CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00529997Updated Aug 11, 2010

Dynamic Stabilization for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Stabilimax NZ® Dynamic Spine Stabilization System

An interventional study of Stabilimax NZ® Dynamic Spine Stabilization System in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, sponsored by Applied Spine Technologies. Terminated at 19 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-08-11.

Sponsored by Applied Spine Technologies · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Company has ceased operation
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
480
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this trial is to assess whether the Stabilimax NZ® is at least as safe and effective as the control therapy of fusion in patients receiving decompression surgery for the treatment of clinically symptomatic spinal stenosis at one contiguous vertebral levels from L1-S1. Safety and effectiveness will be assessed by means of primary study endpoints which address improvements in pain and function in the absence of major device related complications.

The study hypothesis criteria for demonstrating safety and efficacy requires scientific evidence that patients classified as satisfying the primary study endpoint post device implantation is at least as good for Stabilimax NZ® recipients as that for patients undergoing fusion with posterior pedicle screw instrumentation at the 24 month followup assessment.

Read the detailed description

Degenerative spine disease is a normal part of the aging process. This degeneration can sometimes cause significant pain and limit normal movement.

The pain can be from many sources. For patients being enrolled into this study the pain has been diagnosed to be primarily as a result of a condition called spinal stenosis. The current standard of care for the treatment of moderate to severe spinal stenosis is a surgical procedure that relieves the pressure on the spinal cord and nerves is called decompression surgery. The surgeon removes the tissue and bone that are causing the narrowing thus relieving the pinching of the spinal cord and nerve roots. After surgery, the patient may have a spine that is too unstable. In other words the muscles and ligaments around the spine have to work too hard to maintain normal posture and to control movement. For many years those patients with unstable backs have received fusion therapy. Fusion is the development of bone between the vertebra to stabilize the spine and prevent motion. This is done by inserting a bone graft around the vertebra being treated and placing a rigid brace called a fusion device to prevent movement. Eventually bone will form between the vertebra and the spine will become "fused".

In this study we will be conducting research to evaluate a new, investigative medical device that is designed to brace and support the spine just like fusion but without fusing in the patient's spine. Devices that do this are called "motion preserving" or "dynamic stabilizing" spinal devices. The investigational device that is being evaluated in this study is called the Stabilimax NZ® Dynamic Spinal Stabilization System. The Stabilimax NZ® is inserted and fixed to the vertebra by means of pedicle screws in exactly the same way a fusion device is inserted and attached. The only difference is that for the Stabilimax NZ® no bone graft will be placed around or between the vertebra to promote bone growth for fusion. Patients in the study will receive either the Stabilimax NZ® or will receive a fusion procedure. The study is a randomized controlled clinical trial using a 2:1 investigational:control randomization scheme. The study will enroll 480 patients at approximately 20 investigational sites across the United States.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Keywords

  • Lumbar Spine
  • Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
  • Spondylolisthesis
  • Dynamic Stabilization
  • Motion Preserving
  • Arthroplasty
  • Randomized
  • Investigational
  • Back Pain
  • Leg Pain
03

In context

Spinal Stenosis

459 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Stenosis; 103 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 480 is above the median of 80 across 283 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Stenosis.

Browse Spinal Stenosis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Applied Spine Technologies as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Radiographic:

  • Degenerative spinal stenosis of the lumbar spine, central, lateral recess, or foraminal;
  • Evidence of the cal sac and/or cauda equina compression, nerve root impingement, hypertrophic facets with canal encroachment, with or without spondylolisthesis, if present, no more than grade 1

General:

  • The greater of the patients right and left VAS leg pain score is ≥ 40 mm on a 100 mm scale;
  • Zurich Claudication Questionnaire Symptom Severity score greater than 2 on a scale of 1-5;
  • Zurich Claudication Questionnaire Physical Function score greater than or equal to 2 on a scale of 1-4;
  • Intermittent neurogenic claudication
  • At least six months of non-surgical management.
  • Skeletally mature patients at least 21 years of age;
  • Willing to provide written consent for participation and a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act authorization;
  • Willing to undergo all study procedures including physical therapy and adhere to the follow-up schedule; and
  • No additional surgical treatment is required outside the investigational or control at the time of surgery.

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

Initial Screening:

  • Prior surgery at any lumbar level including the level being treated except for: Lamino/Foraminotomy, Microdiscectomy, IDET, and Percutaneous Discectomy.
  • Prior surgery at any lumbar level within one year of enrollment;
  • No more than one prior surgery at any lumbar level;
  • Previous acute trauma at the treated level within two years of enrollment;
  • Primary and predominate diagnosis of discogenic back pain, e.g. torn disc, herniated disc inflamed or irritated disc, or other disc pathology;
  • Symptomatic cervical and/or thoracic neurological compromise;
  • Significant peripheral neuropathy or acute denervation secondary to radiculopathy, caused by conditions other than spinal stenosis;
  • Other neurological pathology that could confound study results;
  • Cauda Equina Syndrome;
  • Contraindicated for MRI;
  • Morbid obesity (BMI > 40);
  • Peripheral vascular disease requiring intervention (≥ 50% stenosis of vessel);
  • Active systemic or surgical site infection;
  • Any significant medical conditions that would represent a significant increase in surgical risk or interfere with normal healing;
  • History of psychosocial disorders that could prevent accurate completion of self reporting assessment scales
  • Women who are pregnant, lactating or anticipate becoming pregnant within 24 months post-surgery;
  • Insulin dependent diabetes mellitus;
  • Immunocompromised such as but not limited to Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome , genetic deficiencies of the complement system, Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Disease, Thymic Hypoplasia;
  • Receiving immunosuppressive therapy
  • Receiving long-term steroid therapy. Autoimmune disease;
  • Active hepatitis;
  • Malignancy of any type within the last five years;
  • Previous known allergy to the materials contained in the Stabilimax NZ™ device including nickel, cobalt, chromium, molybdenum, iron, titanium, or Teflon™;
  • Participation in another clinical study within four weeks of enrollment, or;
  • Receiving Worker's Compensation or is involved in active litigation relating to his/her spinal condition;
  • Patients who are prisoners.

Radiographic:

  • Gross instability, defined as greater than 3 mm translational motion on flexion/extension studies;
  • Degenerative spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis higher than grade 1
  • Degenerative scoliosis > 10° at any level(s) in lumbar spine
  • Lateral listhesis on A-P X Ray
  • Spondylolysis at any level in lumbar spine
  • Isthmic Spondylolisthesis at any level in lumbar spine
  • Spondylolisthesis at more than one lumbar level;
  • DEXA score equal to or below -2.5 T;
  • Pathological vertebral fracture;
  • Metastases to the spinal vertebra; Paget's disease of bone; Osteomalacia; Pars defect or facet fracture;
  • Facet arthropathy at the level(s) to be treated is less than grade 2 and greater than grade 3 according to the Fujiwara scale;
  • More than moderate disc degeneration defined as: > 66% loss of disc height compared to the normal, superior adjacent level; and/or moderate to Severe Osteophyte formation;
  • Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis;
  • Estimated interpedicular distance of less than 30 mm.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
480 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    Posterior Dynamic Stabilization with the Stabilimax NZ

    Device: Stabilimax NZ® Dynamic Spine Stabilization System

  • Active comparator
    2

    Posteriolateral instrumented fusion

    Device: Stabilimax NZ® Dynamic Spine Stabilization System

Interventions

  • DeviceStabilimax NZ® Dynamic Spine Stabilization System

    Surgical Implantation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Decrease in leg pain of 20 mm on a VAS pain scale; Decrease of ≥ .5 on ZCQ for both Symptom Severity and Physical Function; No major device-related complications; and No surgical revision, reoperation, removal, or supplemental fixation at treated level

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Reduction in OR Time, Blood Loss, Hospital Stay. Improvement in quality of life and return to work. Improvement in the incidence of adverse events. Radiographic evidence of nonfusion.

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

19 sites
  • Surgical Specialty Hospital
    Phoenix, Arizona 85015, United States
  • Cedars Sinai Medical Center Hospital
    Los Angeles, California 90048, United States
  • Tri-City Medical Center
    Oceanside, California 92056, United States
  • Littleton Adventist Hospital
    Littleton, Colorado 80122, United States
  • New Britain General Hospital
    New Britain, Connecticut 06052, United States
  • Morton Plant Mease
    Clearwater, Florida 33756, United States
  • Largo Medical Center
    Largo, Florida 33770, United States
  • University Community Hospital at Carrolwood
    Tampa, Florida 33614, United States
  • Rush University Medical Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • Upstate Medical Center
    Syracuse, New York 13210, United States
  • North Carolina Specialty Hospital
    Durham, North Carolina 27704, United States
  • Blanchard Valley Hospital
    Findlay, Ohio 45840, United States
  • Sacred Heart Medical Center
    Eugene, Oregon 97401, United States
  • Lehigh Valley Hospital
    Allentown, Pennsylvania 18105, United States
  • Wellmont Bristol Regional Medical Center
    Bristol, Tennessee 37620, United States
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
  • Presbyterian Plano Center for Diagnostics & Surgery
    Plano, Texas 75093, United States
  • University of Utah Hospital
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, United States
  • DePaul Medical Center
    Norfolk, Virginia 23505, United States
08

References and documents

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 11, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00529997
Lead sponsor
Applied Spine Technologies
First posted
Sep 17, 2007
Start date
Feb 2007
Primary completion
Dec 2010 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2010 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 11, 2010

Study contacts

Richard Guyer, MD
principal investigator · Texas Back Institute
David Musante, M.D.
principal investigator · Triangle Orthopedics Associates
Neel Anand, M.D.
principal investigator · Cedars Sinai Medical Center Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Aug 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion