CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00551135Updated Jan 25, 2021Results posted

Surgical Pain After Inguinal Hernia Repair (SPAIHR)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Pregabalin and placebo in Pain, Postoperative and Hernia, Inguinal, sponsored by Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.. Completed at 42 sites in 6 countries. Open to male participants aged 17 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-01-25.

Sponsored by Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
425
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
17 Years to 75 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to test whether pregabalin added to the standard of care with dosing starting preoperatively and continuing for 1 week post surgery will decrease the intensity of acute post-operative pain following inguinal hernia repair.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain, Postoperative
  • Hernia, Inguinal

Keywords

  • postoperative pain chronic pain
03

In context

Hernia

1,096 studies on the registry are indexed under Hernia; 132 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 425 is above the median of 80 across 739 interventional studies indexed under Hernia.

Browse Hernia studies →

Lead sponsor

Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc. is the lead sponsor of 431 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (89%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
17 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • The subject will have elective ( the subject chooses, but does not have to undergo surgery for an emergency) open unilateral inguinal herniorraphy (hernia repair), using mesh Lichtenstein surgery procedure and under general anesthesia and fentanyl or sufentanil/propofol initiation and sevoflurane or isoflurane maintenance plus local anesthetic infiltration at the conclusion of surgery. Study surgery should be anticipated to be in the morning.
  • Expected to be able to use and tolerate non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (such as naproxen), tramadol, oxycodone, and acetaminophen/paracetamol for pain control after surgery.
  • The subject will be available for a visit within 72 hours of the day of surgery if not admitted the night before for baseline assessments before taking any study medication, and then to receive study medication prior to the day before surgery.
  • The subject is expected and agrees to remain at the hospital (or intermediate care facility) for a minimum of 3 hours following surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with non elective or emergency surgery (must have the surgery no matter what), or hernia with incarceration (the trapping of abdominal contents within the hernia itself).
  • Subjects with hernia repair that is not a primary repair. The planned use of nerve block or spinal/epidural/paravertebral anesthesia or surgery is not planned with general anesthesia.
  • Subjects that are not allowed to receive the anesthesia agents indicated per protocol and general anesthesia.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
425 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    3

    Drug: Pregabalin

  • Placebo comparator
    4

    Drug: placebo

  • Experimental
    2

    Drug: Pregabalin

  • Experimental
    1

    Drug: Pregabalin

Interventions

  • DrugPregabalin

    150 mg BID

  • Drugplacebo

    Placebo

  • DrugPregabalin

    75 mg BID

  • DrugPregabalin

    25 mg BID

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf): Worst Pain 24 Hours Post Surgery

    m-BPI-sf: a self-administered 11-point Likert rating scale to rate pain in the past 24 hours. A single item pertains to worst pain in the past 24 hours: range of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

    Time frame: 24 hours post surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS): Current Pain With Movement - Sitting

    NRS: a self-administered questionnaire to rate pain. A single item asks to rate pain with movement caused by sitting (sitting in a standardized fashion after being in a fully supine position); range: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).

    Time frame: Baseline; 2 hours (h) before surgery (BS); 1, 2, and 3 h post surgery (PS); Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 PS; and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 7 PS or Early Termination])

  2. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS): Current Pain With Movement - Walking

    NRS: a self-administered questionnaire to rate pain. A single item asks to rate pain with movement caused by walking (rising from sitting position and walking approximately 5 meters or 16 feet at a moderate pace); range: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).

    Time frame: Baseline; 2 hours (h) before surgery (BS); 1, 2, and 3 h post surgery (PS); Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 PS; and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 7 PS or Early Termination])

  3. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS): Current Pain With Movement - Coughing

    NRS: a self-administered questionnaire to rate pain. A single item asks to rate pain with movement caused by coughing (coughing two times while sitting); range: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)

    Time frame: Baseline; 2 hours (h) before surgery (BS); 1, 2, and 3 h post surgery (PS); Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 PS; and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 7 PS or Early Termination])

  4. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS): Current Pain With Movement - Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Sitting, Walking, and Coughing

    NRS: a self-administered questionnaire to rate pain. AUC from 1 h PS through 48 h PS for ratings of pain caused by movements of sitting, walking, and coughing; Range: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).

    Time frame: 1 hour through 48 hours post surgery

  5. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS): Current Pain at Rest

    NRS: a self-administered questionnaire to rate pain. A single item asks participant to rate current pain at rest (preceding pain with movement); range: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).

    Time frame: 2 hours (h) before surgery (BS); 1, 2, and 3 h post surgery (PS); Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 PS

  6. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS): Current Pain at Rest - Area Under the Curve (AUC)

    NRS: a self-administered questionnaire to rate pain. AUC for a single item asking participant to rate current pain at rest (preceding pain with movement); range: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).

    Time frame: 1 through 48 hours post surgery (PS)

  7. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS): Average Pain

    NRS: a self-administered questionnaire to rate pain. A single item asks participant to rate pain on average in the last 24 hours; range: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).

    Time frame: 2 hours (h) before surgery (BS); 1, 2, and 3 h post surgery (PS); Days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 PS

  8. Time From End of Surgery to First Rescue Medication

    Rescue medication includes both naproxen and narcotic medication (including tramadol and opioid analgesics). For subjects without use of rescue medication, the time-to-event variable is censored at the Beginning of Taper Visit (Day 7 PS) or at time of withdrawal.

    Time frame: Day 1 through Day 7 post surgery

  9. Time From End of Surgery to Reach a Total Score of at Least 9 on the Post-Anesthetic Discharge Scoring System (PADS)

    PADS is a 5-item scale (individual item range: 0-2; higher scores indicating better readiness for hospital discharge). Total score range: 0-10, with 9 or higher indicating eligibility for discharge. End of surgery is time of transfer to post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Subjects who did not reach a score of 9 on PADS were censored at the date and time of discharge.

    Time frame: Day 1

  10. Time From End of Surgery to Discharge From Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)

    Time frame: Day 1

  11. Daily Sleep Interference Rating Scale (DSIRS) Score

    DSIRS: self-administered 11-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (pain does not interfere with sleep) to 10 (pain completely interferes with sleep \[unable to sleep due to pain\]) during past 24-hour period. Higher score indicates a greater level of sleep disturbance. Performed daily on awakening, prior to taking study medication.

    Time frame: Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 post surgery (PS)

  12. Total Cumulative Dose of Opioids and Tramadol Used During and After Surgery

    Total cumulative dose of opioids and tramadol administered by any route during surgery and postoperatively. Dose of tramadol calculated as milligrams (mg) of oral morphine equivalent.

    Time frame: 24, 48, and 72 hours (h) post surgery (PS), and Days 4, 5, 6, and 7 PS

  13. Amount of Non-opioid Rescue Medication (Naproxen and Antiemetic Medications) Used During the Study

    Total cumulative dose of naproxen calculated in milligrams (mg) from the end of surgery up to and including Day 7 after surgery.

    Time frame: End of Surgery through Day 7 post surgery

  14. Total Clinically Meaningful Event (CME) Score and Cumulative Total Distinct CME Score Using the Opioid-Related Symptom Distress Scale (OR-SDS)

    OR-SDS: a self-administered assessment of 10 common opioid-related side effects (symptoms). A CME is a severe or very severe symptom (or moderate or greater severity symptom of confusion). The Total Distinct CME score is the sum of CMEs across symptoms (range: 0 \[none\] to 10 \[10 CMEs\]); the Cumulative Total Distinct (CT Distinct) CME score is the sum of Total Distinct CME scores at observation and prior observations. The Total CME score is the same as the Total Distinct CME score except that only 1 CME is counted if both nausea and vomiting (or retching) occur (range: 0 \[none\] to 9 \[9 CMEs\]).

    Time frame: 3, 24, and 72 hours (h) Post-Surgery (PS), and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 7 PS or Early Termination])

  15. Participants With Clinically Meaningful Events (CMEs) for Individual Symptoms Using the Opioid-Related Symptom Distress Scale (OR-SDS)

    OR-SDS: a self-administered assessment of 10 common opioid-related side effects (symptoms). A CME is a severe or very severe symptom (or moderate or greater severity symptom of confusion). For individual symptom categories, the number of subjects who experienced at least one CME. Concentrate (concentr).

    Time frame: 3, 24, and 72 hours (h) post surgery (PS), and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 7 PS or Early Termination])

  16. Subject Global Evaluation of Study Medication (GESM)

    GESM is a self-administered overall impression (global evaluation) of study medication received for pain; 4 categories: poor, fair, good, and excellent.

    Time frame: 24 hours (h) post surgery (PS) and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 7 PS or Early Termination])

  17. Participants With Wound Healing Complications

    Investigator-assigned mutually exclusive categories of: 1) no surgical wound complication, 2) superficial incisional surgical site infection, 3) deep incisional surgical site infection, 4) organ or space surgical site infection, or 5) non-infectious wound healing complication.

    Time frame: Day 7 post surgery (PS) and up to 30 days PS

  18. Participants With Physician Contacts Post-discharge

    Number of participants who answered "yes" to the Post-Surgery Contact question: "From the time you were discharged from the hospital, did you have to contact any type of physician because of pain, difficulty getting up and walking about, or difficulty with passing urine?"

    Time frame: 24 and 72 hours (h) post surgery (PS)

  19. Baseline and Change From Baseline in Anxiety Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score

    Anxiety VAS is a single-item self-administered continuous measure of anxiety using a 100-millimeter (mm) line on which the subject is asked to place a mark indicating the intensity of current anxiety. The score is the distance in mm from the left-most point on the line to the subject's mark; range: 0 (Not at all anxious) at the left-most point to 100 (Extremely anxious) at the right-most point. Performed prior to blood draws.

    Time frame: Baseline; 2 hours (h) before surgery (BS); 1, 2, and 3 h PS; Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 PS

  20. Baseline and Change From Baseline in EuroQol (EQ-5D) Health State Profile Score

    EQ-5D is a self-administered questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in 5 domains (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression). Scores from the 5 domains are used to calculate a single index value: the Health State Profile Score; range: 0.0 (death) to 1.0 (perfect health), higher scores indicating better health state.

    Time frame: Baseline and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 7 post surgery or Early Termination])

  21. Change From Baseline in Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) Total Score and Subscales

    The PCS is a self-administered questionnaire with 13 items, each scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time) for extent to which participant catastrophizes postoperative pain. Total score is sum of scores for all questions (range: 0 to 52); Subscale scores: Rumination (sum of scores for 4 items; range: 0 to 16); Magnification (sum of scores for 3 items; range: 0 to 12); and Helplessness (sum of scores for 6 items; range: 0 to 24); higher scores mean a greater extent of pain catastrophizing.

    Time frame: 3 hours (h) post surgery (PS) and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 7 PS or Early Termination])

  22. Relationship Between Baseline and Postoperative Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) Score and Severity of Acute Pain and to Response to Therapy

    The PCS is a self-administered questionnaire with 13 items, each scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time) for extent to which participant catastrophizes postoperative pain. Total score is sum of scores for all items (range: 0 to 52); higher scores mean a greater extent of pain catastrophizing.

    Time frame: Baseline and Days 1 and 7 post surgery (PS)

  23. Baseline and Change From Baseline in Short Form Acute Health Survey 12-Item Version (SF-12v2) Physical Component Summary Score (PCSS) and Mental Component Summary Score (MCSS)

    PCSS and MCSS are component summary scores from the self-administered SF-12v2 acute health quality of life, norm-based survey. PCSS range: 4.95 to 76.13; MCSS range: -0.79 to 79.69; lowest scores mean very much below and highest scores mean very much above the general population average.

    Time frame: Baseline and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 7 post surgery or Early Termination])

  24. Participants With Chronic Postoperative Pain

    Number of participants who reported surgery-related pain at assessment (by answering 'yes' to a single question: "In the last 24 hours, have you had pain in the area affected by your surgery?")

    Time frame: 1, 3, and 6 months (mo) post surgery (PS)

  25. Chronic Postoperative Pain: Pain Severity Index Score and Pain Interference Index Score on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)

    m-BPI-sf: a self-administered 11-point Likert rating scale to rate pain in the past 24 hours. Pain interference index score is mean of 7 individual item scores for interference of pain with functional activities (general activity, mood, walking ability, relations with other people, sleep, normal work, and enjoyment of life); range: 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes with functional activities). Pain severity index score is mean of 4 individual item scores for pain severity (pain right now, and worst, least, and average pain); range: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

    Time frame: 1, 3, and 6 months (mo) post surgery (PS)

  26. Chronic Postoperative Pain: Total Score and Subscale Scores Using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI)

    NPSI: a 12-item self-administered questionnaire to assess the characteristics of neuropathic pain on average in the last 24 hours. 5 subscale scores include: burning spontaneous (spont.) pain, pressing spont. pain, paroxysmal pain, evoked pain, and paresthesia or dysesthesia (paresth/dysesth) (range: 0 \[no pain\] to 10 \[worst pain imaginable\]); total score calculated from the 5 pain subscores (range: 0 to 0.5), higher scores meaning worse pain.

    Time frame: 1, 3, and 6 months (mo) post surgery (PS)

07

Results

Posted Jul 15, 2010

Participant flow

Male subjects were enrolled at 34 centers and participated in the study between 18 January 2008 and 14 September 2009.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePregabalin 50 mgPregabalin 150 mgPregabalin 300 mgPlacebo
Started108106103108
Completed10310498103
Not completed5255
Withdrew: Adverse event1011
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up0001
Withdrew: Other3212
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1031

Outcome measures

PrimaryModified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf): Worst Pain 24 Hours Post Surgery

m-BPI-sf: a self-administered 11-point Likert rating scale to rate pain in the past 24 hours. A single item pertains to worst pain in the past 24 hours: range of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

Time frame:
24 hours post surgery
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on scale
Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf): Worst Pain 24 Hours Post Surgery
scores on scalePregabalin 50 mgPregabalin 150 mgPregabalin 300 mgPlacebo
Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf): Worst Pain 24 Hours Post Surgery5.2 ± 0.245.4 ± 0.254.7 ± 0.245.4 ± 0.24
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0668 (Hochberg's adjustment applied to p-value; Hochberg's adjusted p-value was the primary analysis.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0334 (Unadjusted (raw) p-value.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.8003 (Hochberg's adjustment applied to p-value; Hochberg's adjusted p-value was the primary analysis.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.8003 (Unadjusted (raw) p-value.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.6932 (Unadjusted (raw) p-value.)
SecondaryNumeric Rating Scale (NRS): Current Pain With Movement - Sitting

NRS: a self-administered questionnaire to rate pain. A single item asks to rate pain with movement caused by sitting (sitting in a standardized fashion after being in a fully supine position); range: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).

Time frame:
Baseline; 2 hours (h) before surgery (BS); 1, 2, and 3 h post surgery (PS); Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 PS; and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 7 PS or Early Termination])
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on scale
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS): Current Pain With Movement - Sitting
scores on scalePregabalin 50 mgPregabalin 150 mgPregabalin 300 mgPlacebo
Baseline1.3 ± 0.171.2 ± 0.181.0 ± 0.171.1 ± 0.17
2 h BS (n=102, 99, 101, 101)0.7 ± 0.100.6 ± 0.100.8 ± 0.100.9 ± 0.10
1 h PS (n=92, 91, 91, 91)3.6 ± 0.244.1 ± 0.243.1 ± 0.244.1 ± 0.24
2 h PS (n=96, 93, 100, 96)3.3 ± 0.213.7 ± 0.213.2 ± 0.203.5 ± 0.21
3 h PS (n=100, 98, 101, 101)2.7 ± 0.193.3 ± 0.192.9 ± 0.183.1 ± 0.19
Day 2 PS (n=102, 98, 101, 100)3.5 ± 0.223.6 ± 0.233.4 ± 0.223.7 ± 0.22
Day 3 PS (n=102, 98, 100, 101)2.7 ± 0.223.0 ± 0.223.0 ± 0.222.8 ± 0.22
Day 4 PS (n=101, 99, 99, 101)2.2 ± 0.202.2 ± 0.202.4 ± 0.202.3 ± 0.20
Day 5 PS (n=101, 99, 98, 100)1.7 ± 0.181.8 ± 0.181.9 ± 0.182.0 ± 0.18
Day 6 PS (n=100, 99, 98, 99)1.6 ± 0.171.6 ± 0.171.8 ± 0.171.7 ± 0.17
Day 7 PS (n=96, 93, 91, 93)1.5 ± 0.171.5 ± 0.171.8 ± 0.181.5 ± 0.17
EOT (n=101, 99, 100, 100)1.0 ± 0.151.3 ± 0.151.3 ± 0.151.2 ± 0.15
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4471
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7248
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7556
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0571
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0197
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2398
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0709
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9902
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0018
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4639
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4845
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1641
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1025
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.5615
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2904
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.6017
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.8549
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3386
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7070
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.5244
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4245
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.8624
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7552
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7329
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3053
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.5290
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7951
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7150
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4566
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7750
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9241
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.8994
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2088
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2152
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7662
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7579
SecondaryNumeric Rating Scale (NRS): Current Pain With Movement - Walking

NRS: a self-administered questionnaire to rate pain. A single item asks to rate pain with movement caused by walking (rising from sitting position and walking approximately 5 meters or 16 feet at a moderate pace); range: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).

Time frame:
Baseline; 2 hours (h) before surgery (BS); 1, 2, and 3 h post surgery (PS); Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 PS; and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 7 PS or Early Termination])
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on scale
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS): Current Pain With Movement - Walking
scores on scalePregabalin 50 mgPregabalin 150 mgPregabalin 300 mgPlacebo
Baseline1.9 ± 0.231.6 ± 0.241.9 ± 0.232.0 ± 0.23
2 h BS (n=102, 98, 101, 101)1.2 ± 0.121.1 ± 0.121.2 ± 0.121.2 ± 0.12
1 h PS (n=69, 62, 63, 60)3.2 ± 0.293.9 ± 0.322.9 ± 0.313.7 ± 0.32
2 h PS (n=84, 76, 84, 80)3.3 ± 0.273.4 ± 0.283.1 ± 0.253.6 ± 0.27
3 h PS (n=96, 91, 93, 94)3.1 ± 0.223.6 ± 0.233.0 ± 0.223.3 ± 0.23
Day 2 PS (n=102, 98, 101, 100)3.3 ± 0.233.8 ± 0.233.3 ± 0.233.9 ± 0.23
Day 3 PS (n=102, 98, 100, 101)2.7 ± 0.213.0 ± 0.222.8 ± 0.212.9 ± 0.21
Day 4 PS (n=101, 99, 99, 101)2.2 ± 0.202.2 ± 0.202.1 ± 0.202.2 ± 0.20
Day 5 PS (n=101, 99, 98, 100)1.7 ± 0.171.8 ± 0.171.8 ± 0.171.9 ± 0.17
Day 6 PS (n=100, 99, 98, 99)1.5 ± 0.171.6 ± 0.171.7 ± 0.171.6 ± 0.17
Day 7 PS (n=96, 93, 91, 93)1.3 ± 0.171.4 ± 0.171.5 ± 0.171.3 ± 0.17
EOT (n=101, 99, 100, 100)1.1 ± 0.161.2 ± 0.161.3 ± 0.161.2 ± 0.16
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.6896
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1934
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.6034
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7992
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4770
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.8730
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2000
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.5059
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0348
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3815
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4716
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1063
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3884
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3787
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2537
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0952
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7725
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0660
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3657
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7717
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.5849
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9580
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9884
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.6743
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2689
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.6907
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4798
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.5609
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9834
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.8339
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.8730
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.6327
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3986
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.6370
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9869
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7550
SecondaryNumeric Rating Scale (NRS): Current Pain With Movement - Coughing

NRS: a self-administered questionnaire to rate pain. A single item asks to rate pain with movement caused by coughing (coughing two times while sitting); range: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)

Time frame:
Baseline; 2 hours (h) before surgery (BS); 1, 2, and 3 h post surgery (PS); Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 PS; and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 7 PS or Early Termination])
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on scale
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS): Current Pain With Movement - Coughing
scores on scalePregabalin 50 mgPregabalin 150 mgPregabalin 300 mgPlacebo
Baseline2.4 ± 0.251.8 ± 0.262.2 ± 0.262.1 ± 0.26
2 h BS (n=102, 99, 101, 101)1.4 ± 0.151.5 ± 0.151.6 ± 0.151.8 ± 0.15
1 h PS (n=95, 91, 93, 90)4.4 ± 0.264.8 ± 0.263.7 ± 0.264.6 ± 0.26
2 h PS (n=96, 93, 99, 97)4.1 ± 0.234.3 ± 0.243.8 ± 0.234.3 ± 0.23
3 h PS (n=100, 99, 100, 100)3.8 ± 0.224.1 ± 0.223.8 ± 0.223.9 ± 0.22
Day 2 PS (n=102, 98, 101, 100)4.6 ± 0.255.1 ± 0.264.5 ± 0.255.2 ± 0.25
Day 3 PS (n=102, 98, 101, 100)4.3 ± 0.244.5 ± 0.254.3 ± 0.254.5 ± 0.24
Day 4 PS (n=101, 99, 99, 101)3.6 ± 0.253.6 ± 0.253.6 ± 0.253.9 ± 0.25
Day 5 PS (n=101, 99, 98, 100)2.8 ± 0.243.1 ± 0.243.2 ± 0.243.8 ± 0.24
Day 6 PS (n=100, 99, 98, 99)2.6 ± 0.232.8 ± 0.232.9 ± 0.233.2 ± 0.23
Day 7 PS (n=96, 93, 91, 93)2.4 ± 0.232.5 ± 0.242.5 ± 0.242.7 ± 0.23
EOT (n=101, 99, 100, 100)1.9 ± 0.212.0 ± 0.212.3 ± 0.212.3 ± 0.21
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2912
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3723
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.6116
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0835
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1497
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3950
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.5892
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.6143
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0104
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.5666
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9008
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0967
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.8353
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4530
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7297
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0692
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.6333
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0325
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.5788
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9224
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.5527
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2624
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3263
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3746
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0050
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0493
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0773
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0547
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1976
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3832
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4216
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.5852
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7336
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1647
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2813
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.8423
SecondaryNumeric Rating Scale (NRS): Current Pain With Movement - Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Sitting, Walking, and Coughing

NRS: a self-administered questionnaire to rate pain. AUC from 1 h PS through 48 h PS for ratings of pain caused by movements of sitting, walking, and coughing; Range: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).

Time frame:
1 hour through 48 hours post surgery
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on scale
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS): Current Pain With Movement - Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Sitting, Walking, and Coughing
scores on scalePregabalin 50 mgPregabalin 150 mgPregabalin 300 mgPlacebo
Sitting (n=100, 99, 101, 101)146.22 ± 8.185158.90 ± 8.261148.25 ± 8.115155.57 ± 8.125
Walking (n=97, 91, 95, 96)143.82 ± 8.981162.70 ± 9.575143.40 ± 9.063161.74 ± 9.235
Coughing (n=101, 99, 100, 101)202.93 ± 9.635219.69 ± 9.778199.13 ± 9.645220.34 ± 9.601
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3970
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7640
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.5064
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1318
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9367
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1259
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1812
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9600
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1050
SecondaryNumerical Rating Scale (NRS): Current Pain at Rest

NRS: a self-administered questionnaire to rate pain. A single item asks participant to rate current pain at rest (preceding pain with movement); range: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).

Time frame:
2 hours (h) before surgery (BS); 1, 2, and 3 h post surgery (PS); Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 PS
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on scale
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS): Current Pain at Rest
scores on scalePregabalin 50 mgPregabalin 150 mgPregabalin 300 mgPlacebo
2 h BS (n=102, 99, 101, 101)0.9 ± 0.110.7 ± 0.120.8 ± 0.110.7 ± 0.11
1 h PS (n=102, 97, 100, 100)3.3 ± 0.203.7 ± 0.202.9 ± 0.203.8 ± 0.20
2 h PS (n=102, 99, 101, 101)3.1 ± 0.183.2 ± 0.182.7 ± 0.183.0 ± 0.18
3 h PS (n=102, 99, 101, 101)2.5 ± 0.172.7 ± 0.182.6 ± 0.172.7 ± 0.17
Day 2 PS (n=101, 99, 100, 101)3.2 ± 0.223.3 ± 0.233.3 ± 0.223.3 ± 0.22
Day 3 PS (n=102, 99, 100, 100)2.5 ± 0.192.7 ± 0.192.2 ± 0.192.3 ± 0.19
Day 4 PS (n=101, 99, 99, 101)2.0 ± 0.182.0 ± 0.181.9 ± 0.181.8 ± 0.18
Day 5 PS (n=101, 98, 98, 100)1.4 ± 0.171.8 ± 0.171.8 ± 0.171.7 ± 0.17
Day 6 PS (n=100, 99, 98, 98)1.3 ± 0.151.4 ± 0.151.4 ± 0.151.5 ± 0.15
Day 7 PS (n=96, 93, 90, 93)1.2 ± 0.141.4 ± 0.141.3 ± 0.141.3 ± 0.14
Day 8 PS (n=60, 62, 53, 60)1.3 ± 0.191.2 ± 0.191.2 ± 0.201.1 ± 0.19
Day 9 PS (n=21, 24, 25, 22)0.4 ± 0.211.0 ± 0.200.6 ± 0.201.5 ± 0.19
Day 10 PS (n=11, 11, 13, 11)0.5 ± 0.331.0 ± 0.330.9 ± 0.310.9 ± 0.29
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2818
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.8631
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.5074
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0401
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.5509
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0004
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7070
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3840
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2732
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4418
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.8379
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.5944
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.8139
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9709
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9666
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3204
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0869
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9386
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4352
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4522
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.6606
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1733
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.8788
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.8474
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2938
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7602
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.6881
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7883
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.5374
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9774
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3082
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4373
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.6540
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0002
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0696
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0029
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3695
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9346
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9631
SecondaryNumeric Rating Scale (NRS): Current Pain at Rest - Area Under the Curve (AUC)

NRS: a self-administered questionnaire to rate pain. AUC for a single item asking participant to rate current pain at rest (preceding pain with movement); range: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).

Time frame:
1 through 48 hours post surgery (PS)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on scale
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS): Current Pain at Rest - Area Under the Curve (AUC)
score on scalePregabalin 50 mgPregabalin 150 mgPregabalin 300 mgPlacebo
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS): Current Pain at Rest - Area Under the Curve (AUC)133.8 ± 7.88141.3 ± 7.99132.3 ± 7.78135.1 ± 7.86
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9025
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.5652
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7920
SecondaryNumeric Rating Scale (NRS): Average Pain

NRS: a self-administered questionnaire to rate pain. A single item asks participant to rate pain on average in the last 24 hours; range: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).

Time frame:
2 hours (h) before surgery (BS); 1, 2, and 3 h post surgery (PS); Days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 PS
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on scale
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS): Average Pain
scores on scalePregabalin 50 mgPregabalin 150 mgPregabalin 300 mgPlacebo
2 h BS (n=102, 99, 101, 101)1.3 ± 0.151.3 ± 0.151.3 ± 0.151.4 ± 0.15
1 h PS (n=101, 96, 99, 99)2.8 ± 0.193.0 ± 0.202.5 ± 0.193.2 ± 0.19
2 h PS (n=101, 97, 101, 99)3.0 ± 0.183.2 ± 0.182.8 ± 0.183.1 ± 0.18
3 h PS (n=102, 99, 101, 101)2.8 ± 0.173.2 ± 0.182.9 ± 0.173.2 ± 0.17
Day 1 PS (n=101, 99, 101, 99)3.4 ± 0.203.4 ± 0.202.9 ± 0.203.4 ± 0.20
Day 2 PS (n=102, 99, 99, 100)2.9 ± 0.193.1 ± 0.192.9 ± 0.192.9 ± 0.19
Day 3 PS (n=102, 98, 98 101)2.5 ± 0.182.5 ± 0.182.4 ± 0.182.5 ± 0.18
Day 4 PS (n=101, 99, 97, 100)1.9 ± 0.172.0 ± 0.172.1 ± 0.171.9 ± 0.17
Day 5 PS (n=101, 99, 98, 100)1.6 ± 0.151.8 ± 0.151.7 ± 0.151.8 ± 0.15
Day 6 PS (n=98, 96, 91, 96)1.4 ± 0.141.5 ± 0.141.7 ± 0.141.6 ± 0.14
Day 7 PS (n=63, 66, 56, 62)1.6 ± 0.191.5 ± 0.181.4 ± 0.201.3 ± 0.19
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.6679
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7308
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.6781
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0930
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3751
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0111
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.6811
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7426
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1619
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1132
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9822
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1883
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9391
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9664
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0747
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9681
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3246
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7984
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.8581
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9677
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7104
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.8978
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.6260
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4047
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4461
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9099
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.8805
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2348
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4445
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.8849
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2796
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.5225
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7015
SecondaryTime From End of Surgery to First Rescue Medication

Rescue medication includes both naproxen and narcotic medication (including tramadol and opioid analgesics). For subjects without use of rescue medication, the time-to-event variable is censored at the Beginning of Taper Visit (Day 7 PS) or at time of withdrawal.

Time frame:
Day 1 through Day 7 post surgery

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryTime From End of Surgery to Reach a Total Score of at Least 9 on the Post-Anesthetic Discharge Scoring System (PADS)

PADS is a 5-item scale (individual item range: 0-2; higher scores indicating better readiness for hospital discharge). Total score range: 0-10, with 9 or higher indicating eligibility for discharge. End of surgery is time of transfer to post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Subjects who did not reach a score of 9 on PADS were censored at the date and time of discharge.

Time frame:
Day 1

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryTime From End of Surgery to Discharge From Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)
Time frame:
Day 1

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryDaily Sleep Interference Rating Scale (DSIRS) Score

DSIRS: self-administered 11-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (pain does not interfere with sleep) to 10 (pain completely interferes with sleep \[unable to sleep due to pain\]) during past 24-hour period. Higher score indicates a greater level of sleep disturbance. Performed daily on awakening, prior to taking study medication.

Time frame:
Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 post surgery (PS)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Daily Sleep Interference Rating Scale (DSIRS) Score
scores on a scalePregabalin 50 mgPregabalin 150 mgPregabalin 300 mgPlacebo
Day 2 PS (n=102, 99, 101, 101)2.86 ± 0.2502.61 ± 0.2552.17 ± 0.2503.18 ± 0.251
Day 3 PS (n=102, 98, 100, 101)2.13 ± 0.2112.01 ± 0.2161.50 ± 0.2132.11 ± 0.212
Day 4 PS (n=101, 99, 99, 101)1.52 ± 0.1991.40 ± 0.2011.27 ± 0.2001.48 ± 0.198
Day 5 PS (n=101, 98, 98, 100)1.03 ± 0.1721.22 ± 0.1741.09 ± 0.1731.44 ± 0.172
Day 6 PS (n=100, 99, 98, 99)0.94 ± 0.1470.98 ± 0.1470.81 ± 0.1471.13 ± 0.147
Day 7 PS (n=98, 96, 92, 96)1.04 ± 0.1500.90 ± 0.1510.72 ± 0.1541.00 ± 0.150
Day 8 PS (n=61, 65, 54, 61)1.00 ± 0.1850.90 ± 0.1800.59 ± 0.2020.63 ± 0.185
Day 9 PS (n=21, 24, 25, 24)0.14 ± 0.2401.01 ± 0.2220.40 ± 0.2221.01 ± 0.212
Day 10 PS (n=11, 11, 13, 11)0.15 ± 0.3491.16 ± 0.3470.08 ± 0.3320.72 ± 0.310
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3332
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0933
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0031
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9451
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7312
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0348
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.8936
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7672
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4285
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0785
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3348
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1366
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3338
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4460
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1078
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.8273
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.6140
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1684
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1285
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2640
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.8956
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0058
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9929
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0473
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2426
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3478
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1694
SecondaryTotal Cumulative Dose of Opioids and Tramadol Used During and After Surgery

Total cumulative dose of opioids and tramadol administered by any route during surgery and postoperatively. Dose of tramadol calculated as milligrams (mg) of oral morphine equivalent.

Time frame:
24, 48, and 72 hours (h) post surgery (PS), and Days 4, 5, 6, and 7 PS
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mg
Total Cumulative Dose of Opioids and Tramadol Used During and After Surgery
mgPregabalin 50 mgPregabalin 150 mgPregabalin 300 mgPlacebo
24 h PS (n=102, 99, 101, 101)10.29 ± 2.2759.44 ± 2.3206.58 ± 2.27916.03 ± 2.283
48 h PS (n=102, 99, 101, 101)13.15 ± 2.76314.10 ± 2.8179.73 ± 2.76819.79 ± 2.772
72 h PS (n=102, 99, 101, 101)14.59 ± 3.08816.99 ± 3.14812.34 ± 3.09222.20 ± 3.097
Day 4 PS (n=102, 99, 101, 101)15.35 ± 3.47418.65 ± 3.54214.18 ± 3.47923.97 ± 3.485
Day 5 PS (n=102, 99, 101, 101)16.09 ± 3.78620.46 ± 3.86014.64 ± 3.79225.57 ± 3.798
Day 6 PS (n=101, 99, 99, 100)15.99 ± 4.07221.57 ± 4.13915.81 ± 4.10526.90 ± 4.085
Day 7 PS (n=99, 99, 97, 100)15.88 ± 4.29122.23 ± 4.32216.16 ± 4.33428.15 ± 4.265
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0630
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0347
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0024
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0767
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1327
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0078
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0694
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2173
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0193
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0673
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2629
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0388
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0651
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3242
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0345
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0487
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3384
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0467
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0347
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3086
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0406
SecondaryAmount of Non-opioid Rescue Medication (Naproxen and Antiemetic Medications) Used During the Study

Total cumulative dose of naproxen calculated in milligrams (mg) from the end of surgery up to and including Day 7 after surgery.

Time frame:
End of Surgery through Day 7 post surgery
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mg
Amount of Non-opioid Rescue Medication (Naproxen and Antiemetic Medications) Used During the Study
mgPregabalin 50 mgPregabalin 150 mgPregabalin 300 mgPlacebo
Amount of Non-opioid Rescue Medication (Naproxen and Antiemetic Medications) Used During the Study3938.81 ± 155.1243930.57 ± 155.3043892.96 ± 154.4133770.07 ± 153.322
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4177
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4410
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.5560
SecondaryTotal Clinically Meaningful Event (CME) Score and Cumulative Total Distinct CME Score Using the Opioid-Related Symptom Distress Scale (OR-SDS)

OR-SDS: a self-administered assessment of 10 common opioid-related side effects (symptoms). A CME is a severe or very severe symptom (or moderate or greater severity symptom of confusion). The Total Distinct CME score is the sum of CMEs across symptoms (range: 0 \[none\] to 10 \[10 CMEs\]); the Cumulative Total Distinct (CT Distinct) CME score is the sum of Total Distinct CME scores at observation and prior observations. The Total CME score is the same as the Total Distinct CME score except that only 1 CME is counted if both nausea and vomiting (or retching) occur (range: 0 \[none\] to 9 \[9 CMEs\]).

Time frame:
3, 24, and 72 hours (h) Post-Surgery (PS), and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 7 PS or Early Termination])
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Total Clinically Meaningful Event (CME) Score and Cumulative Total Distinct CME Score Using the Opioid-Related Symptom Distress Scale (OR-SDS)
scores on a scalePregabalin 50 mgPregabalin 150 mgPregabalin 300 mgPlacebo
Total CME 3 h PS (n=98, 97, 98, 98)0.2 ± 0.070.2 ± 0.070.1 ± 0.070.2 ± 0.07
Total CME 24 h PS (n=97, 97, 98, 97)0.2 ± 0.070.3 ± 0.070.4 ± 0.070.2 ± 0.07
Total CME 72 h PS (n=98, 96, 96, 96)0.1 ± 0.050.1 ± 0.050.2 ± 0.050.1 ± 0.05
Total CME EOT (n=100, 98, 99, 97)0.0 ± 0.040.1 ± 0.040.1 ± 0.040.1 ± 0.04
CT Distinct CME 3 h PS (n=98, 97, 98, 98)0.2 ± 0.070.2 ± 0.070.1 ± 0.070.2 ± 0.07
CT Distinct CME 24 h PS (n=93, 95, 96, 94)0.3 ± 0.100.4 ± 0.100.4 ± 0.090.4 ± 0.10
CT Distinct CME 72 h PS (n=91, 92, 93, 92)0.3 ± 0.110.5 ± 0.110.5 ± 0.110.5 ± 0.11
CT Distinct CME EOT (n=90, 92, 93, 89)0.3 ± 0.110.5 ± 0.110.6 ± 0.110.6 ± 0.11
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4273
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4466
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3785
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.5272
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4257
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1428
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2316
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3468
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.5367
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0549
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1351
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9599
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4273
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4466
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3785
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2869
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9905
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9381
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2158
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7887
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9250
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1472
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.5383
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.8869
SecondaryParticipants With Clinically Meaningful Events (CMEs) for Individual Symptoms Using the Opioid-Related Symptom Distress Scale (OR-SDS)

OR-SDS: a self-administered assessment of 10 common opioid-related side effects (symptoms). A CME is a severe or very severe symptom (or moderate or greater severity symptom of confusion). For individual symptom categories, the number of subjects who experienced at least one CME. Concentrate (concentr).

Time frame:
3, 24, and 72 hours (h) post surgery (PS), and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 7 PS or Early Termination])
Reported as:
Number · participants
Participants With Clinically Meaningful Events (CMEs) for Individual Symptoms Using the Opioid-Related Symptom Distress Scale (OR-SDS)
participantsPregabalin 50 mgPregabalin 150 mgPregabalin 300 mgPlacebo
Fatigue 3 h PS (n=99, 98, 98, 100)4222
Fatigue 24 h PS (n=99, 97, 100, 97)2362
Fatigue 72 h PS (n=101, 97, 98, 98)0011
Fatigue EOT (n=100, 98, 100, 98)0003
Drowsiness 3 h PS (n=99, 98, 98, 100)5444
Drowsiness 24 h PS (n=98, 98, 99, 97)2783
Drowsiness 72 h PS (n=100, 98, 98, 98)1013
Drowsiness EOT (n=100, 98, 100, 97)0023
Inability to concentr 3 h PS (n=100, 97, 98, 99)1002
Inability to concentr 24 h PS (n=99, 98, 100, 97)1122
Inability to concentr 72 h PS (101, 98, 98, 97)0011
Inability to concentr EOT (n=100, 98, 100, 99)1001
Nausea 3 h PS (n=101, 97, 99, 100)2114
Nausea 24 h PS (n=100, 99, 101, 98)3431
Nausea 72 h PS (n=101, 99, 99, 98)0000
Nausea EOT (n=101, 98, 100, 99)1021
Dizziness 3 h PS (n=101, 97, 99, 100)2156
Dizziness 24 h PS (n=100, 98, 99, 98)2361
Dizziness 72 h PS (n=101, 98, 97, 98)0010
Dizziness EOT (n=101, 98, 100, 99)1010
Constipation 3 h PS (n=101, 98, 99, 100)1001
Constipation 24 h PS (n=99, 99, 100, 98)4475
Constipation 72 h PS (n=99, 97, 98, 98)47107
Constipation EOT (n=101, 98, 99, 99)1252
Itching 3 h PS (n=100, 98, 99, 100)0100
Itching 24 h PS (n=100, 99, 101, 98)0011
Itching 72 h PS (n=100, 99, 99, 97)1101
Itching EOT (n=101, 98, 100, 98)0001
Difficulty Urinating 3 h PS (n=101, 98, 99, 99)0321
Difficulty Urinating 24 h PS (n=100, 99, 100, 98)2453
Difficulty Urinating 72 h PS (n=100, 99, 99, 98)2030
Difficulty Urinating EOT (n= 101, 98, 100, 99)1030
Confusion 3 h PS (n=101, 98, 99, 100)2332
Confusion 24 h PS (n=101, 99, 99, 98)1121
Confusion 72 h PS (n=100, 99, 99, 98)2132
Confusion EOT (n=101, 98, 100, 99)0202
Retching/Vomiting 3 h PS (n=101, 98, 99, 100)0003
Retching/Vomiting 24 h PS (n=101, 99, 100, 98)0201
Retching/Vomiting 72 h PS (n=101, 99, 99, 98)0000
Retching/Vomiting EOT (n=101, 98, 100, 99)0001
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.4024 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.9766 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.9975 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.9038 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.9370 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2134 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2482 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2207 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.9191 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0686 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0746 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0512 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.7118 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.9883 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.9770 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.5457 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2579 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1232 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2880 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0894 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1979 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0686 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0746 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.4669 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.5533 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1611 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1611 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.4793 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.3533 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.8852 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.3173 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.3173 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.8864 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.8084 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.3173 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2207 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.3747 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1450 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2054 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.4106 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2199 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2896 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 1.0000 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.3173 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.3943 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1703 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0807 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.7728 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.4770 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.3625 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0617 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.3061 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2207 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.3173 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.9191 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.3173 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2207 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.6692 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.7793 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.6065 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.3570 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.9690 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.5299 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.4821 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.8295 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.3304 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2482 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2482 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2207 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.8055 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.9191 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.8488 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2482 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2482 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2207 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2482 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.3291 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1391 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.6318 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.6319 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.8149 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.5795 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1750 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0676 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2943 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0719 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.9283 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.9024 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.7655 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 1.0000 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.8460 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.6419 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.9522 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.5800 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.7675 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1672 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.9634 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1161 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0754 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0711 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0711 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2482 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.8091 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2482 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.3173 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.3173 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.4386 (P-values are derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
SecondarySubject Global Evaluation of Study Medication (GESM)

GESM is a self-administered overall impression (global evaluation) of study medication received for pain; 4 categories: poor, fair, good, and excellent.

Time frame:
24 hours (h) post surgery (PS) and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 7 PS or Early Termination])
Reported as:
Number · participants
Subject Global Evaluation of Study Medication (GESM)
participantsPregabalin 50 mgPregabalin 150 mgPregabalin 300 mgPlacebo
24 h PS: Poor (n=100, 96, 101, 99)108715
24 h PS: Fair (n=100, 96, 101, 99)29282532
24 h PS: Good (n=100, 96, 101, 99)45464240
24 h PS: Excellent (n=100, 96, 101, 99)16142712
EOT: Poor (n=99, 99, 100, 100)910618
EOT: Fair (n=99, 99, 100, 100)14191419
EOT: Good (n=99, 99, 100, 100)45373032
EOT: Excellent (n=99, 99, 100, 100)31335031
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1723 (P-values derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0639 (P-values derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0021 (P-values derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1127 (P-values derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0703 (P-values derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0012 (P-values derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
SecondaryParticipants With Wound Healing Complications

Investigator-assigned mutually exclusive categories of: 1) no surgical wound complication, 2) superficial incisional surgical site infection, 3) deep incisional surgical site infection, 4) organ or space surgical site infection, or 5) non-infectious wound healing complication.

Time frame:
Day 7 post surgery (PS) and up to 30 days PS
Reported as:
Number · participants
Participants With Wound Healing Complications
participantsPregabalin 50 mgPregabalin 150 mgPregabalin 300 mgPlacebo
No surgical wound complication10210299101
Superficial incisional surgical site infection1011
Deep incisional surgical site infection0000
Organ/space surgical site infection0000
Non-infectious wound healing complication2111
SecondaryParticipants With Physician Contacts Post-discharge

Number of participants who answered "yes" to the Post-Surgery Contact question: "From the time you were discharged from the hospital, did you have to contact any type of physician because of pain, difficulty getting up and walking about, or difficulty with passing urine?"

Time frame:
24 and 72 hours (h) post surgery (PS)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Participants With Physician Contacts Post-discharge
participantsPregabalin 50 mgPregabalin 150 mgPregabalin 300 mgPlacebo
24 h PS0210
72 h PS1311
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1927 (P-values derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjests have been combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.3865 (P-values derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjests have been combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.9869 (P-values derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjests have been combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.4354 (P-values derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjests have been combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.8061 (P-values derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjests have been combined into pooled centers.)
SecondaryBaseline and Change From Baseline in Anxiety Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score

Anxiety VAS is a single-item self-administered continuous measure of anxiety using a 100-millimeter (mm) line on which the subject is asked to place a mark indicating the intensity of current anxiety. The score is the distance in mm from the left-most point on the line to the subject's mark; range: 0 (Not at all anxious) at the left-most point to 100 (Extremely anxious) at the right-most point. Performed prior to blood draws.

Time frame:
Baseline; 2 hours (h) before surgery (BS); 1, 2, and 3 h PS; Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 PS
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Baseline and Change From Baseline in Anxiety Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score
scores on a scalePregabalin 50 mgPregabalin 150 mgPregabalin 300 mgPlacebo
Baseline (n=101, 98, 100, 100)20.2 ± 2.0719.4 ± 2.1018.4 ± 2.0716.4 ± 2.07
2 h BS (n=101, 98, 100, 99)0.2 ± 1.563.2 ± 1.581.4 ± 1.544.2 ± 1.57
1 h PS (n=100, 96, 99, 99)-6.4 ± 1.71-3.5 ± 1.73-5.2 ± 1.68-3.2 ± 1.70
2 h PS (n=101, 98, 100, 100)-8.4 ± 1.51-7.6 ± 1.52-7.1 ± 1.48-6.1 ± 1.50
3 h PS (n=101, 98, 100, 100)-8.7 ± 1.44-8.3 ± 1.45-9.0 ± 1.42-6.4 ± 1.43
Day 2 PS (n=101, 98, 100, 100)-7.9 ± 1.59-10.4 ± 1.60-7.5 ± 1.56-5.8 ± 1.58
Day 3 PS (n=101, 97, 99, 100)-9.1 ± 1.23-12.7 ± 1.25-11.3 ± 1.22-9.3 ± 1.23
Day 4 PS (n=101, 98, 98, 101)-11.1 ± 1.23-15.3 ± 1.24-12.1 ± 1.23-11.4 ± 1.22
Day 5 PS (n=101, 98, 97, 99)-12.3 ± 1.06-15.0 ± 1.07-12.4 ± 1.06-12.7 ± 1.07
Day 6 PS (n=100, 98, 97, 97)-12.5 ± 1.08-15.0 ± 1.08-13.6 ± 1.07-12.8 ± 1.09
Day 7 PS (n=97, 93, 89, 95)-13.0 ± 1.15-15.2 ± 1.16-13.3 ± 1.19-12.4 ± 1.15
Day 8 PS (n=61, 64, 53, 58)-13.6 ± 1.16-15.4 ± 1.11-15.5 ± 1.25-14.7 ± 1.18
Day 9 PS (n=21, 24, 23, 22)-16.6 ± 2.07-16.4 ± 1.90-14.7 ± 1.97-12.8 ± 1.90
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1682
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2821
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4781
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0557
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.6098
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1821
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1628
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.8999
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3990
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2665
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4885
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.6415
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2269
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3228
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1808
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3282
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0342
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4198
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9049
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0456
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2463
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.8231
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0221
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.6974
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7461
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1198
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.8031
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.8515
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1285
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.5561
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.6858
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0693
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.5547
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4610
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.6640
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.6158
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1632
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1770
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4882
SecondaryBaseline and Change From Baseline in EuroQol (EQ-5D) Health State Profile Score

EQ-5D is a self-administered questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in 5 domains (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression). Scores from the 5 domains are used to calculate a single index value: the Health State Profile Score; range: 0.0 (death) to 1.0 (perfect health), higher scores indicating better health state.

Time frame:
Baseline and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 7 post surgery or Early Termination])
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on scales
Baseline and Change From Baseline in EuroQol (EQ-5D) Health State Profile Score
scores on scalesPregabalin 50 mgPregabalin 150 mgPregabalin 300 mgPlacebo
Baseline (n=101, 99, 100, 100)0.66 ± 0.0150.68 ± 0.0150.65 ± 0.0150.66 ± 0.015
Change at EOT (n=97, 98, 99, 98)-0.01 ± 0.016-0.01 ± 0.016-0.01 ± 0.015-0.04 ± 0.016
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7936
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.5092
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4233
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2033
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2142
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1218
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) Total Score and Subscales

The PCS is a self-administered questionnaire with 13 items, each scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time) for extent to which participant catastrophizes postoperative pain. Total score is sum of scores for all questions (range: 0 to 52); Subscale scores: Rumination (sum of scores for 4 items; range: 0 to 16); Magnification (sum of scores for 3 items; range: 0 to 12); and Helplessness (sum of scores for 6 items; range: 0 to 24); higher scores mean a greater extent of pain catastrophizing.

Time frame:
3 hours (h) post surgery (PS) and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 7 PS or Early Termination])
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) Total Score and Subscales
scores on a scalePregabalin 50 mgPregabalin 150 mgPregabalin 300 mgPlacebo
Total score change: 3 h PS (n=99, 98, 98, 99)-3.5 ± 0.84-2.8 ± 0.85-3.6 ± 0.83-1.5 ± 0.84
Total score change: EOT (n=97, 96, 98, 96)-6.2 ± 0.64-5.8 ± 0.64-6.3 ± 0.63-5.7 ± 0.64
Rumination change: 3 h PS (n=99, 98, 98, 99)-1.0 ± 0.35-0.7 ± 0.35-1.1 ± 0.35-0.4 ± 0.35
Rumination change: EOT (n=97, 96, 98, 96)-2.3 ± 0.28-1.8 ± 0.28-2.2 ± 0.27-1.9 ± 0.28
Magnification change: 3 h PS (n=99, 98, 99, 99)-0.9 ± 0.21-0.9 ± 0.21-1.1 ± 0.21-0.7 ± 0.21
Magnification change: EOT (n=97, 96, 99, 96)-1.5 ± 0.17-1.7 ± 0.17-1.6 ± 0.17-1.4 ± 0.17
Helplessness change: 3 h PS (n=99, 98, 99, 99)-1.5 ± 0.37-1.3 ± 0.38-1.4 ± 0.37-0.5 ± 0.37
Helplessness change: EOT (n=97, 96, 99, 96)-2.4 ± 0.27-2.3 ± 0.27-2.5 ± 0.26-2.5 ± 0.27
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0830
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2339
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0629
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.5721
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9713
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4809
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1561
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.5267
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1125
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2965
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7774
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3990
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4465
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4385
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2265
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.5985
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2146
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3382
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0430
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1128
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0632
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.8667
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.6365
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9275
SecondaryRelationship Between Baseline and Postoperative Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) Score and Severity of Acute Pain and to Response to Therapy

The PCS is a self-administered questionnaire with 13 items, each scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time) for extent to which participant catastrophizes postoperative pain. Total score is sum of scores for all items (range: 0 to 52); higher scores mean a greater extent of pain catastrophizing.

Time frame:
Baseline and Days 1 and 7 post surgery (PS)

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryBaseline and Change From Baseline in Short Form Acute Health Survey 12-Item Version (SF-12v2) Physical Component Summary Score (PCSS) and Mental Component Summary Score (MCSS)

PCSS and MCSS are component summary scores from the self-administered SF-12v2 acute health quality of life, norm-based survey. PCSS range: 4.95 to 76.13; MCSS range: -0.79 to 79.69; lowest scores mean very much below and highest scores mean very much above the general population average.

Time frame:
Baseline and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 7 post surgery or Early Termination])
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Baseline and Change From Baseline in Short Form Acute Health Survey 12-Item Version (SF-12v2) Physical Component Summary Score (PCSS) and Mental Component Summary Score (MCSS)
scores on a scalePregabalin 50 mgPregabalin 150 mgPregabalin 300 mgPlacebo
PCSS at baseline (n=101, 99, 100, 100)46.43 ± 0.91448.14 ± 0.92846.44 ± 0.91544.89 ± 0.917
PCSS change at EOT (n=99, 99, 99, 98)-6.86 ± 1.013-7.06 ± 1.021-6.92 ± 1.011-8.21 ± 1.025
MCSS at baseline (n=101, 99, 100, 100)54.48 ± 0.78754.58 ± 0.79954.81 ± 0.78756.18 ± 0.789
MCSS change at EOT (n=99, 99, 99, 98)2.65 ± 0.7642.68 ± 0.7623.27 ± 0.7501.50 ± 0.765
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2136
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0094
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2131
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3245
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4070
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3490
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1122
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1380
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2023
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2639
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2524
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0832
SecondaryParticipants With Chronic Postoperative Pain

Number of participants who reported surgery-related pain at assessment (by answering 'yes' to a single question: "In the last 24 hours, have you had pain in the area affected by your surgery?")

Time frame:
1, 3, and 6 months (mo) post surgery (PS)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Participants With Chronic Postoperative Pain
participantsPregabalin 50 mgPregabalin 150 mgPregabalin 300 mgPlacebo
1 month PS (n=98, 98, 98, 99)20241926
3 month PS (n=98, 97, 97, 97)3553
6 month PS (n=98, 97, 97, 97)1110
Statistical analysis
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2371 (P-values are derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.4435 (P-values are derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1692 (P-values are derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.8169 (P-values are derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.5592 (P-values are derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.4453 (P-values are derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 50 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.4795 (P-values are derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 150 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2733 (P-values are derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
  • Pregabalin 300 mg vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.3173 (P-values are derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for pooled centers. Centers with fewer than 8 treated subjects were combined into pooled centers.)
SecondaryChronic Postoperative Pain: Pain Severity Index Score and Pain Interference Index Score on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)

m-BPI-sf: a self-administered 11-point Likert rating scale to rate pain in the past 24 hours. Pain interference index score is mean of 7 individual item scores for interference of pain with functional activities (general activity, mood, walking ability, relations with other people, sleep, normal work, and enjoyment of life); range: 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes with functional activities). Pain severity index score is mean of 4 individual item scores for pain severity (pain right now, and worst, least, and average pain); range: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

Time frame:
1, 3, and 6 months (mo) post surgery (PS)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Chronic Postoperative Pain: Pain Severity Index Score and Pain Interference Index Score on the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (mBPI-sf)
scores on a scalePregabalin 50 mgPregabalin 150 mgPregabalin 300 mgPlacebo
Pain Severity 1 mo PS (n=20, 24, 19, 26)0.86 ± 0.8010.81 ± 0.7671.43 ± 1.2100.76 ± 0.654
Pain Severity 3 mo PS (n=3, 5, 5, 3)0.58 ± 0.6290.75 ± 0.3541.55 ± 1.0520.42 ± 0.520
Pain Interference 1 mo PS (n=20, 24, 19, 26)0.39 ± 0.6300.71 ± 0.9741.29 ± 1.4630.51 ± 0.895
Pain Interference 3 mo PS (n=3, 5, 5, 3)0.14 ± 0.1430.20 ± 0.1631.34 ± 2.1400.00 ± 0.000
SecondaryChronic Postoperative Pain: Total Score and Subscale Scores Using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI)

NPSI: a 12-item self-administered questionnaire to assess the characteristics of neuropathic pain on average in the last 24 hours. 5 subscale scores include: burning spontaneous (spont.) pain, pressing spont. pain, paroxysmal pain, evoked pain, and paresthesia or dysesthesia (paresth/dysesth) (range: 0 \[no pain\] to 10 \[worst pain imaginable\]); total score calculated from the 5 pain subscores (range: 0 to 0.5), higher scores meaning worse pain.

Time frame:
1, 3, and 6 months (mo) post surgery (PS)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Chronic Postoperative Pain: Total Score and Subscale Scores Using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI)
scores on a scalePregabalin 50 mgPregabalin 150 mgPregabalin 300 mgPlacebo
NPSI total score 1 mo PS (n=20, 24, 19, 26)0.03 ± 0.0250.03 ± 0.0480.05 ± 0.0380.04 ± 0.041
NPSI total score 3 mo PS (n=3, 5, 5, 3)0.02 ± 0.0320.02 ± 0.0220.05 ± 0.0340.04 ± 0.044
Burning spont. pain 1 mo PS (n=20, 24, 19, 26)0.30 ± 0.5711.04 ± 1.5741.11 ± 1.7610.77 ± 1.557
Burning spont. pain 3 mo PS (n=3, 5, 5, 3)1.00 ± 1.7320.00 ± 0.000.40 ± 0.8941.00 ± 1.732
Pressing spont. pain 1 mo PS (n=20, 24, 19, 26)0.43 ± 0.5450.50 ± 1.1891.03 ± 1.3070.69 ± 0.939
Pressing spont. pain 3 mo PS (n=3, 5, 5, 3)0.50 ± 0.5000.50 ± 0.3542.30 ± 1.7540.67 ± 0.764
Paroxysmal pain 1 mo PS (n=20, 24, 19, 26)0.95 ± 1.7080.56 ± 1.1061.05 ± 1.4990.71 ± 1.133
Paroxysmal pain 3 mo PS (n=3, 5, 5, 3)0.33 ± 0.2890.20 ± 0.2740.70 ± 0.4471.33 ± 1.528
Evoked pain 1 mo PS (n=20, 24, 19, 26)0.82 ± 0.9700.76 ± 0.9901.44 ± 1.4951.05 ± 1.472
Evoked pain 3 mo PS (n=3, 5, 5, 3)0.22 ± 0.1921.3 ± 2.0821.73 ± 1.2340.44 ± 0.509
Paresth/dysesth 1 mo PS (n=20, 24, 19, 26)0.10 ± 0.3080.35 ± 0.9610.32 ± 0.7680.46 ± 0.774
Paresth/dysesth 3 mo PS (n=3, 5, 5, 3)0.50 ± 0.8660.20 ± 0.2740.10 ± 0.2240.50 ± 0.866

Adverse events

Collected over Baseline (Day 0) through post-treatment phone contact (Month 6). Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Pregabalin 50 mg—3/108 (2.8%)46/108 (42.6%)
Pregabalin 150 mg—1/106 (0.9%)44/106 (41.5%)
Pregabalin 300 mg—0/103 (0%)56/103 (54.4%)
Placebo—3/108 (2.8%)45/108 (41.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPregabalin 50 mgPregabalin 150 mgPregabalin 300 mgPlacebo
AmnesiaNervous system disorders0/1081/1060/1030/108
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders0/1080/1060/1031/108
Gastric ulcer haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders1/1080/1060/1030/108
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/1080/1060/1031/108
PyrexiaGeneral disorders0/1080/1060/1031/108
Muscular weaknessMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/1080/1060/1030/108
Guillain-Barre syndromeNervous system disorders1/1080/1060/1030/108
HaematomaVascular disorders0/1080/1060/1031/108
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 18
Most frequent other events
EventPregabalin 50 mgPregabalin 150 mgPregabalin 300 mgPlacebo
DizzinessNervous system disorders15/10820/10629/10316/108
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders21/10822/10627/10327/108
SomnolenceNervous system disorders24/10825/10625/10328/108
FatigueGeneral disorders24/10818/10623/10323/108
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders21/10818/10614/10322/108
Disturbance in attentionNervous system disorders11/10811/10615/10316/108
DysuriaRenal and urinary disorders10/1086/10610/10310/108
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders9/1087/1064/1036/108
Confusional statePsychiatric disorders6/1083/1068/1036/108
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders2/1087/1061/1036/108

Baseline characteristics

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(participants)Pregabalin 50 mgPregabalin 150 mgPregabalin 300 mgPlaceboTotal
Between 18 and 44 years43374046166
Between 45 and 64 years48585247205
>=65 years1711111554
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(participants)Pregabalin 50 mgPregabalin 150 mgPregabalin 300 mgPlaceboTotal
Number108106103108425
08

Study locations

42 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Birmingham, Alabama 35235, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Glendale, California 91206, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Laguna Hills, California 92653, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Pasadena, California 91105, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Lake Worth, Florida 33462, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Pensacola, Florida 32504, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Rochester, New York 14642, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Stony Brook, New York 11794-8480, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15232, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Hermitage, Tennessee 37075, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Hermitage, Tennessee 37076, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Knoxville, Tennessee 27920, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Knoxville, Tennessee 37920, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Nashville, Tennessee 37203, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Dallas, Texas 75390-7208, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Houston, Texas 77024, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Houston, Texas 77054, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Houston, Texas 77091, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Houston, Texas 77098, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Humble, Texas 77338, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Kingwood, Texas 77339, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Randwick, New South Wales 2031, Australia
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    London, Ontario N6A 4V2, Canada
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    London, Ontario N6A 5A5, Canada
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island C1A 8T5, Canada
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Quebec, G1V 4G2, Canada
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Baroda, Gujarat 390001, India
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Pune, Maharashtra 411011, India
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Madurai, Tamil Nadu 625 107, India
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Delhi, 110 095, India
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Alcorcon, Madrid 28922, Spain
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Barcelona, 08036, Spain
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Madrid, 28006, Spain
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Madrid, 28031, Spain
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Gavle, 801-87, Sweden
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Landskrona, 261 24, Sweden
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Mora, SE-792 85, Sweden
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Orebro, 701 85, Sweden
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Skelleftea, 931 86, Sweden
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Singla NK, Chelly JE, Lionberger DR, Gimbel J, Sanin L, Sporn J, Yang R, Cheung R, Knapp L, Parsons B. Pregabalin for the treatment of postoperative pain: results from three controlled trials using different surgical models. J Pain Res. 2014 Dec 23;8:9-20. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S67841. eCollection 2015. PubMed 25565885 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 25, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00551135
Lead sponsor
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 30, 2007
Start date
Jan 2008
Primary completion
Jun 2009
Completion
Sep 2009
Results posted
Jul 15, 2010
Last update
Jan 25, 2021

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion