CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00585169Updated Apr 8, 2013Results posted

Memantine Treatment Study of Pathological Gambling

A Phase 2 interventional study of Memantine Hydrochloride in Pathological Gambling, sponsored by Yale University. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-04-08.

Sponsored by Yale University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
29
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
21 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of the proposed study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the drug memantine in individuals with pathological gambling (PG). Thirty subjects with DSM-IV PG will receive 10 weeks of open-label treatment with memantine. The hypothesis to be tested is that memantine will be effective and well tolerated in patients with PG. We hypothesize that memantine will reduce the severity of gambling symptoms and improve patients' overall functioning. This study will provide needed data on the treatment of a disabling disorder that currently lacks a clearly effective treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pathological Gambling

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Pathological Gambling
  • Compulsive Gambling
  • Gambling Addiction
  • Gambling
  • Treatment
  • Memantine
  • Pharmacology
03

In context

Gambling

147 studies on the registry are indexed under Gambling; 36 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 29 is below the median of 63 across 120 interventional studies indexed under Gambling.

Browse Gambling studies →

Lead sponsor

Yale University is the lead sponsor of 1,724 studies on the registry; 298 are open to participants now.

Of its 210 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 126 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of Pathological Gambling using the clinician-administered Structured Clinical Interview for Pathological Gambling (SCI-PG) (Grant et al., 2004);
  • Gambling behavior within 2 weeks prior to enrollment;
  • For women, negative results on a urine pregnancy test and stable use of a medically accepted form of contraception.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infrequent gambling (i.e. less than one time per week) that does not meet DSM-IV criteria for PG;
  • Unstable medical illness or clinically significant abnormalities on laboratory tests, EKG, or physical examination at screen;
  • History of seizures;
  • Myocardial infarction within 6 months;
  • Current pregnancy or lactation, or inadequate contraception in women of childbearing potential;
  • A need for medication other than memantine with possible psychotropic effects or unfavorable interactions;
  • Clinically significant suicidality;
  • Current Axis I disorder determined by the SCID and SCID-compatible modules for impulse control disorders (Grant et al., 2005), except for nicotine dependence;
  • Lifetime history of bipolar disorder type I or II, dementia, schizophrenia, or any psychotic disorder determined by SCID;
  • Current or recent (past 3 months) DSM-IV substance abuse or dependence;
  • Positive urine drug screen at screening;
  • Initiation of psychotherapy or behavior therapy within 3 months prior to study baseline;
  • Previous treatment with memantine;
  • Treatment with investigational medication or depot neuroleptics within 3 months, with fluoxetine within 6 weeks, or with other psychotropics within 2 weeks prior to study baseline.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
29 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    memantine

    10 to 30 mg/day memantine. The study consisted of 10 weeks of open-label memantine. All eligible study subjects were started at 10 mg/day for 2 weeks. The dose was increased to 20 mg/day after 2 weeks and then to 30 mg/day after 4 weeks unless remission of PG symptoms was attained at a lower dose.

    Drug: Memantine Hydrochloride

Interventions

  • DrugMemantine Hydrochloride

    10 mg/day for two weeks, dose increase to 20 mg at week 3, 30 mg at week 4 unless clinical improvement is achieved with a lower dose. Total treatment is 10 weeks.

    Also known as: Namenda

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling (PG-YBOCS)

    The PGYBOCS is a reliable \& valid, 10-item, clinician administered scale that rates gambling symptoms within the last 7 days. The first 5 questions assess urges and thoughts associated with pathological gambling, and the last 5 questions assess the behavioral component of the disorder. Scores of 0 through 4 are assigned each item according to the severity of the response (0 = least severe response or none, 4 = most severe response or extreme)with a score ranging from 0-40. Each set of questions (1-5 and 6-10) can be totaled separately for the component score (urges/thoughts and behavioral) as well as together for a total score. A score of 0 indicates no problems while increasing scores indicate increasing severity of problems with gambling. PG-YBOCS is used to measure changes across time. A decreasing score indicates a possible positive response to the intervention. Total score at baseline was compared with the study end to determine if the intervention was efficacious.

    Time frame: Baseline to study end point (10 weeks)

07

Results

Posted Apr 8, 2013

Participant flow

Men and women with a primary diagnosis of Pathological Gambling (PG) were recruited between April 2008 through February 2010

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMemantine
Started29
Completed28
Not completed1
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1

Outcome measures

PrimaryYale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling (PG-YBOCS)

The PGYBOCS is a reliable \& valid, 10-item, clinician administered scale that rates gambling symptoms within the last 7 days. The first 5 questions assess urges and thoughts associated with pathological gambling, and the last 5 questions assess the behavioral component of the disorder. Scores of 0 through 4 are assigned each item according to the severity of the response (0 = least severe response or none, 4 = most severe response or extreme)with a score ranging from 0-40. Each set of questions (1-5 and 6-10) can be totaled separately for the component score (urges/thoughts and behavioral) as well as together for a total score. A score of 0 indicates no problems while increasing scores indicate increasing severity of problems with gambling. PG-YBOCS is used to measure changes across time. A decreasing score indicates a possible positive response to the intervention. Total score at baseline was compared with the study end to determine if the intervention was efficacious.

Time frame:
Baseline to study end point (10 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling (PG-YBOCS)
units on a scaleMemantine
Baseline21.8 ± 4.3
10 weeks8.9 ± 7.2

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Memantine 10mg—0/29 (0%)5/29 (17.2%)
Memantine 20mg—0/24 (0%)6/24 (25%)
Memantine 30mg—0/16 (0%)8/16 (50%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventMemantine 10mgMemantine 20mgMemantine 30mg
Lethargic or tiredGeneral disorders0/291/243/16
Light-headed/dizzyGeneral disorders2/294/242/16
NauseaGeneral disorders0/290/242/16
HeadacheGeneral disorders3/290/240/16
Decreased libidoGeneral disorders0/291/241/16

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Memantine
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years28
>=65 years1
Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)Memantine
Mean50.4 ± 13
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Memantine
Female18
Male11
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Memantine
American Indian or Alaska Native2
Asian2
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American1
White23
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported1
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Memantine
United States29
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Yale University School of Medicine
    New Haven, Connecticut 06519, United States
  • University of Minnesota Medical Center, Fairview
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55454, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Grant JE, Chamberlain SR, Odlaug BL, Potenza MN, Kim SW. Memantine shows promise in reducing gambling severity and cognitive inflexibility in pathological gambling: a pilot study. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2010 Dec;212(4):603-12. doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-1994-5. Epub 2010 Aug 19. PubMed 20721537 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 8, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00585169
Lead sponsor
Yale University
Collaborators
University of Minnesota, Forest Laboratories
Responsible party
Marc Potenza (Professor of Psychiatry, Child Study, and Neurobiology, Yale University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 3, 2008
Start date
Dec 2007
Primary completion
Dec 2011
Completion
Dec 2011
Results posted
Apr 8, 2013
Last update
Apr 8, 2013

Study contacts

Marc N. Potenza, M.D, Ph.D.
principal investigator · Yale University
Jon E Grant, MD, JD, MPH
principal investigator · University of Minnesota

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion