A Phase 2 interventional study of Ketamine and 0.9% saline in Lung Cancer, sponsored by Duke University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-07-25.
Sponsored by Duke University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
The primary aim of the study is to demonstrate a reduction in circulating interleukin 6 levels at 4 and 24 hours after completion of lobectomy (either VATS or open). The null hypothesis (H0) is thus that there is no difference in circulating interleukin 6 levels when patients are given either ketamine or placebo (0.9% saline in equivalent volume). The alternative (two tailed) hypothesis (HA) if the null is disproved is that ketamine leads to significantly different levels of interleukin 6 at 4 and 24 hours after completion of surgery. We plan to randomize 40 patients to receive either ketamine or placebo, in a block of 4 randomization design stratified by whether surgery is performed by VATS or open lobectomy.
This study is designed to be a phase 2 (efficacy) randomized controlled clinical trial of ketamine versus placebo in 40 patients undergoing lobectomy by VATS or open approach, at Duke University. We selected a single dose regimen of 0.5mg/kg IV ketamine given at induction of anesthesia, as this is the dose that previously has been shown to induce maximal suppression of the IL-6 response in cardiac surgery.
We plan to randomize 40 patients to receive either ketamine or placebo, in a block of 4 randomization design stratified by whether surgery is performed by VATS or open lobectomy. 40 patients (n=20 per group) will provide 90% power to detect a change in IL 6 of 20 pg/ml from a mean of 100 pg/ml at 4 hours, with two tailed alpha = 0.05. Allowing for 10-20% attrition we will enroll 50 patients to achieve this sample size. All patients presenting for lobectomy either VATS or open will be included. Patients will be screened by review of the preoperative surgical schedule posted each day and approached for consent to participate if they do not have any exclusion criteria. Patients who are randomized but do not undergo lobectomy for any reason will not be included in the analysis of the primary endpoint. Patients who are listed for VATS resection but convert to open will be included in the analysis on a per protocol basis. The randomization is stratified according to planned approach (VATS vs open), however we expect the majority of these cases to be VATS lobectomies.
Treatment will be by intravenous administration of a single dose of study drug over 5 minutes immediately after induction of anesthesia and before surgical incision.
Patients will be randomized (by sealed envelope) in blocks of 4 to receive ketamine or placebo. The randomization will be stratified according to whether the planned surgery is via VATS or open (thoracotomy) approach. The study drug will be prepared by the investigational pharmacy and provided to the attending anesthesiologist of record for the case. It will contain 0.5 mg/kg ketamine for injection by IV bolus over 5 minutes, or as an equivalent volume of 0.9% saline. It will be the responsibility of the principal investigator to ensure that study drug is administered in a timely fashion, usually by delegation to the attending anesthesiologist of record for the case. The anesthetic procedure will be standardized in that each patient will receive a total intravenous anesthetic using propofol and an intravenous opioid infusion. This anesthetic will be supplemented by an epidural and intravenous opioid boluses as needed to control pain.
Visits by the research team will be performed as follows:
Duke University is the lead sponsor of 2,025 studies on the registry; 275 are open to participants now.
Of its 194 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 159 (82%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Single bolus 0.5mg/kg ketamine IV after induction of anesthesia
Drug: Ketamine
0.9 % saline bolus of equivalent volume
Drug: 0.9% saline
Interventional
placebo
Interleukin Levels at 24 Hours
Time frame: 24 Hours
C-reactive Protein (CRP) Serum Levels
The CRP levels were measured 24 hours postoperatively.
Time frame: 24 hours
Verbal Pain Scores
Pain scores rated by the subject on a scale of 0 low - 10 high
Time frame: baseline, 4 hours, 24 hours and at discharge
| Milestone | Ketamine | Placebo |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 21 | 20 |
| Completed | 20 | 20 |
| Not completed | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Protocol violation | 1 | 0 |
| pg/ml | Ketamine | Placebo |
|---|---|---|
| Interleukin-6 (IL-6) | 245 ± 287 | 269 ± 210 |
| Interleukin-8 (IL-8) | 11.3 ± 12.6 | 14.8 ± 10.8 |
| Interleukin-10 (IL-10) | 3.0 ± 4.7 | 4.9 ± 5.8 |
The CRP levels were measured 24 hours postoperatively.
| pg/ml | Ketamine | Placebo |
|---|---|---|
| C-reactive Protein (CRP) Serum Levels | 8.8 ± 4.5 | 9.3 ± 5.6 |
Pain scores rated by the subject on a scale of 0 low - 10 high
| units on a scale | Ketamine | Placebo |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 0.30 ± 0.73 | 0.35 ± 1.35 |
| 4 Hours | 3.8 ± 2.1 | 3.1 ± 2.8 |
| 24 Hours | 2.6 ± 2.2 | 2.8 ± 2.1 |
| Discharge | 1.8 ± 2.5 | 1.1 ± 1.8 |
Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ketamine | — | 0/20 (0%) | 6/20 (30%) |
| Placebo | — | 0/20 (0%) | 5/20 (25%) |
| Event | Ketamine | Placebo |
|---|---|---|
| AFCardiac disorders | 3/20 | 3/20 |
| RESPIRATORY INSUFFICIENCYRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 2/20 | 0/20 |
| CHEST TUBE PLACEMENTSurgical and medical procedures | 1/20 | 1/20 |
| SMALL BOWEL OBSTRUCTIONGastrointestinal disorders | 0/20 | 1/20 |
| Age, Continuous(Years) | Ketamine | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| AGE | 61 ± 12 | 66 ± 10 | 63 ± 11 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Ketamine | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 10 | 8 | 18 |
| Male | 11 | 12 | 23 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Ketamine | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 20 | 41 |
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Duke University