CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00490919Updated Sep 10, 2012Results posted

Buprenorphine Transdermal System (BTDS) in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Low Back Pain

A Phase 3 interventional study of Buprenorphine transdermal system and Placebo in Low Back Pain, sponsored by Purdue Pharma LP. Completed at 86 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-09-10.

Sponsored by Purdue Pharma LP · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
539
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to determine the analgesic efficacy and safety of Buprenorphine Transdermal System (BTDS) 10 and 20 compared to placebo in opioid-naïve subjects with moderate to severe chronic low back pain. The double-blind treatment intervention duration is 12 weeks, during which time supplemental analgesic medication (immediate-release oxycodone for the first 6 days post-randomization and acetaminophen or ibuprofen for the remainder of the double-blind phase) will be provided to all subjects in addition to study drug.

Read the detailed description

Buprenorphine is a synthetic opioid analgesic with over 25 years of international clinical experience indicating it to be safe and effective in a variety of therapeutic settings for the relief of moderate to severe pain. BTDS is a transdermal system formulation that is designed to deliver a consistent and a steady dose of buprenorphine over a 7-day period with limited blood concentration fluctuation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Low Back Pain

Keywords

  • Chronic pain
  • opioid
  • transdermal
  • Moderate to severe chronic low back pain
03

In context

Back Pain

2,373 studies on the registry are indexed under Back Pain; 284 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 539 is above the median of 60 across 1,941 interventional studies indexed under Back Pain.

Browse Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Purdue Pharma LP is the lead sponsor of 58 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects with moderate to severe chronic low back pain (lasting several hours daily) as their predominant pain condition for at least 3 months prior to screening,
  • Subjects treated within the 14 days prior to screening with nonopioid therapy only, or with therapy including opioids at a dose of \<5 mg oxycodone (or equivalent) per day,
  • Subjects whose low back pain is not adequately controlled with non-opioid analgesic medication and who the Investigator feels are appropriate candidates for around-the-clock opioid therapy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who had a surgical procedure directed towards the source of back pain within 6 months of screening or planned during the study conduct period,
  • Subjects who are allergic to buprenorphine or who had a history of allergies to other opioids,
  • Subjects who have allergies or other contraindications to transdermal delivery systems or patch adhesives.

Other protocol-specific inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
539 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Double-blind BTDS 10 or 20

    Buprenorphine transdermal system 10 or 20 mcg/h applied for 7-day wear

    Drug: Buprenorphine transdermal system

  • Placebo comparator
    Double-blind Placebo TDS

    Placebo transdermal system to match BTDS patches, applied for 7 days

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugBuprenorphine transdermal system

    Buprenorphine transdermal system 10 or 20 mcg/h worn for 7 days

    Also known as: Butrans™

  • DrugPlacebo

    transdermal system (placebo) worn for 7 days

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours Scores at Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase.

    Pain was assessed on an 11-point numerical scale ranging from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine.

    Time frame: Prerandomization phase consisted of a 6-10 day screening period and a <27 day open-label run-in period; and a 12-week double-blind phase.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Mean Daily Number of Tablets of Nonopioid Supplemental Analgesic Medications Taken During Weeks 2 Through 12 of the Double-blind Phase

    Nonopioid supplemental analgesic tablets were sponsor-supplied acetaminophen or ibuprofen.

    Time frame: weeks 2-12

  2. The Sleep Disturbance Subscale in the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the Double-blind Phase

    The MOS Sleep Scale consists of 12 individual items (4 sleep disturbance, 2 sleep adequacy, 1 quantity of and optimal sleep, 3 somnolence, 1 snoring, and 1 shortness of breath) and takes 5 to 10 minutes to complete. Question 1 is scored on a scale of 1 to 5 and Questions 2 to 12 are scored on a scale of 1 to 6. The Sleep Disturbance Subscale score is derived from the scores to Questions 1, 3, 7 and 8, and ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate greater sleep disturbance.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 of double-blind phase

07

Results

Posted Sep 9, 2010

Participant flow

Study dates: 27-Jun-2007 (first patient first visit) to 24-Jul-2008 (last patient last visit), at 86 medical/research sites in the USA.

Open-label Run-in Period
Participant flow — Open-label Run-in Period
MilestoneOpen-label Run-in PeriodDouble-blind BTDS 10 or 20Double-blind Placebo TDS
Started102400
Completed54100
Not completed48300
Withdrew: Adverse event23900
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject3700
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up2100
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy14300
Withdrew: Administrative4000
Withdrew: Confirmed or suspected diversion300
Double-blind Phase
Participant flow — Double-blind Phase
MilestoneOpen-label Run-in PeriodDouble-blind BTDS 10 or 20Double-blind Placebo TDS
Started0256283
Completed0170199
Not completed08684
Withdrew: Adverse event04020
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01011
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up0811
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy02236
Withdrew: Administrative066

Outcome measures

PrimaryAverage Pain Over the Last 24 Hours Scores at Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase.

Pain was assessed on an 11-point numerical scale ranging from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine.

Time frame:
Prerandomization phase consisted of a 6-10 day screening period and a <27 day open-label run-in period; and a 12-week double-blind phase.
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hours Scores at Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase.
Units on a scaleDouble-blind BTDSDouble-blind Placebo TDS
Screening7.24 ± 1.2637.17 ± 1.223
Prerandomization2.57 ± 1.2832.56 ± 1.207
Week 12 - Primary outcome3.83 ± 2.7384.38 ± 2.690
Statistical analysis
  • Double-blind BTDS vs Double-blind Placebo TDS · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .0104 · Mean difference (final values): -0.58 · 95% CI -1.02 to -0.14Double-blind analysis (comparison between BTDS and placebo TDS) at week 12 of the double-blind phase.
SecondaryThe Mean Daily Number of Tablets of Nonopioid Supplemental Analgesic Medications Taken During Weeks 2 Through 12 of the Double-blind Phase

Nonopioid supplemental analgesic tablets were sponsor-supplied acetaminophen or ibuprofen.

Time frame:
weeks 2-12
Reported as:
Mean · tablets
The Mean Daily Number of Tablets of Nonopioid Supplemental Analgesic Medications Taken During Weeks 2 Through 12 of the Double-blind Phase
tabletsDouble-blind BTDSDouble-blind Placebo TDS
The Mean Daily Number of Tablets of Nonopioid Supplemental Analgesic Medications Taken During Weeks 2 Through 12 of the Double-blind Phase0.620 ± 0.06580.743 ± 0.0574
Statistical analysis
  • Double-blind BTDS vs Double-blind Placebo TDS · ANCOVA · p = .1586 (To address the issue of multiplicity and control the family-wise error rate, a gate-keeping strategy and a stepwise approach (Holms methodology) were used to evaluate the statistical significance of the secondary efficacy analyses.) · Mean difference (final values): -0.124 · 95% CI -0.296 to 0.048Mean comparison from weeks 2-12 of the double-blind phase.
SecondaryThe Sleep Disturbance Subscale in the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the Double-blind Phase

The MOS Sleep Scale consists of 12 individual items (4 sleep disturbance, 2 sleep adequacy, 1 quantity of and optimal sleep, 3 somnolence, 1 snoring, and 1 shortness of breath) and takes 5 to 10 minutes to complete. Question 1 is scored on a scale of 1 to 5 and Questions 2 to 12 are scored on a scale of 1 to 6. The Sleep Disturbance Subscale score is derived from the scores to Questions 1, 3, 7 and 8, and ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate greater sleep disturbance.

Time frame:
Weeks 4, 8, 12 of double-blind phase
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
The Sleep Disturbance Subscale in the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Units on a scaleDouble-blind BTDSDouble-blind Placebo TDS
Week 432.84 ± 25.55241.20 ± 26.813
Week 835.63 ± 26.27639.87 ± 26.362
Week 1234.97 ± 26.87140.42 ± 26.675
Statistical analysis
  • Double-blind BTDS vs Double-blind Placebo TDS · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .0062 (To address the issue of multiplicity and control the family-wise error rate, a gate-keeping strategy and a stepwise approach (Holms methodology) were used to evaluate the statistical significance of the secondary efficacy analyses.) · Mean difference (final values): -4.40 · 95% CI -7.55 to -1.25Treatment comparison over Weeks 4, 8, and 12.

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse Events (AEs) that occurred after the signing of the informed consent up to end of study and 7 days after, discontinuation, or Serious AEs occurring up to 30 days following the last study visit were followed until the AE resolved or stabilized.. Non-serious events are listed at a 4.50% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Double-blind BTDS 10, 20—3/256 (1.2%)52/256 (20.3%)
Double-blind Placebo TDS 10, 20—2/283 (0.7%)63/283 (22.3%)
Open-label Run-in Period, BTDS 5, 10, 20—4/1,024 (0.4%)437/1,024 (42.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 14
Most frequent serious events
EventDouble-blind BTDS 10, 20Double-blind Placebo TDS 10, 20Open-label Run-in Period, BTDS 5, 10, 20
Road traffic accidentInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/2560/2831/1024
Major depressionPsychiatric disorders1/2560/2830/1024
Drug abuserSocial circumstances1/2560/2830/1024
Acute myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders0/2561/2830/1024
Homicidal thoughtsPsychiatric disorders0/2561/2830/1024
AnxietyPsychiatric disorders0/2561/2830/1024
Suicidal ideationPsychiatric disorders0/2561/2830/1024
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/2560/2831/1024
Skin lacerationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/2560/2831/1024
Joint sprainInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/2560/2831/1024
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventDouble-blind BTDS 10, 20Double-blind Placebo TDS 10, 20Open-label Run-in Period, BTDS 5, 10, 20
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders32/25631/283240/1024
DizzinessNervous system disorders10/2563/283102/1024
HeadacheNervous system disorders14/25614/283100/1024
Application site pruritusGeneral disorders11/25619/28387/1024
SomnolenceNervous system disorders4/2566/28384/1024
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders11/2565/28377/1024
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders9/2563/28367/1024
Application site erythemaGeneral disorders9/25614/28332/1024
Application site rashGeneral disorders12/2567/28318/1024

Baseline characteristics

Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)Double-blind BTDSDouble-blind Placebo TDSTotal
Mean48.9 ± 12.5050.1 ± 13.3149.5 ± 12.93
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Double-blind BTDSDouble-blind Placebo TDSTotal
Female133163296
Male123120243
08

Study locations

86 sites
  • Research Facility
    Anniston, Alabama 36207, United States
  • Coastal Clinical Research, Inc.
    Mobile, Alabama 36608, United States
  • Radiant Research; Phoenix Southeast
    Chandler, Arizona 85225, United States
  • Arizona Research Center Inc.
    Phoenix, Arizona 85023, United States
  • Research Facility
    Phoenix, Arizona 85029, United States
  • Research Facility
    Phoenix, Arizona 85032, United States
  • Research Facility
    Anaheim, California 92801, United States
  • Lovelace Scientific Resources, Inc.
    Beverly Hills, California 90211, United States
  • Research Facility
    Carmichael, California 95608, United States
  • Advance Care Medical Group
    City of Industry, California 91748, United States
  • Research Facility
    Downey, California 90241, United States
  • Research Facility
    Foothill Ranch, California 92610, United States
  • Research Facility
    Sacramento, California 95831, United States
  • Research Facility
    San Luis Obispo, California 93405, United States
  • Research Facility
    Littleton, Colorado 80128, United States
  • Research Facility
    Stamford, Connecticut 06905, United States
  • Clinical Research of West Florida
    Clearwater, Florida 33765, United States
  • Research Facility
    Clearwater, Florida 33765, United States
  • University Clinical Research
    Deland, Florida 32720, United States
  • Arthritis Associates of S. FL
    Delray Beach, Florida 33484, United States
  • Research Facility
    Ft. Myers, Florida 33907, United States
  • Century Clinical Research, Inc.
    Holly Hill, Florida 32117-2257, United States
  • Research Facility
    Jupiter, Florida 33458-7200, United States
  • Research Facility
    Largo, Florida 33770, United States
  • Research Facility
    Merritt Island, Florida 32953, United States
  • Pharmax Research Clinic
    Miami, Florida 33126, United States
  • Research Facility
    Orlando, Florida 32806, United States
  • Research Facility
    Plantation, Florida 33324, United States
  • Research Facility
    Port Orange, Florida 32127, United States
  • Clinical Research of West Flor
    Tampa, Florida 33603, United States
  • Research Facility
    Tampa, Florida 33613, United States
  • Research Facility
    West Palm Beach, Florida 33409, United States
  • Independent Neurodiagnostic Clinic
    Atlanta, Georgia 30327, United States
  • Research Facility
    Dawsonville, Georgia 30534, United States
  • Druid Oaks Health Center
    Decatur, Georgia 30033, United States
  • Research Facility
    Marietta, Georgia 30060, United States
  • Research Facility
    Marietta, Georgia 30066, United States
  • Research Facility
    Honolulu, Hawaii 96814-4526, United States
  • Research Facility
    Boise, Idaho 83702, United States
  • Rehabilitation Association of IN
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46250, United States
  • Research Facility
    Overland Park, Kansas 66211, United States
  • CTT Consultants, Inc.
    Prairie Village, Kansas 66206, United States
  • Dolby Research, LLC
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70809, United States
  • Research Facility
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70114, United States
  • Research Facility
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70115, United States
  • Research Facility
    Shreveport, Louisiana 71103, United States
  • Research Facility
    Brockton, Massachusetts 02301, United States
  • East Coast Clinical Research
    Haverhill, Massachusetts 01830-6141, United States
  • Research Facility
    Springfield, Massachusetts 01103, United States
  • Research Facility
    Bay City, Michigan 48706, United States
  • Research Facility
    Biloxi, Mississippi 39531, United States
  • Research Facility
    Florissant, Missouri 63031, United States
  • Research Facility
    St. Louis, Missouri 63117, United States
  • Research Facility
    St. Louis, Missouri 63141, United States
  • Sports Med Consultants, PC
    St. Louis, Missouri 63141, United States
  • Research Facility
    Henderson, Nevada 89014, United States
  • Research Facility
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89123, United States
  • Lovelace Scientific Resources
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87108, United States
  • Research Facility
    New York, New York 10004, United States
  • Research Facility
    New York, New York 10022, United States
  • Research Facility
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28209, United States
  • Research Facility
    Greensboro, North Carolina 27401, United States
  • Research Facility
    Morgantown, North Carolina 28655, United States
  • Community Research
    Cincinatti, Ohio 45245, United States
  • Research Facility
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45242, United States
  • Research Facility
    Columbus, Ohio 43213, United States
  • Research Facility
    Columbus, Ohio 43235, United States
  • Research Facility
    Toledo, Ohio 43623, United States
  • Research Facility
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73109, United States
  • Research Facility
    Eugene, Oregon 97404, United States
  • Research Facility
    Medford, Oregon 97504-8311, United States
  • Research Facility
    Altoona, Pennsylvania 16602, United States
  • Research Facility
    Chicora, Pennsylvania 16025, United States
  • Research Facility
    Duncansville, Pennsylvania 16635, United States
  • Research Facility
    Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania 17055, United States
  • Research Facility
    West Reading, Pennsylvania 19611, United States
  • New England Center for Clinical Research
    Cranston, Rhode Island 02920, United States
  • Anderson Family Care, PA
    Anderson, South Carolina 29621, United States
  • KRK Medical Research
    Dallas, Texas 75230, United States
  • Research Facility
    Killeen, Texas 76543, United States
  • Research Facility
    Plano, Texas 75093, United States
  • Research Facility
    San Antonio, Texas 78205-1116, United States
  • Research Facility
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • Research Facility
    Sugarland, Texas 77479, United States
  • Research Facility
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84106, United States
  • Research Facility
    Roanoke, Virginia 24018, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Steiner DJ, Sitar S, Wen W, Sawyerr G, Munera C, Ripa SR, Landau C. Efficacy and safety of the seven-day buprenorphine transdermal system in opioid-naive patients with moderate to severe chronic low back pain: an enriched, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Dec;42(6):903-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006. Epub 2011 Sep 25. PubMed 21945130 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 10, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00490919
Lead sponsor
Purdue Pharma LP
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 25, 2007
Start date
Jun 2007
Primary completion
Jul 2008
Completion
Oct 2008
Results posted
Sep 9, 2010
Last update
Sep 10, 2012

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion