CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00573872RAD0408Updated Dec 5, 2017Results posted

A Phase II Study of Spinal Radiosurgery

An interventional study of Radiosurgery in Neoplasm and Arteriovenous Malformations, sponsored by University of Alabama at Birmingham. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 19 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-12-05.

Sponsored by University of Alabama at Birmingham · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2005, registered Dec 2007).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
43
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
19 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Phase I of the study (motion and quality assurance [QA] study) is being used to determine intrafraction target motion and define quality assurance procedures for single fraction spinal radiosurgery. The Phase II portion of the study is being used to estimate the palliative response (pain or relief of neurologic symptoms) and local control for single fraction radiosurgery delivered with TomoTherapy and to assess the acute and late toxicity of spinal radiosurgery.

Read the detailed description

Optimal radiation plan is generated that treats the tumor (CTV) and spares normal tissue, especially the spinal cord. Motion and QA study will determine intrafraction motion for phase II portion of the study.

Dose prescription to tumor is based upon maximal dose received by 0.5 cc of spinal cord and whether patient has had prior radiation therapy to that area:

Phase I - Motion and QA Study: 20-25 Gy in 5 fractions/10-20 patients/previous RT = \<50% CTV dose/No previous RT = \<80% CTV dose.

Phase II - 9-24 Gy in 1 fraction/30 total in order to have 20 evaluable patients (15 patients with prior RT and 15 without prior RT/previous RT = 8 Gy/No previous RT = 10 Gy.

# Motion and QA study will treat CTV to 20-25 Gy in 5 fractions to study intrafraction motion for QA of single fraction administration. This will define treatment margins for single fraction radiosurgery.

*Previous RT:

  • greater than six months since completion of RT
  • at least 20 Gy, but no more than 50 Gy
02

Conditions studied

  • Neoplasm
  • Arteriovenous Malformations

Keywords

  • Radiosurgery
  • Phase II
  • Cancer
  • Spinal
  • AVM
03

In context

Arteriovenous Malformations

120 studies on the registry are indexed under Arteriovenous Malformations; 32 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 43 is below the median of 59 across 59 interventional studies indexed under Arteriovenous Malformations.

Browse Arteriovenous Malformations studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Alabama at Birmingham is the lead sponsor of 1,396 studies on the registry; 284 are open to participants now.

Of its 156 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 124 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. All subjects must have history of histologically confirmed neoplasm or radiographically-diagnosed AVM. Patients without a prior tissue diagnosis but who have a radiographically characteristic lesion are eligible if there is consensus agreement of the diagnosis in the UAB Neuro-oncology Tumor Board.
  2. ECOG performance status of less than or equal to 2
  3. Age greater than 18
  4. Life expectancy greater than 12 weeks
  5. Subjects given written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Cytotoxic chemotherapy within 7 days of treatment
  2. Insufficient recovery from all active toxicities of prior therapies
  3. Epidural spinal cord compression requiring immediate neurosurgical decompression. If a patient requires immediate surgery for neurologic compromise, they may still be eligible post operatively if tumor was incompletely resected.
  4. Patient is non-ambulatory. Optimization of pretreatment neurologic function with steroids is allowed. Ambulation with assistance of walker or cane is allowed.
  5. Patient is pregnant and it is judged by the treating Radiation Oncologist that spinal radiosurgery would place the fetus in unacceptable danger.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
43 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Spinal Radiosurgery

    Patients will be fitted in a custom immobilization device. A CT simulation scan will then be performed to pinpoint intended radiosurgery target producing a computer optimized radiation plan to be confirmed by planning radiation physicist. Patient will then be placed in their immobilization device and aligned with the treatment planning position. Patient then receives radiosurgery. Treatment delivery will be divided into components of 3-5Gy with repeat CT based localization in between each of these components. For all patients, a nominal prescription dose of 24Gy will be entered into the tomotherapy cost function. Once the plan that provides maximal spinal sparing has been generated, the plan will be renormalized to produce no more than 8Gy (prior RT) or 10Gy (no prior RT) to 0.5cc of spinal cord by dividing the single fraction treatment into fractions of 3-5Gy.

    Radiation: Radiosurgery

Interventions

  • RadiationRadiosurgery

    Phase I: 20-25 Gy in 5 fractions Phase II: 9-24 GY in 1 fraction

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Palliative Response (Pain or Relief of Neurologic Symptoms) From Single Fraction Radiosurgery Delivered With Tomotherapy

    Physician's subjective report of palliative pain relief. The maximal benefit patient received (best response) is reported. Scale is pain described as "worse", "stable", "better", or "completely resolved". In the reporting "better" or "completely resolved" indicates response to treatment.

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Assess the Acute and Late Toxicity of Spinal Radiosurgery

    CTCAE version 3. Acute toxicity will be recorded if toxicity occurs early phase or within 3 months, and late toxicity would be any toxicity that follows those 3 months.

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Number of Participants With Lack of Tumor Growth at Last Follow-up

    Lack of tumor growth by CT or MRI at last follow-up

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Results

Posted Oct 20, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSpinal Radiosurgery
Started43
Completed32
Not completed11

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Palliative Response (Pain or Relief of Neurologic Symptoms) From Single Fraction Radiosurgery Delivered With Tomotherapy

Physician's subjective report of palliative pain relief. The maximal benefit patient received (best response) is reported. Scale is pain described as "worse", "stable", "better", or "completely resolved". In the reporting "better" or "completely resolved" indicates response to treatment.

Time frame:
2 years
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Palliative Response (Pain or Relief of Neurologic Symptoms) From Single Fraction Radiosurgery Delivered With Tomotherapy
ParticipantsSpinal Radiosurgery
Number of Participants With Palliative Response (Pain or Relief of Neurologic Symptoms) From Single Fraction Radiosurgery Delivered With Tomotherapy29
PrimaryAssess the Acute and Late Toxicity of Spinal Radiosurgery

CTCAE version 3. Acute toxicity will be recorded if toxicity occurs early phase or within 3 months, and late toxicity would be any toxicity that follows those 3 months.

Time frame:
2 years
Reported as:
Number · events
Assess the Acute and Late Toxicity of Spinal Radiosurgery
eventsSpinal Radiosurgery
Assess the Acute and Late Toxicity of Spinal Radiosurgery4
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Lack of Tumor Growth at Last Follow-up

Lack of tumor growth by CT or MRI at last follow-up

Time frame:
2 years
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Lack of Tumor Growth at Last Follow-up
ParticipantsSpinal Radiosurgery
Number of Participants With Lack of Tumor Growth at Last Follow-up21

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Spinal Radiosurgery—1/32 (3.1%)1/32 (3.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventSpinal Radiosurgery
Hospitalization for PneumoniaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/32
Worsening neurological symptoms from progressive spinal diseaseNervous system disorders1/32
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventSpinal Radiosurgery
Grade 2 myelopathyNervous system disorders1/32

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Spinal Radiosurgery
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years19
>=65 years13
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Spinal Radiosurgery
Female13
Male19
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Spinal Radiosurgery
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American4
White28
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham/The Kirklin Clinic at Acton Road
    Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Abbatucci JS, Delozier T, Quint R, Roussel A, Brune D. Radiation myelopathy of the cervical spinal cord: time, dose and volume factors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1978 Mar-Apr;4(3-4):239-48. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(78)90144-x. No abstract available. PubMed 640895 ↗
  • Ang KK, Jiang GL, Feng Y, Stephens LC, Tucker SL, Price RE. Extent and kinetics of recovery of occult spinal cord injury. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Jul 15;50(4):1013-20. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01599-1. PubMed 11429229 ↗
  • Bilsky MH, Yamada Y, Yenice KM, Lovelock M, Hunt M, Gutin PH, Leibel SA. Intensity-modulated stereotactic radiotherapy of paraspinal tumors: a preliminary report. Neurosurgery. 2004 Apr;54(4):823-30; discussion 830-1. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000114263.01917.1e. PubMed 15046647 ↗
  • Daut RL, Cleeland CS, Flanery RC. Development of the Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire to assess pain in cancer and other diseases. Pain. 1983 Oct;17(2):197-210. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90143-4. PubMed 6646795 ↗
  • Delattre JY, Rosenblum MK, Thaler HT, Mandell L, Shapiro WR, Posner JB. A model of radiation myelopathy in the rat. Pathology, regional capillary permeability changes and treatment with dexamethasone. Brain. 1988 Dec;111 ( Pt 6):1319-36. doi: 10.1093/brain/111.6.1319. PubMed 3208060 ↗
  • Gerszten PC, Ozhasoglu C, Burton SA, Vogel WJ, Atkins BA, Kalnicki S, Welch WC. CyberKnife frameless stereotactic radiosurgery for spinal lesions: clinical experience in 125 cases. Neurosurgery. 2004 Jul;55(1):89-98; discussion 98-9. PubMed 15214977 ↗
  • Glanzmann C, Aberle HG, Horst W. The risk of chronic progressive radiation myelopathy. Strahlentherapie. 1976 Oct;152(4):363-72. PubMed 982487 ↗
  • Nieder C: Recommendation of Human Spinal Cord Re-irradiation Dose Based on Data From 39 Patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57:373, 2003
  • Schultheiss TE, Stephens LC. Invited review: permanent radiation myelopathy. Br J Radiol. 1992 Sep;65(777):737-53. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-65-777-737. No abstract available. PubMed 1393407 ↗
  • Schultheiss TE, Stephens LC, Jiang GL, Ang KK, Peters LJ. Radiation myelopathy in primates treated with conventional fractionation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1990 Oct;19(4):935-40. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(90)90015-c. PubMed 2211262 ↗
  • Schultheiss TE, Stephens LC, Maor MH. Analysis of the histopathology of radiation myelopathy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1988 Jan;14(1):27-32. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(88)90046-6. PubMed 3275603 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 5, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00573872
Lead sponsor
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Collaborators
Health Services Foundation, The Kirklin Clinic at Acton Road
Responsible party
John Fiveash, MD (Professor and Vice Chair, University of Alabama at Birmingham Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 14, 2007
Start date
Apr 2005
Primary completion
Sep 2016
Completion
Sep 2016
Results posted
Oct 20, 2017
Last update
Dec 5, 2017

Study contacts

John B. Fiveash, M.D.
principal investigator · University of Alabama at Birmingham

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion