CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00464217Updated Jan 5, 2010

Treatment of the Acute Myeloblastic Leukaemia in Patients Over 65 Years

A Phase 4 interventional study of ARA-C and Idarubicin in Acute Myeloblastic Leukaemia, sponsored by PETHEMA Foundation. Completed at 24 sites in Spain. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-01-05.

Sponsored by PETHEMA Foundation · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To reproduce or to improve the index of complete responses of protocol LMA-91 with a similar protocol, decreasing the dose of Idarubicin to try to reduce the deaths in induction

Read the detailed description

INDUCTION TREATMENT :Ara-C 100 mg/m 2 /day in continuous perfusion,days 1 - 7. Idarubicin 8 mg/m 2 /day, days 1 - 3 in bolus. GM-CSF (Leucomax) 5 mcg/kg subcutaneous or endovenous from day + 4 after finishing the chemotherapy until the recovery of neutropenia (> 1.000/mm 3)

CONSOLIDATION TREATMENT The patients who reach a complete response with the first cycle, will receive a second cycle to consolidation. The patients who do not reach a complete response with the first cycle will receive a second cycle. If after two cycles,do not obtain the response, patient should leave the protocol.

INTENSIFICATION TREATMENT All the patients who are in complete response after one cycle of induction and one cycle of consolidation, or after two cycles of induction, will receive a treatment of intensification with: ARA-C 500 mg/m 2 /12 h in one hour infusion, days 1-4. Daunomycin 45 mg/m 2 /day bolu, days 5-7. GM-CSF (Leucomax): 5 mcg/kg from day to + 4 after finishing the chemotherapy until the recovery of neutropenia (>1.000/mm 3)

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Myeloblastic Leukaemia

Keywords

  • Acute Myeloblastic Leukaemia
03

In context

Leukemia

5,441 studies on the registry are indexed under Leukemia; 637 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 100 is above the median of 38 across 4,248 interventional studies indexed under Leukemia.

Browse Leukemia studies →

Lead sponsor

PETHEMA Foundation is the lead sponsor of 104 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Cytologic diagnosis of acute myeloblastic leukaemia (excluded M3)
  • Over 65 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous diagnosis of other malignancy hematopoietic disorder or myelodysplastic syndrome
  • Previous treatment with antileucemic chemotherapy
  • Psychiatric disorder
  • Diagnosis of subtype FAB M3
  • Creatinine > 2.5 mg/dL
  • Bilirubin , Alkaline Phosphatase or transaminases three times upper the limit
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants

Interventions

  • DrugARA-C
  • DrugIdarubicin
  • DrugLeucomax
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Improve the complete response index in patients diagnosed of acute myeloblastic leukaemia over 65 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluate the toxicity

  2. Evaluate the effect of haematopoietic growth factors

07

Study locations

24 sites
  • Hospital General de Albacete
    Albacete, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario
    Alicante, Spain
  • Hospital Ntra. Sra. del Rossell
    Cartagena, Spain
  • Hospital General
    Castellón, Spain
  • Hospital Puerta del Mar
    Cádiz, Spain
  • Hospital de Galdacano
    Galdacano, Spain
  • Hospital Ciudad de Jaén
    Jaen, Spain
  • Hospital Insular de las Palmas
    Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
  • Hospital Xeral
    Lugo, Spain
  • Hospital Clínico San Carlos
    Madrid, Spain
  • Hospital Ramón y Cajal
    Madrid, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario de Alcalá de Henares
    Madrid, Spain
  • Hospital Morales Messeguer
    Murcia, Spain
  • Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca
    Murcia, Spain
  • Hospital Virgen de la Victoria
    Málaga, Spain
  • Hospital Central de Asturias
    Oviedo, Spain
  • Clínica Universitaria de Pamplona
    Pamplona, Spain
  • Hospital Montecelo
    Pontevedra, Spain
  • Hospital Clínico Universitario
    Salamanca, Spain
  • Hospital Arnau de Vilanova
    Valencia, Spain
  • Hospital Clínico
    Valencia, Spain
  • Hospital Dr. Pesset
    Valencia, Spain
  • Hospital Clínico
    Valladolid, Spain
  • Hospital Virgen de la Concha
    Zamora, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Martinez-Lopez J, Fernandez-Redondo E, Garcia-Sanz R, Montalban MA, Martinez-Sanchez P, Pavia B, Mateos MV, Rosinol L, Martin M, Ayala R, Martinez R, Blanchard MJ, Alegre A, Besalduch J, Bargay J, Hernandez MT, Sarasquete ME, Sanchez-Godoy P, Fernandez M, Blade J, San Miguel JF, Lahuerta JJ; GEM (Grupo Espanol Multidisciplinar de Melanoma)/PETHEMA (Programa para el Estudio de la Terapeutica en Hemopatias Malignas) cooperative study group. Clinical applicability and prognostic significance of molecular response assessed by fluorescent-PCR of immunoglobulin genes in multiple myeloma. Results from a GEM/PETHEMA study. Br J Haematol. 2013 Dec;163(5):581-9. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12576. Epub 2013 Oct 3. PubMed 24117042 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 5, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00464217
Lead sponsor
PETHEMA Foundation
First posted
Apr 23, 2007
Start date
Oct 1998
Primary completion
Dec 2008
Completion
Dec 2008
Last update
Jan 5, 2010

Study contacts

Garcia Laraña Jose, Dr
principal investigator · Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion