CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT00583804Updated Oct 3, 2025Results posted

Implanted Myoelectric Control for Restoration of Hand Function in Spinal Cord Injury

An interventional study of IST-12 in Spinal Cord Injury and Tetraplegia, sponsored by MetroHealth Medical Center. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-03.

Sponsored by MetroHealth Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 18 years 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 1989, registered Dec 2007).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of an implanted stimulator and sensor for providing hand and arm function for individuals with cervical level spinal cord injury.

Read the detailed description

The design of this study is to determine the efficacy of improving upper extremity function in tetraplegic subjects after receiving an implantable device for neuromuscular control. Evaluations will be made so as to document changes in performance of manipulative tasks when using the stimulation system.

Subjects who consent to participate in this project will have an implantable stimulator surgically placed in the upper extremity for control of the upper extremity. A series of tests will be performed before implantation, and repeated at intervals after implantation to assess changes in each subject's performance.

This study is a non-randomized feasibility study with concurrent (neuroprosthesis on and off) and longitudinal (pre- and post-implantation/training) self-controls.

Subjects participating in the study can expect to be actively involved in the study for two years after implantation and followed for life thereafter. The screening procedures take up to two days, depending on the specific evaluations necessary to determine candidacy. Pre-surgical exercise is conducted for at least two weeks. The implantation surgery itself lasts one day, with three to seven days of post-surgical hospitalization. Following an eight-week exercise program and a twelve-week training program, subjects are discharged from the active rehabilitation phase. They are followed quarterly for one year, and then annually thereafter.

The device is referred to as the Implanted Stimulator-Telemeter (IST) -12. The device uses functional electrical stimulation (FES) to activate paralyzed muscles.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Cord Injury
  • Tetraplegia

Keywords

  • Spinal Cord Injury
  • Tetraplegia
  • Functional Electrical Stimulation
  • Neuroprosthesis
03

In context

Spinal Cord Injuries

1,948 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries; 505 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 24 across 1,566 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries.

Browse Spinal Cord Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

MetroHealth Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 101 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Of its 12 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 7 (58%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • C5-C8 spinal cord injury
  • Minimum of one-year post injury with no additional function prior to implantation surgery
  • Male or female
  • 18-60 years of age
  • intact vision
  • pharmacologically controlled spasticity, when applicable
  • Functional in wheelchair with adequate trunk support to allow bimanual manipulation
  • Positive attitude and motivation with supportive home environment
  • Willingness to return to laboratory for periodic evaluation and testing
  • Free of contractures known to diminish performance of the system (e.g., supination contracture of the wrist).
  • Integrity of the lower motor neuron (peripheral nerve) to the muscles to be activated
  • Adequate range of motion of joints of the shoulder, wrist, and hand (upper extremity).
  • If an acute infection is present, the subject will not be considered for surgery until it clears.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior history of a major chronic systemic infection or other illness that would increase the risk of surgery.
  • Contraindications include immunologic diseases, cardiac arrhythmias, undiagnosed or high-risk breast masses, dermatologic conditions, and any major system failure.
  • Acute infection currently present that has not cleared.
  • Hypersensitivity that inhibits their ability to sustain pressure over their digits.
  • Blind
  • Uncontrolled disorders, i.e., seizures
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Stimulation ON

    Individuals implanted with stimulator/sensor device. Stimulator is turned on and is active.

    Device: IST-12

  • Active comparator
    Stimulation OFF

    Function with stimulation turned off.

    Device: IST-12

Interventions

  • DeviceIST-12

    Implanted stimulator and sensor device, with twelve implanted stimulating electrodes and two myoelectric signal recording electrodes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Grasp-Release Test

    Grasp and Release Test (GRT) - The Grasp and Release Test (GRT) \[Wuolle, 1994; Smith et al., 1996; Carroll et al., 2000; Taylor et al., 2002; Mulcahey et al., 2004\], developed at the Cleveland FES Center, has been utilized by multiple centers to show improvements in hand function after implantation of a neuroprosthesis and tendon transfers \[Peckham, 2001\]. This pick-and-place test requires the participant to unilaterally acquire, move, and release six objects varying in weight and size. The objects are: 1) a small peg, 2) a wooden cube, 3) a small juice can, 4) a videotape, 5) a paperweight (\~1000g) and a simulated fork task (spring-loaded plunger). The number of objects that the participant can successfully manipulate are scored. Success in manipulating each object in the GRT is defined as the ability to pick up and place the object at least once within 30 seconds.

    Time frame: One Year

  2. Activities of Daily Living Test

    The ADL Abilities Test was developed to measure differences in activity performance with and without a hand neuroprosthesis. Scoring is based on an activity analysis approach. The activities, which are chosen by the participant, are broken down into phases, and each phase is scored for the amount of assistance the participant uses: 1) "Physical Assistance" (PA): assistance from an attendant, 2) "Adaptive Equipment" (AE): any modifications of the activity or its components, 3) "Orthotic Assistance" (OA): an orthotic device that the participant normally wears all day (e.g., a dorsal wrist support), and that can be considered a modification of the hand, 4) "Self Assistance" (SA): use of any part of the body other than the dominant hand, or use of the test equipment in an adapted way to complete the activity (e.g., using two hands to hold a glass, or sliding an object to the end of the table for grasping), and 5) "Independent".

    Time frame: Three months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adverse Events

    Self-reported adverse events.

    Time frame: From date of implant until study completion or date of death from any cause.

07

Results

Posted Jun 8, 2018

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneImplanted Individuals
Started10
Completed10
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryGrasp-Release Test

Grasp and Release Test (GRT) - The Grasp and Release Test (GRT) \[Wuolle, 1994; Smith et al., 1996; Carroll et al., 2000; Taylor et al., 2002; Mulcahey et al., 2004\], developed at the Cleveland FES Center, has been utilized by multiple centers to show improvements in hand function after implantation of a neuroprosthesis and tendon transfers \[Peckham, 2001\]. This pick-and-place test requires the participant to unilaterally acquire, move, and release six objects varying in weight and size. The objects are: 1) a small peg, 2) a wooden cube, 3) a small juice can, 4) a videotape, 5) a paperweight (\~1000g) and a simulated fork task (spring-loaded plunger). The number of objects that the participant can successfully manipulate are scored. Success in manipulating each object in the GRT is defined as the ability to pick up and place the object at least once within 30 seconds.

Time frame:
One Year
Reported as:
Median · Number of Objects
Grasp-Release Test
Number of ObjectsStimulation ONStimulation OFF
Grasp-Release Test5.5 (5 to 6)2 (0 to 4)
PrimaryActivities of Daily Living Test

The ADL Abilities Test was developed to measure differences in activity performance with and without a hand neuroprosthesis. Scoring is based on an activity analysis approach. The activities, which are chosen by the participant, are broken down into phases, and each phase is scored for the amount of assistance the participant uses: 1) "Physical Assistance" (PA): assistance from an attendant, 2) "Adaptive Equipment" (AE): any modifications of the activity or its components, 3) "Orthotic Assistance" (OA): an orthotic device that the participant normally wears all day (e.g., a dorsal wrist support), and that can be considered a modification of the hand, 4) "Self Assistance" (SA): use of any part of the body other than the dominant hand, or use of the test equipment in an adapted way to complete the activity (e.g., using two hands to hold a glass, or sliding an object to the end of the table for grasping), and 5) "Independent".

Time frame:
Three months
Reported as:
Median · Number of Tasks Improved
Activities of Daily Living Test
Number of Tasks ImprovedImplanted Individuals
Activities of Daily Living Test6 (2 to 11)
SecondaryAdverse Events

Self-reported adverse events.

Time frame:
From date of implant until study completion or date of death from any cause.

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Implanted Individuals—0/10 (0%)2/10 (20%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventImplanted Individuals
Device infectionInfections and infestations2/10

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Implanted Individuals
Median37 (26 to 56)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Implanted Individuals
Female2
Male8
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Implanted Individuals
Hispanic or Latino1
Not Hispanic or Latino9
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Implanted Individuals
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White10
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Grasp-Release Test - Baseline
Grasp-Release Test - Baseline(Objects)Implanted Individuals
Median2 (0 to 4)
08

Study locations

1 site
  • MetroHealth Medical Center
    Cleveland, Ohio 44109, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Peckham PH, Kilgore KL, Keith MW, Bryden AM, Bhadra N, Montague FW. An advanced neuroprosthesis for restoration of hand and upper arm control using an implantable controller. J Hand Surg Am. 2002 Mar;27(2):265-76. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.2002.30919. PubMed 11901386 ↗
  • Kilgore KL, Bryden A, Keith MW, Hoyen HA, Hart RL, Nemunaitis GA, Peckham PH. Evolution of Neuroprosthetic Approaches to Restoration of Upper Extremity Function in Spinal Cord Injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018 Summer;24(3):252-264. doi: 10.1310/sci2403-252. PubMed 29997428 ↗
  • Peckham PH, Keith MW, Kilgore KL, Grill JH, Wuolle KS, Thrope GB, Gorman P, Hobby J, Mulcahey MJ, Carroll S, Hentz VR, Wiegner A; Implantable Neuroprosthesis Research Group. Efficacy of an implanted neuroprosthesis for restoring hand grasp in tetraplegia: a multicenter study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Oct;82(10):1380-8. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.25910. PubMed 11588741 ↗
  • Kilgore KL, Hoyen HA, Bryden AM, Hart RL, Keith MW, Peckham PH. An implanted upper-extremity neuroprosthesis using myoelectric control. J Hand Surg Am. 2008 Apr;33(4):539-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.01.007. PubMed 18406958 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00583804
Lead sponsor
MetroHealth Medical Center
Collaborators
Case Western Reserve University, VA Office of Research and Development, FDA Office of Orphan Products Development
Responsible party
Kevin Kilgore (Program Manager, MetroHealth Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 31, 2007
Start date
Apr 1, 1989
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2015
Completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Results posted
Jun 8, 2018
Last update
Oct 3, 2025

Study contacts

Kevin L Kilgore, Ph.D.
principal investigator · MetroHealth Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion