CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT00482222Updated Jan 23, 2013

Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Cetuximab Before and After Surgery in Treating Patients With Resectable Liver Metastases Caused By Colorectal Cancer

A Phase 3 interventional study of cetuximab and capecitabine in Colorectal Cancer and Metastatic Cancer, sponsored by University of Southampton. Status unknown at 22 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-01-23.

Sponsored by University of Southampton · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2008), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
340
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, leucovorin, and capecitabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Monoclonal antibodies, such as cetuximab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Some block the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Others find tumor cells and help kill them or carry tumor-killing substances to them. Giving combination chemotherapy together with monoclonal antibodies before surgery may make the tumor smaller and reduce the amount of normal tissue that needs to be removed. Giving these treatments after surgery may kill any tumor cells that remain after surgery. It is not yet known whether combination chemotherapy is more effective with or without cetuximab in treating liver metastases caused by colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying combination chemotherapy to compare how well it works when given with or without cetuximab before and after surgery in treating patients with resectable liver metastases caused by colorectal cancer.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Compare progression-free survival of patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases treated with neoadjuvant and adjuvant combination chemotherapy with vs without cetuximab.

Secondary

  • Compare the overall survival of patients treated with these regimens.
  • Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
  • Compare the cost effectiveness of these regimens in these patients.

OUTLINE: This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label study. Patients are stratified according to participating center and assigned chemotherapy regimen. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

  • Neoadjuvant therapy:

    • Arm I: Patients receive 1 of the following chemotherapy regimens:

      • OxMdG: Patients receive leucovorin calcium IV over 2 hours and oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours on day 1. Patients also receive fluorouracil IV continuously over 46 hours beginning on day 1. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for up to 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
      • CAPOX: Patients receive oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours on day 1 and oral capecitabine twice daily on days 1-14. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for up to 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
    • Arm II: Patients receive 1 of the following regimens:

      • OxMdG + cetuximab: Patients receive cetuximab IV over 1-2 hours on day 1 and OxMdG chemotherapy as in arm I. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for up to 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
      • CAPOX + cetuximab: Patients receive cetuximab IV over 1-2 hours on days 1, 8, and 15 and CAPOX chemotherapy as in arm I. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for up to 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
  • Surgery: Beginning 2-6 weeks after completion of chemotherapy, patients in both arms undergo liver resection.
  • Adjuvant therapy: Beginning 4-8 weeks after completion of surgery, patients receive treatment (OxMdG or CAPOX with or without cetuximab) as in arm I or II of neoadjuvant therapy.

    • Arm I: Treatment with OxMdG repeats every 2 weeks for up to 6 courses and treatment with CAPOX repeats every 3 weeks for up to 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
    • Arm II: Treatment with OxMdG + cetuximab repeats every 2 weeks for up to 6 courses and treatment with CAPOX + cetuximab repeats every 3 weeks for up to 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Quality of life is assessed at baseline, every 12 weeks during chemotherapy, at completion of study treatment, every 3 months for 1 year, and then every 6 months thereafter.

Cost per life year and per quality-adjusted life year is assessed at baseline, every 12 weeks during treatment, and then at 3, 5, and 10 years.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months for 3 years.

Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK

02

Conditions studied

  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Metastatic Cancer

Keywords

  • adenocarcinoma of the colon
  • stage IV colon cancer
  • adenocarcinoma of the rectum
  • stage IV rectal cancer
  • liver metastases
  • recurrent colon cancer
  • recurrent rectal cancer
03

In context

Colorectal Neoplasms

5,599 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms; 1,459 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 340 is above the median of 77 across 4,123 interventional studies indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms.

Browse Colorectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Southampton is the lead sponsor of 121 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically* or radiologically confirmed primary adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum

    • Advanced and/or metastatic disease NOTE: *Liver metastases should not be biopsied
  • Must have potentially resectable liver metastases present, as defined by any of the following:

    • Metachronous metastases AND complete resection of the primary tumor without gross or microscopic evidence of residual disease (R0)
    • Synchronous metastases AND R0 resection of the primary tumor > 1 month before study entry
    • Synchronous metastases with sufficient evidence (e.g., by CT scan or diagnostic laparoscopy) that both the primary tumor and the liver metastases can be completely resected during the same procedure and resection of primary tumor can be delayed for 3-4 months
    • Suboptimally resectable disease (i.e., potentially resectable disease with compromise of the resection margins)
  • No detectable extrahepatic tumor that cannot be completely resected
  • Unidimensionally measurable disease
  • No brain metastases

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • WHO performance status 0-2
  • WBC ≥ 4,000/mm³
  • ANC ≥ 1,500/mm³
  • Platelet count > 150,000/mm³
  • Bilirubin ≤ 1.25 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 5 times ULN
  • AST or ALT ≤ 3 times ULN
  • Creatinine clearance > 50 mL/min OR glomerular filtration rate > 50 mL/min
  • Not pregnant or nursing
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Fertile patients must use effective contraception during and for ≥ 3 months after completion of study treatment
  • No psychiatric or neurological condition that would preclude study compliance
  • No partial or complete bowel obstruction
  • No preexisting neuropathy > grade 1
  • No other prior or concurrent malignant disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude study treatment
  • No concurrent severe uncontrolled medical illness (including poorly-controlled angina or myocardial infarction within the past 3 months) that would preclude study treatment
  • No known hypersensitivity reaction to any of the components of the study drugs

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • No prior systemic chemotherapy for metastatic disease
  • More than 6 months since prior adjuvant chemotherapy comprising fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium, capecitabine, or irinotecan hydrochloride
  • More than 1 month since prior rectal chemoradiotherapy comprising fluorouracil and leucovorin calcium
  • No concurrent contraindicated medication
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
340 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    OxMdG / IrMdG chemotherapy

    OxMdG / IrMdG chemotherapy for 12 weeks Followed by surgery OxMdG / IrMdG chemotherapy for 12 weeks

    Drug: capecitabine · Drug: fluorouracil · Drug: leucovorin calcium · Drug: oxaliplatin · Other: study of socioeconomic and demographic variables · Procedure: adjuvant therapy · Procedure: neoadjuvant therapy · Procedure: quality-of-life assessment

  • Experimental
    OxMdG / IrMdG chemotherapy with cetuximab

    OxMdG / IrMdG chemotherapy with cetuximab for 12 weeks Followed by Surgery OxMdG / IrMdG chemotherapy with cetuximab for 12 weeks

    Biological: cetuximab · Drug: capecitabine · Drug: fluorouracil · Drug: leucovorin calcium · Drug: oxaliplatin · Other: study of socioeconomic and demographic variables · Procedure: adjuvant therapy · Procedure: neoadjuvant therapy · Procedure: quality-of-life assessment

Interventions

  • Biologicalcetuximab
  • Drugcapecitabine
  • Drugfluorouracil
  • Drugleucovorin calcium
  • Drugoxaliplatin
  • Otherstudy of socioeconomic and demographic variables
  • Procedureadjuvant therapy
  • Procedureneoadjuvant therapy
  • Procedurequality-of-life assessment
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression-free survival

    Time frame: end of study

Secondary outcomes

  1. Response rate before surgery as assessed by RECIST criteria

    Time frame: end of study

  2. Pathological resection status

    Time frame: end of study

  3. Overall survival

    Time frame: end of study

  4. Toxicity

    Time frame: end of study

  5. Quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D, EORTC QLQ-C30, and EORTC QLQ-LMC21

    Time frame: end of study

  6. Cost effectiveness

    Time frame: end of study

  7. Safety

    Time frame: end of study

07

Study locations

22 of 22 sites recruiting
  • Basildon University Hospital
    Basildon, England SS16 5NL, United Kingdom
    • Pauline Leonard, MD · Contact · 44-1702-435-555
    Recruiting
  • Basingstoke and North Hampshire NHS Foundation Trust
    Basingstoke, England RG24 9NA, United Kingdom
    • Charlotte Rees, MD · Contact · 44-125-631-4793
    Recruiting
  • Royal Bournemouth Hospital
    Bournemouth, England BH7 7DW, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
  • Addenbrooke's Hospital
    Cambridge, England CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
  • St. Luke's Cancer Centre at Royal Surrey County Hospital
    Guildford, England GU2 7XX, United Kingdom
    • Sharadah Essapen, MD · Contact · 44-1483-571-122
    Recruiting
  • Aintree University Hospital
    Liverpool, England L9 7AL, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
  • Royal Liverpool University Hospital
    Liverpool, England L9 7AL, United Kingdom
    • Paula Ghaneh, MD · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Saint Bartholomew's Hospital
    London, England EC1A 7BE, United Kingdom
    • Sarah Slater, MD · Contact · 44-20-7601-8391
    Recruiting
  • UCL Cancer Institute
    London, England NW3 2PF, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
  • Royal Marsden - London
    London, England SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom
    • David Cunningham, MD · Contact · 44-20-8661-3156
    Recruiting
  • Charing Cross Hospital
    London, England W6 8RF, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
  • Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology
    Merseyside, England CH63 4JY, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
  • St. Mary's Hospital
    Newport, England PO30 5TG, United Kingdom
    • Christopher Baughan, MD · Contact · 44-1983-524-081
    Recruiting
  • Cancer Research Centre at Weston Park Hospital
    Nottingham, England NG5 1PB, United Kingdom
    • J. Hornbuckle, MD · Contact · 44-115-969-1169 ext. 47599
    Recruiting
  • Dorset Cancer Centre
    Poole Dorset, England BH15 2JB, United Kingdom
    • Tamas Hickish, MD · Contact · 44-1202-442-532
    Recruiting
  • Salisbury District Hospital
    Salisbury, England SP2 8BJ, United Kingdom
    • Tim J. Iveson, MD · Contact · 44-1722-336-262 ext. 4688
    Recruiting
  • Southampton General Hospital
    Southampton, England SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
  • Royal Marsden - Surrey
    Sutton, England SM2 5PT, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
  • Southend University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
    Westcliff-On-Sea, England SS0 0RY, United Kingdom
    • Pauline Leonard, MD · Contact · 44-1702-435-555
    Recruiting
  • Worthing Hospital
    Worthing, England BN11 2DH, United Kingdom
    • Andrew Webb, MD · Contact · 44-1903-205-111
    Recruiting
  • Velindre Cancer Center at Velindre Hospital
    Cardiff, Wales CF14 2TL, United Kingdom
    • Timothy Maughan, MD · Contact · 44-2920-316-904
    Recruiting
  • University Hospital of Wales
    Cardiff, Wales CF14 4XW, United Kingdom
    • Timothy Maughan, MD · Contact · 44-2920-316-904
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 23, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00482222
Lead sponsor
University of Southampton
Collaborators
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 5, 2007
Start date
Feb 2007
Primary completion
Dec 2014 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 23, 2013

Study contacts

Louisa Little
Contact
02380795154
John N. Primrose, MD
study chair · University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2008. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion