CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00473590AMBERUpdated Jun 14, 2017Results posted

A Study of Bevacizumab in Combination With Bortezomib in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (AMBER)

A Phase 2 interventional study of Bevacizumab and Bortezomib in Multiple Myeloma, sponsored by Genentech, Inc.. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-06-14.

Sponsored by Genentech, Inc. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
102
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter, Phase II study designed to provide a preliminary assessment of the safety and efficacy of combining bevacizumab with bortezomib in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

02

Conditions studied

  • Multiple Myeloma

Keywords

  • Avastin
  • AMBER
  • Myeloma
  • Velcade
03

In context

Multiple Myeloma

3,632 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Myeloma; 745 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 102 is above the median of 41 across 2,907 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Myeloma.

Browse Multiple Myeloma studies →

Lead sponsor

Genentech, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 507 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Of its 90 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 50 (56%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, or 2
  • Previously diagnosed with multiple myeloma
  • Relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma with disease progression following one to three prior treatment regimens
  • Measurable multiple myeloma disease

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Grade ≥ 2 peripheral neuropathy
  • Use of corticosteroids within 21 days prior to Day 1
  • Use of other anti-myeloma therapy within 21 days prior to Day 1
  • Intolerance to bortezomib or compounds containing boron
  • Life expectancy of \< 12 weeks
  • Current, recent, or planned participation in an experimental drug study
  • Active malignancy other than multiple myeloma within 5 years before screening
  • Prior treatment with bevacizumab
  • Inadequately controlled hypertension
  • Prior history of hypertensive crisis or hypertensive encephalopathy
  • New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II or greater congestive heart failure (CHF)
  • Decreased left ventricular function at study entry
  • History of myocardial infarction or unstable angina within 6 months prior to Day 1
  • History of stroke or transient ischemic attack within 6 months prior to Day 1
  • Significant vascular disease or recent peripheral arterial thrombosis within 6 months prior to Day 1
  • Evidence of bleeding diathesis or significant coagulopathy (in the absence of therapeutic anticoagulation)
  • Major surgical procedure, open biopsy, or significant traumatic injury within 28 days prior to Day 1, or anticipation of need for major surgical procedure during the course of the study
  • Core biopsy or other minor surgical procedure, including placement of a vascular access device within 7 days prior to Day 1
  • History of abdominal fistula or gastrointestinal perforation within 6 months prior to Day 1
  • Serious, non-healing wound, active ulcer, or untreated bone fracture (for pathologic bone fractures consistent with multiple myeloma, patients may be eligible if no treatment is planned)
  • Albuminuria
  • Known hypersensitivity to any component of bevacizumab
  • Pregnancy (positive pregnancy test) or lactation
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
102 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Bortezomib + bevacizumab

    Participants received bortezomib 1.3 mg/m\^2 administered as a 3- to 5-second bolus intravenous injection on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day cycle for a maximum of eight cycles and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg administered by intravenous infusion on the first day of each 21-day cycle during the blinded treatment phase. After completion of 8 cycles, participants could continue to receive bevacizumab as monotherapy until disease progression.

    Drug: Bevacizumab · Drug: Bortezomib

  • Active comparator
    Bortezomib + placebo

    Participants received bortezomib 1.3 mg/m\^2 administered as a 3- to 5-second bolus intravenous injection on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day cycle for a maximum of eight cycles and placebo intravenous infusion on the first day of each 21-day cycle during the blinded treatment phase. At the completion of the 8-cycle treatment phase, participants entered the observation phase until disease progression.

    Drug: Bortezomib · Drug: placebo

Interventions

  • DrugBevacizumab

    15 mg/kg administered by intravenous infusion

  • DrugBortezomib

    1.3 mg/m\^2 administered by intravenous bolus injection

  • Drugplacebo

    Intravenous repeating dose

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression-free Survival (PFS)

    Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression or death on study from any cause within 30 days of the last response assessment. Disease progression was determined by the investigator using the International Myeloma Working Group's (IMWG) uniform response criteria. Median PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. For patients who were alive at the time of the analysis and whose disease had not yet progressed, PFS was censored at the time of the last response assessment.

    Time frame: From randomization to disease progression or death on study (up to 116 weeks).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With an Overall Response

    Overall response was defined as a stringent complete response, complete response, very good partial response, or partial response (sCR, CR, VGPR, and PR, respectively) determined on two consecutive assessments ≤ 6 weeks apart and before the initiation of any new anti-tumor therapy, as assessed by the investigator using the International Myeloma Working Group's (IMWG's) uniform response criteria. Patients without a post-baseline response assessment or who died prior to their first scheduled response assessment were considered non-responders.

    Time frame: From randomization to the end of study (clinical cut-off; up to 116 weeks).

  2. Percentage of Participants With an Overall Response

    Overall response was defined as a stringent complete response, complete response, very good partial response, or partial response (sCR, CR, VGPR, and PR) determined on two consecutive assessments ≤ 6 weeks apart and before the initiation of any new anti-tumor therapy, as assessed by the investigator using the IMWG's uniform response criteria. Patients without a post-baseline response assessment or who died prior to their first scheduled response assessment were considered non-responders.

    Time frame: From randomization to the end of study (clinical cut-off; up to 116 weeks).

  3. Duration of Response

    Duration of response was defined as the time from the initial response to disease progression or death on study. Disease progression was determined by the investigator using the IMWG's uniform response criteria and defined as an increase of ≥25% from best response in: Serum M-protein and/or Urine M-protein and/or Marrow plasma cells; or new or increased plasmacytomas or bone lesions; or hypercalcemia due to myeloma. Duration of response was estimated using Kaplan-Meier. For patients who had not progressed or died, duration of response was censored at the date of the last response assessment.

    Time frame: From randomization to the end of study (clinical cut-off; up to 116 weeks).

  4. Overall Survival (OS)

    Overall survival was defined as the duration of time from randomization until death from any cause. All deaths were included, whether they occurred on study treatment or following treatment discontinuation. Overall survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier. For patients who had not died, overall survival was censored at the date that the patient was last known to be alive.

    Time frame: From randomization until death from any cause, up until the end of study (clinical cut-off; up to 116 weeks).

  5. Number of Participants With Selected Adverse Events (AEs)

    Adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), v3.0. All serious adverse events are listed in the Adverse Event Reporting section.

    Time frame: Participants were monitored for AEs from initiation of treatment to 30 days after treatment termination (up to 122 weeks).

07

Results

Posted Jan 19, 2012

Participant flow

Phase II, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter study designed to provide a preliminary assessment of the safety and efficacy of combining bevacizumab with bortezomib in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma starting 11 July 2007 and completing 9 November 2009.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBORT + PBORT + BV
Started5349
Treated5248
Safety population5050
Completed811
Not completed4538
Withdrew: Adverse event33
Withdrew: Death42
Withdrew: Progression not resulting in death2420
Withdrew: Non-protocol-specified therapy75
Withdrew: Physician decision24
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject53
Withdrew: Other01

Outcome measures

SecondaryNumber of Participants With an Overall Response

Overall response was defined as a stringent complete response, complete response, very good partial response, or partial response (sCR, CR, VGPR, and PR, respectively) determined on two consecutive assessments ≤ 6 weeks apart and before the initiation of any new anti-tumor therapy, as assessed by the investigator using the International Myeloma Working Group's (IMWG's) uniform response criteria. Patients without a post-baseline response assessment or who died prior to their first scheduled response assessment were considered non-responders.

Time frame:
From randomization to the end of study (clinical cut-off; up to 116 weeks).
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With an Overall Response
participantsBORT + PBORT + BV
Number of Participants With an Overall Response2325
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With an Overall Response

Overall response was defined as a stringent complete response, complete response, very good partial response, or partial response (sCR, CR, VGPR, and PR) determined on two consecutive assessments ≤ 6 weeks apart and before the initiation of any new anti-tumor therapy, as assessed by the investigator using the IMWG's uniform response criteria. Patients without a post-baseline response assessment or who died prior to their first scheduled response assessment were considered non-responders.

Time frame:
From randomization to the end of study (clinical cut-off; up to 116 weeks).
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With an Overall Response
Percentage of ParticipantsBORT + PBORT + BV
Percentage of Participants With an Overall Response43.4 (30.1 to 57.7)51.0 (36.3 to 65.2)
SecondaryDuration of Response

Duration of response was defined as the time from the initial response to disease progression or death on study. Disease progression was determined by the investigator using the IMWG's uniform response criteria and defined as an increase of ≥25% from best response in: Serum M-protein and/or Urine M-protein and/or Marrow plasma cells; or new or increased plasmacytomas or bone lesions; or hypercalcemia due to myeloma. Duration of response was estimated using Kaplan-Meier. For patients who had not progressed or died, duration of response was censored at the date of the last response assessment.

Time frame:
From randomization to the end of study (clinical cut-off; up to 116 weeks).
Reported as:
Median · Months
Duration of Response
MonthsBORT + PBORT + BV
Duration of Response6.0 (4.86 to 8.31)6.9 (4.73 to 11.83)
Statistical analysis
  • BORT + P vs BORT + BV · Log Rank · p = 0.9179 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.956 · 95% CI 0.404 to 2.261The hazard ratios were estimated using Cox regression.
  • BORT + P vs BORT + BV · Log Rank · p = 0.6665 (The tests were exploratory because patients were not randomized to the two arms with respect to response status.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.836 · 95% CI 0.369 to 1.893The hazard ratios were estimated using Cox regression.
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was defined as the duration of time from randomization until death from any cause. All deaths were included, whether they occurred on study treatment or following treatment discontinuation. Overall survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier. For patients who had not died, overall survival was censored at the date that the patient was last known to be alive.

Time frame:
From randomization until death from any cause, up until the end of study (clinical cut-off; up to 116 weeks).
Reported as:
Median · Months
Overall Survival (OS)
MonthsBORT + PBORT + BV
Overall Survival (OS)24.0 (15.24 to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • BORT + P vs BORT + BV · Log Rank · p = 0.3134 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.633 · 95% CI 0.258 to 1.552The hazard ratios were estimated using Cox regression. The strata were number of prior cancer treatments (1, \> 1) and β2-microglobulin level (\< 3.5, ≥ 3.5 mg/L).
  • BORT + P vs BORT + BV · Log Rank · p = 0.2634 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.608 · 95% CI 0.251 to 1.468The hazard ratios were estimated using Cox regression.
PrimaryProgression-free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression or death on study from any cause within 30 days of the last response assessment. Disease progression was determined by the investigator using the International Myeloma Working Group's (IMWG) uniform response criteria. Median PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. For patients who were alive at the time of the analysis and whose disease had not yet progressed, PFS was censored at the time of the last response assessment.

Time frame:
From randomization to disease progression or death on study (up to 116 weeks).
Reported as:
Median · months
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
monthsBORT + PBORT + BV
Progression-free Survival (PFS)5.1 (4.17 to 7.20)6.2 (4.40 to 8.54)
Statistical analysis
  • BORT + P vs BORT + BV · Log Rank · p = 0.2804 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.743 · 95% CI 0.432 to 1.276The hazard ratio was estimated using Cox regression. The hazard ratio is relative to BORT + P.
  • BORT + P vs BORT + BV · Log Rank · p = 0.2009 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.713 · 95% CI 0.424 to 1.200Hazard ratio relative to BORT + P was estimated using Cox regression.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Selected Adverse Events (AEs)

Adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), v3.0. All serious adverse events are listed in the Adverse Event Reporting section.

Time frame:
Participants were monitored for AEs from initiation of treatment to 30 days after treatment termination (up to 122 weeks).
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Selected Adverse Events (AEs)
ParticipantsBORT + PBORT + BV
Arterial thromboembolic events (any grade)01
Bleeding other than pulmonary or CNS (Grade >=3)12
Febrile neutropenia (any grade)11
Gastrointestinal Perforation (Any Grade)10
Hypertension (Grade >= 3)08
Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (Grade >= 3)10
Neutropenia (Grade >= 3)610
Osteonecrosis of the Jaw01
Peripheral Neuropathy (Grade >= 3)78
Pulmonary and CNS Bleeding (Any Grade)01
Thrombocytopenia (Grade >= 3)1515
Vernous Thromboembolic Events (Grade >=3)10

Adverse events

Collected over Participants were monitored for AEs from initiation of treatment to 30 days after treatment termination.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
BORT + P—26/50 (52%)41/50 (82%)
BORT + BV—24/50 (48%)43/50 (86%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 50
Most frequent serious events
EventBORT + PBORT + BV
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders5/500/50
Renal Failure AcuteRenal and urinary disorders3/501/50
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/502/50
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders2/500/50
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/502/50
Orthostatic HypotensionVascular disorders2/500/50
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/501/50
Febrile NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/501/50
Atrial FlutterCardiac disorders1/500/50
PericarditisCardiac disorders1/500/50
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 14
Most frequent other events
EventBORT + PBORT + BV
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders16/5014/50
NeuralgiaNervous system disorders6/5010/50
HypertensionVascular disorders2/5010/50
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders6/509/50
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders6/509/50
Neuropathy PeripheralNervous system disorders8/508/50
FatigueGeneral disorders3/506/50
Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionInfections and infestations5/506/50
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders5/504/50
HeadacheNervous system disorders0/504/50

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)BORT + PBORT + BVTotal
Mean64.9 ± 9.265.6 ± 9.365.2 ± 9.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)BORT + PBORT + BVTotal
Female232043
Male302959
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 14, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00473590
Lead sponsor
Genentech, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 15, 2007
Start date
Jun 2007
Primary completion
Nov 2009
Completion
Nov 2009
Results posted
Jan 19, 2012
Last update
Jun 14, 2017

Study contacts

Virginia (Ginny) Paton, M.D.
study director · Genentech, Inc.
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion