CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00443872AtoZUpdated Oct 31, 2014Results posted

Efficacy of Orally Disintegrating Selegiline in Parkinson's Patients Experiencing Adverse Effects With Dopamine Agonists

A Phase 4 interventional study of orally disintegrating selegiline (Zelapar) in Parkinson's Disease, sponsored by Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorder Center of Boca Raton. Completed at 17 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-10-31.

Sponsored by Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorder Center of Boca Raton · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
77
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
30 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to determine if reducing or eliminating a dopamine agonist (DA) causing one of the side effects of daytime sleepiness, swelling of the lower legs or feet, hallucinations or impulsive behaviors while adding orally disintegrating selegiline can eliminate the adverse effect and maintain control of Parkinson's disease (PD) symptoms.

Read the detailed description

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease. Symptomatic therapy is primarily aimed at restoring dopamine function in the brain. Levodopa is the most effective symptomatic treatment; however, long term use is associated with motor fluctuations (periods of return of PD symptoms when medication effect wears off) and dyskinesia (drug induced involuntary movements including chorea and dystonia). Once patients develop motor fluctuations treatment options include increasing the frequency of levodopa dosing, switching to sustained-release levodopa, adding other therapies including monoamine oxidase type B (MAO-B) inhibitors, dopamine agonists, catechol-o-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors and in patients with severe motor fluctuations deep brain stimulation surgery. There are no good evidence based studies indicating whether the use of one of these class of drugs is superior to the other nor are there treatment algorithms that recommend which class of drug should be initiated when the patients initially develop motor fluctuations. It is believed that the efficacy of the different drug classes is similar. However, the frequency of adverse effects may differ between drug classes, but such studies are lacking. In clinical practice when patients develop adverse effects to a drug from one class, a drug from another class is substituted in an attempt to maintain efficacy with reduced adverse effects.

Dopamine agonists often have a higher risk of adverse effects compared to MAO B inhibitors. Therefore, the rationale for this study is that the addition of orally disintegrating selegiline after the reduction or discontinuation of the offending dopamine agonist will result in comparable efficacy with reduced adverse events. This study will assess the safety and efficacy of the addition of orally disintegrating selegiline in PD patients who are having adverse effects to dopamine agonists for which a dose reduction of the dopamine agonist is being considered. All patients in the study will receive orally disintegrating selegiline 1.25 mg once a day and the dose will be increased to 2.5 mg once a day if tolerated.

Comparisons: The status of the adverse event at the end of the study while on orally disintegrating selegiline will be compared to the adverse event at the start of the study. In addition, efficacy will be compared at the start of the study while on the dopamine agonist to the end of the study with orally disintegrating selegiline.

02

Conditions studied

  • Parkinson's Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Parkinson's disease
  • Dopamine agonist adverse effects
  • MAO-B inhibitor
  • orally disintegrating selegiline
  • Zelapar
03

In context

Parkinson Disease

4,487 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,082 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 77 is above the median of 40 across 3,294 interventional studies indexed under Parkinson Disease.

Browse Parkinson Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorder Center of Boca Raton as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) confirmed by at least two of the following signs: resting tremor, bradykinesia,rigidity
  • Male or female outpatients
  • Age 30-90 years
  • Current use of levodopa (stable for at least 1 month) and a dopamine agonist (pramipexole or ropinirole)
  • Treatment response to current anti-parkinsonian medications in the opinion of the investigator
  • Dopamine agonist adverse effect that in the opinion of the investigator requires a reduction or discontinuation of the dopamine agonist. The adverse effects must be in one of the following four categories and should not be so severe as to require immediate discontinuation of the dopamine agonist (i.e., hallucinations without insight, serious impulsive behavior resulting in significant loss or danger to the patient).

Daytime sleepiness - must score >10 on Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at Baseline; Pedal edema - bothersome/concerning to patient; Hallucinations - insight should be maintained; Impulsive behavior - not including behaviors that are harmful to the patient requiring immediate discontinuation of the agonist.

  • Daily off time
  • Acceptable contraception for females of child bearing potential
  • Willing and able to comply with study procedures.
  • Willing and able to give written informed consent prior to beginning any study procedures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Atypical parkinsonism due to drugs, metabolic disorders, encephalitis, trauma, or other neurodegenerative diseases.
  • Significant cognitive or psychiatric impairment which, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the ability to complete all the tests required in the protocol.
  • Participation in another clinical drug trial within the previous four weeks.
  • Patients currently on monoamine oxidase type A or B (MAO-A or B) inhibitors, meperidine, tramadol, methadone, propoxyphene, dextromethorphan, and mirtazapine.
  • History of hypersensitivity or adverse reaction to selegiline or previous exposure to orally disintegrating selegiline
  • History of melanoma
  • Unstable/uncontrolled medical problems
  • History of drug/alcohol abuse
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
77 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    orally disintegrating selegiline

    This is a one arm open label study of patients who are experiencing a dopamine agonist (DA) related adverse effects (AE) of either one or more of the following: excessive daytime sleepiness, hallucinations, pedal edema, impulse control disorder. All subjects received orally disintegrating selegiline.

    Drug: orally disintegrating selegiline (Zelapar)

Interventions

  • Drugorally disintegrating selegiline (Zelapar)

    1.25 mg once daily orally disintegrating selegiline for 6 weeks with an increase to 2.5 mg once daily orally disintegrating selegiline for remaining 6 weeks if tolerated

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Reduction in Adverse Events

    The primary outcome measure was the reduction of daytime sleepiness, hallucinations, pedal edema, and impulse control disorders after a reduction of dopamine agonist dose with the addition of an monoamine oxidase (MAO)-B inhibitor (orally disintegrating selegiline). Percentages of participants with reduction in individual adverse events as well as reduction in any adverse events are reported.

    Time frame: 3 Months

  2. Epworth Sleepiness Scale Score for Those With Daytime Sleepiness

    This is a measure of daytime sleepiness. The test is a list of eight situations in which one rates their tendency to become sleepy on a scale of 0, no change of dozing to 3, high chance of dozing. The total score ranges fro 0-24, with higher values representing excessive sleepiness. A score of greater than 10 represents clinically significant sleepiness.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months

  3. Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Hallucinations Scale Score for Those With Hallucinations

    Report of hallucinations with insight maintained based on the hallucinations questions of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). The participant and their caregiver are asked a series of questions to determine if hallucinations are present. If present they rate the frequency of hallucinations on a scale of 1 (rarely, less than once a week) to 4, very often (once or more daily). They also rate the severity of the hallucinations, as mild (1 - present but harmless and cause little distress), moderate (2 - distressing and disruptive) or severe (3 - very disruptive, major source of behavioral disturbance, may need meds). The frequency and severity scores are multiplied (maximum score 12, with higher scores representing more distress/disability) for the total score.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months

  4. Circumference of Lower Leg/Foot at Greatest Point of Swelling for Pedal Edema

    The circumference of the lower leg/ankle with the greatest swelling was measured using a standard tape measure at baseline and 12 weeks for both the right and left ankles.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months

  5. Barratt Impulsiveness Scale Score for Those With Impulsive Behavior

    This is a measure of impulsiveness. There are 30 questions regarding the presence of impulsive and non-impulsive behaviors each scored from 1 (rarely/never) to 4 (almost always/always). The total score reflects the sum of the 30 items. A higher score represents more impulsiveness.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Scores

    The UPDRS activities of daily living sub scale has 14 questions regarding the ability to perform daily activities like dressing, eating, etc. These questions are completed by the patient and each question has 5 responses ranging from 0 (no problems) to 4 (severe disability/cannot do). The total score for this sub scale is the sum of the scores for the 14 questions (higher scores represent greater disability), maximum score is 56. The motor assessment is completed by the investigator. There are 14 questions evaluating motor function in various body parts, representing 27 individual items (i.e., some questions, such as rigidity, are rated for 5 different body parts, other questions, such as finger tapping, are rated on both the right and left sides, and other questions are rated individually). Each item has 5 responses, 0 being none/no disability and 4 being the most severe disability. The 27 items are summed (higher scores represent greater disability); maximum score is 108.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months

  2. PDQ-39 Quality of Life Assessment Total Scores

    The PDQ-39 is a measure of quality of life, it has 8 sub scales and a total score. For this study only the total score was examined. There are a total of 39 questions related to the following 8 sub scales: ability/difficulty to perform motor activities, ability to perform daily activities, cognition, emotional well being, stigma, social support, communication, bodily discomfort; each question with 5 responses (0, no/never, 4 always). The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the 39 items, dividing by 39 x 4 (maximum score for all 39 items) and then multiplying by 100 to get a percentage score ranging from 0-100 with 100 representing the most disability and greatest impact on quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months

  3. Beck Depression Inventory for All Subjects

    The Beck Depression Inventory is a general measure of depression. There are 21 questions each with responses ranging from 0 (no issue or problem) to 3 (maximum issue/distress), all questions are related to emotions, mood, feelings, etc. The total possible score is 63 (higher scores represent more depression). The total score is calculated by adding the scores of the 21 items.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months

  4. Beck Anxiety Inventory Scores for All Subjects

    The Beck Anxiety Inventory is a general measure of anxiety. There are 21 questions each with responses ranging from 0 (no issue or problem) to 3 (severe - I could barely stand it), all questions are related to the presence of signs or symptoms of anxiety. The total possible score is 63 and a higher score represents greater anxiety. The total score is calculated by adding the responses for each of the 21 items.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months

  5. Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Scores for All Subjects

    The MMSE is a general measure of cognition (i.e., measures attention, memory, visuospatial construction, etc). It has 30 items, each item representing 1 point. The total score ranges from 0-30 with 30 being a perfect score (no cognitive impairment) and 0 being the lowest score (greatest possible level of impairment). The total score is calculated by adding the scores of each item.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months

07

Results

Posted Oct 31, 2014

Participant flow

Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with levodopa-induced motor fluctuations were enrolled at 12 sites in the United States. The first subject was enrolled in March 2007, and the last subject completed in September 2008.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePD Patients With DA Related AE
Started77
Completed60
Not completed17
Withdrew: Protocol violation7
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up2
Withdrew: Adverse event8

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Reduction in Adverse Events

The primary outcome measure was the reduction of daytime sleepiness, hallucinations, pedal edema, and impulse control disorders after a reduction of dopamine agonist dose with the addition of an monoamine oxidase (MAO)-B inhibitor (orally disintegrating selegiline). Percentages of participants with reduction in individual adverse events as well as reduction in any adverse events are reported.

Time frame:
3 Months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Reduction in Adverse Events
percentage of participantsPD Patients With DA Related AE
Excessive Daytime Sleepiness (n=50)94
Hallucinations (n=15)86
Pedal Edema (n=26)73
Impulse Control Disorder (n=25)84
Any Adverse Event (n=60)100
PrimaryEpworth Sleepiness Scale Score for Those With Daytime Sleepiness

This is a measure of daytime sleepiness. The test is a list of eight situations in which one rates their tendency to become sleepy on a scale of 0, no change of dozing to 3, high chance of dozing. The total score ranges fro 0-24, with higher values representing excessive sleepiness. A score of greater than 10 represents clinically significant sleepiness.

Time frame:
Baseline and 3 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Epworth Sleepiness Scale Score for Those With Daytime Sleepiness
units on a scalePD Patients With DA Related AE (Daytime Sleepiness)
Baseline13.5 ± 3.0
3 months (12 weeks)9.0 ± 3.7
Statistical analysis
  • PD Patients With DA Related AE (Daytime Sleepiness) · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = <0.01 · Mean difference (final values): 4.5
PrimaryNeuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Hallucinations Scale Score for Those With Hallucinations

Report of hallucinations with insight maintained based on the hallucinations questions of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). The participant and their caregiver are asked a series of questions to determine if hallucinations are present. If present they rate the frequency of hallucinations on a scale of 1 (rarely, less than once a week) to 4, very often (once or more daily). They also rate the severity of the hallucinations, as mild (1 - present but harmless and cause little distress), moderate (2 - distressing and disruptive) or severe (3 - very disruptive, major source of behavioral disturbance, may need meds). The frequency and severity scores are multiplied (maximum score 12, with higher scores representing more distress/disability) for the total score.

Time frame:
Baseline and 3 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Hallucinations Scale Score for Those With Hallucinations
units on a scalePD Patients With DA Related AE (Hallucinations)
Baseline3.3 ± 2.7
3 months (12 weeks)1.3 ± 1.8
Statistical analysis
  • PD Patients With DA Related AE (Hallucinations) · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = <0.01 · Mean difference (final values): 2.0
PrimaryCircumference of Lower Leg/Foot at Greatest Point of Swelling for Pedal Edema

The circumference of the lower leg/ankle with the greatest swelling was measured using a standard tape measure at baseline and 12 weeks for both the right and left ankles.

Time frame:
Baseline and 3 months
Reported as:
Mean · centimeters
Circumference of Lower Leg/Foot at Greatest Point of Swelling for Pedal Edema
centimetersPD Patiens With DA Related AE (Pedal Edema)
Left foot baseline25.8 ± 3.4
Left foot 3 months (12 weeks)24.6 ± 3.1
Right foot baseline26.4 ± 4.2
Right Foot 3 months (12 weeks)25.2 ± 4.0
Statistical analysis
  • PD Patiens With DA Related AE (Pedal Edema) · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.01 · Mean difference (final values): 1.2Comparison of baseline vs. 3 month circumference of the Left and Right lower leg/ankle (change identical for both legs).
PrimaryBarratt Impulsiveness Scale Score for Those With Impulsive Behavior

This is a measure of impulsiveness. There are 30 questions regarding the presence of impulsive and non-impulsive behaviors each scored from 1 (rarely/never) to 4 (almost always/always). The total score reflects the sum of the 30 items. A higher score represents more impulsiveness.

Time frame:
Baseline and 3 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Barratt Impulsiveness Scale Score for Those With Impulsive Behavior
units on a scalePD Patients With DA Related AE (Impulse Control Disorder)
Baseline64.1 ± 11.4
3 months (12 weeks)61.3 ± 12.4
Statistical analysis
  • PD Patients With DA Related AE (Impulse Control Disorder) · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = <0.05 · Mean difference (final values): 2.8
SecondaryUnified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Scores

The UPDRS activities of daily living sub scale has 14 questions regarding the ability to perform daily activities like dressing, eating, etc. These questions are completed by the patient and each question has 5 responses ranging from 0 (no problems) to 4 (severe disability/cannot do). The total score for this sub scale is the sum of the scores for the 14 questions (higher scores represent greater disability), maximum score is 56. The motor assessment is completed by the investigator. There are 14 questions evaluating motor function in various body parts, representing 27 individual items (i.e., some questions, such as rigidity, are rated for 5 different body parts, other questions, such as finger tapping, are rated on both the right and left sides, and other questions are rated individually). Each item has 5 responses, 0 being none/no disability and 4 being the most severe disability. The 27 items are summed (higher scores represent greater disability); maximum score is 108.

Time frame:
Baseline and 3 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Scores
units on a scaleAll Subjects With DA Related AEs (UPDRS Data)
ADLs baseline11.9 ± 5.8
ADLs 3 months (12 weeks)10.3 ± 5.1
Motor baseline23.6 ± 10.9
Motor 3 months (12 weeks)21.4 ± 10.4
Statistical analysis
  • All Subjects With DA Related AEs (UPDRS Data) · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = <0.01 · Mean difference (final values): 1.6
  • All Subjects With DA Related AEs (UPDRS Data) · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = <0.05 (This analysis is for the motor section of the UPDRS) · Mean difference (final values): 2.2
SecondaryPDQ-39 Quality of Life Assessment Total Scores

The PDQ-39 is a measure of quality of life, it has 8 sub scales and a total score. For this study only the total score was examined. There are a total of 39 questions related to the following 8 sub scales: ability/difficulty to perform motor activities, ability to perform daily activities, cognition, emotional well being, stigma, social support, communication, bodily discomfort; each question with 5 responses (0, no/never, 4 always). The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the 39 items, dividing by 39 x 4 (maximum score for all 39 items) and then multiplying by 100 to get a percentage score ranging from 0-100 with 100 representing the most disability and greatest impact on quality of life.

Time frame:
Baseline and 3 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
PDQ-39 Quality of Life Assessment Total Scores
units on a scaleAll Subjects PDQ-39
Baseline28.6 ± 15.3
3 months (12 weeks)24.4 ± 15.1
Statistical analysis
  • All Subjects PDQ-39 · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.01 · Mean difference (final values): 4.2
SecondaryBeck Depression Inventory for All Subjects

The Beck Depression Inventory is a general measure of depression. There are 21 questions each with responses ranging from 0 (no issue or problem) to 3 (maximum issue/distress), all questions are related to emotions, mood, feelings, etc. The total possible score is 63 (higher scores represent more depression). The total score is calculated by adding the scores of the 21 items.

Time frame:
Baseline and 3 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Beck Depression Inventory for All Subjects
units on a scaleAll PD Patients With DA Related AEs (BDI)
Baseline10.2 ± 6.4
3 months (12 weeks)9.4 ± 7.4
Statistical analysis
  • All PD Patients With DA Related AEs (BDI) · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = >0.05 · Mean difference (final values): 0.8
SecondaryBeck Anxiety Inventory Scores for All Subjects

The Beck Anxiety Inventory is a general measure of anxiety. There are 21 questions each with responses ranging from 0 (no issue or problem) to 3 (severe - I could barely stand it), all questions are related to the presence of signs or symptoms of anxiety. The total possible score is 63 and a higher score represents greater anxiety. The total score is calculated by adding the responses for each of the 21 items.

Time frame:
Baseline and 3 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Beck Anxiety Inventory Scores for All Subjects
units on a scaleAll PD Patients With DA Related AEs (BAI)
Baseline11.5 ± 9.7
3 months (12 weeks)10.9 ± 10.2
Statistical analysis
  • All PD Patients With DA Related AEs (BAI) · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = >0.05 · Mean difference (final values): 0.6
SecondaryMini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Scores for All Subjects

The MMSE is a general measure of cognition (i.e., measures attention, memory, visuospatial construction, etc). It has 30 items, each item representing 1 point. The total score ranges from 0-30 with 30 being a perfect score (no cognitive impairment) and 0 being the lowest score (greatest possible level of impairment). The total score is calculated by adding the scores of each item.

Time frame:
Baseline and 3 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Scores for All Subjects
units on a scaleAll PD Patients With DA Related AEs (MMSE)
Baseline28.8 ± 1.6
3 months (12 weeks)29.2 ± 1.2
Statistical analysis
  • All PD Patients With DA Related AEs (MMSE) · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.05 · Mean difference (final values): 0.4

Adverse events

Collected over 12 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
PD Patients With DA Related AE—0/77 (0%)57/77 (74%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPD Patients With DA Related AE
worsening of PDNervous system disorders13/77
Nausea/vomitingGastrointestinal disorders11/77
DyskinesiaNervous system disorders8/77
Increased body aches and painGeneral disorders6/77
Increased insomniaGeneral disorders5/77
Increased anxietyPsychiatric disorders4/77
Restless legsNervous system disorders4/77
orthostatic hypotensionCardiac disorders4/77
Increased depressionPsychiatric disorders4/77

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)PD Patients With DA Related AE
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years31
>=65 years46
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PD Patients With DA Related AE
Mean66.9 ± 8.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PD Patients With DA Related AE
Female38
Male39
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)PD Patients With DA Related AE
United States77
08

Study locations

17 sites
  • University of California - Irvine
    Irvine, California 92697, United States
  • Coastal Neurological Medical Group, Inc
    La Jolla, California 92037, United States
  • University of Southern California
    Los Angeles, California 90093, United States
  • The Parkinson's Institute
    Sunnyvale, California 94085, United States
  • Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorder Center of Boca Raton
    Boca Raton, Florida 33486, United States
  • University of South Florida
    Tampa, Florida 33606, United States
  • Methodist Plaza Speciality Clinic
    Des Moines, Iowa 50309, United States
  • University of Kansas Medical Center
    Kansas City, Kansas 66160, United States
  • Ochsner Clinic Foundation
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70121, United States
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • Henry Ford Health Center - Franklin Pointe
    Southfield, Michigan 48034, United States
  • Struthers Parkinson's Center
    Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427, United States
  • University of Toledo
    Toledo, Ohio 43614, United States
  • NeuroHealth Parkinson Disease and Movement Disorder Center
    Warwick, Rhode Island 02886, United States
  • Neurology Specialists Dallas
    Dallas, Texas 75231, United States
  • ETMC Neurological Institute
    Tyler, Texas 75701, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Lyons KE, Friedman JH, Hermanowicz N, Isaacson SH, Hauser RA, Hersh BP, Silver DE, Tetrud JW, Elmer LW, Parashos SA, Struck LK, Lew MF, Pahwa R. Orally disintegrating selegiline in Parkinson patients with dopamine agonist-related adverse effects. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2010 Jan-Feb;33(1):5-10. doi: 10.1097/WNF.0b013e3181b7926f. PubMed 19855267 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 31, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00443872
Lead sponsor
Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorder Center of Boca Raton
Collaborators
Bausch Health Americas, Inc.
Responsible party
Stuart Isaacson (MD, Director of the Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorder Center of Boca Raton, Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorder Center of Boca Raton) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 6, 2007
Start date
Mar 2007
Primary completion
Sep 2008
Completion
Dec 2008
Results posted
Oct 31, 2014
Last update
Oct 31, 2014

Study contacts

Rajesh Pahwa, MD
principal investigator · University of Kansas Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion