ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00448981STUFFYUpdated May 5, 2026

Stopping Upper Respiratory Infections and Flu in the Family: The Stuffy Trial

An interventional study of Education and Hand Sanitizer in Respiratory Tract Infections and Common Cold, sponsored by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Completed at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-05.

Primary conditionCommon ColdRegistry: Respiratory Tract InfectionsReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Respiratory Tract Infections — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Common Cold
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Common Cold, a narrower term within Respiratory Tract Infections.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,788
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Colds and flu cause much loss of work and school. The purpose of this study is to try to reduce the transmission of colds and flu among household members with one of three interventions: some educational material, educational material and use of alcohol hand sanitizers, and educational material and use of alcohol hand sanitizers as well as face masks when somebody has symptoms of the flu. We will recruit 450 households in Northern Manhattan and each household will be randomly assigned to one of these three groups. We will then follow these households for 15 months to see how often they get cold and flu symptoms. We will also look at antibiotic use practices for symptoms of colds and influenza ; household member knowledge of prevention and treatment strategies for pandemic influenza and viral URIs; and rates of influenza vaccination among household members. When someone in the study has serious flu symptoms such as a high fever and cough or sore throat, we will also obtain a nasal culture (by swabbing the nose) to see if there is flu virus present.

Read the detailed description

Although 'colds' and seasonal influenza are clinically very different diseases from pandemic influenza, they share common transmission pathways and the community level interventions needed to reduce both seasonal flu, common viral upper respiratory infections and pandemic influenza are likely to be similar.

Aims of this project are to compare the impact of two household level interventions (an alcohol based hand sanitizer with or without face masks) on six outcomes: incidence and strains of virologically confirmed influenza in study households; rates of symptoms; number of secondary cases in households; antibiotic use practices for symptoms of influenza and other viral upper respiratory infections; household member knowledge of prevention and treatment strategies for pandemic influenza and viral upper respiratory infections; and rates of influenza vaccination among household members.

450 households in northern Manhattan (primarily recently immigrated Hispanics) will be randomized to three groups: control (receiving only a pamphlet on influenza prevention), alcohol hand sanitizer, and sanitizer plus face masks. Symptoms of influenza will be monitored daily for 15 months using ecological momentary assessment technology. Virologic cultures will be obtained from persons with flu symptoms (fever >100 degrees F., sore throat and/or cough). Antibiotic use practices, knowledge, and vaccination rates will be assessed by survey using piloted, psychometrically sound instruments. For this cluster randomization design with randomized intervention on the household level, outcomes will be measured at the individual and household level using generalized linear mixed model for counts response with a Poisson distribution and other appropriate multivariate techniques to control for confounding.

Comparison(s): The purpose of this study is to try to reduce the transmission of colds and flu among household members with one of three interventions: comparison of transmission in groups receiving educational material only to a group receiving educational material and instructed to use alcohol hand sanitizers to a group receiving educational material and instructed to use alcohol hand sanitizers as well as face masks when somebody has symptoms of the flu

02

Conditions studied

  • Respiratory Tract Infections
  • Common Cold

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Preventing upper respiratory tract infections
  • Preventing influenza
  • Preventing the common cold
  • Hand hygiene and upper respiratory infections
  • Mask use in preventing upper respiratory infections
03

In context

Common Cold Reclassified

219 studies on the registry are indexed under Common Cold; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,788 is above the median of 150 across 184 interventional studies indexed under Common Cold.

Browse Common Cold studies →

Lead sponsor

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is the lead sponsor of 275 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 11 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (73%) have results posted.

Compared within Common Cold, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Respiratory Tract Infections. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Households with at least three members
  • At least one preschool or elementary school-aged child in the household
  • Residence in Northern Manhattan
  • Ability to speak English or Spanish
  • Access to a telephone
  • Willingness to participate in regular symptom reporting and home visits
  • Not routinely using alcohol-based hand sanitizer at baseline

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Households with fewer than three members
  • No preschool or elementary school-aged child in the household
  • Inability to communicate in English or Spanish
  • No access to a telephone
  • Unwillingness or inability to comply with study procedures
  • Routine use of alcohol-based hand sanitizer prior to enrollment
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2,788 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Education (Control Group)

    Participants received written educational materials (English or Spanish) on prevention and treatment of upper respiratory infections (URIs) and influenza.

    Behavioral: Education

  • Other
    Education + Hand Sanitizer

    Participants received the same educational materials plus alcohol-based hand sanitizer (multiple sizes) for use at home, work, and school.

    Behavioral: Education · Device: Hand Sanitizer

  • Other
    Education + Hand Sanitizer + Face Masks

    Participants received educational materials, hand sanitizer, and surgical face masks with instructions for use when a household member developed influenza-like illness (ILI).

    Behavioral: Education · Device: Hand Sanitizer · Device: Face Masks

Interventions

  • BehavioralEducation

    Educational materials (English or Spanish) on prevention and treatment of upper respiratory infections (URIs) and influenza.

  • DeviceHand Sanitizer

    Alcohol-based hand sanitizer provided in multiple sizes for use at home, work, and school.

  • DeviceFace Masks

    Surgical face masks with instructions for use when a household member develops influenza-like illness (ILI).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rates of virologically confirmed influenza and influenza vaccination

    Incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza based on nasal swab specimens analyzed by viral culture or PCR; vaccination rates assessed via participant report.

    Time frame: Throughout 19-month follow-up period

  2. Rates of influenza-like symptoms

    Incidence of ILI episodes defined using CDC criteria (fever ≥37.8°C with cough and/or sore throat).

    Time frame: Throughout 19-month follow-up period (symptoms reported at least twice weekly)

  3. Knowledge and attitudes about influenza and the common cold and antibiotic use practices.

    Change in knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) score based on a 10-item survey assessing understanding of transmission, prevention, and treatment.

    Time frame: Baseline and end of study (up to 19 months)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Columbia University School of Nursing
    New York, New York 10032, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cohen B, Ferng YH, Wong-McLoughlin J, Jia H, Morse SS, Larson EL. Predictors of flu vaccination among urban Hispanic children and adults. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Mar;66(3):204-9. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.099879. Epub 2010 Sep 29. PubMed 20881023 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Nov 2006, a primary completion of Jun 2008 and a completion of Jun 2008. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 16, 2007
First posted
Mar 19, 2007
Start
Nov 2006
Primary completionActual
Jun 2008
CompletionActual
Jun 2008
Last update
May 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 5, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00448981
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 19, 2007
Start date
Nov 2006
Primary completion
Jun 2008
Completion
Jun 2008
Last update
May 5, 2026

Study contacts

Elaine Larson, RN,PhD
principal investigator · Columbia University School of Nursing

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion