CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00576017Updated May 19, 2011

A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Fentanyl-TTS Compared to Weak Opioids in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Cancer Pain Previously Treated With NSAIDS (Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs).

A Phase 4 interventional study of Fentanyl-TTS in Pain, sponsored by Janssen-Cilag, S.A.. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-05-19.

Sponsored by Janssen-Cilag, S.A. · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
19
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To show, using the analgesic WHO scale, that fentanyl-TTS may be directly used for treating moderate to severe cancer pain in patients treated with NSAIDs, acetaminophen, or metamizole (first step drugs) avoiding the second step, and may be at least as effective and safe as currently used second step drugs, minor opioids.

Read the detailed description

This study is a multicenter, randomized(study drug assigned by chance), open-label, nationwide study. Patients with moderate to severe chronic pain due to the oncological disease (VAS>5) meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were randomized to treatment with fentanyl-TTS (transdermal patches, initial dosage: 25µg/h patch every 3 days, experimental drug) or with minor opioids (Tramadol, initial dosage of 200mg/day and Dihydrocodeine initial dosage of 120mg/day, control arm). The follow-up and drug administration was two months, during which controls were performed every 7 days, except for the first that was on Day 4. If pain was not controlled (VAS\<3), the investigator could increase the dose of the relevant drug (according to data sheet). The primary endpoint has been the control of pain during treatment. Pain was assessed by the visual analogue scale. Pain severity was assessed at each follow-up visit. The secondary endpoint was to assess the advantages of using fentanyl-TTS after the first step of the WHO analgesic ladder as compared to minor opioids. These advantages were assessed based on the incidence of side effects associated with treatment with opioids during treatment where the following was assessed by a table with the most common side effects: nausea, vomiting, constipation and drowsiness (WHO) and their severity, the quantity of support drugs required by the patients to cope with the side effects occurring, adverse events related to the study drug, and the percentage of patients discontinuing or switching treatment due to side effects. Fentanyl, dosage forms: 25µg/h, 50µg/h and 100µg/h. Transdermal patches (initial dosage: 25µg/h patch every 3 days). Tramadol, dosage forms: 100mg, 150mg and 200mg, (initial dosage: 200mg/day). Dihydrocodeine, dosage forms: 60mg, 90mg and 120mg, (initial dosage: 120mg/day). If pain was not controlled (VAS\<3), the investigator could increase the dose of the relevant drug. The follow-up and drug administration was two months, during which controls were performed every 7 days.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Cancer pain treatment
  • Fentanyl TTS
  • Dihydrocodeine
  • Tramadol
  • Cancer pain
  • Durogesic
  • Ultram
03

In context

Cancer Pain

338 studies on the registry are indexed under Cancer Pain; 71 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 19 is below the median of 60 across 254 interventional studies indexed under Cancer Pain.

Browse Cancer Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Janssen-Cilag, S.A. is the lead sponsor of 21 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with moderate to severe chronic pain due to the oncological condition, defined as VAS => 5, treated with first step drugs, either NSAIDs or acetaminophen or metamizole (the dose of first step drugs requiring a switch in treatment is left to the physician's discretion)
  • Patients with a documented histological diagnosis of cancer.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients whose pain has some neuropathic component
  • Patients who have been treated with opioids during the 2 months prior to study entry
  • Patients with dermatological disease, a history of allergy or hypersensitivity to fentanyl or to adhesive components preventing use of patches
  • Patients with a history of cardiac, CNS, or respiratory disease that prevents their participation in the study in the investigator's judgment
  • Patients with kidney or liver failure contraindicating use of opioids based on medical criterion
  • Pregnant women or women of childbearing age who do not use an effective contraceptive method throughout the study
  • Patients in whom surgery is planned during the study
  • Patients who are participating at the same time in another trial.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
19 participants (actual)

Interventions

  • DrugFentanyl-TTS
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary endpoint was the control of pain during treatment. Pain was assessed by the visual analogue scale. Pain severity was assessed at each follow-up visit.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The secondary endpoint was to assess the advantages of using fentanyl-TTS after the first step of the WHO analgesic ladder as compared to minor opioids.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 19, 2011, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00576017
Lead sponsor
Janssen-Cilag, S.A.
First posted
Dec 18, 2007
Start date
Oct 2003
Completion
Mar 2005
Last update
May 19, 2011

Study contacts

Janssen-Cilag S.A. (formerly Janssen Sp) Clinical Trial
study director · Janssen-Cilag, S.A.
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion