CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00529308TMSUpdated Feb 21, 2019Results posted

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) for Individuals With Tourette's Syndrome

A Phase 2 interventional study of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (active) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (sham) in Tourette Syndrome, sponsored by Yale University. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-21.

Sponsored by Yale University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will evaluate the clinical efficacy of 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied to the supplementary motor area (SMA) in Tourette's Syndrome (TS) patients who have not fully responded to conventional therapies. The investigators will collect TMS measures of motor cortex excitability to test whether rTMS restores normal levels of intracortical inhibition found to be deficient in TS. The investigators will administer neuropsychological tests to demonstrate that SMA targeted rTMS can be administered safely without significant impairments of cognitive or motor functioning. The investigators hypothesize that:

  1. Compared to sham (placebo), active rTMS will improve symptoms of TS as assessed with the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (Y-GTSS) and Clinical Global Impression (CGI).
  2. Active (but not sham) rTMS will normalize levels of motor cortex excitability, as reflected by increased intracortical inhibition, motor threshold, and cortical silent period, and by decreased intracortical facilitation, relative to pre-treatment baseline.
Read the detailed description

This study tests the efficacy of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of Tourette's Syndrome (TS). It also examines measures of brain function to study the brain basis underlying TS.

Despite major advances in the study and treatment of TS, patients often do not experience full remission from pharmacotherapy or behavioral therapy (Leckman 2002). rTMS is a non-invasive procedure that stimulates the brain using magnetic fields. This pilot study reported that rTMS may reduce TS symptoms (Mantovani et al., 2006). While promising, prior research has several limitations (e.g., relatively small sample sizes, and lack of sham [placebo] comparison).

This study addresses the drawbacks of prior work, and will provide data that will help to determine whether rTMS can be useful for TS patients resistant to conventional therapies. 25 outpatients with TS who have been only partially responsive to conventional therapies will be randomly assigned to either active low frequency (1 Hz) rTMS or sham (placebo) stimulation. The active or sham stimulation will be applied to the supplementary motor area (SMA) daily for three weeks. If rTMS will be added onto ongoing pharmacotherapy, the doses must have been stable for four weeks prior to study entry. The SMA was selected because of its connections with brain areas implicated in TS. Pilot work indicates that stimulation of SMA with low frequency rTMS is beneficial in TS patients. Low frequency rTMS has the added benefit of a better safety profile (i.e. no risk of seizure) than high frequency rTMS.

Rating scales for symptom change will be obtained at baseline, during the rTMS course, and at the end of three weeks of treatment. Patients will then be offered an open-label cross-over phase for an additional three weeks of daily active rTMS treatment. Patients who meet remission criteria in either phase or response criteria following the cross-over phase will continue routine clinical care under the supervision of their treating psychiatrist and will be invited back for assessment at 1, 3, and 6 months to determine the persistence of benefit.

Excitability of the motor cortex has been reported to be abnormal in TS, and may relate to dysfunction in motor pathways. We will collect measures of motor cortex excitability (with single and paired-pulse TMS) at baseline and after each phase to study whether changes in these measures may be correlated with clinical improvement.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tourette Syndrome

Keywords

  • Tourette
  • Tourette's
03

In context

Tourette Syndrome

220 studies on the registry are indexed under Tourette Syndrome; 37 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 34 across 166 interventional studies indexed under Tourette Syndrome.

Browse Tourette Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Yale University is the lead sponsor of 1,724 studies on the registry; 298 are open to participants now.

Of its 210 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 126 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Primary diagnosis of Tourette's Syndrome, as confirmed by the DSM-IV-TR criteria
  • Residual TS symptoms, defined as a total Y-GTSS total motor tic or phonic tic score > 20, despite treatment with an adequate trial of medications (defined as a failure to respond to a trial of commonly used medications for TS such as clonidine, guanfacine, or neuroleptic medications, given at recommended dosage and duration based on the clinician's judgment)
  • Persistent high level of tic severity for 4 months despite efforts to control the tics using medications, or the presence of self injurious tics
  • Duration of the index episode of at least a year
  • Individuals who cannot tolerate medications of class and dose at the specified duration as described above will also be included
  • Patients currently on medication must be at the same stable dose(s) for one month prior to enrollment and be willing to continue at the same dose(s) through the duration of the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals diagnosed with major depressive disorder (current) of moderate or severe intensity (CGI ≥ 4), bipolar disorder (lifetime), any psychotic disorder (lifetime), or an Axis II personality disorder; with a history of substance abuse or dependence within the past year (except nicotine and caffeine); or at significant acute suicide risk will be excluded

Other exclusion criteria include those common to every TMS protocol:

  • Individuals with a clinically defined neurological disorder, with an increased risk of seizure for any reason, with a history of treatment with TMS, deep brain stimulation for any disorder will be excluded
  • Patients with cardiac pacemakers, implanted medication pumps, intracardiac lines, or acute, unstable cardiac disease, with intracranial implants (e.g. aneurysm clips, shunts, stimulators, cochlear implants, or electrodes) or any other metal object within or near the head, excluding the mouth, that cannot be safely removed will be excluded
  • Current use of any investigational drug, any medications with proconvulsive action, such as bupropion, maprotiline, tricyclic antidepressant, clomipramine, classical antipsychotics, and daily use of any medications with a known inhibitory effect on cortical excitability measures (e.g., anticonvulsants, standing doses of benzodiazepines, sedative/hypnotics, and atypical antipsychotics) will not be permitted
  • If participating in psychotherapy, patients must have been in stable treatment for at least three months prior to entry into the study, with no anticipation of change in frequency therapeutic sessions, or the therapeutic focus over the duration of the TMS trial
  • Finally, current significant laboratory abnormality, known or suspected pregnancy, women who are breast-feeding or women of childbearing potential not using a medically accepted form of contraception when engaging in sexual intercourse will also be excluded.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Active

    Device: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (active)

  • Sham comparator
    Sham

    Device: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (sham)

Interventions

  • DeviceTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation (active)

    Magstim Rapid2 stimulator with Air Film Coil at 110% motor threshold at 1Hz for 30 minutes.

    Also known as: Magstim Rapid2

  • DeviceTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation (sham)

    Magstim Rapid2 stimulator with Sham Air Film Coil at 110% motor threshold at 1Hz for 30 minutes.

    Also known as: Magstim Rapid2

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (Y-GTSS)

    Y-GTSS is a clinician-rated scale used to assess tic severity. Motor and phonic tics are rated separately from 0 to 5 on several scales including number, frequency, intensity, complexity, and interference. Thus Motor and Phonic Tic scores can range from 0 to 25; the combined Total Tic Score ranges from 0 to 50. There is also an Impairment score that rates the overall burden due to tics. The Impairment scale yields a single score from 0 to 50 with higher scores indicating higher levels of overall impairment associated with tics.

    Time frame: 3 weeks

  2. Motor Cortex Excitability Normalization-Right Motor Threshold

    Motor Threshold (MT) is thought to be a measure of membrane excitability in pyramidal neurons. MT is defined as the minimum magnetic flux needed to elicit a threshold EMG response (50 µV in peak to peak amplitude) in a resting target muscle in 5 out of 10 trials using single pulse TMS administered to the contralateral primary motor cortex. MT for both right and left hand are determined, and the lowest is used to select the intensity for rTMS.

    Time frame: 3 weeks

  3. Number of Patients With "Much Improved or Very Much Improved" on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI) Scale

    The CGI-I is a clinician-rated scales that have been used in clinical trials for over 25 years. Clinicians rate patient improvement compared to baseline. By convention, 4 = No Change; scores of 5, 6, and 7 move in the direction of worsening; scores of 3, 2, and 1 correspond to "Minimal Improvement," "Much Improved" or "Very Much Improved," respectively. CGI-I ratings of "Much" or "Very Much Improved" at post-treatment are used to identify treatment responders.

    Time frame: 3 weeks

  4. Motor Cortex Excitability Normalization-Left Motor Threshold

    Motor Threshold (MT) is thought to be a measure of membrane excitability in pyramidal neurons. MT is defined as the minimum magnetic flux needed to elicit a threshold EMG response (50 µV in peak to peak amplitude) in a resting target muscle in 5 out of 10 trials using single pulse TMS administered to the contralateral primary motor cortex. MT for both right and left hand are determined, and the lowest is used to select the intensity for rTMS.

    Time frame: 3 weeks

  5. Number of Patients With "Improved or Minimally Improved" in Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI) Scale

    The CGI-I is a clinician-rated scales that have been used in clinical trials for over 25 years. Clinicians rate patient improvement compared to baseline. By convention, 4 = No Change; scores of 5, 6, and 7 move in the direction of worsening; scores of 3, 2, and 1 correspond to "Minimal Improvement," "Much Improved" or "Very Much Improved," respectively. CGI-I ratings of "Much" or "Very Much Improved" at post-treatment are used to identify treatment responders.

    Time frame: 3 weeks

07

Results

Posted Feb 15, 2013

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneActive rTMSSham
Started911
Completed810
Not completed11
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject11

Outcome measures

PrimaryYale Global Tic Severity Scale (Y-GTSS)

Y-GTSS is a clinician-rated scale used to assess tic severity. Motor and phonic tics are rated separately from 0 to 5 on several scales including number, frequency, intensity, complexity, and interference. Thus Motor and Phonic Tic scores can range from 0 to 25; the combined Total Tic Score ranges from 0 to 50. There is also an Impairment score that rates the overall burden due to tics. The Impairment scale yields a single score from 0 to 50 with higher scores indicating higher levels of overall impairment associated with tics.

Time frame:
3 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (Y-GTSS)
units on a scaleActiveSham
Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (Y-GTSS)29.5 ± 11.931.5 ± 8.1
PrimaryMotor Cortex Excitability Normalization-Right Motor Threshold

Motor Threshold (MT) is thought to be a measure of membrane excitability in pyramidal neurons. MT is defined as the minimum magnetic flux needed to elicit a threshold EMG response (50 µV in peak to peak amplitude) in a resting target muscle in 5 out of 10 trials using single pulse TMS administered to the contralateral primary motor cortex. MT for both right and left hand are determined, and the lowest is used to select the intensity for rTMS.

Time frame:
3 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · µV
Motor Cortex Excitability Normalization-Right Motor Threshold
µVActiveSham
Motor Cortex Excitability Normalization-Right Motor Threshold56 ± 16.359.8 ± 16.3
PrimaryNumber of Patients With "Much Improved or Very Much Improved" on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI) Scale

The CGI-I is a clinician-rated scales that have been used in clinical trials for over 25 years. Clinicians rate patient improvement compared to baseline. By convention, 4 = No Change; scores of 5, 6, and 7 move in the direction of worsening; scores of 3, 2, and 1 correspond to "Minimal Improvement," "Much Improved" or "Very Much Improved," respectively. CGI-I ratings of "Much" or "Very Much Improved" at post-treatment are used to identify treatment responders.

Time frame:
3 weeks
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Patients With "Much Improved or Very Much Improved" on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI) Scale
participantsActiveSham
Number of Patients With "Much Improved or Very Much Improved" on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI) Scale10
PrimaryMotor Cortex Excitability Normalization-Left Motor Threshold

Motor Threshold (MT) is thought to be a measure of membrane excitability in pyramidal neurons. MT is defined as the minimum magnetic flux needed to elicit a threshold EMG response (50 µV in peak to peak amplitude) in a resting target muscle in 5 out of 10 trials using single pulse TMS administered to the contralateral primary motor cortex. MT for both right and left hand are determined, and the lowest is used to select the intensity for rTMS.

Time frame:
3 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · µV
Motor Cortex Excitability Normalization-Left Motor Threshold
µVActiveSham
Motor Cortex Excitability Normalization-Left Motor Threshold56.5 ± 12.863.8 ± 16.3
PrimaryNumber of Patients With "Improved or Minimally Improved" in Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI) Scale

The CGI-I is a clinician-rated scales that have been used in clinical trials for over 25 years. Clinicians rate patient improvement compared to baseline. By convention, 4 = No Change; scores of 5, 6, and 7 move in the direction of worsening; scores of 3, 2, and 1 correspond to "Minimal Improvement," "Much Improved" or "Very Much Improved," respectively. CGI-I ratings of "Much" or "Very Much Improved" at post-treatment are used to identify treatment responders.

Time frame:
3 weeks
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Patients With "Improved or Minimally Improved" in Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI) Scale
participantsActiveSham
Number of Patients With "Improved or Minimally Improved" in Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI) Scale28

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse Events were collected throughout the duration of the study, which was approximately 4 years.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Active—0/8 (0%)4/8 (50%)
Sham—0/10 (0%)9/10 (90%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventActiveSham
Neck PainMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/89/10
HeadacheNervous system disorders4/84/10
Scalp PainSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders2/82/10
Trouble ConcentratingNervous system disorders0/81/10

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)ActiveShamTotal
Mean29.1 ± 7.439.0 ± 16.133.7 ± 12.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ActiveShamTotal
Female224
Male7916
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Yale University School of Medicine
    New Haven, Connecticut 06520, United States
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute
    New York, New York 10032, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Alexander GE, Crutcher MD, DeLong MR. Basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuits: parallel substrates for motor, oculomotor, "prefrontal" and "limbic" functions. Prog Brain Res. 1990;85:119-46. PubMed 2094891 ↗
  • Allison DB, Mentore JL, Heo M, Chandler LP, Cappelleri JC, Infante MC, Weiden PJ. Antipsychotic-induced weight gain: a comprehensive research synthesis. Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Nov;156(11):1686-96. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.11.1686. PubMed 10553730 ↗
  • Artola A, Brocher S, Singer W. Different voltage-dependent thresholds for inducing long-term depression and long-term potentiation in slices of rat visual cortex. Nature. 1990 Sep 6;347(6288):69-72. doi: 10.1038/347069a0. PubMed 1975639 ↗
  • Bliss TV, Gardner-Medwin AR. Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the unanaestetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path. J Physiol. 1973 Jul;232(2):357-74. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010274. PubMed 4727085 ↗
  • Bruggeman R, van der Linden C, Buitelaar JK, Gericke GS, Hawkridge SM, Temlett JA. Risperidone versus pimozide in Tourette's disorder: a comparative double-blind parallel-group study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001 Jan;62(1):50-6. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v62n0111. PubMed 11235929 ↗
  • Chen R, Classen J, Gerloff C, Celnik P, Wassermann EM, Hallett M, Cohen LG. Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology. 1997 May;48(5):1398-403. doi: 10.1212/wnl.48.5.1398. PubMed 9153480 ↗
  • Elwood RW. The California Verbal Learning Test: psychometric characteristics and clinical application. Neuropsychol Rev. 1995 Sep;5(3):173-201. doi: 10.1007/BF02214761. PubMed 8653108 ↗
  • Greenberg BD, Ziemann U, Cora-Locatelli G, Harmon A, Murphy DL, Keel JC, Wassermann EM. Altered cortical excitability in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Neurology. 2000 Jan 11;54(1):142-7. doi: 10.1212/wnl.54.1.142. PubMed 10636140 ↗
  • Hoffman RE, Cavus I. Slow transcranial magnetic stimulation, long-term depotentiation, and brain hyperexcitability disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Jul;159(7):1093-102. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.7.1093. PubMed 12091184 ↗
  • Kirkwood A, Dudek SM, Gold JT, Aizenman CD, Bear MF. Common forms of synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus and neocortex in vitro. Science. 1993 Jun 4;260(5113):1518-21. doi: 10.1126/science.8502997. PubMed 8502997 ↗
  • Leckman JF. Tourette's syndrome. Lancet. 2002 Nov 16;360(9345):1577-86. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11526-1. PubMed 12443611 ↗
  • Leckman JF, Hardin MT, Riddle MA, Stevenson J, Ort SI, Cohen DJ. Clonidine treatment of Gilles de la Tourette's syndrome. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1991 Apr;48(4):324-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1991.01810280040006. PubMed 2009034 ↗
  • Leckman JF, Vaccarino FM, Kalanithi PS, Rothenberger A. Annotation: Tourette syndrome: a relentless drumbeat--driven by misguided brain oscillations. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006 Jun;47(6):537-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01620.x. PubMed 16712630 ↗
  • Marsh R, Alexander GM, Packard MG, Zhu H, Wingard JC, Quackenbush G, Peterson BS. Habit learning in Tourette syndrome: a translational neuroscience approach to a developmental psychopathology. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004 Dec;61(12):1259-68. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.12.1259. PubMed 15583117 ↗
  • Moll GH, Heinrich H, Gevensleben H, Rothenberger A. Tic distribution and inhibitory processes in the sensorimotor circuit during adolescence: a cross-sectional TMS study. Neurosci Lett. 2006 Jul 31;403(1-2):96-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.04.021. Epub 2006 May 9. PubMed 16690208 ↗
  • Peterson BS, Leckman JF. The temporal dynamics of tics in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Biol Psychiatry. 1998 Dec 15;44(12):1337-48. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(98)00176-0. PubMed 9861477 ↗
  • Peterson BS, Skudlarski P, Anderson AW, Zhang H, Gatenby JC, Lacadie CM, Leckman JF, Gore JC. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of tic suppression in Tourette syndrome. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998 Apr;55(4):326-33. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.55.4.326. PubMed 9554428 ↗
  • Peterson BS, Staib L, Scahill L, Zhang H, Anderson C, Leckman JF, Cohen DJ, Gore JC, Albert J, Webster R. Regional brain and ventricular volumes in Tourette syndrome. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001 May;58(5):427-40. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.58.5.427. PubMed 11343521 ↗
  • Peterson BS, Thomas P, Kane MJ, Scahill L, Zhang H, Bronen R, King RA, Leckman JF, Staib L. Basal Ganglia volumes in patients with Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Apr;60(4):415-24. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.4.415. PubMed 12695320 ↗
  • Piacentini J, Chang S. Behavioral treatments for Tourette syndrome and tic disorders: state of the art. Adv Neurol. 2001;85:319-31. No abstract available. PubMed 11530440 ↗
  • Quintana H. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in persons younger than the age of 18. J ECT. 2005 Jun;21(2):88-95. doi: 10.1097/01.yct.0000162556.02720.58. PubMed 15905749 ↗
  • Rossi S, Pasqualetti P, Rossini PM, Feige B, Ulivelli M, Glocker FX, Battistini N, Lucking CH, Kristeva-Feige R. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on movement-related cortical activity in humans. Cereb Cortex. 2000 Aug;10(8):802-8. doi: 10.1093/cercor/10.8.802. PubMed 10920051 ↗
  • Sallee FR, Kurlan R, Goetz CG, Singer H, Scahill L, Law G, Dittman VM, Chappell PB. Ziprasidone treatment of children and adolescents with Tourette's syndrome: a pilot study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2000 Mar;39(3):292-9. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200003000-00010. PubMed 10714048 ↗
  • Sallee FR, Nesbitt L, Jackson C, Sine L, Sethuraman G. Relative efficacy of haloperidol and pimozide in children and adolescents with Tourette's disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 1997 Aug;154(8):1057-62. doi: 10.1176/ajp.154.8.1057. PubMed 9247389 ↗
  • Scahill L, Chappell PB, Kim YS, Schultz RT, Katsovich L, Shepherd E, Arnsten AF, Cohen DJ, Leckman JF. A placebo-controlled study of guanfacine in the treatment of children with tic disorders and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2001 Jul;158(7):1067-74. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.7.1067. PubMed 11431228 ↗
  • Scahill L, Leckman JF, Schultz RT, Katsovich L, Peterson BS. A placebo-controlled trial of risperidone in Tourette syndrome. Neurology. 2003 Apr 8;60(7):1130-5. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000055434.39968.67. PubMed 12682319 ↗
  • Scahill L, Riddle MA, King RA, Hardin MT, Rasmusson A, Makuch RW, Leckman JF. Fluoxetine has no marked effect on tic symptoms in patients with Tourette's syndrome: a double-blind placebo-controlled study. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 1997 Summer;7(2):75-85. doi: 10.1089/cap.1997.7.75. PubMed 9334893 ↗
  • Schultz RT, Carter AS, Gladstone M, Scahill L, Leckman JF, Peterson BS, Zhang H, Cohen DJ, Pauls D. Visual-motor integration functioning in children with Tourette syndrome. Neuropsychology. 1998 Jan;12(1):134-145. doi: 10.1037//0894-4105.12.1.134. PubMed 9460741 ↗
  • Shapiro E, Shapiro AK, Fulop G, Hubbard M, Mandeli J, Nordlie J, Phillips RA. Controlled study of haloperidol, pimozide and placebo for the treatment of Gilles de la Tourette's syndrome. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989 Aug;46(8):722-30. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810080052006. PubMed 2665687 ↗
  • Speer AM, Willis MW, Herscovitch P, Daube-Witherspoon M, Shelton JR, Benson BE, Post RM, Wassermann EM. Intensity-dependent regional cerebral blood flow during 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in healthy volunteers studied with H215O positron emission tomography: II. Effects of prefrontal cortex rTMS. Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Oct 15;54(8):826-32. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00324-x. PubMed 14550682 ↗
  • Stanton PK, Sejnowski TJ. Associative long-term depression in the hippocampus induced by hebbian covariance. Nature. 1989 May 18;339(6221):215-8. doi: 10.1038/339215a0. PubMed 2716848 ↗
  • Wirshing DA, Boyd JA, Meng LR, Ballon JS, Marder SR, Wirshing WC. The effects of novel antipsychotics on glucose and lipid levels. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002 Oct;63(10):856-65. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v63n1002. PubMed 12416594 ↗
  • Ziemann U, Paulus W, Rothenberger A. Decreased motor inhibition in Tourette's disorder: evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation. Am J Psychiatry. 1997 Sep;154(9):1277-84. doi: 10.1176/ajp.154.9.1277. PubMed 9286189 ↗
  • Parent A, Hazrati LN. Functional anatomy of the basal ganglia. I. The cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical loop. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1995 Jan;20(1):91-127. doi: 10.1016/0165-0173(94)00007-c. PubMed 7711769 ↗
  • Cohen LG, Roth BJ, Nilsson J, Dang N, Panizza M, Bandinelli S, Friauf W, Hallett M. Effects of coil design on delivery of focal magnetic stimulation. Technical considerations. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990 Apr;75(4):350-7. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(90)90113-x. PubMed 1691084 ↗
  • Wassermann EM. Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998 Jan;108(1):1-16. doi: 10.1016/s0168-5597(97)00096-8. PubMed 9474057 ↗
  • Orth M, Kirby R, Richardson MP, Snijders AH, Rothwell JC, Trimble MR, Robertson MM, Munchau A. Subthreshold rTMS over pre-motor cortex has no effect on tics in patients with Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Apr;116(4):764-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.10.003. Epub 2004 Nov 25. PubMed 15792884 ↗
  • Wilhelm S, Deckersbach T, Coffey BJ, Bohne A, Peterson AL, Baer L. Habit reversal versus supportive psychotherapy for Tourette's disorder: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Jun;160(6):1175-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.6.1175. PubMed 12777279 ↗
  • Bloch MH, Leckman JF, Zhu H, Peterson BS. Caudate volumes in childhood predict symptom severity in adults with Tourette syndrome. Neurology. 2005 Oct 25;65(8):1253-8. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000180957.98702.69. PubMed 16247053 ↗
  • Chae JH, Nahas Z, Wassermann E, Li X, Sethuraman G, Gilbert D, Sallee FR, George MS. A pilot safety study of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in Tourette's syndrome. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2004 Jun;17(2):109-17. doi: 10.1097/01.wnn.0000116253.78804.3a. PubMed 15453520 ↗
  • Davis KK, Davis JS, Dowler L. In motion, out of place: the public space(s) of Tourette Syndrome. Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jul;59(1):103-12. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.10.008. PubMed 15087147 ↗
  • Fried I, Katz A, McCarthy G, Sass KJ, Williamson P, Spencer SS, Spencer DD. Functional organization of human supplementary motor cortex studied by electrical stimulation. J Neurosci. 1991 Nov;11(11):3656-66. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.11-11-03656.1991. PubMed 1941101 ↗
  • Karadenizli D, Dilbaz N, Bayam G. Gilles de la Tourette syndrome: response to electroconvulsive therapy. J ECT. 2005 Dec;21(4):246-8. doi: 10.1097/01.yct.0000184618.00661.72. PubMed 16301887 ↗
  • Knowlton BJ, Mangels JA, Squire LR. A neostriatal habit learning system in humans. Science. 1996 Sep 6;273(5280):1399-402. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5280.1399. PubMed 8703077 ↗
  • Mantovani A, Lisanby SH, Pieraccini F, Ulivelli M, Castrogiovanni P, Rossi S. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and Tourette's syndrome (TS). Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2006 Feb;9(1):95-100. doi: 10.1017/S1461145705005729. Epub 2005 Jun 28. PubMed 15982444 ↗
  • Munchau A, Bloem BR, Thilo KV, Trimble MR, Rothwell JC, Robertson MM. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for Tourette syndrome. Neurology. 2002 Dec 10;59(11):1789-91. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000036615.25044.50. PubMed 12473773 ↗
  • Landeros-Weisenberger A, Mantovani A, Motlagh MG, de Alvarenga PG, Katsovich L, Leckman JF, Lisanby SH. Randomized Sham Controlled Double-blind Trial of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Adults With Severe Tourette Syndrome. Brain Stimul. 2015 May-Jun;8(3):574-81. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.11.015. Epub 2014 Dec 3. PubMed 25912296 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 21, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00529308
Lead sponsor
Yale University
Collaborators
Tourette Association of America
Responsible party
Angeli Landeros-Weisenberger (Principal Investigator, Yale University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 14, 2007
Start date
Jul 2007
Primary completion
Jul 2011
Completion
Jul 2011
Results posted
Feb 15, 2013
Last update
Feb 21, 2019

Study contacts

Antonio Mantovani, MD
principal investigator · New York State Psychiatric Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion