CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00524303Updated Nov 11, 2016Results posted

Lapatinib +/- Trastuzumab In Addition To Standard Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer Therapy.

A Phase 2 interventional study of Trastuzumab and Paclitaxel in Neoplasms, Breast, sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. Completed at 23 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-11-11.

Sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study will examine safety and efficacy of Lapatinib in combination with a standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy including 5FU, Epirubicin, Cyclophosphamide and Paclitaxel. Tumor tissue will be obtained at 3 timepoints (optional 4th) to evaluate tumor response to treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neoplasms, Breast

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • ErbB2 Overexpressing
  • ErbB2 Positive
  • Lapatinib
  • Invasive Breast Cancer
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,544 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 100 is above the median of 72 across 9,303 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

GlaxoSmithKline is the lead sponsor of 3,562 studies on the registry; 117 are open to participants now.

Of its 258 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 232 (90%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Have signed an informed consent form (ICF) and a Patient Authorization Form (HIPAA).
  • Have histologically or cytologically confirmed ErbB2- (HER2/neu-) overexpressing invasive breast cancer (T2-4, N0-2).
  • ErbB2 overexpressing breast cancer, defined as one of the following definitions:
  • 3+ staining by immunohistochemistry (IHC),
  • a fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) result of more than six HER2 gene copies per nucleus
  • a FISH ratio of more than 2.2.
  • Have either measurable or evaluable disease.
  • Have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0-1 (Refer to Section 11.4).
  • Have LVEF within the institutional range of normal as measured by either echocardiogram (ECHO) or MUGA scans. The same modality must be used consistently throughout the study.
  • Be deemed able to tolerate 8 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy, including 4 cycles with an anthracycline (epirubicin).
  • Must be willing to undergo 2 mandatory core biopsies (4 passes each) after diagnosis to obtain tissue for biologic expression profiling. Any subject with clinically palpable residual disease may undergo an optional third biopsy to allow identification of presumed pathways of resistance to therapy. This information might be useful in providing the subject with options for other targeted therapies if definitive surgery confirms residual disease. Definitive local therapy with surgery and radiation therapy as indicated will be performed after completion of 12 weeks of paclitaxel-based chemotherapy.
  • Are able to swallow and retain oral medication (intact pill).
  • Are able to complete all screening assessments as outlined in the protocol.
  • Have adequate organ function as defined in Table 4:

Table 1 Baseline Laboratory Values

Hematologic:

ANC (absolute neutrophil count) >1.5 x 109/L hemoglobin >9 g/dL platelets >75 x 109/L

Hepatic:

albumin >2.5 g/dL serum bilirubin \<1.25 x ULN AST / ALT \<3 x ULN if no documented liver metastases AST / ALT \<3 x ULN with documented liver metastases

Renal:

serum creatinine \<2.0 mg/dL

  • OR - calculated creatinine clearance >40 mL/min
  • Are subjects aged >18 years with any menopausal status:

Non-child-bearing potential (i.e., women with functioning ovaries who have a current documented tubal ligation or hysterectomy, or women who are postmenopausal)

Child-bearing potential (i.e., women with functioning ovaries and no documented impairment of oviductal or uterine function that would cause sterility.) This category includes women with oligomenorrhea (severe), women who are perimenopausal, and young women who have begun to menstruate. These subjects must have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening and agree to one of the following:

Complete abstinence from intercourse from 2 weeks prior to administration of the first dose of study medication until 28 days after the final dose of study medication; or Consistent and correct use of one of the following acceptable methods of birth control: male partner who is sterile prior to the female subject's entry into the study and is the sole sexual partner for that female subject; any intrauterine device (IUD) with a documented failure rate of less than 1% per year; oral contraceptives (either combined or progestogen only) where not contraindicated for this subject population or per local practice.; or barrier methods, including diaphragm or condom with a spermicide.

Please note that breast cancer subjects on this trial cannot receive injectable levonorgestrel or injectable progestogen due to the potential for an adverse effect of anti-hormonal therapies on chemotherapy administered for breast cancer [Albain, 2002]. Progestogen may also affect the proliferative rate of endocrine-responsive tumors.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have received any prior chemotherapy.
  • Had prior therapy with an ErbB1 and/or ErbB2 inhibitor.
  • Are receiving concurrent anti-cancer therapy (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and biologic therapy) while taking study medication.
  • Have malabsorption syndrome, disease significantly affecting gastrointestinal function, or resection of the stomach or small bowel. Women with ulcerative colitis are also excluded.
  • Have a concurrent disease or condition that would make the woman inappropriate for study participation, or any serious medical disorder that would interfere with the woman's safety.
  • Have an active or uncontrolled infection.
  • Have dementia, altered mental status, or any psychiatric condition that would prohibit the understanding or rendering of informed consent.
  • Have active cardiac disease, defined as one or more of the following:

History of uncontrolled or symptomatic angina History of arrhythmias requiring medications, or clinically significant Myocardial infarction \<6 months from study entry Uncontrolled or symptomatic congestive heart failure Ejection fraction below the institutional normal limit Any other cardiac condition, which in the opinion of the treating physician, would make this protocol unreasonably hazardous for the patient

  • Are pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • Have received concurrent treatment with an investigational agent or participate in another clinical trial.
  • Have received concurrent treatment with prohibited medications (refer to Section 5.8.2 for details on prohibited medications).
  • Have used an investigational drug within 30 days or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, preceding the first dose of study medication.
  • Have a known immediate or delayed hypersensitivity reaction or idiosyncrasy to drugs chemically related to any of the agents used in this study or their excipients.
  • Are receiving therapeutic anti-coagulation therapy (i.e. warfarin, heparin).
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Arm 1

    Trastuzumab alone for 2 weeks then in combination with FEC75 for 4 (21 Day) cycles and Paclitaxel for 4 (21 day) cycles then continued trastuzumab until time of definitive surgery

    Drug: Trastuzumab · Drug: Paclitaxel · Drug: FEC75

  • Experimental
    Arm 2

    Lapatinib alone for 2 weeks then in combination with FEC75 for 4 (21 Day) cycles followed by Paclitaxel for 4 (21 day) cycles then continued lapatinib until time of definitive surgery

    Drug: Paclitaxel · Drug: FEC75 · Drug: Lapatinib

  • Experimental
    Arm 3

    Trastuzumab + Lapatinib for 2 weeks then added FEC75 for 4 (21 Day) cycles followed by Paclitaxel for 4 (21 day) cycles then continued trastuzumab + lapatinib until time of definitive surgery

    Drug: Trastuzumab · Drug: Paclitaxel · Drug: FEC75 · Drug: Lapatinib

Interventions

  • DrugTrastuzumab

    4mg/kg IV loading dose followed by 2mg/kg IV weekly

  • DrugPaclitaxel

    80mg/m2 IV weekly for 4 (21 day) cycles

  • DrugFEC75

    5FU 500mg/m2 + Epirubicin 75 mg/m2 + cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 IV on day 1 of 4 (21 day) cycles

  • DrugLapatinib

    1250 mg oral daily dose in arm 2, 750 mg oral daily dose for FEC cycles and then 1000 mg oral daily dose during the Paclitaxel cycles in arm 3

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Overall Pathological Complete Response (pCR) After 26 Weeks of Therapy

    A pCR in the breast was defined as no pathologic evidence of invasive disease (residual ductal carcinoma in situ \[DCIS\] or lobular carcinoma in situ \[LCIS\] was allowed). A pCR in the axillary lymph node(s) was defined as no evidence of breast cancer cells in the lymph node (including subcapsular sinus). Overall pCR was defined as the sum of pCR in the breast and pCR in the lymph nodes. 26 weeks of therapy comprised the 2-week run-in phase, 12 weeks of treatment with FEC, and 12 weeks of treatment with Paclitaxel.

    Time frame: Week 26

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Complete Response (cCR) at 26 Weeks or at End of Treatment (EOT) or Early Withdrawal

    cCR was defined as the percentage of participants achieving either a Complete Response (CR) or a Partial Response (PR) using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, and PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD.

    Time frame: Week 26 or EOT or Early withdrawal

  2. Percentage of Participants (Par.) With Disease-free Survival (DFS) at the End of 5 Years From Randomization

    Percentage is the Kaplan Meier estimate of DFS. DFS is time from randomization until disease recurrence (contralateral breast cancer; second primary cancer; progression during neo-adjuvant treatment; or death from any cause). Par. who experienced progression during treatment and were withdrawn were considered to have a DFS event at withdrawal.

    Time frame: From first dose date until disease progression, assessed up to a maximum of 5 years

  3. Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Status at Baseline and at EOT or Early Withdrawal

    12-lead ECGs were performed, and participants were classified as having normal ECG, abnormal- not clinically significant (NCS) ECG, and abnormal-clinically significant (CS) ECG per investigator opinion and reported result.

    Time frame: Baseline and EOT (up to Week 26) or Early withdrawal

  4. Cumulative Number of Participants With at Least One Decrease of More Than or Equal to 20% in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) at the Indicated Time Points Compared to LVEF at Baseline

    LVEF is the measurement of how much blood is being pumped out of the left ventricle of the heart (the main pumping chamber) with each contraction and is used to determine cardiac function. LVEF was measured by performing echocardiogram (ECHO). If ECHO could not be performed or if the investigator believed that it was not conclusive to evaluate LVEF, then a multigated acquisition (MUGA) scan was performed.

    Time frame: Weeks 3, 9, and 15; EOT or early withdrawal; and 3- and 6-month survival follow-up after last chemotherapy course

Other outcomes

  1. Mean Intra-tumoral Expression of the Indicated Proteins at Baseline and Day 14

    Expression (exp) of biomarker proteins (prot) were analyzed to determine if individual prot levels either in the Baseline or Day 14 breast tumor biopsy specimen correlated with breast pCR. A biomarker indicates a change in exp or state of a prot that correlates with the risk or disease progression, or with the susceptibility of the disease to a given treatment. Biomarkers are characteristic biological properties that can be detected and measured in parts of the body like blood or tissue. pCR=yes: participants (par.) had breast pCR. pCR=no: par. did not have breast pCR. Prot exp values are represented as normalized, scaled values; the unit of measurement is unit-less. Raw exp values were processed as follows: background subtraction of the raw exp value, then that value divided by beta-acting exp to normalize the exp value. A Standard Z score was calculated to scale the exp value.

    Time frame: Tumor core biopsy taken at Baseline and Treatment Day 14

  2. Cancer Stem Cells and the Correlation to Response/Non-response to Treatment

    Stem cell data were of poor quality and thus could not be analyzed. Increases or decreases in cancer stem cells and how the changes correlated with response/non-response to treatment were to have been assessed.

    Time frame: Tumor core biopsy taken at Baseline and Treatment Day 14

  3. Transcriptional Profiling of Total RNA and the Correlation to Response/Non-response to Treatment

    Transcriptional data were of poor quality and thus could not be analyzed. Gene pathways that correlate with response/non-response to treatment were to have been evaluated. The unit of measure is unit less; however, the processed values would be considered normalized relative expression level.

    Time frame: Tumor core biopsy taken at Baseline and Treatment Day 14

07

Results

Posted Aug 11, 2011

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTrastuzumabLapatinibTrastuzumab+Lapatinib
Started333433
Completed212415
Not completed121018
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up603
Withdrew: Protocol violation011
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject304
Withdrew: Death023
Withdrew: Adverse event123
Withdrew: Did not complete study dosing100
Withdrew: Worsening peripheral neuropathy100
Withdrew: Disease progression041
Withdrew: Disease recurrence010
Withdrew: Sponsor request001
Withdrew: Physician decision001
Withdrew: Completed 5 years001

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Overall Pathological Complete Response (pCR) After 26 Weeks of Therapy

A pCR in the breast was defined as no pathologic evidence of invasive disease (residual ductal carcinoma in situ \[DCIS\] or lobular carcinoma in situ \[LCIS\] was allowed). A pCR in the axillary lymph node(s) was defined as no evidence of breast cancer cells in the lymph node (including subcapsular sinus). Overall pCR was defined as the sum of pCR in the breast and pCR in the lymph nodes. 26 weeks of therapy comprised the 2-week run-in phase, 12 weeks of treatment with FEC, and 12 weeks of treatment with Paclitaxel.

Time frame:
Week 26
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Overall Pathological Complete Response (pCR) After 26 Weeks of Therapy
percentage of participantsTrastuzumabLapatinibTrastuzumab+Lapatinib
Percentage of Participants With Overall Pathological Complete Response (pCR) After 26 Weeks of Therapy54.045.074.0
Statistical analysis
  • Trastuzumab vs Lapatinib · Percent difference: -9 · 95% CI -38.1 to 17.9Approximate 95% confidence interval for the difference in response rates between the trastuzumab arm and the lapatinib arm was calculated.
  • Trastuzumab vs Trastuzumab+Lapatinib · Percent difference: 20 · 95% CI -8.0 to 49.4Approximate 95% confidence interval for the difference in response rates between the transtuzumab arm and the transtuzumab + lapatinib arm was calculated.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Clinical Complete Response (cCR) at 26 Weeks or at End of Treatment (EOT) or Early Withdrawal

cCR was defined as the percentage of participants achieving either a Complete Response (CR) or a Partial Response (PR) using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, and PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD.

Time frame:
Week 26 or EOT or Early withdrawal
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Complete Response (cCR) at 26 Weeks or at End of Treatment (EOT) or Early Withdrawal
percentage of participantsTrastuzumabLapatinibTrastuzumab+Lapatinib
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Complete Response (cCR) at 26 Weeks or at End of Treatment (EOT) or Early Withdrawal61.068.061.0
Statistical analysis
  • Trastuzumab vs Lapatinib · Fisher Exact · p = 0.627 · Percent difference: 7 · 95% CI -17.8 to 32.5Approximate 95% confidence interval for the difference in response rates between the transtuzumab arm and the lapatinib arm was calculated.
  • Trastuzumab vs Trastuzumab+Lapatinib · Fisher Exact · p = 1.000 · Percent difference: 0 · 95% CI -25.1 to 25.1Approximate 95% confidence interval for the difference in response rates between the transtuzumab arm and the transtuzumab + lapatinib arm was calculated.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants (Par.) With Disease-free Survival (DFS) at the End of 5 Years From Randomization

Percentage is the Kaplan Meier estimate of DFS. DFS is time from randomization until disease recurrence (contralateral breast cancer; second primary cancer; progression during neo-adjuvant treatment; or death from any cause). Par. who experienced progression during treatment and were withdrawn were considered to have a DFS event at withdrawal.

Time frame:
From first dose date until disease progression, assessed up to a maximum of 5 years
Reported as:
Number · Percentage
Percentage of Participants (Par.) With Disease-free Survival (DFS) at the End of 5 Years From Randomization
PercentageTrastuzumabLapatinibTrastuzumab+Lapatinib
Percentage of Participants (Par.) With Disease-free Survival (DFS) at the End of 5 Years From Randomization90 (72 to 97)67 (47 to 80)66 (44 to 82)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Status at Baseline and at EOT or Early Withdrawal

12-lead ECGs were performed, and participants were classified as having normal ECG, abnormal- not clinically significant (NCS) ECG, and abnormal-clinically significant (CS) ECG per investigator opinion and reported result.

Time frame:
Baseline and EOT (up to Week 26) or Early withdrawal
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Electrocardiogram (ECG) Status at Baseline and at EOT or Early Withdrawal
participantsTrastuzumabLapatinibTrastuzumab+Lapatinib
Baseline, Normal, n= 28, 32, 30182323
Baseline, Abnormal-NCS, n= 28, 32, 301087
Baseline, Abnormal-CS, n= 28, 32, 30010
EOT/early withdrawal, Normal, n= 16, 21, 16101212
EOT/early withdrawal, Abnormal-NCS, n= 16, 21, 16684
EOT/early withdrawal, Abnormal-CS, n= 16, 21, 16010
SecondaryCumulative Number of Participants With at Least One Decrease of More Than or Equal to 20% in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) at the Indicated Time Points Compared to LVEF at Baseline

LVEF is the measurement of how much blood is being pumped out of the left ventricle of the heart (the main pumping chamber) with each contraction and is used to determine cardiac function. LVEF was measured by performing echocardiogram (ECHO). If ECHO could not be performed or if the investigator believed that it was not conclusive to evaluate LVEF, then a multigated acquisition (MUGA) scan was performed.

Time frame:
Weeks 3, 9, and 15; EOT or early withdrawal; and 3- and 6-month survival follow-up after last chemotherapy course
Reported as:
Number · participants
Cumulative Number of Participants With at Least One Decrease of More Than or Equal to 20% in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) at the Indicated Time Points Compared to LVEF at Baseline
participantsTrastuzumabLapatinibTrastuzumab+Lapatinib
Week 3, n= 30, 31, 26101
Week 9, n= 30, 32, 27101
Week 15, n= 31, 34, 28122
Early withdrawal/EOT, n= 31, 34, 28142
3-month survival follow-up, n= 31, 34, 28243
6-month survival follow-up, n= 31, 34, 28444
Other pre-specifiedMean Intra-tumoral Expression of the Indicated Proteins at Baseline and Day 14

Expression (exp) of biomarker proteins (prot) were analyzed to determine if individual prot levels either in the Baseline or Day 14 breast tumor biopsy specimen correlated with breast pCR. A biomarker indicates a change in exp or state of a prot that correlates with the risk or disease progression, or with the susceptibility of the disease to a given treatment. Biomarkers are characteristic biological properties that can be detected and measured in parts of the body like blood or tissue. pCR=yes: participants (par.) had breast pCR. pCR=no: par. did not have breast pCR. Prot exp values are represented as normalized, scaled values; the unit of measurement is unit-less. Raw exp values were processed as follows: background subtraction of the raw exp value, then that value divided by beta-acting exp to normalize the exp value. A Standard Z score was calculated to scale the exp value.

Time frame:
Tumor core biopsy taken at Baseline and Treatment Day 14
Reported as:
Mean · : normalized relative expression level
Mean Intra-tumoral Expression of the Indicated Proteins at Baseline and Day 14
: normalized relative expression levelTrastuzumabLapatinib
Baseline, EGFR_Tyr1068; pCR=yes, n=0, 4NA ± NA-0.70 ± 0.47
Baseline, Baseline, EGFR_Tyr1068; pCR=no, n=0, 11NA ± NA0.05 ± 0.55
Post Baseline, EGFR_Tyr1068; pCR=yes, n=9, 00.65 ± 1.02NA ± NA
Post Baseline, EGFR_Tyr1068; pCR=no, n=6, 0-0.26 ± 0.56NA ± NA
Day 14, pSTAT5; pCR=yes, n=11, 6NA ± NANA ± NA
Day 14, pSTAT5; pCR=no, n=9, 11NA ± NANA ± NA
Post Baseline, PI3K; pCR=yes, n=0, 5NA ± NA0.46 ± 0.73
Post Baseline, PI3K; pCR=no, n=0, 10NA ± NA-0.53 ± 0.67
Post Baseline, LC3B; pCR=yes, n=0, 5NA ± NA0.68 ± 0.81
Post Baseline, LC3B; pCR=no, n=0, 10NA ± NA-0.43 ± 0.75
Post Baseline, MMP9; pCR=yes, n=0, 5NA ± NA0.71 ± 0.34
Post Baseline, MMP9; pCR=no, n=0, 5NA ± NA-0.48 ± 0.48
Post Baseline, GSK3_a_b_Tyr279_216; pCR=yes, n=8,00.26 ± 0.82NA ± NA
Post Baseline, GSK3_a_b_Tyr279_216; pCR=no, n=5,0-0.86 ± 0.67NA ± NA
Other pre-specifiedCancer Stem Cells and the Correlation to Response/Non-response to Treatment

Stem cell data were of poor quality and thus could not be analyzed. Increases or decreases in cancer stem cells and how the changes correlated with response/non-response to treatment were to have been assessed.

Time frame:
Tumor core biopsy taken at Baseline and Treatment Day 14

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Other pre-specifiedTranscriptional Profiling of Total RNA and the Correlation to Response/Non-response to Treatment

Transcriptional data were of poor quality and thus could not be analyzed. Gene pathways that correlate with response/non-response to treatment were to have been evaluated. The unit of measure is unit less; however, the processed values would be considered normalized relative expression level.

Time frame:
Tumor core biopsy taken at Baseline and Treatment Day 14

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Trastuzumab—7/32 (21.9%)31/32 (96.9%)
Lapatinib—7/34 (20.6%)34/34 (100%)
Trastuzumab+Lapatinib—8/31 (25.8%)31/31 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 21
Most frequent serious events
EventTrastuzumabLapatinibTrastuzumab+Lapatinib
Febrile nuetropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders3/320/342/31
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders3/320/341/31
Pulmonary embolismRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/320/341/31
PyrexiaGeneral disorders0/323/340/31
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders0/322/342/31
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations0/320/341/31
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations0/320/341/31
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/321/341/31
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders0/320/341/31
StomatitisGastrointestinal disorders0/320/341/31
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 118
Most frequent other events
EventTrastuzumabLapatinibTrastuzumab+Lapatinib
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders17/3229/3431/31
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders26/3226/3426/31
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders14/3228/3426/31
FatigueGeneral disorders22/3224/3424/31
AlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders21/3224/3418/31
Neuropathy peripheralNervous system disorders15/3219/3414/31
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders13/3212/3415/31
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders7/3215/348/31
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders10/3212/3412/31
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders12/328/346/31

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)TrastuzumabLapatinibTrastuzumab+LapatinibTotal
Mean51.1 ± 10.9050.8 ± 8.7649.2 ± 10.4750.4 ± 10.01
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)TrastuzumabLapatinibTrastuzumab+LapatinibTotal
Female333433100
Male0000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)TrastuzumabLapatinibTrastuzumab+LapatinibTotal
African American/African heritage81211
American Indian or Alaska native0011
Asian - Central/South Asian heritage0101
Asian - East Asian heritage0101
Asian - South East Asian heritage0213
White - Arabic/North African heritage0101
White - White/Caucasian/European heritage25272981
Mixed race0101
08

Study locations

23 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Fountain Valley, California 92708, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Los Angeles, California 90057, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Denver, Colorado 80220, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Hudson, Florida 34667, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Miami, Florida 33176, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Pembroke Pines, Florida 33028, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46219, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Henderson, Nevada 89052, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Austin, Texas 78731, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Beaumont, Texas 77702-1449, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Bedford, Texas 76022, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Dallas, Texas 75231, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Dallas, Texas 75246, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Dallas, Texas 75320-2510, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    El Paso, Texas 79915, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Houston, Texas 77024, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Lewisville, Texas 75067, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Sugar Land, Texas 77479, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Tyler, Texas 75702, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Norfolk, Virginia 23502, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Seattle, Washington 98117, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Yakima, Washington 98902, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • O'Shea J, Cremona M, Morgan C, Milewska M, Holmes F, Espina V, Liotta L, O'Shaughnessy J, Toomey S, Madden SF, Carr A, Elster N, Hennessy BT, Eustace AJ. A preclinical evaluation of the MEK inhibitor refametinib in HER2-positive breast cancer cell lines including those with acquired resistance to trastuzumab or lapatinib. Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 22;8(49):85120-85135. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19461. eCollection 2017 Oct 17. PubMed 29156708 ↗
  • Holmes FA, Espina V, Liotta LA, Nagarwala YM, Danso M, McIntyre KJ, Osborne CR, Anderson T, Krekow L, Blum JL, Pippen J, Florance A, Mahoney J, O'Shaughnessy JA. Pathologic complete response after preoperative anti-HER2 therapy correlates with alterations in PTEN, FOXO, phosphorylated Stat5, and autophagy protein signaling. BMC Res Notes. 2013 Dec 5;6:507. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-507. PubMed 24304724 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 11, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00524303
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 3, 2007
Start date
Aug 2007
Primary completion
Oct 2010
Completion
Aug 2015
Results posted
Aug 11, 2011
Last update
Nov 11, 2016

Study contacts

GSK Clinical Trials
study director · GlaxoSmithKline

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion