A Phase 4 interventional study of Standard primary PCI and Mechanical postconditioning in ST-segment Myocardial Infarction, sponsored by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-10-06.
Sponsored by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
Standard treatment of patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction consist of acute re-opening of the occluded coronary artery (primary PCI). Despite successful treatment of the epicardial vessel reperfusion is sometimes inadequate leading to large final infarct sizes. This phenomenon is known as the reperfusion injury. Several animal studies have indicated that graded re-opening of the artery may limit tissue damage. Generally this is referred to as mechanical postconditioning.
The study investigates the effect on final infarct size evaluated by magnetic resonance scan of postconditioning of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions. Mechanical postconditioning is performed by means of several balloon inflations in the injured vessel following its acute re-opening.
Please see above
Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet is the lead sponsor of 39 studies on the registry; 14 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Re-opening of the infarcted coronary artery by several balloon inflations separated by reperfusion of the vessel.
Procedure: Mechanical postconditioning
Standard treatment (primary PCI)
Procedure: Standard primary PCI
Acute re-opening of the occluded coronary artery
Mechanical postconditioning with 4 cycles 30/30 sek balloon inflations
Final infarct size evaluated by MR
Time frame: 3 month
MACE (death, re-infarction, TLR)
Time frame: 1, 15 month
Stent thrombosis
Time frame: 15 month
The record gives a start of Jul 2007 and a primary completion of Nov 2008. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet