CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00587730HawkeyeUpdated Apr 23, 2015

Attenuation Corrected Cardiac SPECT Using the GE Hawkeye Camera System

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of GE Attenuation Corrected Hawkeye Camera in Cardiac Disease, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-04-23.

Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Why this study was terminated
Recruiting or enrolling participants has halted prematurely and will not resume.
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
608
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The accuracy of stress single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is limited by imaging artifacts, many of which are caused by soft tissue attenuation. A recent multicenter study performed by our laboratory comparing 7 commercially available attenuation correction (AC) camera systems in a cardiac phantom showed the best performance with the GE Hawkeye (a hybrid gamma camera-CT scanner) and the University of Michigan M-step (unique feature a camera orbit of 360˚ versus the usual 180˚) systems. In this study we will combine the strengths of these two systems (GE Hawkeye AC system and 360˚ camera orbit) to test the accuracy of this imaging system in a population of 400 consecutive patients undergoing clinically indicated stress SPECT. These patients will undergo SPECT imaging both with conventional methodology and the GE Hawkeye system. The conventional study will be interpreted and reported in the usual clinical fashion. The GE Hawkeye images will be interpreted independently by 2 observers blinded to the results of conventional imaging and will not be reported clinically. The primary study hypothesis is that AC will substantially reduce attenuation artifacts (mild fixed defects) without reducing the accuracy of either normal studies or myocardial infarction (MI). Clinical data and noninvasive test results (history of MI, electrocardiogram, and gated wall motion) will be used to distinguish defects which represent attenuation (false-positive) versus those due to MI (true-positive).

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiac Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • heart disease
  • cardiac disease
  • chest pain
  • myocardial infarction
  • heart attack
03

In context

Heart Diseases

3,639 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Diseases; 461 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 608 is above the median of 100 across 1,778 interventional studies indexed under Heart Diseases.

Browse Heart Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic is the lead sponsor of 3,218 studies on the registry; 670 are open to participants now.

Of its 445 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 313 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients referred to the Charlton Nuclear Cardiology Laboratory for stress Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Prior PTCA or CABG
  • Left bundle branch block (LBBB) or paced ventricular rhythm
  • Clinically significant valvular heart disease
  • Hypertrophic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy
  • Atrial fibrillation or frequent atrial or ventricular ectopy (defined as >20% ectopic beats
  • History of MI
  • ECG evidence of MI
  • Chest circumference >55 inches
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
608 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Clinical SPECT

    GE Hawkeye Attenuation Correction Camera is being compared to the approved clinical use SPECT camera.

    Device: GE Attenuation Corrected Hawkeye Camera

Interventions

  • DeviceGE Attenuation Corrected Hawkeye Camera

    GE Hawkeye AC system and 360˚ camera orbit

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The overall comparisons of the agreement between conventional SPECT imaging and the GE Hawkeye system will be completed using McNemar's test.

    Time frame: Measured/Compared at time of each scan.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparisons of categorical factors between the 2 tests will also be completed using McNemar's test, continuous factors will be completed using a paired t-test if the differences are normally distributed.

    Time frame: Measured/Compared at time of study

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Mayo Clinic
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 23, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00587730
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
First posted
Jan 7, 2008
Start date
Jul 2001
Primary completion
Aug 2004
Completion
Aug 2004
Last update
Apr 23, 2015

Study contacts

Todd D Miller, MD
principal investigator · Mayo Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion