CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00564850DECAPUBUpdated Oct 12, 2022Results posted

Efficacy and Safety Study of Pamoate of Triptorelin in Children With Precocious Puberty

A Phase 3 interventional study of Triptorelin pamoate 11.25mg (Decapeptyl® SR) in Precocious Puberty, sponsored by Ipsen. Completed at 18 sites in France. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-12.

Sponsored by Ipsen · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
37
Allocation
Not applicable
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy of triptorelin 11.25 mg pamoate in the delay of premature onset of puberty in girls less than 9 years and boys less than 10 years. This is measured by assessing the proportion of children who have a suppressed Luteinizing Hormone (LH) response to Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone (GnRH) test performed 3 months after injection with triptorelin 11.25 mg.

02

Conditions studied

  • Precocious Puberty

Browse trials for

03

In context

Puberty, Precocious

75 studies on the registry are indexed under Puberty, Precocious; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 37 is below the median of 64 across 47 interventional studies indexed under Puberty, Precocious.

Browse Puberty, Precocious studies →

Lead sponsor

Ipsen is the lead sponsor of 282 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.

Of its 24 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 19 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria in the screening phase:

  • Onset of sex characteristics (Tanner method) breast development in girls or testicular enlargement in boys before the age of 8 years in girls and 9 years in boys.
  • Weight ≥ 20 kg.

Inclusion Criteria in the treatment phase:

  • Proven central precocious puberty defined as onset of sex characteristics development (according to Tanner method) diagnosed before the age of 8 years in girls and 9 years in boys.
  • Age at evaluation less than 9 years for girls and 10 years for boys.
  • A pubertal response of LH to GnRH test in both sexes (stimulated LH ≥ 5 IU/l).
  • Difference Bone age (BA) (according to Greulich et Pyle method) - Chronological age (CA) > 1 year.
  • Testosterone level ≥ 0.5 ng/ml in boys.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with a peripheral precocious puberty: extrapituitary secretion of gonadotropins or gonadotropin-independent gonadal or adrenal sex steroids secretion.
  • Patient with a cerebral tumour requiring a neurosurgery or cerebral irradiation.
  • Patient with a Body Weight ≥ 125% of the ideal weight for the height and age (growth curves).
  • The patient has received a previous treatment with a GnRH analogue, or medroxyprogesterone or cyproterone acetate.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
37 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Triptorelin pamoate 11.25mg (Decapeptyl® SR)

    Drug: Triptorelin pamoate 11.25mg (Decapeptyl® SR)

Interventions

  • DrugTriptorelin pamoate 11.25mg (Decapeptyl® SR)

    One intra muscular injection at day 1 and month 3.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With a GnRH-stimulated LH Level ≤3 IU/L

    Time frame: 3 months after the first injection of triptorelin pamoate 11.25 mg

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Whose Intravenous (i.v.) GnRH-stimulated LH Response Was ≤3 IU/L

    Time frame: Month 6

  2. Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Level Following GnRH Test

    Time frame: Screening, month 3 and 6

  3. Basal FSH Level

    Time frame: Month 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

  4. Basal LH Level

    Time frame: Month 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

  5. Number of Girls With Oestradiol Levels ≤ 20 pg/ml

    Time frame: Month 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

  6. Testosterone Level

    Time frame: Month 0, 3 and 6

  7. Number of Girls With Inhibin B Levels < 6 pg/ml

    Time frame: Month 0, 3 and 6

  8. Change From Screening in Pubertal Stage (Tanner Method) at Month 6

    Pubertal stage (graded from 1 to 5 for penis and breast development, graded from 1 to 6 for pubic hair development) according to the Tanner method was collected. A low stage (i.e. 1) corresponds to a pre-pubertal stage and a high stage (i.e. 5 or 6) to an adult stage. Any increase of grade was defined as 'increased' and no change in grade or a reduced grade was defined as 'stabilised or reduced'.

    Time frame: Between screening and month 6

  9. Height Standard Deviation Score (SDS)

    Standard deviation (SD) is a standard term used in growth studies and represents Standard Deviations calculated as the patient value minus the mean divided by the standard deviation. Standard Deviation Scores vary depending on the age and sex of the child.

    Time frame: Month 0, 3 and 6

  10. Body Mass Index (BMI) SDS

    Time frame: Month 0, 3 and 6

  11. Change From Baseline in Growth Velocity (GV) SDS at Month 6

    Change from baseline of GV was calculated as: GV at month 6 - GV at baseline. GV SDS was calculated using SAS algorithm. Growth velocity during the study was calculated using the two height measures as: GV = (Height at baseline - Height at screening)\*365/delay between two height measures.

    Time frame: Baseline and month 6

  12. Difference Between Bone Age and Chronological Age

    Bone age was defined according to Greulich and Pyle method. Chronological age was calculated using the date of birth.

    Time frame: Month 0 and 6

  13. Uterine Length

    Time frame: Month 0, 3 and 6

  14. Triptorelin Plasma Levels

    Time frame: Month 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

07

Results

Posted Dec 1, 2011

Participant flow

62 participants were screened, of which 37 met the study's entry criteria and received at least one dose of investigational medicinal product. 25 participants failed screening. Participants were recruited from October 2007 at 18 Hospital clinics across France.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTriptorelin Pamoate 11.25 mg
Started37
Completed35
Not completed2
Withdrew: Protocol violation2

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With a GnRH-stimulated LH Level ≤3 IU/L
Time frame:
3 months after the first injection of triptorelin pamoate 11.25 mg
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With a GnRH-stimulated LH Level ≤3 IU/L
participantsTriptorelin Pamoate 11.25 mg
Yes [ITT (n=37)]31 (68.0 to 93.8)
No [ITT (n=37)]6
Yes [mITT (n=34)]31 (76.3 to 98.1)
No [mITT (n=34)]3
Yes [PP (n=32)]30 (79.2 to 99.2)
No [PP (n=32)]2
SecondaryNumber of Participants Whose Intravenous (i.v.) GnRH-stimulated LH Response Was ≤3 IU/L
Time frame:
Month 6
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Whose Intravenous (i.v.) GnRH-stimulated LH Response Was ≤3 IU/L
participantsTriptorelin Pamoate 11.25 mg
Yes (n=37)32 (71.2 to 95.5)
No (n=37)5
SecondaryFollicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Level Following GnRH Test
Time frame:
Screening, month 3 and 6
Reported as:
Mean · IU/L
Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Level Following GnRH Test
IU/LTriptorelin Pamoate 11.25 mg
Screening (n=37)11.84 ± 3.23
Month 3 (n=34)2.26 ± 2.5
Month 6 (n=35)2.34 ± 1.65
SecondaryBasal FSH Level
Time frame:
Month 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6
Reported as:
Mean · IU/L
Basal FSH Level
IU/LTriptorelin Pamoate 11.25 mg
Month 0 (screening, n=37)4.13 ± 2.65
Month 1 (n=35)0.67 ± 0.53
Month 2 (n=36)1.07 ± 0.82
Month 3 (n=35)1.11 ± 0.73
Month 4 (n=35)0.78 ± 0.39
Month 5 (n=34)1.41 ± 2.09
Month 6 (n=35)1.36 ± 1.24
SecondaryBasal LH Level
Time frame:
Month 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
Reported as:
Mean · IU/L
Basal LH Level
IU/LTriptorelin Pamoate 11.25 mg
Month 0 (screening, n=37)1.49 ± 1.78
Month 1 (n=35)0.42 ± 0.22
Month 2 (n=36)0.42 ± 0.31
Month 3 (n=35)0.43 ± 0.27
Month 4 (n=35)0.43 ± 0.23
Month 5 (n=34)0.48 ± 0.70
Month 6 (n=35)0.44 ± 0.42
SecondaryNumber of Girls With Oestradiol Levels ≤ 20 pg/ml
Time frame:
Month 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Girls With Oestradiol Levels ≤ 20 pg/ml
participantsTriptorelin Pamoate 11.25 mg
Yes - month 0 (n=36)22
No - month 0 (n=36)14
Yes - month 1 (n=34)34 (89.7 to 99.9)
No - month 1 (n=34)0
Yes - month 2 (n=35)34 (85.1 to 99.9)
No - month 2 (n=35)1
Yes - month 3 (n=34)33 (84.7 to 99.9)
No - month 3 (n=34)1
Yes - month 4 (n=34)34 (89.7 to 100)
No - month 4 (n=34)0
Yes - month 5 (n=33)33 (89.4 to 100)
No - month 5 (n=33)0
Yes - month 6 (n=34)33 (84.7 to 99.9)
No - month 6 (n=34)1
SecondaryTestosterone Level
Time frame:
Month 0, 3 and 6
Reported as:
Number · ng/ml
Testosterone Level
ng/mlTriptorelin Pamoate 11.25 mg
Month 0 (screening)2.0
Month 30.12
Month 60.16
SecondaryNumber of Girls With Inhibin B Levels < 6 pg/ml
Time frame:
Month 0, 3 and 6
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Girls With Inhibin B Levels < 6 pg/ml
participantsTriptorelin Pamoate 11.25 mg
Yes - month 0 (screening, n=36)18
No - month 0 (screening, n=36)18
Yes - month 3 (n=34)33 (84.7 to 99.9)
No - month 3 (n=34)1
Yes - month 6 (n=34)32 (80.3 to 99.3)
No - month 6 (n=34)2
SecondaryChange From Screening in Pubertal Stage (Tanner Method) at Month 6

Pubertal stage (graded from 1 to 5 for penis and breast development, graded from 1 to 6 for pubic hair development) according to the Tanner method was collected. A low stage (i.e. 1) corresponds to a pre-pubertal stage and a high stage (i.e. 5 or 6) to an adult stage. Any increase of grade was defined as 'increased' and no change in grade or a reduced grade was defined as 'stabilised or reduced'.

Time frame:
Between screening and month 6
Reported as:
Number · participants
Change From Screening in Pubertal Stage (Tanner Method) at Month 6
participantsTriptorelin Pamoate 11.25 mg
Pubic hair stage stabilised or reduced (n=35)30
Pubic hair stage increased (n=35)5
Breast stage stabilised or reduced (n=34)32
Breast stage increased (n=34)2
Penis stage stabilised or reduced (n=1)1
Penis stage increased (n=1)0
SecondaryHeight Standard Deviation Score (SDS)

Standard deviation (SD) is a standard term used in growth studies and represents Standard Deviations calculated as the patient value minus the mean divided by the standard deviation. Standard Deviation Scores vary depending on the age and sex of the child.

Time frame:
Month 0, 3 and 6
Reported as:
Mean · SD score
Height Standard Deviation Score (SDS)
SD scoreTriptorelin Pamoate 11.25 mg
Month 0 (baseline, n=37)1.25 ± 1.14
Month 3 (n=37)1.32 ± 1.16
Month 6 (n=35)1.32 ± 1.16
SecondaryBody Mass Index (BMI) SDS
Time frame:
Month 0, 3 and 6
Reported as:
Mean · SD score
Body Mass Index (BMI) SDS
SD scoreTriptorelin Pamoate 11.25 mg
Month 0 (baseline, n=36)0.58 ± 0.85
Month 3 (n=37)0.64 ± 0.89
Month 6 (n=35)0.60 ± 0.78
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Growth Velocity (GV) SDS at Month 6

Change from baseline of GV was calculated as: GV at month 6 - GV at baseline. GV SDS was calculated using SAS algorithm. Growth velocity during the study was calculated using the two height measures as: GV = (Height at baseline - Height at screening)\*365/delay between two height measures.

Time frame:
Baseline and month 6
Reported as:
Mean · SD score
Change From Baseline in Growth Velocity (GV) SDS at Month 6
SD scoreTriptorelin Pamoate 11.25 mg
Change From Baseline in Growth Velocity (GV) SDS at Month 6-1.95 ± 2.07
SecondaryDifference Between Bone Age and Chronological Age

Bone age was defined according to Greulich and Pyle method. Chronological age was calculated using the date of birth.

Time frame:
Month 0 and 6
Reported as:
Mean · years
Difference Between Bone Age and Chronological Age
yearsTriptorelin Pamoate 11.25 mg
Month 0 (screening, n=37)2.09 ± 0.91
Month 6 (n=33)2.02 ± 0.88
SecondaryUterine Length
Time frame:
Month 0, 3 and 6
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Uterine Length
mmTriptorelin Pamoate 11.25 mg
Month 0 (screening, n=35)37.6 ± 10.6
Month 3 (n=34)37.4 ± 8.2
Month 6 (n=34)36.8 ± 6.9
SecondaryTriptorelin Plasma Levels
Time frame:
Month 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Triptorelin Plasma Levels
ng/mLTriptorelin Pamoate 11.25 mg
Month 1 (n=35)0.187 ± 0.115
Month 2 (n=36)0.048 ± 0.023
Month 3 (n=35)0.034 ± 0.018
Month 4 (n=34)0.201 ± 0.120
Month 5 (n=33)0.045 ± 0.023
Month 6 (n=35)0.030 ± 0.017

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Triptorelin Pamoate 11.25 mg—1/37 (2.7%)7/37 (18.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventTriptorelin Pamoate 11.25 mg
Foot fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/37
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventTriptorelin Pamoate 11.25 mg
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders4/37
Injection site painGeneral disorders2/37
Hot flushVascular disorders2/37

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Triptorelin Pamoate 11.25 mg
<=18 years37
Between 18 and 65 years0
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Triptorelin Pamoate 11.25 mg
Mean8.2 ± 1.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Triptorelin Pamoate 11.25 mg
Female36
Male1
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Triptorelin Pamoate 11.25 mg
France37
Weight
Weight(Kg)Triptorelin Pamoate 11.25 mg
Mean32.76 ± 7.36
08

Study locations

18 sites
  • Hôpital Hotel-Dieu (CHU)
    Angers, 49033, France
  • Hôpital Saint-Jacques
    Besancon, 25030, France
  • Medical Centre
    Bordeaux, 33000, France
  • Hôpital du Bocage
    Dijon, 21034, France
  • Hôpital Flaubert
    Le Havre, 76083, France
  • Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre
    Lille, 59037, France
  • Hôpital Debrousse
    Lyon, 69322, France
  • Hôpital de la Timone Enfants
    Marseille, 13385, France
  • Hôpital Archet 2
    Nice, 06202, France
  • Hôpital Trousseau
    Paris, 75012, France
  • Hôpital St-Vincent de Paul
    Paris, 75014, France
  • Hôpital Necker - Enfants Malades
    Paris, 75015, France
  • Hôpital Robert Debré
    Paris, 75019, France
  • American Memorial Hospital
    Reims, 51092, France
  • Hôpital Charles Nicolle
    Rouen, 76031, France
  • Hôpital Hautepierre
    Strasbourg, 67100, France
  • Hôpital de la Gespe
    Tarbes, 65013, France
  • Hôpital des Enfants
    Toulouse, 31026, France
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized, and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of study participants. Any requests should be submitted to www.vivli.org for assessment by an independent scientific review board.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 12, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00564850
Lead sponsor
Ipsen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 28, 2007
Start date
Oct 2007
Primary completion
Oct 2010
Completion
Oct 2010
Results posted
Dec 1, 2011
Last update
Oct 12, 2022

Study contacts

Ipsen Medical Director
study director · Ipsen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion