ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00536536Updated Apr 9, 2019

Evaluating the Transferability of a Successful, Hospital-based, Childhood Obesity Clinic to Primary Care: a Pilot Study

An interventional study of Obesity management framework in Childhood Obesity, sponsored by University of Bristol. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-09.

Sponsored by University of Bristol · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
106
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
5 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Obesity affects one in five children in the UK and undoubtedly causes increased ill health with rising levels of childhood and adolescent diabetes, obesity induced liver disease and increased risk of early heart disease. There are few clinics offering effective treatment for childhood obesity. However, the clinic for childhood obesity at Bristol Royal Hospital for Children (BCH) has been successful in around 83% of cases. This pilot study aims to examine the feasibility of transferring the success of the hospital clinic to primary care in preparation for a full RCT. The study will entail training a practice nurse, community dietician and exercise specialist to deliver the same clinical service in primary care as that offered in BCH. Initial work will gather the views of staff delivering the hospital service and those of patients and parents to identify the crucial components of the intervention that are likely to be needed in primary care and to then to refine the intervention.A pilot trial will examine how feasible it is to recruit patients into the service and get some initial idea as to whether weight management is equally good, patient satisfaction and retention improves and what data needs to be collected for a full economic assessment. If found to be effective, the next step will be to use knowledge gained in this study to design and undertake a more extensive, formal study across Bristol in various primary care settings.This larger study will address how such a service can be delivered across a complete spectrum of primary care populations, so that similar services could be developed across the country.

Read the detailed description

The care of childhood obesity clinic (COCO) at Bristol Royal Hospital for Children (BCH) provides a proven and effective treatment service for childhood obesity and is one of only a few specialist centres in the UK. The clinic service is based around a multidisciplanary team comprising: consultant; specialist nurses; dietitian: exercise specialist. This pilot study examines the feasibility of transferring the hospital clinic to a nurse led primary care setting in preparation for a full RCT. The study involves training a practice nurse to deliver the service in primary care alongside a dietitian and exercise specialist. Initial work will collect the views of staff delivering the hospital service and patients and parents which will enable us to identify the components of the service that will be needed to run a primary care based service. As a pilot we will focus on: (a) whether weight management is equally good in primary care; (b) whether recruitment, patient retention and satisfaction can be improved in primary care and (c) what data need to be collected for a full economic assessment.

Children will be recruited to the trial by GP via electronic referral form designed by the study team. Families of children fulfilling recruitment criteria (age: 5-16, BMI≥98th centile) will be sent a study pack and reply form, all those who do not respond will be contacted by the COCO consultant to clarify willingness to participate. Families declining participation will follow usual care pathway. Recruited families will be randomised to one of two primary care clinics or COCO clinic.

02

Conditions studied

  • Childhood Obesity

Keywords

  • Childhood
  • Obesity
  • Primary Care
03

In context

Pediatric Obesity

1,129 studies on the registry are indexed under Pediatric Obesity; 187 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 106 is close to the median of 100 across 870 interventional studies indexed under Pediatric Obesity.

Browse Pediatric Obesity studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Bristol is the lead sponsor of 22 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 5 to \<18 yrs old on day of recruitment
  • Children consulting their general practitioner or other primary care professional with a weight > 95th percentile

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suspected underlying pathology or syndrome on primary consultation
  • Severe learning difficulties
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
106 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Hospital

    Care of Childhood Obesity Clinic (COCO)

    Behavioral: Obesity management framework

  • Active comparator
    Primary Care

    Primary care clinics (x2)

    Behavioral: Obesity management framework

Interventions

  • BehavioralObesity management framework

    Treatment in primary care will be compared to treatment in a secondary hospital setting. Treatment in both cases will be provided by a multi-disciplinary team of: obesity or practice nurse, dietitian, exercise specialist with some input from medical team.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To investigate the feasibility of replicating a successful hospital based, childhood obesity clinic in primary care using trained primary care staff and undertake a pilot trial.

    To measure whether attendance and retention are similar in primary care clinic to hospital based clinic.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Primary care staff training

    Can we train primary care staff to deliver the weight management intervention

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. General practice engagement

    Is it possible to engage general practices in structured care of obese children

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Family expectations of locality based, weight management clinics.

    What parents and children would like to see in a community based service especially regarding access and retention in the service

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Defining outcomes for main RCT.

    The optimum outcome measures to be used in the main RCT especially for the health economics

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. The protocol for GP screening to identify exclusions

    To produce a GP exclusion criteria list for main RCT.

    Time frame: 3 months

  6. Sample size calculation (for main trial)

    The likely size of differences between the groups and thus the size of the main trial

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Bristol Primary Care Trust
    Bristol, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hollinghurst S, Hunt LP, Banks J, Sharp DJ, Shield JP. Cost and effectiveness of treatment options for childhood obesity. Pediatr Obes. 2014 Feb;9(1):e26-34. doi: 10.1111/j.2047-6310.2013.00150.x. Epub 2013 Mar 18. PubMed 23505002 ↗
  • Banks J, Sharp DJ, Hunt LP, Shield JP. Evaluating the transferability of a hospital-based childhood obesity clinic to primary care: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Jan;62(594):e6-12. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X616319. PubMed 22520658 ↗
  • Banks J, Williams J, Cumberlidge T, Cimonetti T, Sharp DJ, Shield JP. Is healthy eating for obese children necessarily more costly for families? Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Jan;62(594):e1-5. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X616300. PubMed 22520655 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Apr 2008, a primary completion of Jun 2010 and a completion of Jun 2010. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 27, 2007
First posted
Sep 28, 2007
Start
Apr 2008
Primary completionActual
Jun 2010
CompletionActual
Jun 2010
Last update
Apr 9, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 9, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00536536
Lead sponsor
University of Bristol
Responsible party
Julian Hamilton-Shield (Professor of Diabetes and metabolic Endocrinology, University of Bristol) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 28, 2007
Start date
Apr 2008
Primary completion
Jun 2010
Completion
Jun 2010
Last update
Apr 9, 2019

Study contacts

Debbie Sharp
principal investigator · University of Bristol
Christopher Salisbury
principal investigator · University of Bristol

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion