CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00442572Updated Apr 24, 2025Results posted

SOFIA-LTT Study: A Study of Intermittent Long Term Treatment With PEGASYS (Peginterferon Alfa-2a (40KD)) in Patients With HBeAg Negative Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB).

A Phase 2 interventional study of PEGASYS [peginterferon alfa-2a] in Hepatitis B, Chronic, sponsored by Hoffmann-La Roche. Completed at 1 site in Bulgaria. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-24.

Sponsored by Hoffmann-La Roche · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2006, registered Feb 2007).
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
21
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This 2 arm study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of intermittent treatment with PEGASYS in HBeAg negative patients with chronic hepatitis B who have demonstrated virological and biochemical response after treatment with interferon alfa. After 48 weeks therapy with interferon alfa, and 24 weeks treatment-free follow-up, eligible patients will be randomized into the PEGASYS or the observational group. Those in the PEGASYS group will receive 4 therapeutic cycles of long term intermittent treatment with PEGASYS (135 micrograms sc weekly for 12 weeks, followed by a treatment-free period of 12 weeks) and those in the observational arm will receive no specific antiviral treatment. The anticipated time on study treatment is 1-2 years, and the target sample size is 100 individuals.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Hepatitis A

2,709 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis A; 142 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 21 is below the median of 100 across 1,886 interventional studies indexed under Hepatitis A.

Browse Hepatitis A studies →

Lead sponsor

Hoffmann-La Roche is the lead sponsor of 2,061 studies on the registry; 85 are open to participants now.

Of its 319 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 239 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • adult patients, >=18 years of age;
  • liver disease consistent with CHB;
  • evidence of chronic HBeAg-negative CHB prior to initial course of interferon alfa;
  • patients who have responded to previous 48 weeks treatment with interferon alfa.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • coinfection with HCV, HDV or HIV;
  • decompensated liver disease, hepatocellular cancer, or evidence of a medical condition associated with chronic liver disease other than viral hepatitis;
  • any other systemic antiviral, antineoplastic or immunomodulatory treatment \<=6 months prior to first dose of randomized treatment.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
21 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PEGASYS

    Participants received 4 treatment cycles of continuous intermittent treatment with PEGASYS® (Peginterferon alfa-2a) . Each cycle consisted of 12 weeks injection treatment with Peginterferon alfa-2a 135 micrograms in 0.5 ml solution in prefilled syringes, applied once weekly subcutaneously and followed by 12 weeks period without treatment.

    Drug: PEGASYS [peginterferon alfa-2a]

  • No intervention
    No Intervention

    Participants were on non- specific anti-viral treatment.

Interventions

  • DrugPEGASYS [peginterferon alfa-2a]

    There were 4 treatment cycles of continuous intermittent treatment with Peginterferon alfa-2a. Each cycle consisted of 12 weeks injection treatment with Peginterferon alfa-2a 135 micrograms in 0.5 ml solution in prefilled syringes, applied once weekly subcutaneously and followed by 12 weeks period without treatment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Stable Virological Response

    Stable virological response is serum Hepatitis B virus deoxyribonucleic acid (HBV DNA) \<20 000 copies/ml during the treatment (after each 12 weeks) and after the follow-up period (24 weeks after the last treatment period).

    Time frame: Up to Week 108

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Stable Virological and Biochemical Response

    All participants who achieved virological response (serum HBV DNA \< 20 000 copies/ml) and biochemical response (stable normalization of their alanine transaminase \[ALT\]) during the treatment cycle (after each 12 weeks) and after the follow-up period (24 weeks after the last treatment period).

    Time frame: Up to Week 108

  2. Percentage of Participants With Loss of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen

    Loss of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) was defined as change of detectable HBsAg from positive to negative.

    Time frame: Up to Week 108

  3. Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion

    The development of antibodies against HBsAg is known as HBsAg seroconversion. It signifies clearance of HBsAg and resolution of the chronic infection. НBsAg seroconversion is the final goal of anti-hepatitis B virus treatment and it is closest to the definition of "cure" but in practice it is very rare in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

    Time frame: Up to Week 108

  4. Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA Levels Under the Lower Limit (Serum HBV DNA Level < 300 Copies/ml) For a Significant Quantity

    HBV DNA level, or viral load, is an indicator of viral replication. Higher HBV DNA levels are usually associated with an increased risk of liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. HBV DNA level typically falls in response to effective antiviral treatment.

    Time frame: Up to Week 108

  5. Fibrosis-4 and Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Ratio Index Scores For Change in Liver Fibrosis

    Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) and Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) are non-invasive scoring systems, which are calculated on the basis of laboratory tests that indicates the level of liver fibrosis. The APRI scores are calculated based on Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) levels and platelet counts whereas FIB-4 scores are calculated based on platelets, ALT, AST and age. For APRI, the scores are interpreted as ≤ 0.5 is 81% sensitive and 50% specific for a diagnosis of significant fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C (CHC), where as a cut-off \> 1.5 is 35% sensitive and 91% specific for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis. The majority of biomarker panels will produce inconclusive results for a proportion of participants falling within the indeterminate range (between 0.5 and 1.5) for a specific fibrosis end-point. For FIB-4, the scores are interpreted as FIB-4 score of \< 1.45: absence of cirrhosis, FIB-4 score of 1.45 to 3.25: inconclusive, FIB-4 score \> 3.25: cirrhosis.

    Time frame: Up to Week 108

  6. Mean Change From Baseline in HBsAg Levels

    An early decrease in HBsAg from baseline to Weeks 12 or 24 has been identified as further on-treatment predictor for sustained HBsAg clearance and virological response in HBeAg negative participants.

    Time frame: Up to Week 108

  7. Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin

    The hemoglobin values were planned to be calculated as arithmetic mean by treatment groups (PEGASYS and No Intervention).

    Time frame: Up to Week 108

  8. Mean Change From Baseline in Hematology

    The hematology parameters included erythrocytes, leucocytes, basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, thrombocytes. All laboratory parameters were planned to be calculated as arithmetic mean by treatment groups (PEGASYS and No Intervention).

    Time frame: Up to Week 108

  9. Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry

    The clinical chemistry parameters included alanine aminotransferase (ALAT), aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP). All laboratory parameters were planned to be calculated as arithmetic mean by treatment groups (PEGASYS and No Intervention).

    Time frame: Up to Week 108

  10. Mean Change From Baseline in Protein and Indirect Albumin

    The clinical chemistry parameters included indirect protein and albumin. All laboratory parameters were planned to be calculated as arithmetic mean by treatment groups (PEGASYS and no intervention).

    Time frame: Up to Week 108

  11. Mean Change From Baseline in Bilirubin Indirect and Bilirubin Direct

    The laboratory parameters included bilirubin indirect and bilirubin direct. All laboratory parameters were planned to be calculated as arithmetic mean by treatment groups (PEGASYS and No Intervention).

    Time frame: Up to Week 108

  12. Mean Change From Baseline in Blood Urea

    The blood urea was planned to be calculated as arithmetic mean by treatment groups (PEGASYS and No Intervention).

    Time frame: Up to Week 108

  13. Mean Change From Baseline in Creatinine and Uric Acid

    The creatinine and uric acid values were planned to be calculated as arithmetic mean by treatment groups (PEGASYS and No Intervention).

    Time frame: Up to Week 108

  14. Mean Change From Baseline in Blood Glucose

    The blood glucose was measured for change from baseline. All blood glucose values were planned to be calculated as arithmetic mean by treatment groups (PEGASYS and No Intervention).

    Time frame: Up to Week 108

  15. Mean Change From Baseline in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH)

    The TSH was planned to be calculated as arithmetic mean by treatment groups (PEGASYS and No Intervention).

    Time frame: Up to Week 108

  16. Mean Change From Baseline in Triiodothyronine and Thyroxine

    The Triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4) values were planned to be calculated as arithmetic mean by treatment groups (PEGASYS and No Intervention).

    Time frame: Up to Week 108

07

Results

Posted Apr 11, 2016

Participant flow

All participants in this study were enrolled at one centre in Bulgaria from 03 July 2006 to 23 April 2012. Of the 21 participants enrolled, 17 participants were randomized to PEGASYS arm and 4 participants were randomized to no intervention arm.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePEGASYSNo Intervention
Started174
Completed91
Not completed83
Withdrew: Relapse81
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up01
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Stable Virological Response

Stable virological response is serum Hepatitis B virus deoxyribonucleic acid (HBV DNA) \<20 000 copies/ml during the treatment (after each 12 weeks) and after the follow-up period (24 weeks after the last treatment period).

Time frame:
Up to Week 108
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Stable Virological Response
Percentage of ParticipantsPEGASYSNo Intervention
Week 12100 (80.49 to 100.00)100.0 (29.24 to 100.00)
Week 2452.9 (27.81 to 77.02)66.7 (9.42 to 99.16)
Week 3652.9 (27.81 to 77.02)100.0 (29.24 to 100.00)
Week 4847.1 (22.98 to 72.19)66.7 (9.42 to 99.16)
Week 6047.1 (22.98 to 72.19)33.3 (0.84 to 90.58)
Week 7241.2 (18.44 to 67.08)33.3 (0.84 to 90.58)
Week 8441.2 (18.44 to 67.08)33.3 (0.84 to 90.58)
Week 9629.4 (10.31 to 55.96)33.3 (0.84 to 90.58)
Week 10829.4 (10.31 to 55.96)33.3 (0.84 to 90.58)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Stable Virological and Biochemical Response

All participants who achieved virological response (serum HBV DNA \< 20 000 copies/ml) and biochemical response (stable normalization of their alanine transaminase \[ALT\]) during the treatment cycle (after each 12 weeks) and after the follow-up period (24 weeks after the last treatment period).

Time frame:
Up to Week 108
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Stable Virological and Biochemical Response
Percentage of ParticipantsPEGASYSNo Intervention
Week 12100.0 (80.49 to 100.00)100.0 (29.24 to 100.00)
Week 2452.9 (27.81 to 77.02)66.7 (9.42 to 99.16)
Week 3652.9 (27.81 to 77.02)100.0 (29.24 to 100.00)
Week 4847.1 (22.98 to 72.19)66.7 (9.42 to 99.16)
Week 6047.1 (22.98 to 72.19)33.3 (0.84 to 90.58)
Week 7241.2 (18.44 to 67.08)33.3 (0.84 to 90.58)
Week 8441.2 (18.44 to 67.08)33.3 (0.84 to 90.58)
Week 9629.4 (10.31 to 55.96)33.3 (0.84 to 90.58)
Week 10829.4 (10.31 to 55.96)33.3 (0.84 to 90.58)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Loss of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen

Loss of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) was defined as change of detectable HBsAg from positive to negative.

Time frame:
Up to Week 108
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Loss of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen
Percentage of ParticipantsPEGASYSNo Intervention
Percentage of Participants With Loss of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen5.9 (0.14 to 28.69)0 (0 to 0)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion

The development of antibodies against HBsAg is known as HBsAg seroconversion. It signifies clearance of HBsAg and resolution of the chronic infection. НBsAg seroconversion is the final goal of anti-hepatitis B virus treatment and it is closest to the definition of "cure" but in practice it is very rare in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

Time frame:
Up to Week 108
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion
Percentage of ParticipantsPEGASYSNo Intervention
Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion0—
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA Levels Under the Lower Limit (Serum HBV DNA Level < 300 Copies/ml) For a Significant Quantity

HBV DNA level, or viral load, is an indicator of viral replication. Higher HBV DNA levels are usually associated with an increased risk of liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. HBV DNA level typically falls in response to effective antiviral treatment.

Time frame:
Up to Week 108
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA Levels Under the Lower Limit (Serum HBV DNA Level < 300 Copies/ml) For a Significant Quantity
Percentage of ParticipantsPEGASYSNo Intervention
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA Levels Under the Lower Limit (Serum HBV DNA Level < 300 Copies/ml) For a Significant Quantity29.4 (10.3 to 56.0)—
SecondaryFibrosis-4 and Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Ratio Index Scores For Change in Liver Fibrosis

Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) and Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) are non-invasive scoring systems, which are calculated on the basis of laboratory tests that indicates the level of liver fibrosis. The APRI scores are calculated based on Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) levels and platelet counts whereas FIB-4 scores are calculated based on platelets, ALT, AST and age. For APRI, the scores are interpreted as ≤ 0.5 is 81% sensitive and 50% specific for a diagnosis of significant fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C (CHC), where as a cut-off \> 1.5 is 35% sensitive and 91% specific for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis. The majority of biomarker panels will produce inconclusive results for a proportion of participants falling within the indeterminate range (between 0.5 and 1.5) for a specific fibrosis end-point. For FIB-4, the scores are interpreted as FIB-4 score of \< 1.45: absence of cirrhosis, FIB-4 score of 1.45 to 3.25: inconclusive, FIB-4 score \> 3.25: cirrhosis.

Time frame:
Up to Week 108
Reported as:
Median · Units on a scale
Fibrosis-4 and Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Ratio Index Scores For Change in Liver Fibrosis
Units on a scalePEGASYSNo Intervention
FIB-41.06 (0.36 to 2.66)—
APRI0.25 (0.14 to 1.48)—
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in HBsAg Levels

An early decrease in HBsAg from baseline to Weeks 12 or 24 has been identified as further on-treatment predictor for sustained HBsAg clearance and virological response in HBeAg negative participants.

Time frame:
Up to Week 108
Reported as:
Mean · copies/mL
Mean Change From Baseline in HBsAg Levels
copies/mLPEGASYSNo Intervention
Week 12, n=17,3-1156.00 (-5212.33 to 2900.33)-240.50 (-3715.65 to 3234.65)
Week 24, n=17,3-1293.72 (-5756.89 to 3169.45)-146.00 (-7172.53 to 6880.53)
Week 36, n=14,3-3049.64 (-7949.30 to 1850.01)-564.00 (-4248.80 to 3120.80)
Week 48, n=13, 3-1591.78 (-9217.83 to 6034.28)-528.50 (-2987.15 to 1930.15)
Week 60, n=11,1-3096.56 (-11135.37 to 4942.26)-379.00 (NA to NA)
Week 72, n=10, 1-3485.90 (-10299.06 to 3327.26)-34.00 (NA to NA)
Week 84, n=9, 1201.40 (-11899.81 to 12302.61)-54.72 (NA to NA)
Week 96, n=14,1-3011.75 (-8046.71 to 2023.21)-49.51 (NA to NA)
Week 108, n=12,0-3368.13 (-7625.12 to 888.87)—
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin

The hemoglobin values were planned to be calculated as arithmetic mean by treatment groups (PEGASYS and No Intervention).

Time frame:
Up to Week 108
Reported as:
Mean · Gram/deciliter
Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin
Gram/deciliterPEGASYSNo Intervention
Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin-1.73 ± 10.44—
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Hematology

The hematology parameters included erythrocytes, leucocytes, basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, thrombocytes. All laboratory parameters were planned to be calculated as arithmetic mean by treatment groups (PEGASYS and No Intervention).

Time frame:
Up to Week 108
Reported as:
Mean · 10^9/L
Mean Change From Baseline in Hematology
10^9/LPEGASYSNo Intervention
Erythrocytes0.08 ± 0.26—
Leukocytes-1.72 ± 2.00—
Basophils-0.18 ± 0.38—
Lymphocytes5.56 ± 6.31—
Monocytes1.87 ± 3.10—
Thrombocytes-31.20 ± 36.40—
Eosinophils0.92 ± 1.24—
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry

The clinical chemistry parameters included alanine aminotransferase (ALAT), aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP). All laboratory parameters were planned to be calculated as arithmetic mean by treatment groups (PEGASYS and No Intervention).

Time frame:
Up to Week 108
Reported as:
Mean · Units/Litre
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry
Units/LitrePEGASYSNo Intervention
ALAT5.56 ± 25.44—
ASAT9.00 ± 27.76—
GGT1.00 ± 3.70—
ALP50.92 ± 38.00—
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Protein and Indirect Albumin

The clinical chemistry parameters included indirect protein and albumin. All laboratory parameters were planned to be calculated as arithmetic mean by treatment groups (PEGASYS and no intervention).

Time frame:
Up to Week 108
Reported as:
Mean · Gram/deciliter
Mean Change From Baseline in Protein and Indirect Albumin
Gram/deciliterPEGASYSNo Intervention
Protein indirect-31.62 ± 38.70—
Albumin-1.35 ± 1.71—
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Bilirubin Indirect and Bilirubin Direct

The laboratory parameters included bilirubin indirect and bilirubin direct. All laboratory parameters were planned to be calculated as arithmetic mean by treatment groups (PEGASYS and No Intervention).

Time frame:
Up to Week 108
Reported as:
Mean · milligrams/deciliter
Mean Change From Baseline in Bilirubin Indirect and Bilirubin Direct
milligrams/deciliterPEGASYSNo Intervention
Indirect bilirubin-0.95 ± 3.38—
Direct bilirubin-0.16 ± 0.77—
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Blood Urea

The blood urea was planned to be calculated as arithmetic mean by treatment groups (PEGASYS and No Intervention).

Time frame:
Up to Week 108
Reported as:
Mean · millimoles/liter
Mean Change From Baseline in Blood Urea
millimoles/literPEGASYSNo Intervention
Mean Change From Baseline in Blood Urea-0.34 ± 1.23—
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Creatinine and Uric Acid

The creatinine and uric acid values were planned to be calculated as arithmetic mean by treatment groups (PEGASYS and No Intervention).

Time frame:
Up to Week 108
Reported as:
Mean · micromole/liter
Mean Change From Baseline in Creatinine and Uric Acid
micromole/literPEGASYSNo Intervention
Creatinine-3.65 ± 13.23—
Uric acid-21.51 ± 130.42—
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Blood Glucose

The blood glucose was measured for change from baseline. All blood glucose values were planned to be calculated as arithmetic mean by treatment groups (PEGASYS and No Intervention).

Time frame:
Up to Week 108
Reported as:
Mean · millimoles/ liter
Mean Change From Baseline in Blood Glucose
millimoles/ literPEGASYSNo Intervention
Mean Change From Baseline in Blood Glucose-0.06 ± 0.40—
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH)

The TSH was planned to be calculated as arithmetic mean by treatment groups (PEGASYS and No Intervention).

Time frame:
Up to Week 108
Reported as:
Mean · milli-international units/liter
Mean Change From Baseline in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH)
milli-international units/literPEGASYSNo Intervention
Mean Change From Baseline in Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH)0.67 ± 1.50—
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Triiodothyronine and Thyroxine

The Triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4) values were planned to be calculated as arithmetic mean by treatment groups (PEGASYS and No Intervention).

Time frame:
Up to Week 108
Reported as:
Mean · picomole/liter
Mean Change From Baseline in Triiodothyronine and Thyroxine
picomole/literPEGASYSNo Intervention
T3, Week 1080.19 ± 5.44—
T4, Week 108-0.85 ± 4.99—

Adverse events

Collected over Up to Week 108. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
PEGASYS0/17 (0%)0/17 (0%)11/17 (64.7%)
No Intervention0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)1/4 (25%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 24
Most frequent other events
EventPEGASYSNo Intervention
Dental and gingival conditionsGastrointestinal disorders1/171/4
HeadacheNervous system disorders2/171/4
Muscle painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/170/4
PyrexiaGeneral disorders3/170/4
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders2/170/4
DysmenorrheaReproductive system and breast disorders2/170/4
ExpectorationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/170/4
FatigueGeneral disorders2/170/4
Herpes simplexInfections and infestations2/170/4
Joint acheMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/170/4

Baseline characteristics

Safety population included all the randomized participants who passed during at least one treatment period, and had at least one efficacy and safety evaluation.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PEGASYSNo InterventionTotal
Median44 (23 to 61)38.5 (22 to 50)42 (22 to 61)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PEGASYSNo InterventionTotal
Female707
Male10414
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Mhat St. Ivan Rilski; Clinic of Gastroenterology
    Sofia, 1612, Bulgaria
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00442572
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 2, 2007
Start date
Jul 3, 2006
Primary completion
Apr 23, 2012
Completion
Apr 23, 2012
Results posted
Apr 11, 2016
Last update
Apr 24, 2025

Study contacts

Clinical Trials
study director · Hoffmann-La Roche
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion