. The fatigue-specific module (including general fatigue, sleep/rest fatigue, and cognitive fatigue scales) comprises an additional 18 questions. PedsQL was completed by both the participant and/or a parent/caregiver. Fatigue-specific module obtains information relating to items such as: "I feel too tired to do things that I like to do"; "I spend a lot of time in bed"; and "I have trouble remembering more than one thing at a time;" Each of the fatigue-specific module items was scored on a 5-point likert response scale from 0 (never a problem) to 4 (almost always a problem). Scores were transformed on a scale from 0 to 100 (0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0), with higher scores indicating less fatigue. Total score was the sum of all items over the number of items answered on all scales. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 48.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

  14. Change From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the Total Fatigue Scale Score at Week 48

    HRQL was measured via the PedsQL. The fatigue-specific module (including general fatigue, sleep/rest fatigue, and cognitive fatigue scales) comprises an additional 18 questions. The PedsQL was completed by both the participant and/or a parent/caregiver. Fatigue-specific module obtains information relating to items such as: "I feel too tired to do things that I like to do"; "I spend a lot of time in bed"; and "I have trouble remembering more than one thing at a time;" Each of the fatigue-specific module items was scored on a 5-point likert response scale from 0 (never a problem) to 4 (almost always a problem). Scores were transformed on a scale from 0 to 100 (0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0), with higher scores indicating less fatigue. Total score was the sum of all items over the number of items answered on all scales. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 48.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

  15. Parent/Caregiver-Reported Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Score

    TSQM consisted of 14 questions about treatment satisfaction with drug in 4 domains: Effectiveness (Questions 1-3 scored as 1 \[extremely dissatisfied\] to 7 \[extremely satisfied\]), Side Effects (question 4 scored as 0 \[no\] or 1 \[yes\]; question 5 scored as 1 \[extremely bothersome\] to 5 \[not at all bothersome\]; questions 6 - 8 scored as 1 \[a great deal\] to 5 \[not at all\]), Convenience (questions 9 and 10 scored as 1 \[extremely difficult\] to 7 \[extremely easy\]; question 11 scored as 1 \[extremely inconvenient\] to 5 \[extremely convenient\]) and Global Satisfaction (question 12 scored as 1 \[not at all confident\] to 7 \[extremely confident\]; question 13 scored as 1 \[not at all certain\] to 5 \[extremely certain\]; question 14 scored as 1 \[extremely dissatisfied\] to 5 \[extremely satisfied\]). The scores of each of the domains were added together and an algorithm was used to create a score of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better treatment satisfaction.

    Time frame: Week 48

  16. Change From Baseline in Participant/Caregiver-Reported Number of Daily Accidental Falls at Week 48

    Number of falls was determined by daily diary records maintained by participants and/or parent/caregivers.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

  17. Change From Baseline in Number of Digits Recalled Forwards and Backwards on Digit Span Task at Week 48

    Basic attention and working memory was measured using the digit span task. A series of digits (0-9) were presented to the child in an auditory format only. The task had 2 parts; in the forward condition, the child was requested to repeat back the digits in the order they were presented and in the backward condition, he was requested to reverse the order of presentation. A raw score of the total number of correct responses was converted to an age-scaled-score (z-score) by subtracting the corresponding mean and dividing by the corresponding standard deviation of a reference population for that age.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

  18. Change From Baseline in Heart Rate Before, During, and After Each 6MWT at Week 48, as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar® RS400

    The heart rate was measured with a Polar RS400 heart rate monitor, which consists of a transmitter strap worn around the chest and a wristwatch receiver. The monitor produces a digital text file with 1 value per minute that represents the mean heart rate for that minute. Mean heart rates values were collected prior to, during, and after the 6MWT. The participant rested for 5 minutes in a sitting position prior to the 6MWT, and the mean heart rate for the last minute of this rest period was collected and documented as the resting heart rate. During the 6MWT, the mean heart rate was collected and documented as the active heart rate. After completing the 6MWT and resting for 3 minutes, the mean heart rate for 1 minute was collected and documented as the recovery heart rate.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

  19. Change From Baseline in Serum Concentration of Creatine Kinase (CK) at Week 48

    Blood samples collected for chemistry assays were used to quantify serum CK concentrations. Serum CK was assessed as a potential biomarker for muscle fragility, with a reduction in serum CK considered to be a positive outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

  20. Percent Change From Pre-Treatment Visit (1 Week Prior to Baseline Visit) in Biceps Muscle Dystrophin Expression at Post-Treatment Visit (Week 36), as Determined by Immunofluorescence

    Immunofluorescence evidence of a change in dystrophin expression on biceps muscle biopsy was defined as an increase in the staining of the sarcolemmal membrane with an antibody to the C-terminal portion of the dystrophin protein (excluding revertant fibers) between the pre-treatment (1 week prior to Baseline visit) and post-treatment (Week 36) biopsies. The biceps muscle was biopsied from one arm for confirmation of the absence or reduced levels of dystrophin prior to treatment initiation and from the other arm to assess for production of dystrophin post-treatment.

    Time frame: Pre-Treatment (1 week prior to baseline), post-treatment (Week 36)

Other outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious AEs. Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event that occurred or worsened in the period extending from first dose of study drug to 6 weeks after the last dose of study drug. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all SAEs, regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported AE section'.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 54

  2. Study Drug Compliance

    Study drug compliance was assessed by participant daily diary and quantification of used and unused study drug. Compliance was assessed in terms of the percentage of drug actually taken relative to the amount that should have been taken during the study.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

07

Results

Posted Apr 7, 2020

Participant flow

A total of 185 participants were screened for eligibility, of which 11 participants did not meet entry criteria.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneHigh-Dose AtalurenLow-Dose AtalurenPlacebo
Started605757
As-treated population605757
Itt population605757
Completed595757
Not completed100
Withdrew: Protocol noncompliance100

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in 6MWD at Week 48

The 6MWD test was performed in a 30 meters long flat corridor, where the participant was instructed to walk as far as possible, back and forth around two cones, with the permission to slow down, rest, or stop if needed. Ambulation was assessed via the 6MWD test following standardized procedures by measuring the 6MWD in meters. Participants were not permitted to use assistive devices (walker, long leg braces, or short leg braces) during the 6MWD test.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · meters
Change From Baseline in 6MWD at Week 48
metersHigh-Dose AtalurenLow-Dose AtalurenPlacebo
Change From Baseline in 6MWD at Week 48-41.81 ± 89.234-12.86 ± 72.007-42.56 ± 90.046
Statistical analysis
  • High-Dose Ataluren vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.4756 · Least square (ls) mean difference: -30.52 · 95% CI -114.8 to 53.75
  • Low-Dose Ataluren vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.1490 · Ls mean difference: 62.65 · 95% CI -22.66 to 147.96
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Time to Stand From Supine Position at Week 48

If the time taken to perform this test exceeded 30 seconds or if a participant could not perform this test due to disease progression, a value of 30 seconds was used. Change from baseline data has been reported.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · seconds
Change From Baseline in Time to Stand From Supine Position at Week 48
secondsHigh-Dose AtalurenLow-Dose AtalurenPlacebo
Baseline12.25 ± 11.19110.80 ± 9.92411.50 ± 11.440
Change at Week 483.00 ± 5.6863.23 ± 5.7613.24 ± 7.253
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Time to Walk/Run 10 Meters at Week 48

If the time taken to perform this test exceeded 30 seconds or if a participant could not perform this test due to disease progression, a value of 30 seconds was used. Change from baseline data has been reported.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · seconds
Change From Baseline in Time to Walk/Run 10 Meters at Week 48
secondsHigh-Dose AtalurenLow-Dose AtalurenPlacebo
Baseline7.80 ± 5.2437.45 ± 4.3736.86 ± 2.813
Change at Week 482.37 ± 6.1491.68 ± 5.6173.03 ± 6.691
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs at Week 48

If the time taken to perform this test exceeded 30 seconds or if a participant could not perform this test due to disease progression, a value of 30 seconds was used. Change from baseline data has been reported.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · seconds
Change From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs at Week 48
secondsHigh-Dose AtalurenLow-Dose AtalurenPlacebo
Baseline7.63 ± 7.5226.94 ± 6.4746.04 ± 5.661
Change at Week 483.51 ± 6.7942.39 ± 4.6184.79 ± 7.949
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Time to Descend 4 Stairs at Week 48

If the time taken to perform this test exceeded 30 seconds or if a participant could not perform this test due to disease progression, a value of 30 seconds was used. Change from baseline data has been reported.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · seconds
Change From Baseline in Time to Descend 4 Stairs at Week 48
secondsHigh-Dose AtalurenLow-Dose AtalurenPlacebo
Baseline6.75 ± 7.2196.08 ± 5.9855.52 ± 5.753
Change at Week 482.95 ± 7.3232.41 ± 6.1624.03 ± 7.828
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, and Shoulder Abduction at Week 48, as Assessed by Myometry

Upper and lower extremity myometry was performed using a myometer following standardized procedures. Muscle groups evaluated included knee flexors, knee extensors, elbow flexors, elbow extensors, and shoulder abductors. Bilateral assessments were done and 3 measurements were recorded from each muscle group on each side if possible. Mean values for the left and right sides were calculated.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · pounds
Change From Baseline in Force Exerted During Knee Flexion and Extension, Elbow Flexion and Extension, and Shoulder Abduction at Week 48, as Assessed by Myometry
poundsHigh-Dose AtalurenLow-Dose AtalurenPlacebo
Baseline: Force during knee flexion12.45 ± 4.68412.08 ± 4.21711.06 ± 3.494
Change at Week 48: Force during knee flexion0.39 ± 3.148-0.07 ± 3.5110.38 ± 2.991
Baseline: Force during knee extension12.71 ± 7.91012.81 ± 5.75312.96 ± 6.162
Change at Week 48: Force during knee extension-0.59 ± 3.511-0.63 ± 3.616-1.85 ± 3.899
Baseline: Force exerted during elbow flexion8.72 ± 4.7097.66 ± 3.1548.14 ± 2.972
Change at Week 48: Force during elbow flexion-0.50 ± 1.832-0.10 ± 1.680-0.35 ± 1.807
Baseline: Force during elbow extension6.81 ± 3.8156.19 ± 3.0836.77 ± 2.785
Change at Week 48: Force during elbow extension-0.28 ± 1.4730.10 ± 1.493-0.51 ± 2.333
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Activity Period/Day/Visit at Week 48, as Assessed by Step Activity Monitoring (SAM)

The SAM is a pedometer (worn on the ankle) that continuously records the number of steps per time interval. Participants were instructed to continue to wear the SAM for at least 9 consecutive days. SAM was used to record the number of strides/minute following each visit. A stride is the leg motion that begins when the foot with SAM leaves the floor and ends when the same foot touches the floor again (that is, a stride generally equals 2 steps). Mean activity period/day/visit was computed for each participant. Mean obtained during Screening (Week -6 to -1) and following Week 1 visit were used as baseline data for analysis. For each day, an active period was defined as the first time after 3:00 AM that greater than (\>) 2 strides/minute were recorded to the last time prior to midnight that \>2 strides/minute were recorded. Days were deleted on which such an active period was less than (\<) 50 percent (%) of the mean active period across all days for that participant's visit.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Change From Baseline in Mean Activity Period/Day/Visit at Week 48, as Assessed by Step Activity Monitoring (SAM)
minutesHigh-Dose AtalurenLow-Dose AtalurenPlacebo
Baseline756.84 ± 84.612761.86 ± 76.984751.71 ± 60.513
Change at Week 480.87 ± 57.833-22.23 ± 84.759-19.91 ± 91.960
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Total Step Count/Day/Visit During the Active Periods at Week 48, as Assessed by SAM

The SAM is a pedometer (worn on the ankle) that continuously records the number of steps per time interval. Participants were instructed to continue to wear the SAM for at least 9 consecutive days. SAM was used to record the number of strides/minute following each visit. A stride is the leg motion that begins when the foot with SAM leaves the floor and ends when the same foot touches the floor again (that is, a stride generally equals 2 steps). Mean total step count/day/visit during the active periods was computed for each participant. Mean obtained during Screening (Week -6 to -1) and following Week 1 visit were used as baseline data for analysis. For each day, an active period was defined as the first time after 3:00 AM that \>2 strides/minute were recorded to the last time prior to midnight that \>2 strides/minute were recorded. Days were deleted on which such an active period was \<50% of the mean active period across all days for that participant's visit.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · steps/day
Change From Baseline in Mean Total Step Count/Day/Visit During the Active Periods at Week 48, as Assessed by SAM
steps/dayHigh-Dose AtalurenLow-Dose AtalurenPlacebo
Baseline5302.31 ± 1907.0584870.13 ± 2165.5225602.31 ± 2023.543
Change at Week 48-615.14 ± 1468.452-676.46 ± 1717.535-908.34 ± 1999.969
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Total Step Count/Hour During the Active Period at Week 48, as Assessed by SAM

The SAM is a pedometer (worn on the ankle) that continuously records the number of steps per time interval. Participants were instructed to continue to wear the SAM for at least 9 consecutive days. SAM was used to record the number of strides/minute following each visit. A stride is the leg motion that begins when the foot with SAM leaves the floor and ends when the same foot touches the floor again (that is, a stride generally equals 2 steps). Mean total step count/hour during the active periods for the days in a visit was computed for each participant. Mean obtained during Screening (Week -6 to -1) and following Week 1 visit were used as baseline data for analysis. For each day, an active period was defined as the first time after 3:00 AM that \>2 strides/minute were recorded to the last time prior to midnight that \>2 strides/minute were recorded. Days were deleted on which such an active period was \<50% of the mean active period across all days for that participant's visit.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · steps/hour
Change From Baseline in Mean Total Step Count/Hour During the Active Period at Week 48, as Assessed by SAM
steps/hourHigh-Dose AtalurenLow-Dose AtalurenPlacebo
Baseline423.67 ± 168.754383.62 ± 161.911446.37 ± 160.666
Change at Week 48-44.51 ± 125.154-42.23 ± 126.429-59.62 ± 153.054
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Maximum Continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute Total Step Count at Week 48, as Assessed by SAM

SAM is a pedometer (worn on the ankle) that continuously records the number of steps per time interval. Participants were instructed to continue to wear the SAM for at least 9 consecutive days. SAM was used to record the number of strides/minute following each visit. A stride is the leg motion that begins when the foot with SAM leaves the floor and ends when the same foot touches the floor again (that is, a stride generally equals 2 steps). The maximum continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute total step counts were computed for each participant. Mean obtained during Screening (Week -6 to -1) and following Week 1 visit were used as baseline data for analysis. For each day, an active period was defined as the first time after 3:00 AM that \>2 strides/minute were recorded to the last time prior to midnight that \>2 strides/minute were recorded. Days were deleted on which such an active period was \<50% of the mean active period across all days for that participant's visit.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · steps
Change From Baseline in Maximum Continuous 10-minute, 20-minute, 30-minute, and 60-minute Total Step Count at Week 48, as Assessed by SAM
stepsHigh-Dose AtalurenLow-Dose AtalurenPlacebo
Baseline: 10-minute total step count35.77 ± 10.22232.24 ± 11.37436.76 ± 8.935
Change at Week 48: 10-minute total step count-2.77 ± 8.569-2.79 ± 6.355-3.97 ± 9.720
Baseline: 20-minute total step count29.13 ± 9.27225.68 ± 10.03829.74 ± 8.205
Change at Week 48: 20-minute total step count-2.49 ± 7.407-2.40 ± 5.806-3.55 ± 8.677
Baseline: 30-minute total step count25.00 ± 8.05322.08 ± 9.20625.70 ± 7.350
Change at Week 48: 30-minute total step count-2.08 ± 6.519-2.31 ± 5.505-3.03 ± 7.604
Baseline: 60-minute total step count18.58 ± 6.21016.52 ± 7.19919.50 ± 5.887
Change at Week 48: 60-minute total step count-1.50 ± 5.177-1.85 ± 4.616-2.33 ± 6.241
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Percentage of Time During the Active Period Spent at Low Activity (Less Than or Equal to [≤] 15 Steps/Minute), Medium Activity (16-30 Steps/Minute), and High Activity (Greater Than [>]30 Steps/Minute) at Week 48

SAM is a pedometer(worn on the ankle) that continuously records the number of steps per time interval. Participants were instructed to continue to wear the SAM for at least 9 consecutive days. SAM was used to record the number of strides/minute following each visit. A stride is the leg motion that begins when the foot with SAM leaves the floor and ends when the same foot touches the floor again. Proportion of time during active periods spent at low activity(≤15 steps/minute), medium activity(16-30 steps/minute), and high activity(\>30 steps/minute) were computed for each participant. Mean obtained during Screening and following Week 1 visit were used as baseline data for analysis. For each day, an active period was defined as first time after 3:00 AM that \>2 strides/minute were recorded to the last time prior to midnight that \>2 strides/minute were recorded. Days were deleted on which such an active period was \<50% of the mean active period across all days for that participant's visit.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of time
Change From Baseline in Percentage of Time During the Active Period Spent at Low Activity (Less Than or Equal to [≤] 15 Steps/Minute), Medium Activity (16-30 Steps/Minute), and High Activity (Greater Than [>]30 Steps/Minute) at Week 48
percentage of timeHigh-Dose AtalurenLow-Dose AtalurenPlacebo
Baseline: Time spent at low activity32.91 ± 7.84232.38 ± 8.21332.86 ± 6.239
Change at Week 48: Time spent at low activity-2.06 ± 7.903-1.12 ± 8.220-1.11 ± 5.586
Baseline: Time spent at medium activity11.11 ± 4.01310.00 ± 3.65611.84 ± 4.304
Change at Week 48: Time spent at medium activity-1.35 ± 3.348-0.69 ± 3.828-1.92 ± 4.178
Baseline: Time spent at high activity6.59 ± 4.0775.78 ± 3.7857.17 ± 3.700
Change at Week 48: Time spent at high activity-0.66 ± 2.790-0.96 ± 2.828-1.03 ± 3.783
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Participant- Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48

HRQL was measured via the PedsQL. The generic core module (including physical, emotional, social and school functioning scales) comprises 23 questions and the fatigue-specific module (including general fatigue, sleep/rest fatigue, and cognitive fatigue scales) comprises an additional 18 questions. The PedsQL was completed by both the participant and/or a parent/caregiver. Examples of items in each of the generic core module scales include: "It is hard for me to run"; "I feel sad or blue"; "I cannot do things that other kids my age can do;" and "It is hard to pay attention in class." Each of the generic core module items was scored on a 5-point likert response scale from 0 (never a problem) to 4 (almost always a problem). Scores were transformed on a scale from 0 to 100 (0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0), with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 48.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Participant- Reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) as Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48
units on a scaleHigh-Dose AtalurenLow-Dose AtalurenPlacebo
Baseline: Physical functioning score63.63 ± 20.02959.27 ± 22.78261.87 ± 19.411
Change at Week 48: Physical functioning score-0.94 ± 19.1252.37 ± 25.105-1.00 ± 24.022
Baseline: Emotional functioning score73.92 ± 20.41873.70 ± 20.22370.13 ± 19.332
Change at Week 48: Emotional functioning score2.36 ± 16.742-1.83 ± 23.7254.30 ± 22.315
Baseline: Social functioning score67.50 ± 21.74965.09 ± 18.42163.36 ± 20.476
Change at Week 48: Social functioning score5.37 ± 20.4633.89 ± 21.8417.75 ± 18.870
Baseline: School functioning score67.72 ± 19.27664.55 ± 20.39664.65 ± 17.841
Change at Week 48: School functioning score3.61 ± 13.0086.11 ± 23.7654.06 ± 23.244
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver- Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48

HRQL was measured via the PedsQL. The generic core module (including physical, emotional, social and school functioning scales) comprises 23 questions and the fatigue-specific module (including general fatigue, sleep/rest fatigue, and cognitive fatigue scales) comprises an additional 18 questions. The PedsQL was completed by both the participant and/or a parent/caregiver. Examples of items in each of the generic core module scales include: "It is hard for me to run"; "I feel sad or blue"; "I cannot do things that other kids my age can do;" and "It is hard to pay attention in class." Each of the generic core module items was scored on a 5-point likert response scale from 0 (never a problem) to 4 (almost always a problem). Scores were transformed on a scale from 0 to 100 (0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0), with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 48.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver- Reported HRQL as Measured by the PedsQL Physical, Emotional, Social, and School Functioning Domain Scores at Week 48
units on a scaleHigh-Dose AtalurenLow-Dose AtalurenPlacebo
Baseline: Physical functioning score56.15 ± 19.95554.96 ± 20.59251.47 ± 19.274
Change at Week 48: Physical functioning score0.03 ± 17.088-3.10 ± 16.5500.23 ± 23.712
Baseline: Emotional functioning score70.08 ± 16.83669.11 ± 18.71165.96 ± 17.964
Change at Week 48: Emotional functioning score4.07 ± 15.3823.39 ± 18.0681.21 ± 17.794
Baseline: Social functioning score61.58 ± 15.82562.77 ± 16.54055.79 ± 18.269
Change at Week 48: Social functioning score-0.40 ± 18.470-1.09 ± 14.2683.71 ± 14.130
Baseline: School functioning score66.17 ± 18.25866.16 ± 16.32061.93 ± 13.587
Change at Week 48: School functioning score2.73 ± 18.490-2.32 ± 15.4623.48 ± 13.913
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Participant-Reported HRQL as Measured by the Total Fatigue Scale Score at Week 48

HRQL was measured via the PedsQL. The fatigue-specific module (including general fatigue, sleep/rest fatigue, and cognitive fatigue scales) comprises an additional 18 questions. PedsQL was completed by both the participant and/or a parent/caregiver. Fatigue-specific module obtains information relating to items such as: "I feel too tired to do things that I like to do"; "I spend a lot of time in bed"; and "I have trouble remembering more than one thing at a time;" Each of the fatigue-specific module items was scored on a 5-point likert response scale from 0 (never a problem) to 4 (almost always a problem). Scores were transformed on a scale from 0 to 100 (0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0), with higher scores indicating less fatigue. Total score was the sum of all items over the number of items answered on all scales. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 48.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Participant-Reported HRQL as Measured by the Total Fatigue Scale Score at Week 48
units on a scaleHigh-Dose AtalurenLow-Dose AtalurenPlacebo
Baseline69.47 ± 16.52571.62 ± 16.47469.70 ± 15.263
Change at Week 486.95 ± 13.4600.45 ± 23.0683.92 ± 16.512
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the Total Fatigue Scale Score at Week 48

HRQL was measured via the PedsQL. The fatigue-specific module (including general fatigue, sleep/rest fatigue, and cognitive fatigue scales) comprises an additional 18 questions. The PedsQL was completed by both the participant and/or a parent/caregiver. Fatigue-specific module obtains information relating to items such as: "I feel too tired to do things that I like to do"; "I spend a lot of time in bed"; and "I have trouble remembering more than one thing at a time;" Each of the fatigue-specific module items was scored on a 5-point likert response scale from 0 (never a problem) to 4 (almost always a problem). Scores were transformed on a scale from 0 to 100 (0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0), with higher scores indicating less fatigue. Total score was the sum of all items over the number of items answered on all scales. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 48.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Parent/Caregiver-Reported HRQL as Measured by the Total Fatigue Scale Score at Week 48
units on a scaleHigh-Dose AtalurenLow-Dose AtalurenPlacebo
Baseline73.39 ± 13.67170.71 ± 12.72068.27 ± 13.170
Change at Week 481.97 ± 13.8731.27 ± 12.0952.51 ± 12.039
SecondaryParent/Caregiver-Reported Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Score

TSQM consisted of 14 questions about treatment satisfaction with drug in 4 domains: Effectiveness (Questions 1-3 scored as 1 \[extremely dissatisfied\] to 7 \[extremely satisfied\]), Side Effects (question 4 scored as 0 \[no\] or 1 \[yes\]; question 5 scored as 1 \[extremely bothersome\] to 5 \[not at all bothersome\]; questions 6 - 8 scored as 1 \[a great deal\] to 5 \[not at all\]), Convenience (questions 9 and 10 scored as 1 \[extremely difficult\] to 7 \[extremely easy\]; question 11 scored as 1 \[extremely inconvenient\] to 5 \[extremely convenient\]) and Global Satisfaction (question 12 scored as 1 \[not at all confident\] to 7 \[extremely confident\]; question 13 scored as 1 \[not at all certain\] to 5 \[extremely certain\]; question 14 scored as 1 \[extremely dissatisfied\] to 5 \[extremely satisfied\]). The scores of each of the domains were added together and an algorithm was used to create a score of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better treatment satisfaction.

Time frame:
Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Parent/Caregiver-Reported Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) Score
units on a scaleHigh-Dose AtalurenLow-Dose AtalurenPlacebo
Effectiveness score55.97 ± 27.79654.60 ± 22.30751.26 ± 23.536
Side-effects score96.36 ± 11.19997.77 ± 7.57896.89 ± 8.874
Convenience score55.85 ± 17.00858.23 ± 19.04060.91 ± 16.665
Global satisfaction score61.04 ± 25.96761.19 ± 23.69157.56 ± 21.851
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Participant/Caregiver-Reported Number of Daily Accidental Falls at Week 48

Number of falls was determined by daily diary records maintained by participants and/or parent/caregivers.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · falls/day
Change From Baseline in Participant/Caregiver-Reported Number of Daily Accidental Falls at Week 48
falls/dayHigh-Dose AtalurenLow-Dose AtalurenPlacebo
Baseline0.40 ± 0.5970.27 ± 0.4800.54 ± 0.943
Change at Week 48-0.10 ± 0.466-0.06 ± 0.5010.20 ± 1.282
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Number of Digits Recalled Forwards and Backwards on Digit Span Task at Week 48

Basic attention and working memory was measured using the digit span task. A series of digits (0-9) were presented to the child in an auditory format only. The task had 2 parts; in the forward condition, the child was requested to repeat back the digits in the order they were presented and in the backward condition, he was requested to reverse the order of presentation. A raw score of the total number of correct responses was converted to an age-scaled-score (z-score) by subtracting the corresponding mean and dividing by the corresponding standard deviation of a reference population for that age.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · z-score
Change From Baseline in Number of Digits Recalled Forwards and Backwards on Digit Span Task at Week 48
z-scoreHigh-Dose AtalurenLow-Dose AtalurenPlacebo
Baseline: Forward condition3.59 ± 2.5542.89 ± 2.1802.84 ± 1.675
Change at Week 48: Forward condition0.39 ± 1.6770.50 ± 1.7670.40 ± 1.550
Baseline: Backward condition1.73 ± 1.8461.70 ± 1.8681.59 ± 1.460
Change at Week 48: Backward condition0.56 ± 1.5000.33 ± 1.4410.59 ± 1.203
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Heart Rate Before, During, and After Each 6MWT at Week 48, as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar® RS400

The heart rate was measured with a Polar RS400 heart rate monitor, which consists of a transmitter strap worn around the chest and a wristwatch receiver. The monitor produces a digital text file with 1 value per minute that represents the mean heart rate for that minute. Mean heart rates values were collected prior to, during, and after the 6MWT. The participant rested for 5 minutes in a sitting position prior to the 6MWT, and the mean heart rate for the last minute of this rest period was collected and documented as the resting heart rate. During the 6MWT, the mean heart rate was collected and documented as the active heart rate. After completing the 6MWT and resting for 3 minutes, the mean heart rate for 1 minute was collected and documented as the recovery heart rate.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · beats/minute
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate Before, During, and After Each 6MWT at Week 48, as Assessed by Heart Rate Monitoring With the Polar® RS400
beats/minuteHigh-Dose AtalurenLow-Dose AtalurenPlacebo
Baseline: Resting heart rate105.47 ± 12.908109.70 ± 9.908104.07 ± 11.588
Change at Week 48: Resting heart rate-0.63 ± 13.008-0.36 ± 10.223-0.26 ± 15.614
Baseline: Active heart rate142.67 ± 18.070141.77 ± 15.574136.67 ± 20.713
Change at Week 48: Active heart rate-5.00 ± 21.9762.39 ± 19.0951.65 ± 21.295
Baseline: Recovery heart rate109.90 ± 12.633113.48 ± 10.340107.86 ± 12.066
Change at Week 48: Recovery heart rate-0.23 ± 13.475-1.33 ± 13.2700.54 ± 15.181
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Serum Concentration of Creatine Kinase (CK) at Week 48

Blood samples collected for chemistry assays were used to quantify serum CK concentrations. Serum CK was assessed as a potential biomarker for muscle fragility, with a reduction in serum CK considered to be a positive outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48
Reported as:
Mean · units/liter (U/L)
Change From Baseline in Serum Concentration of Creatine Kinase (CK) at Week 48
units/liter (U/L)High-Dose AtalurenLow-Dose AtalurenPlacebo
Baseline10853.65 ± 6251.13612084.70 ± 7772.63110569.60 ± 6488.477
Change at Week 48-1680.09 ± 4264.769-2146.32 ± 7151.944-1235.13 ± 4323.943
SecondaryPercent Change From Pre-Treatment Visit (1 Week Prior to Baseline Visit) in Biceps Muscle Dystrophin Expression at Post-Treatment Visit (Week 36), as Determined by Immunofluorescence

Immunofluorescence evidence of a change in dystrophin expression on biceps muscle biopsy was defined as an increase in the staining of the sarcolemmal membrane with an antibody to the C-terminal portion of the dystrophin protein (excluding revertant fibers) between the pre-treatment (1 week prior to Baseline visit) and post-treatment (Week 36) biopsies. The biceps muscle was biopsied from one arm for confirmation of the absence or reduced levels of dystrophin prior to treatment initiation and from the other arm to assess for production of dystrophin post-treatment.

Time frame:
Pre-Treatment (1 week prior to baseline), post-treatment (Week 36)
Reported as:
Mean · percent change
Percent Change From Pre-Treatment Visit (1 Week Prior to Baseline Visit) in Biceps Muscle Dystrophin Expression at Post-Treatment Visit (Week 36), as Determined by Immunofluorescence
percent changeHigh-Dose AtalurenLow-Dose AtalurenPlacebo
Pre-treatment336.096 ± 138.9753359.797 ± 142.7361357.271 ± 139.6650
Percent change post-treatment-1.278 ± 27.7432-2.128 ± 28.8287-0.898 ± 19.2112
Other pre-specifiedPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious AEs. Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event that occurred or worsened in the period extending from first dose of study drug to 6 weeks after the last dose of study drug. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all SAEs, regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported AE section'.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 54
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)
percentage of participantsHigh-Dose AtalurenLow-Dose AtalurenPlacebo
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)95.096.598.2
Other pre-specifiedStudy Drug Compliance

Study drug compliance was assessed by participant daily diary and quantification of used and unused study drug. Compliance was assessed in terms of the percentage of drug actually taken relative to the amount that should have been taken during the study.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 48
Reported as:
Median · percentage of drug
Study Drug Compliance
percentage of drugHigh-Dose AtalurenLow-Dose AtalurenPlacebo
Study Drug Compliance97.87 (34.9 to 99.6)97.03 (64.5 to 99.8)97.74 (76.6 to 99.9)

Adverse events

Collected over Baseline up to 6 weeks after the last dose of study drug (Week 54). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
High-Dose Ataluren—2/60 (3.3%)58/60 (96.7%)
Low-Dose Ataluren—2/57 (3.5%)56/57 (98.2%)
Placebo—3/57 (5.3%)57/57 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventHigh-Dose AtalurenLow-Dose AtalurenPlacebo
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders0/600/571/57
AppendicitisInfections and infestations0/601/570/57
InfluenzaInfections and infestations0/600/571/57
VaricellaInfections and infestations0/600/571/57
Femur fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/600/571/57
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/601/570/57
Grand mal convulsionNervous system disorders0/600/571/57
Supraventricular tachycardiaCardiac disorders1/600/570/57
Lower limb fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/600/570/57
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 310
Most frequent other events
EventHigh-Dose AtalurenLow-Dose AtalurenPlacebo
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders28/6033/5722/57
HeadacheNervous system disorders16/6023/5714/57
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders18/6011/5715/57
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders15/609/5713/57
PyrexiaGeneral disorders8/6014/5712/57
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations10/6013/5713/57
Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders13/609/579/57
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations12/609/5712/57
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders12/608/574/57
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications7/6011/577/57

Baseline characteristics

As-treated population included all randomized participants who actually received any study treatment.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)High-Dose AtalurenLow-Dose AtalurenPlaceboTotal
Mean8.4 ± 2.538.8 ± 2.918.3 ± 2.338.5 ± 2.59
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)High-Dose AtalurenLow-Dose AtalurenPlaceboTotal
Female0000
Male605757174
6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)
6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)(meters)High-Dose AtalurenLow-Dose AtalurenPlaceboTotal
Mean358.2 ± 103.97350.0 ± 97.55359.6 ± 87.67356.0 ± 96.30
08

Study locations

37 sites
  • University of California-Davis
    Sacramento, California, United States
  • The Children's Hospital
    Aurora, Colorado, United States
  • Child Neurology Center of Pensacola
    Pensacola, Florida, United States
  • University of Iowa Healthcare
    Iowa City, Iowa, United States
  • University of Kansas Medical Centre
    Kansas City, Kansas, United States
  • Children's Hospital of Boston/Harvard Medical School
    Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • University of Minnesota
    Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
  • Washington University School of Medicine
    Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
  • Columbia University Medical School
    New York, New York, United States
  • Duke University Medical Center
    Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45229-3039, United States
  • Shriners Hospital for Children
    Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Southwestern University
    Dallas, Texas, United States
  • University of Utah
    Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
  • Royal Children's Hospital
    Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  • Institute For Neuromuscular Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead
    Westmead, Australia
  • University Hospital KU Leuven
    Leuven, Belgium
  • Alberta Children's Hospital
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • British Columbia Children's Hospital
    Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • London Health Sciences Center
    London, Ontario, Canada
  • Service de Neuropediatrie, hôpital La Timone
    Marseille, France
  • Neuromuscular center of Nantes
    Nantes, France
  • Groupe Hospitalier La Pitie-Salpetriere
    Paris, France
  • University Clinic for Children, University of Essen
    Essen, Germany
  • University Hospital
    Freiburg, Germany
  • Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University Hospital
    Jerusalem, Israel
  • Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico in Milan
    Milan, Italy
  • Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesu
    Rome, Italy
  • U.O. Complessa di Neuropsichiatria Infantile
    Rome, Italy
  • Hospital Sant Joan de déu
    Barcelona, Spain
  • Hospital Universitari La Fe
    Valencia, Spain
  • Queen Silvia Children's Hospital
    Göteborg, Sweden
  • Astrid Lindgren Pediatric Hospital
    Stockholm, Sweden
  • Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
  • Univ of Newcastle, Institute of Human Genetics
    Newcastle, United Kingdom
  • Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic NHS Trust
    Oswestry, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Shieh PB, Elfring G, Trifillis P, Santos C, Peltz SW, Parsons JA, Apkon S, Darras BT, Campbell C, McDonald CM; Members of the Ataluren Phase IIb Study Group; Members of the Ataluren Phase IIb Study Clinical Evaluator Training Group; Members of the ACT DMD Study Group; Members of the ACT DMD Clinical Evaluator Training Group. Meta-analyses of deflazacort versus prednisone/prednisolone in patients with nonsense mutation Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Comp Eff Res. 2021 Dec;10(18):1337-1347. doi: 10.2217/cer-2021-0018. Epub 2021 Oct 25. PubMed 34693725 ↗
  • Campbell C, Barohn RJ, Bertini E, Chabrol B, Comi GP, Darras BT, Finkel RS, Flanigan KM, Goemans N, Iannaccone ST, Jones KJ, Kirschner J, Mah JK, Mathews KD, McDonald CM, Mercuri E, Nevo Y, Pereon Y, Renfroe JB, Ryan MM, Sampson JB, Schara U, Sejersen T, Selby K, Tulinius M, Vilchez JJ, Voit T, Wei LJ, Wong BL, Elfring G, Souza M, McIntosh J, Trifillis P, Peltz SW, Muntoni F; PTC124-GD-007-DMD Study Group; ACT DMD Study Group; Clinical Evaluator Training Groups. Meta-analyses of ataluren randomized controlled trials in nonsense mutation Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Comp Eff Res. 2020 Oct;9(14):973-984. doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0095. Epub 2020 Aug 27. PubMed 32851872 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 7, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00592553
Lead sponsor
PTC Therapeutics
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 14, 2008
Start date
Feb 29, 2008
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2009
Completion
Dec 31, 2009
Results posted
Apr 7, 2020
Last update
Apr 7, 2020

Study contacts

Leone Atkinson, MD, PhD
study director · PTC Therapeutics

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion