CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00476164RituxiCAN-C4Updated Mar 5, 2020

Study of Rituximab to Treat Chronic Renal Transplant Rejection

A Phase 4 interventional study of Rituximab and Control arm in Kidney Transplantation, Graft Rejection and Immunosuppression, sponsored by King's College London. Completed at 11 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-05.

Sponsored by King's College London · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
62
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Purpose of clinical trial; Evaluate the effectiveness of rituximab in C4d+ CAN

Primary objective; To determine whether anti-CD20 therapy can stabilize or improve renal function and/or proteinuria in patients with C4d+, chronic (humoral) rejection in whom standard therapeutic approaches have failed.

Secondary objective (s);

  • To compare patient and graft survival between control and rituximab-treated groups
  • To evaluate the adverse effect profile of rituximab in this group
  • To correlate changes in circulating B cell numbers, anti-HLA and non-HLA Ab profiles and titre with responses to standard therapy and / or rituximab
  • To correlate changes in T cell responsiveness to alloantigens with responses to standard therapy and / or rituximab

Study Design; Prospective, randomised, two arm, open-labeled

Study Endpoints; Primary

  • Rate of deterioration in renal function, defined by slope of reciprocal creatinine plot, on samples taken 3-5 months post-randomisation.
  • Change in degree of proteinuria, where present, at 3-5 months post-randomisation 2˚ endpoints, determined at 3-5 months post-randomisation and at 1, 2 and 3 years post-recruitment are;
  • Rate of deterioration in renal function, defined by slope of reciprocal creatinine plot, determined by analysis of samples taken since previous assessment.
  • Patient survival
  • Graft survival
  • Incidence of culture positive infection
  • Incidence of malignancy
  • Degree of proteinuria
  • Changes in circulating CD20+ cells in peripheral blood
  • Changes in anti-graft Ab titres, (measured every 3 months)
  • Changes in T cell responsiveness to alloantigens (measured every 3 months).

Sample Size; 15 patients to be randomised to each arm (i.e. 30 patients randomised). Up to 120 patients will need to be enrolled into the study. In addition, in those participants that received a living donor kidney, these donors will be approached to provide up to 5 samples of blood to help with the in vitro analyses.

Summary of eligibility criteria;

  • Male or female renal allograft recipients 18-70 years of age
  • more than 6/12 post-transplantation
  • Either deteriorating allograft function on reciprocal creatinine plot or significant proteinuria or both.
  • C4d+/- CAN on renal allograft biopsy

Investigational medicinal product and dosage; Rituximab, 1g on day 0 and 1g on day 14

Active comparator product(s); None

Route(s) of administration; Intravenous infusion

Maximum duration of treatment of a subject; 14 days with rituximab. The treatment arms of the study, including optimisation period, formal run-in and post-randomisation phase lasts for 10 months post-recruitment.

Procedures; Screening \& enrollment. Potentially eligible patients will be identified by screening renal allograft biopsies performed for 'creeping creatinine' and/or proteinuria. Recruitment by informed consent prior to enrollment.

Procedures; Baseline. In addition to routine tests, blood for anti-HLA and non-HLA antibody analysis and for peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) purification.

Procedures; Treatment period. 3 month run-in period on optimal conventional immunosuppressive therapy, preceded by up to 2 months to allow tailored-optimization. Patients will be reviewed at least six times in their normal transplant clinic appointments for routine blood biochemistry, full blood count and urine analysis. At the end of the run-in period, further blood will be taken for anti-graft antibody analysis and PBMC purification. Those patients in whom allograft function stabilises and/or proteinuria improves will have normal transplant clinic follow-up appointments and have blood taken for further anti-graft antibody and PBMC purification up to every 3 months for 3 years. Those with continued deterioration in either allograft function or persisting or worsening proteinuria will be randomised. These patients will be reviewed during their normal transplant clinic appointments until the primary end-point and will need to have at least 6 routine blood biochemistry, full blood count and urine analysis during the final 3 months of this period, post-randomisation. At the primary end-point, further blood will be taken for anti-graft antibody analysis and PBMC.

Procedures; End of Study. •Follow up will continue for 3 years, with blood taken for anti-graft antibody analysis and PBMC purification every three months

Procedures for safety monitoring during trial; Regular patient interviews and examination, routine haematological and biochemical analyses. Serious adverse events will be reported and forwarded to the sponsor, MHRA, LREC and Roche as appropriate The WLRATC transplant research committee will discuss the trial and any safety concerns at their regular three monthly meetings. Data will be reviewed after 30 and also after 60 people have been enrolled.

Criteria for withdrawal of patients on safety grounds; Serious adverse effects related to rituximab infusion

02

Conditions studied

  • Kidney Transplantation
  • Graft Rejection
  • Immunosuppression

Keywords

  • chronic allograft nephropathy
  • C4d
  • Anti-CD20
  • B cells
  • Antibody
03

In context

Lead sponsor

King's College London is the lead sponsor of 506 studies on the registry; 125 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Functioning kidney allograft (with estimated (e) GFR by MDRD >20) and be >6/12 post-transplantation
  • Deteriorating allograft function as defined by linear regression of reciprocal creatinine plot. Deterioration will be defined as a negative slope over at least the preceding 3 months (with at least 6 creatinines included) with an adjusted r2 >0.35 and a p value of ≤0.05 compared to horizontal baseline. Deterioration will be confirmed by reduction in Cockcroft-Gault (CG) eGFR over the same period (to exclude increases in body mass as a cause of a negative slope on reciprocal creatinine plots) OR significant proteinuria as assessed by a urine protein/creatinine ratio of ≥50
  • CAN, by Banff '97 criteria, and/or transplant glomerulopathy on renal allograft biopsy performed within 6/12 of enrolment
  • Diffuse, linear C4d deposition on at least 25% of peritubular capillary (PTC) and/or glomerular EC of renal transplant biopsy when assessed by immunoperoxidase or >50% of PTC (alone) when assessed by immunofluorescence OR PTCitis OR glomerulitis with combined PTC/g score of ≥2.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ages below 18 years of age
  • Suspicion of pregnancy confirmed by positive HCG pregnancy test
  • Untreated ureteric obstruction on ultrasound of allograft
  • History of acute allograft rejection in preceding 3/12
  • History of MI in preceding 3/12
  • History of malignancy in previous 5 years (excluding tumours limited to skin)
  • Symptomatic IHD
  • Recipient of simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplant
  • Recipient of ABO-incompatible kidney
  • Recipient who underwent an HLA desensitisation procedure prior to transplantation
  • Evidence, on examination of renal allograft biopsy specimen, of recurrent or de-novo disease (except IgA deposition in absence of mesangial proliferation)
  • Evidence, on examination of renal allograft biopsy specimen, of CNI toxicity IF ACCOMPANIED by mostly supra-therapeutic CNI trough levels in the 6 month period preceding biopsy.
  • Documented allergy to mouse or chimeric human/mouse proteins
  • HepBsAg+, HepBcAb+, HCV Ab+ or HIV+.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
62 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Rituximab

    Infusion of 2 x 1g of rituximab, 14 days apart

    Drug: Rituximab

  • Sham comparator
    2

    Other: Control arm

Interventions

  • DrugRituximab

    2 doses of 1g 14 days apart

    Also known as: Mabthera

  • OtherControl arm

    Continue of optimised oral immunosuppression

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of deterioration in renal function, defined by slope of reciprocal creatinine plot

    Time frame: 3-5 months post-randomisation

  2. Change in degree of proteinuria, where present

    Time frame: 3-5 months post-randomisation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of deterioration in renal function, defined by slope of reciprocal creatinine plot, determined by analysis of samples taken since previous assessment

    Time frame: 1, 2 and 3 years post-recruitment

  2. Patient survival

    Time frame: 5 months post-randomisation and at 1, 2 and 3 years post-recruitment

  3. Graft survival

    Time frame: 5 months post-randomisation and at 1, 2 and 3 years post-recruitment

  4. Incidence of culture positive infection

    Time frame: 5 months post-randomisation and at 1, 2 and 3 years post-recruitment

  5. Incidence of malignancy

    Time frame: 5 months post-randomisation and at 1, 2 and 3 years post-recruitment

  6. Degree of proteinuria

    Time frame: 1, 2 and 3 years post-recruitment

  7. Changes in circulating CD20+ cells in peripheral blood

    Time frame: 5 months post-randomisation and at 1, 2 and 3 years post-recruitment

  8. Changes in anti-graft Ab titres

    Time frame: 3 monthly to 3 years post-recruitment

  9. Changes in T cell responsiveness to alloantigens

    Time frame: 3 monthly to 3 years post-recruitment

07

Study locations

11 sites
  • University Hospital Birmingham
    Birmingham, B15 2LN, United Kingdom
  • East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust
    Canterbury, CT1 3NG, United Kingdom
  • Univeristy Hospital of Wales
    Cardiff, CF14 4XW, United Kingdom
  • Epsom & St Helier University Hospitals Trust
    Carshalton, SM5 1AA, United Kingdom
  • Western Infirmary
    Glasgow, G11 6NT, United Kingdom
  • Hull Royal Infirmary
    Hull, HU3 2JZ, United Kingdom
  • St Jame's University Hospital
    Leeds, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
  • The Royal Free Hospital
    London, NW3 2PF, United Kingdom
  • King's College London, Guy's Hospital
    London, SE 19RT, United Kingdom
  • Imperial College London and West London Renal & Transplantation Centre
    London, W12 0NN, United Kingdom
  • Manchester Royal Infirmary
    Manchester, M13 9WL, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Shiu KY, Stringer D, McLaughlin L, Shaw O, Brookes P, Burton H, Wilkinson H, Douthwaite H, Tsui TL, Mclean A, Hilton R, Griffin S, Geddes C, Ball S, Baker R, Roufosse C, Horsfield C, Dorling A. Effect of Optimized Immunosuppression (Including Rituximab) on Anti-Donor Alloresponses in Patients With Chronically Rejecting Renal Allografts. Front Immunol. 2020 Feb 5;11:79. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00079. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32117242 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 5, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00476164
Lead sponsor
King's College London
Collaborators
Medical Research Council, Roche Pharma AG
Responsible party
A. Dorling (Professor of Transplant Inflammation and Repair, King's College London) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 21, 2007
Start date
Jan 2007
Primary completion
May 2015
Completion
Apr 2017
Last update
Mar 5, 2020

Study contacts

Anthony Dorling, PhD FRCP
principal investigator · King's College London

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion