CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00536627VAC-ADNUpdated Apr 2, 2026

Efficacy and Tolerance of Naked DNA Vaccine in Patients With Chronic B Hepatitis

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of DNA vaccine pCMVS2.S in Chronic Hepatitis B, sponsored by French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-02.

Sponsored by French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if DNA vaccination of chronic HBV patients under treatment with NRTI can restore T-cell responsiveness and delay virologic reactivation after treatment discontinuation.

Read the detailed description

Despite the availability of effective vaccines against hepatitis B, over 370 million people worldwide remain persistently infected with HBV. Persistent infection is associated with chronic liver disease that can lead to the developement of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in two-third of persons. Treatment of chronic hepatitis B relies on the use of analogs such as lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir or immunostimulators such as interferons. Although analogs are efficient, genotypic resistance occurs after one year of treatment and the rate of virologic relapse is high after treatment discontinuation.

HBV is a non cytopathic virus and liver damage is caused by immune response against infected hepatocytes and to a non specific inflammatory response. Immune response contributes to the virus clearance. In acute hepatitis B infection, T cell response is polyclonal, specific and vigorous, whereas in patients with chronic infection, responses remain weak, less specific and hardly detectable in peripheral blood.

T cell responses could be induced or restored by antigenic stimulation such as vaccination. In a previous phase I clinical trial, we showed that DNA vaccination with plasmid pCMVS2.S is safe and can specifically, but transiently activate T-cell responses in chronic HBV-carriers not responding to current antiviral therapies.

Analogs such as lamivudine and adefovir were shown to enhance T cell responses concomitantly with viral load decrease. In this phase I/II clinical trial, we would like to determine if DNA vaccination of chronic HBV patients under treatment with NRTI can restore T-cell responsiveness and delay virologic reactivation after treatment discontinuation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Hepatitis B

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • DNA vaccine
03

In context

Hepatitis B, Chronic

942 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis B, Chronic; 145 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 70 is below the median of 100 across 683 interventional studies indexed under Hepatitis B, Chronic.

Browse Hepatitis B, Chronic studies →

Lead sponsor

French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis is the lead sponsor of 83 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • chronic hepatitis B with or without AgHBe
  • no cirrhosis and no hepatocellular carcinoma
  • treatment with NRTI unchanged for at least 3 months
  • undetectable HBV viral load for 12 months
  • HBV viral load \< 12 IU/ml at screening
  • sGPT \< 5N
  • tetanus immunization or booster dose for less than 8 years
  • accurate birth control or menopausal women or sterility
  • sickness insurance
  • signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • HLA-DR 15/16
  • coinfections with HDV, HCV and/or HIV
  • treatment with immunomodulators
  • immunosuppressors
  • long-term corticotherapy (over 4 weeks)
  • active intravenous drug-users
  • prolonged and excessive consumption of alcohol (men > 40g/day ; women > 30g/day ; for more than 5 years)
  • medical history of autoimmune disease or presence of autoantibodies
  • previous immunization by HBV vaccine of less than 5 years
  • previous immunization by DNA vaccine against HBV
  • personal or family medical history of demyelinising diseases
  • uncontrolled hypophosphatemia
  • renal failure, renal transplantation, haemodialysis
  • pregnancy, breast-feeding
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
70 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    Patients will receive 5 injections of DNA vaccine at weeks 0, 8, 16, 40, 44.

    Biological: DNA vaccine pCMVS2.S

  • No intervention
    2

Interventions

  • BiologicalDNA vaccine pCMVS2.S

    Patients will receive injections of 1 ml of vaccine (1 mg/ml) at weeks 0, 8, 16, 40 and 44

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary endpoint is virologic failure defined by 1) reactivation after analogs' treatment interruption, 2) virologic breakthrough during treatment with analogs, 3) the impossibility for the patients to interrupt treatment at week 48

    Time frame: at week 72

Secondary outcomes

  1. Delay of appearance of virologic failure

    Time frame: at Week 72

  2. Biological and clinical tolerance of DNA vaccine

    Time frame: all along the trial

  3. Immunological responses

    Time frame: At weeks 18, 40, 46, 60, 72

  4. Clinical progression of hepatitis B

    Time frame: all along the trial

07

Study locations

1 site
  • FONTAINE Hélène
    Paris, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mancini-Bourgine M, Fontaine H, Brechot C, Pol S, Michel ML. Immunogenicity of a hepatitis B DNA vaccine administered to chronic HBV carriers. Vaccine. 2006 May 22;24(21):4482-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.08.013. Epub 2005 Aug 18. PubMed 16310901 ↗
  • Mancini-Bourgine M, Fontaine H, Scott-Algara D, Pol S, Brechot C, Michel ML. Induction or expansion of T-cell responses by a hepatitis B DNA vaccine administered to chronic HBV carriers. Hepatology. 2004 Oct;40(4):874-82. doi: 10.1002/hep.20408. PubMed 15382173 ↗
  • Fontaine H, Kahi S, Chazallon C, Bourgine M, Varaut A, Buffet C, Godon O, Meritet JF, Saidi Y, Michel ML, Scott-Algara D, Aboulker JP, Pol S; ANRS HB02 study group. Anti-HBV DNA vaccination does not prevent relapse after discontinuation of analogues in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a randomised trial--ANRS HB02 VAC-ADN. Gut. 2015 Jan;64(1):139-47. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305707. Epub 2014 Feb 20. PubMed 24555998 ↗
  • Godon O, Fontaine H, Kahi S, Meritet JF, Scott-Algara D, Pol S, Michel ML, Bourgine M; ANRS HB02 study group. Immunological and antiviral responses after therapeutic DNA immunization in chronic hepatitis B patients efficiently treated by analogues. Mol Ther. 2014 Mar;22(3):675-684. doi: 10.1038/mt.2013.274. Epub 2013 Dec 5. PubMed 24394187 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00536627
Lead sponsor
French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 28, 2007
Start date
Jan 2008
Primary completion
Nov 2010
Completion
Nov 2010
Last update
Apr 2, 2026

Study contacts

Hélène FONTAINE, MD
principal investigator · Pôle d'Hépatologie, Hôpital COCHIN, PARIS, FRANCE
Jean-Pierre ABOULKER, MD
study chair · INSERM SC-10, VILLEJUIF, FRANCE

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2011. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion