CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00461331Updated Jan 8, 2021Results posted

Comparison of Insulins Aspart and Lispro in Insulin Pumps

A Phase 4 interventional study of Insulin Aspart and Insulin Lispro in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, sponsored by Tulane University Health Sciences Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-01-08.

Sponsored by Tulane University Health Sciences Center · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to compare the glycemic control between insulins aspart and lispro 48 to 100 hours after pump infusion line change in subjects with type 1 using diabetes using an insulin pump.

Read the detailed description

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (Insulin pump therapy) is a well established tool for the management of type 1 diabetes. In clinical trials, insulin pump therapy has been shown to have increased efficacy over multiple daily injections. However, the overall glycemic control in patients using insulin pumps has been disappointing. The recommended duration of "needle use" in insulin pump treatment is 48 hours, based on anecdotal observations.

One of the reasons for the suboptimal control may be that patients do not adhere to the advice of changing their pump infusion line every 48 hours. However, it is possible that the loss of glycemic control may be related to instability of insulin in the pump/line. In addition to premeal loss of control after 48 hours of line change, very little is known about post-prandial hyperglycemia leading to loss of efficacy of the insulin via an insulin pump bolus. The development of continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) and new tests for short term fluctuations in glucose control such as 1,5-anhydroglucitol make it easier to evaluate the impact of short term loss of control in patients using the insulin pump who delay changing their lines.

The different variables will be compared between the two insulins using a paired t test.

  1. Glycemic control will be will be compared 24 to 100 hours after pump infusion line change using CGMS and daily serum 1,5-anhydroglucitol.
  2. Post prandial glycemic excursions in plasma glucose following a standardized breakfast 48, 72, and 96 hours after a pump infusion line change will be compared.
  3. The used pump infusion line will be collected from the patient and analyzed for insulin binding to the plastic, as well as other possible effects that may determine its role in loss of glycemic control.
  4. Comparison of some of the markers of coagulation, inflammation, protein glycation and oxidative stress 48, 72, and 96 hours after a pump infusion line change.
02

Conditions studied

  • Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

  • Type 1 diabetes mellitus
  • Glycemic control
  • Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion
  • Continuous glucose monitoring system
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

10,925 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,319 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 80 across 8,367 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

Tulane University Health Sciences Center is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Type 1 Diabetes treated with a pump for at least 3 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Plasma Creatinine > 1.2 mg/dl
  • Inability to give informed consent
  • HbA1c > 8%
  • Known or suspected hypersensitivity to trial drugs or any of their components
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Insulin 1

    Either insulin Aspart or insulin Lispro were randomized to be insulin 1.

    Drug: Insulin Aspart

  • Active comparator
    Insulin 2

    Between insulin Aspart and insulin Lispro, the one that was not used as insulin 1 was then used as the second insulin for the second arm of the study.

    Drug: Insulin Lispro

Interventions

  • DrugInsulin Aspart

    Either one of these insulins were given to the patient as the second insulin (depending on which was given as the first one, the other insulin was insulin 2). Patients used this insulin in the same dose as they did prior to entering the study.

    Also known as: Insulin lispro - insulin Humalog, Insulin aspart - insulin Novolog

  • DrugInsulin Lispro

    Patients were given either insulin Aspart or Lispro in test period 1. Then they were switched to the other insulin in test period 2.

    Also known as: Insulin Aspart

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Glycemic Control (Glucose Levels Between 180-300 mg/dL) 24 to 100 Hours After Line Change

    For each test period, we measured the duration of time that the same pump infusion line could be kept in place without losing glycemic control. Loss of glycemic control was defined as capillary blood glucose level \>300 mg/dL.

    Time frame: 24 to 100 hours after last pump infusion line change

Secondary outcomes

  1. Daily Serum Glycomark Levels 48 to 100 Hours After Keeping the Same Pump Infusion Line in Place

    Daily serum glycomark levels between day 3 and day 5 after the pump infusion line change. These levels were measured for both the test periods.

    Time frame: 48 to 100 hours after keeping the same pump infusion line in place

  2. Oxidative Stress Marker 48, 72 and 96 Hours After Keeping the Same Pump Infusion Line in Place

    Free 15-F2t isoprostane was measured between days 3 and 5 after the keeping the same pump infusion line in place. It is a marker of oxidative stress due to hyperglycemia that was being compared between the two test periods.

    Time frame: Between 48, 72 and 96 hours after the last pump infusion line change

07

Results

Posted May 19, 2011

Participant flow

Patients with Type I diabetes mellitus using an insulin pump were recruited from the outpatient clinics.

Intervention 1
Participant flow — Intervention 1
MilestoneAspart First, Washout, Then LisproLispro First, Washout, Then Aspart
Started1010
Completed1010
Not completed00
Washout
Participant flow — Washout
MilestoneAspart First, Washout, Then LisproLispro First, Washout, Then Aspart
Started1010
Completed1010
Not completed00
Intervention 2
Participant flow — Intervention 2
MilestoneAspart First, Washout, Then LisproLispro First, Washout, Then Aspart
Started1010
Completed1010
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Glycemic Control (Glucose Levels Between 180-300 mg/dL) 24 to 100 Hours After Line Change

For each test period, we measured the duration of time that the same pump infusion line could be kept in place without losing glycemic control. Loss of glycemic control was defined as capillary blood glucose level \>300 mg/dL.

Time frame:
24 to 100 hours after last pump infusion line change
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Glycemic Control (Glucose Levels Between 180-300 mg/dL) 24 to 100 Hours After Line Change
ParticipantsInsulin AspartInsulin Lispro
Number of Participants With Glycemic Control (Glucose Levels Between 180-300 mg/dL) 24 to 100 Hours After Line Change1716
Statistical analysis
  • Insulin Aspart vs Insulin Lispro · Regression, Linear · p = 0.52 · Mean difference (final values): 96.4 · 95% CI 87.9 to 100.07 patients underwent early termination of either one or both of their test period due to loss of glycemic control
SecondaryDaily Serum Glycomark Levels 48 to 100 Hours After Keeping the Same Pump Infusion Line in Place

Daily serum glycomark levels between day 3 and day 5 after the pump infusion line change. These levels were measured for both the test periods.

Time frame:
48 to 100 hours after keeping the same pump infusion line in place
Reported as:
Mean · µg/ml
Daily Serum Glycomark Levels 48 to 100 Hours After Keeping the Same Pump Infusion Line in Place
µg/mlInsulin AspartInsulin Lispro
Daily Serum Glycomark Levels 48 to 100 Hours After Keeping the Same Pump Infusion Line in Place5.1 ± 4.135.6 ± 4.2
Statistical analysis
  • Insulin Aspart vs Insulin Lispro · Regression, Linear · p = 0.15 · Mean difference (net): 5.35 · 95% CI 0.97 to 9.23This was between days 3 and 5 after the last pump infusion line change using Insulin Aspart and Insulin Lispro. Adequate samples were not available to do the analysis for day 2.
SecondaryOxidative Stress Marker 48, 72 and 96 Hours After Keeping the Same Pump Infusion Line in Place

Free 15-F2t isoprostane was measured between days 3 and 5 after the keeping the same pump infusion line in place. It is a marker of oxidative stress due to hyperglycemia that was being compared between the two test periods.

Time frame:
Between 48, 72 and 96 hours after the last pump infusion line change
Reported as:
Mean · pg/ml
Oxidative Stress Marker 48, 72 and 96 Hours After Keeping the Same Pump Infusion Line in Place
pg/mlInsulin AspartInsulin Lispro
Oxidative Stress Marker 48, 72 and 96 Hours After Keeping the Same Pump Infusion Line in Place6.9 ± 2.56.5 ± 2.2
Statistical analysis
  • Insulin Aspart vs Insulin Lispro · Regression, Linear · p = 0.55 · Mean difference (net): 6.7 · 95% CI 4.4 to 9.4This was for test period 1 between days 3 and 5 after the last pump infusion line change.

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Insulin Aspart—0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)
Insulin Lispro—0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Entire Study Population
Mean45.5 ± 14.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Entire Study Population
Female16
Male4
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Clinical Translational Unit - Tulane School of Medicine
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 8, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00461331
Lead sponsor
Tulane University Health Sciences Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 18, 2007
Start date
Oct 2004
Primary completion
Jun 2007
Completion
Aug 2008
Results posted
May 19, 2011
Last update
Jan 8, 2021

Study contacts

Vivian A Fonseca, MD, FRCP
principal investigator · Tulane Universtiy Health Sciences Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion