ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT00487851Updated Apr 12, 2013

Comparing Endoscopic Based Stent Strategy Versus Bypass Surgery in Non-resectable Periampullary Cancer

A Phase 2 interventional study of surgery and endoscopic strategy in Pancreatic Neoplasms, Biliary Tract Neoplasms and Duodenal Neoplasms, sponsored by Karolinska Institutet. Withdrawn at 1 site in Sweden. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-04-12.

Sponsored by Karolinska Institutet · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
Withdrawn
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Randomized study comparing endoscopic stent insertion strategy versus double-bypass surgery in non-resectable periampullary cancer

Read the detailed description

Experience shows that patients with advanced periampullary cancer suffer not only from jaundice but in 25 -30% of cases also duodenal stricture with nausea, vomiting and nutritional difficulties. Ten years ago, the only palliative treatment for these patients was a bypass operation for bile flow and intestinal passage. This operation was often associated with a high morbidity. Developments in endoscopic treatments allow palliation with lower morbidity. However, stent treatment is not free of problems like stent dysfunction. During the last ten years, anesthesia and surgical techniques have developed which allow lower postoperative morbidity compared to earlier treatments. A total of 70 patients were randomized to surgery with hepaticojejunostomy on Roux loop and gastrojejunostomy or endoscopic treatment with self-expanding metallic stent in the bile duct and so-called duodenal stent. Based on the inclusion of 70 patients, we expected a 20% difference in some of the primary variables with a power of 80%.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pancreatic Neoplasms
  • Biliary Tract Neoplasms
  • Duodenal Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Pancreatic
  • cancer
  • Periampullay
  • Neoplasms
  • Biliary
  • Duodenal
  • Jaundice
  • obstruction
  • pancreas cancer
  • Pancreatic cancer
03

In context

Pancreatic Neoplasms

3,310 studies on the registry are indexed under Pancreatic Neoplasms; 910 are open to participants now.

Browse Pancreatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Karolinska Institutet is the lead sponsor of 1,145 studies on the registry; 274 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with a locally advanced periampullary neoplastic process with extrahepatic bile duct obstruction.
  • The patient tumor burden and general condition should be such that treatment related morbidity and mortality is calculated as "reasonable" and both treatment strategies are considered "applicable".

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non consent.
  • The patients' general condition will not tolerate either treatment (strategy).
  • Previous laparotomy or laparoscopy.
  • Life expectancy \< 3 months.
  • Inability to participate (language, social, etc.)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    1

    Endoscopic treatment strategy

    Procedure: endoscopic strategy

  • Active comparator
    2

    Surgical treatment strategy

    Procedure: surgery

Interventions

  • Proceduresurgery

    hepaticojejunostomy and gastroenterostomy

  • Procedureendoscopic strategy

    Stent insertion

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary outcome consist of a composite score (i.e. number of hospitalizations, episodes of cholangitis, degree of jaundice, other complications requiring therapeutic interventions). Secondary outcome are QoL,hospital stay and health economic burden.

    Time frame: 1, 3 and 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Karolinksa university hospital
    Huddinge, 14186, Sweden
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 12, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00487851
Responsible party
Farshad Frozanpor (MD, PhD, Karolinska Institutet) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 19, 2007
Start date
Mar 2007
Primary completion
Mar 2012 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2012
Last update
Apr 12, 2013

Study contacts

Farshad Frozanpor
principal investigator · Karolinska institut Huddinge

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Apr 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion