CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00555750Updated Dec 10, 2013Results posted

Sleep Loss and Mechanisms of Impaired Glucose Metabolism

An interventional study of eszopiclone and placebo in Primary Insomnia, sponsored by Brigham and Women's Hospital. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 25 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-12-10.

Sponsored by Brigham and Women's Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
25 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to test the effects of sleep and eszopiclone, a drug that helps people sleep, on how the body processes glucose (sugar). Eszopiclone is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for sale for the treatment of insomnia. It is marketed in the United States as LUNESTA.

Main Hypothesis: Primary insomnia is associated with impairments of glucose metabolism that can be reversed by two months of eszopiclone for the primary insomnia

Read the detailed description

Insomnia is the most common sleep disorder, affecting nearly one-third of all adults in any given year, and chronically affecting 10-15% of the adult population. Reduced sleep time, independent of insomnia, has been associated with a variety of deleterious long term effects, including an increased risk of incident myocardial infarction and symptomatic diabetes. Chronic partial sleep loss or insomnia may impair glucose metabolism in the short term and are associated with the development of diabetes in the long term. Although the extent of sleep loss is more acute in the laboratory-based 'sleep debt' studies of healthy volunteers, chronic primary insomnia patients exhibit 'hyperarousal' (hypercortisolemia in the afternoon and evening, accelerated metabolism) similar to that seen with acute sleep deprivation. In addition, degradations of sleep quantity and quality in primary insomnia have been attributed to cognitive and somatic hyperarousal in the sleep setting. study examines and quantifies in adult men and women the link between primary insomnia and impaired glucose tolerance. This study examines the extent which adequate treatment of primary insomnia reverses impairments of glucose metabolism. If abnormalities of glucose metabolism are reversible, this study will demonstrate the importance of treatment of chronic primary insomnia.

02

Conditions studied

  • Primary Insomnia

Keywords

  • sleep
  • metabolism
  • insulin
  • glucose
  • actigraphy
  • diary
  • volumetry
  • GABA
03

In context

Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders

1,856 studies on the registry are indexed under Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; 594 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 73 across 1,631 interventional studies indexed under Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders.

Browse Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Brigham and Women's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,236 studies on the registry; 224 are open to participants now.

Of its 116 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 64 (55%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 25-55
  • Complaint of insomnia of at least 6 months duration
  • DSM-IV diagnosis of Primary Insomnia
  • Sleep diary: mean Total Sleep Time \< 6 hours and a mean total wake time (sleep latency + wake after sleep onset) of greater than 60 minutes (in previous 14 days as recorded on sleep diary)
  • A willingness to comply with study procedures
  • If of child-bearing potential, using a medically-accepted method of birth control, including abstinence, barrier method with spermicide, steroidal contraceptive (oral, transdermal, implanted, and injected) in conjunction with a barrier method, and intrauterine device [IUD])

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current diagnosis of DSM-IV Axis I disorder other than Primary Insomnia
  • Regular treatment (more than 1 time/week) with CNS active medication within 1 month of fist inpatient visit
  • Treatment with medications that interfere with glucose metabolism including anti-diabetic medications or steroidal contraceptives
  • Uncontrolled medical illness that would interfere with participation in the study
  • Body Mass Index >32 or \<19.8
  • Current symptoms or diagnosis of any moderate to severe sleep disorder other than insomnia
  • No menopausal or peri-menopausal symptoms that disrupt sleep
  • Pregnant, lactating or planning to become pregnant
  • Consumption of > 2 caffeinated beverages per day (including coffee, tea and/or other caffeine-containing beverages or food) during 3 weeks prior to the start of the study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    eszopiclone (3mg)

    active medication (eszopiclone 3mg tablet) by mouth nightly 30 min before bed

    Drug: eszopiclone

  • Placebo comparator
    placebo

    identical placebo tablet by mouth nightly 30 min before bed

    Drug: placebo

Interventions

  • Drugeszopiclone

    3mg tablet, by mouth nightly 30 min before bed, for two months

    Also known as: Lunesta

  • Drugplacebo

    inactive placebo tablet, by mouth nightly 30 minutes before bed, for two months

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Glucose Tolerance (Kg) in Response to Insulin-modified Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test

    Difference in glucose tolerance (Kg) in response to insulin-modified intravenous glucose tolerance test. Glucose tolerance was calculated as the slope of the natural log of declining glucose values from minute 5 to minute 19 post-infusion. By convention, this negative slope is multiplied by -1, in other words, expressed as a rate of disposal.

    Time frame: baseline and 2 months post-treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Acute Insulin Response to Glucose (AIRg)

    Change over two months in 1st phase Insulin secretion

    Time frame: baseline and 2 months post-treatment

  2. Change in Insulin Sensitivity (SI)

    Insulin sensitivity index (SI) "was defined in quantitative terms as the effect of insulin to catalyse the disappearance of glucose from plasma." \[R. Bergman, Horm Res 2005;64(suppl 3):8-15\]. SI calculated using Bergman's Minimal model analyses (Minmod Millennium 2000; R. Bergman, University of South- ern California, Los Angeles, CA)

    Time frame: baseline and 2 months post-treatment

  3. Change in Glucose Effectiveness (SG)

    Glucose effectiveness was defined as "the ability of glucose itself to enhance its own disappearance independent of an increment in insulin." \[R. Bergman, Horm Res 2005;64(suppl 3):8-15\]. SG calculated using Bergman's Minimal model analyses (Minmod Millennium 2000; R. Bergman, University of South- ern California, Los Angeles, CA)

    Time frame: baseline and 2 months post-treatment

  4. Change in HbA1c Levels

    Difference in HbA1c levels following two months treatment with eszopiclone versus placebo

    Time frame: baseline and 2 months post-treatment

  5. Pre-Treatment Leptin Levels

    Leptin Levels prior to two months treatment with eszopiclone or placebo, measure after an overnight fast

    Time frame: baseline

  6. Post-treatment Leptin Levels

    Leptin levels following two months treatment with 3mg eszopiclone or placebo, measured after an overnight fast

    Time frame: two months post-treatment

  7. Pre-treatment Ghrelin Levels

    Ghrelin levels prior to two months treatment with 3mg eszopiclone or placebo, measured after an overnight fast

    Time frame: baseline

  8. Post-treatment Ghrelin Levels

    Ghrelin levels following two months treatment with 3mg eszopiclone or placebo, measured after an overnight fast

    Time frame: 2 months post-treatment

  9. Change in Subjective Sleepiness as Measured on the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS)

    At visits before and after two months treatment with 3mg eszopiclone or placebo, subjects completed a short test battery including the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) every three hours during wake periods. KSS is a single-item scale of sleepiness on a scale from 1 ("very alert") to 9 ("very sleepy, fighting sleep, an effort to keep awake"). Subjective sleepiness was defined as mean deviation from baseline KSS.

    Time frame: baseline and 2 months post-treatment

  10. Change in Mean Lapses of Attention

    At visits before and after two months treatment with 3mg eszopiclone or placebo, subjects completed a short test battery every three hours during wake periods. The battery included the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT). The PVT involved a 10-minute visual reaction time (RT) performance test in which the subject was instructed to maintain the fastest possible RT to a simple visual stimulus. Lapses of attention refer to the number of times the subject failed to respond to the signal within 500ms. Mean lapses per test across 6 tests given a 4 hour intervals during normal waking hours (and not during the IVGTT) during the 30-hr were compared for the post-treatment visit as the absolute deviation from the baseline mean lapses/test.

    Time frame: baseline and 2 months post-treatment

  11. Change in Total Sleep Time as Reported in Sleep Diaries

    Total sleep time reported on sleep diaries prior to treatment with 3mg eszopiclone or placebo. Change defined as baseline minus post-treatment).

    Time frame: baseline and 2 months post-treatment

  12. Change in Total Sleep Time Measured by PSG

    Change (baseline minus post-treatment) in total sleep time measured by polysomnography after two months treatment with 3mg eszopiclone or placebo

    Time frame: baseline and 2 months post-treatment

07

Results

Posted Sep 25, 2013

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneEszopiclonePlacebo
Started1010
Completed1010
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Glucose Tolerance (Kg) in Response to Insulin-modified Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test

Difference in glucose tolerance (Kg) in response to insulin-modified intravenous glucose tolerance test. Glucose tolerance was calculated as the slope of the natural log of declining glucose values from minute 5 to minute 19 post-infusion. By convention, this negative slope is multiplied by -1, in other words, expressed as a rate of disposal.

Time frame:
baseline and 2 months post-treatment
Reported as:
Mean · %/min, slope of natural log glucose
Change in Glucose Tolerance (Kg) in Response to Insulin-modified Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test
%/min, slope of natural log glucoseActivePlacebo
Change in Glucose Tolerance (Kg) in Response to Insulin-modified Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test.33 ± .94-0.10 ± .42
SecondaryAcute Insulin Response to Glucose (AIRg)

Change over two months in 1st phase Insulin secretion

Time frame:
baseline and 2 months post-treatment
Reported as:
Mean · mU*l^-1*min
Acute Insulin Response to Glucose (AIRg)
mU*l^-1*minActivePlacebo
Acute Insulin Response to Glucose (AIRg)94.0 ± 269.025.1 ± 74.7
SecondaryChange in Insulin Sensitivity (SI)

Insulin sensitivity index (SI) "was defined in quantitative terms as the effect of insulin to catalyse the disappearance of glucose from plasma." \[R. Bergman, Horm Res 2005;64(suppl 3):8-15\]. SI calculated using Bergman's Minimal model analyses (Minmod Millennium 2000; R. Bergman, University of South- ern California, Los Angeles, CA)

Time frame:
baseline and 2 months post-treatment
Reported as:
Mean · mU/l)^-1*min^-1
Change in Insulin Sensitivity (SI)
mU/l)^-1*min^-1ActivePlacebo
Change in Insulin Sensitivity (SI)-1.19 ± 2.570.05 ± 3.43
SecondaryChange in Glucose Effectiveness (SG)

Glucose effectiveness was defined as "the ability of glucose itself to enhance its own disappearance independent of an increment in insulin." \[R. Bergman, Horm Res 2005;64(suppl 3):8-15\]. SG calculated using Bergman's Minimal model analyses (Minmod Millennium 2000; R. Bergman, University of South- ern California, Los Angeles, CA)

Time frame:
baseline and 2 months post-treatment
Reported as:
Mean · min^-1
Change in Glucose Effectiveness (SG)
min^-1ActivePlacebo
Change in Glucose Effectiveness (SG)0.001 ± 0.0040.001 ± 0.009
SecondaryChange in HbA1c Levels

Difference in HbA1c levels following two months treatment with eszopiclone versus placebo

Time frame:
baseline and 2 months post-treatment
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of glycosylation
Change in HbA1c Levels
percentage of glycosylationActivePlacebo
Change in HbA1c Levels.03 ± .11-.09 ± .06
SecondaryPre-Treatment Leptin Levels

Leptin Levels prior to two months treatment with eszopiclone or placebo, measure after an overnight fast

Time frame:
baseline
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Pre-Treatment Leptin Levels
ng/mLActivePlacebo
Pre-Treatment Leptin Levels4.99 ± 3.6316.53 ± 11.37
SecondaryPost-treatment Leptin Levels

Leptin levels following two months treatment with 3mg eszopiclone or placebo, measured after an overnight fast

Time frame:
two months post-treatment
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Post-treatment Leptin Levels
ng/mLActivePlacebo
Post-treatment Leptin Levels5.49 ± 4.3315.28 ± 9.94
SecondaryPre-treatment Ghrelin Levels

Ghrelin levels prior to two months treatment with 3mg eszopiclone or placebo, measured after an overnight fast

Time frame:
baseline
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Pre-treatment Ghrelin Levels
ng/mLActivePlacebo
Pre-treatment Ghrelin Levels573.14 ± 336.50648.41 ± 230.95
SecondaryPost-treatment Ghrelin Levels

Ghrelin levels following two months treatment with 3mg eszopiclone or placebo, measured after an overnight fast

Time frame:
2 months post-treatment
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Post-treatment Ghrelin Levels
ng/mLActivePlacebo
Post-treatment Ghrelin Levels544.95 ± 273.65670.94 ± 180.36
SecondaryChange in Subjective Sleepiness as Measured on the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS)

At visits before and after two months treatment with 3mg eszopiclone or placebo, subjects completed a short test battery including the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) every three hours during wake periods. KSS is a single-item scale of sleepiness on a scale from 1 ("very alert") to 9 ("very sleepy, fighting sleep, an effort to keep awake"). Subjective sleepiness was defined as mean deviation from baseline KSS.

Time frame:
baseline and 2 months post-treatment
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Subjective Sleepiness as Measured on the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS)
units on a scaleActivePlacebo
Change in Subjective Sleepiness as Measured on the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS)0.53 ± 0.420.38 ± 0.38
SecondaryChange in Mean Lapses of Attention

At visits before and after two months treatment with 3mg eszopiclone or placebo, subjects completed a short test battery every three hours during wake periods. The battery included the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT). The PVT involved a 10-minute visual reaction time (RT) performance test in which the subject was instructed to maintain the fastest possible RT to a simple visual stimulus. Lapses of attention refer to the number of times the subject failed to respond to the signal within 500ms. Mean lapses per test across 6 tests given a 4 hour intervals during normal waking hours (and not during the IVGTT) during the 30-hr were compared for the post-treatment visit as the absolute deviation from the baseline mean lapses/test.

Time frame:
baseline and 2 months post-treatment
Reported as:
Mean · lapses of attention
Change in Mean Lapses of Attention
lapses of attentionActivePlacebo
Change in Mean Lapses of Attention-0.04 ± 0.490.07 ± 0.29
SecondaryChange in Total Sleep Time as Reported in Sleep Diaries

Total sleep time reported on sleep diaries prior to treatment with 3mg eszopiclone or placebo. Change defined as baseline minus post-treatment).

Time frame:
baseline and 2 months post-treatment
Reported as:
Mean · hours
Change in Total Sleep Time as Reported in Sleep Diaries
hoursActivePlacebo
Change in Total Sleep Time as Reported in Sleep Diaries.58 ± .36.09 ± .01
SecondaryChange in Total Sleep Time Measured by PSG

Change (baseline minus post-treatment) in total sleep time measured by polysomnography after two months treatment with 3mg eszopiclone or placebo

Time frame:
baseline and 2 months post-treatment
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Change in Total Sleep Time Measured by PSG
minutesActivePlacebo
Change in Total Sleep Time Measured by PSG2.9 ± 25.5-6.4 ± 30.2

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Active—0/10 (0%)10/10 (100%)
Placebo—0/10 (0%)10/10 (100%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 28
Most frequent other events
EventActivePlacebo
Feeling HotGeneral disorders4/106/10
HeadacheGeneral disorders2/105/10
Unpleasant TasteGeneral disorders4/102/10
DizzinessCardiac disorders3/102/10
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/103/10
ParaesthesiaNervous system disorders1/103/10
Puncture Site PainGeneral disorders2/103/10
Venipuncture site bruisingInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/103/10
Abdominal DiscomfortGastrointestinal disorders1/102/10
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/102/10

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)ActivePlaceboTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years101020
>=65 years000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ActivePlaceboTotal
Female279
Male8311
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)ActivePlaceboTotal
United States101020
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital, Division of Sleep Medicine
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Ayas NT, White DP, Al-Delaimy WK, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Speizer FE, Patel S, Hu FB. A prospective study of self-reported sleep duration and incident diabetes in women. Diabetes Care. 2003 Feb;26(2):380-4. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.2.380. PubMed 12547866 ↗
  • Ayas NT, White DP, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Speizer FE, Malhotra A, Hu FB. A prospective study of sleep duration and coronary heart disease in women. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Jan 27;163(2):205-9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.2.205. PubMed 12546611 ↗
  • Beck-Nielsen H, Henriksen JE, Alford F, Hother-Nielson O. In vivo glucose metabolism, insulin secretion and, insulin action in Europids with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and their first-degree relatives. Diabet Med. 1996 Sep;13(9 Suppl 6):S78-84. PubMed 8894487 ↗
  • Belenky G, Wesensten NJ, Thorne DR, Thomas ML, Sing HC, Redmond DP, Russo MB, Balkin TJ. Patterns of performance degradation and restoration during sleep restriction and subsequent recovery: a sleep dose-response study. J Sleep Res. 2003 Mar;12(1):1-12. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2869.2003.00337.x. PubMed 12603781 ↗
  • Boyne MS, Saudek CD. Effect of insulin therapy on macrovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1999 Apr;22 Suppl 3:C45-53. PubMed 10189562 ↗
  • Buxton OM, Spiegel K and Van Cauter E. Modulation of endocrine function and metabolism by sleep and sleep loss. In: Sleep Medicine, edited by Lee-Chiong M, Carskadon M and Sateia M. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus, Inc., 2002, p. 59-69.
  • Buysse DJ, Jarrett DB, Miewald JM, Kupfer DJ, Greenhouse JB. Minute-by-minute analysis of REM sleep timing in major depression. Biol Psychiatry. 1990 Nov 15;28(10):911-25. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(90)90571-i. PubMed 2268693 ↗
  • Czeisler CA, Winkelman JW and Richardson GS. Disorders of sleep and circadian rhythms. In: Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, edited by Braunwald E, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Longo DL and Jameson JL. New York: McGraw-Hill,Inc., 2000, p. 1-78.
  • Dijk DJ, Duffy JF, Czeisler CA. Circadian and sleep/wake dependent aspects of subjective alertness and cognitive performance. J Sleep Res. 1992 Jun;1(2):112-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.1992.tb00021.x. PubMed 10607036 ↗
  • Dinges DF, Kribbs NB, Bates BL and Carlin MM. A very brief probed-recall memory task: Sensitivity to sleep loss. Sleep Res 22: 330, 1993.
  • Dinges DF and Powell JW. Microcomputer analyses of performance on a portable, simple visual RT task during sustained operations. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 17: 652-655, 1985.
  • Gillberg M, Kecklund G, Akerstedt T. Relations between performance and subjective ratings of sleepiness during a night awake. Sleep. 1994 Apr;17(3):236-41. doi: 10.1093/sleep/17.3.236. PubMed 7939123 ↗
  • Gottlieb DJ, Punjabi NM, Newman AB, Resnick HE, Redline S, Baldwin CM, Nieto FJ. Association of sleep time with diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance. Arch Intern Med. 2005 Apr 25;165(8):863-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.8.863. PubMed 15851636 ↗
  • Hoddes E, Dement WC and Zarcone V. The development and use of the Stanford Sleepiness Scale (SSS). Psychophysiol 9: 150, 1971.
  • King H, Aubert RE, Herman WH. Global burden of diabetes, 1995-2025: prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections. Diabetes Care. 1998 Sep;21(9):1414-31. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.9.1414. PubMed 9727886 ↗
  • King H, Zimmet P. Trends in the prevalence and incidence of diabetes: non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. World Health Stat Q. 1988;41(3-4):190-6. PubMed 2466380 ↗
  • Lakka HM, Laaksonen DE, Lakka TA, Niskanen LK, Kumpusalo E, Tuomilehto J, Salonen JT. The metabolic syndrome and total and cardiovascular disease mortality in middle-aged men. JAMA. 2002 Dec 4;288(21):2709-16. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.21.2709. PubMed 12460094 ↗
  • Nilsson PM, Roost M, Engstrom G, Hedblad B, Berglund G. Incidence of diabetes in middle-aged men is related to sleep disturbances. Diabetes Care. 2004 Oct;27(10):2464-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.10.2464. PubMed 15451917 ↗
  • Simon GE, VonKorff M. Prevalence, burden, and treatment of insomnia in primary care. Am J Psychiatry. 1997 Oct;154(10):1417-23. doi: 10.1176/ajp.154.10.1417. PubMed 9326825 ↗
  • Spiegel K, Leproult R, Van Cauter E. Impact of sleep debt on metabolic and endocrine function. Lancet. 1999 Oct 23;354(9188):1435-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01376-8. PubMed 10543671 ↗
  • Spiegel K, Tasali E, Penev P, Van Cauter E. Brief communication: Sleep curtailment in healthy young men is associated with decreased leptin levels, elevated ghrelin levels, and increased hunger and appetite. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Dec 7;141(11):846-50. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-11-200412070-00008. PubMed 15583226 ↗
  • Van Dongen HP, Maislin G, Mullington JM, Dinges DF. The cumulative cost of additional wakefulness: dose-response effects on neurobehavioral functions and sleep physiology from chronic sleep restriction and total sleep deprivation. Sleep. 2003 Mar 15;26(2):117-26. doi: 10.1093/sleep/26.2.117. Erratum In: Sleep. 2004 Jun 15;27(4):600. PubMed 12683469 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 10, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00555750
Lead sponsor
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Collaborators
Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc., Mclean Hospital, National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)
Responsible party
John W. Winkelman, MD, PhD (Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 9, 2007
Start date
Mar 2006
Primary completion
Jul 2008
Completion
Aug 2008
Results posted
Sep 25, 2013
Last update
Dec 10, 2013

Study contacts

John W Winkelman, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Brigham and Women's Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion