CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00434408CHXUpdated Oct 5, 2022

Impact of Umbilical Cord Cleansing With 4.0% Chlorhexidine on Neonatal Mortality

A Phase 3 interventional study of chx once and CHX x 7 days in Omphalitis and Infection, sponsored by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Completed at 1 site in Bangladesh. Open to participants aged 1 Minute to 7 Days. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-05.

Sponsored by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
28,797
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Minute to 7 Days
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A community based trial that seeks to address the effect of umbilical cord cleansing using 4.0% chlorhexidine cleansing solution

Read the detailed description

Of the annual four million neonatal deaths, 99% occur in developing countries, and more than one-third globally can be attributed to infections. In areas with high-mortality rates, the proportion attributable to infections is as high as 50%. Many infections in infants can be prevented or treated with already existing measures, yet finding the best way to provide these measures in communities that are limited in resources need to be identified. Applying chlorhexidine to the umbilical cord of newborns may be a simple way to help reduce neonatal mortality and morbidity in the community at low cost.

A study by our group was recently completed in Nepal. It was a large community-based, factorial-designed trial in southern Nepal to: (1) assess the impact of newborn total body skin cleansing with 0.25% chlorhexidine on neonatal mortality and morbidity and (2) assess the impact of cleansing of the umbilical stump with 4% chlorhexidine on omphalitis and neonatal mortality.

The results of these studies have suggested that chlorhexidine antisepsis interventions may significantly reduce neonatal mortality and omphalitis. A single full body cleansing of the neonate with chlorhexidine as soon as possible after birth reduced mortality among low birth weight (LBW) infants by 28%. Repeated cleansing of the umbilical stump with chlorhexidine reduced the rate of severe cord infection by 75% and, if this treatment was begun within the first 24 hours following birth, reduced neonatal mortality by 34%.

In rural Bangladesh, over 90% of women deliver at home with only untrained local women or family members in attendance, and low birth weight babies are delivered approximately 30% of the time. The overall neonatal mortality rate exceeds 36 per 1000 live births and in order to reduce this burden, simple, cost-effective interventions that can be delivered at the community level are urgently needed. Given the potential impact of repeated chlorhexidine cleansing of the cord demonstrated in the Nepal trial, a replication study of this regimen and further investigations of more simple regimens are necessary. The number of treatments necessary to reduce neonatal mortality has important programmatic implications for who can deliver the intervention, and how it is packaged.

02

Conditions studied

  • Omphalitis
  • Infection

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • omphalitis
  • neonates
  • umbilical cord
  • infection
  • infant mortality
  • neonate morbidity
  • chlorhexidine
03

In context

Infections

6,687 studies on the registry are indexed under Infections; 807 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 28,797 is above the median of 120 across 4,200 interventional studies indexed under Infections.

Browse Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health is the lead sponsor of 364 studies on the registry; 41 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Minute to 7 Days
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • live-born infants delivered in one of three upazillas of Sylhet District (Zakiganj, Khanaighat, Beanibazar)
  • married women of reproductive age within their individual target areas listed above

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • individuals outside of the target area in Sylhet(Zakiganj, Khanaighat, Beanibazar)
  • infants not met at home by a project worker during the first seven days of life
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
28,797 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    4.0% chlorhexidine cleansing of the cord during home visits by project workers for the first 7 days after birth

    Behavioral: CHX x 7 days

  • Experimental
    2

    4.0% chlorhexidine cleansing of the cord applied once by a project worker visiting the newborn in the home as soon as possible after birth

    Behavioral: chx once

  • Active comparator
    3

    dry cord care

    Behavioral: dry cord care

Interventions

  • Behavioralchx once

    4.0% chlorhexidine cleansing of the cord applied once by a project worker visiting the newborn in the home as soon as possible after birth

  • BehavioralCHX x 7 days

    4.0% chlorhexidine cleansing of the cord during home visits by project workers for the first 7 days after birth

  • Behavioraldry cord care

    Household members are instructed to apply nothing to the newborn's umbilical cord stump.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. neonatal mortality

    Time frame: 3 Month intervals

  2. omphalitis among live born infants.

    Time frame: 3 Month intervals

Secondary outcomes

  1. newborn care practices

    Time frame: 3 Years

  2. care seeking behaviors

    Time frame: 3 Years

  3. morbidity measures, including sepsis and omphalitis

    Time frame: 3 Years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Rural Sylhet District
    Sylhet, Bangladesh
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Aggett PJ, Cooper LV, Ellis SH, McAinsh J. Percutaneous absorption of chlorhexidine in neonatal cord care. Arch Dis Child. 1981 Nov;56(11):878-80. doi: 10.1136/adc.56.11.878. PubMed 7305432 ↗
  • Baqui AH, Darmstadt GL, Williams EK, Kumar V, Kiran TU, Panwar D, Srivastava VK, Ahuja R, Black RE, Santosham M. Rates, timing and causes of neonatal deaths in rural India: implications for neonatal health programmes. Bull World Health Organ. 2006 Sep;84(9):706-13. doi: 10.2471/blt.05.026443. PubMed 17128340 ↗
  • Darmstadt GL, Bhutta ZA, Cousens S, Adam T, Walker N, de Bernis L; Lancet Neonatal Survival Steering Team. Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: how many newborn babies can we save? Lancet. 2005 Mar 12-18;365(9463):977-88. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71088-6. PubMed 15767001 ↗
  • Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J; Lancet Neonatal Survival Steering Team. 4 million neonatal deaths: when? Where? Why? Lancet. 2005 Mar 5-11;365(9462):891-900. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71048-5. PubMed 15752534 ↗
  • Mullany LC, Darmstadt GL, Khatry SK, Katz J, LeClerq SC, Shrestha S, Adhikari R, Tielsch JM. Topical applications of chlorhexidine to the umbilical cord for prevention of omphalitis and neonatal mortality in southern Nepal: a community-based, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet. 2006 Mar 18;367(9514):910-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68381-5. PubMed 16546539 ↗
  • Mullany LC, Darmstadt GL, Tielsch JM. Safety and impact of chlorhexidine antisepsis interventions for improving neonatal health in developing countries. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006 Aug;25(8):665-75. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000223489.02791.70. PubMed 16874163 ↗
  • Mitra DK, Mullany LC, Harrison M, Mannan I, Shah R, Begum N, Moin MI, El Arifeen S, Baqui AH; Projahnmo Study Group in Bangladesh. Incidence and risk factors of neonatal infections in a rural Bangladeshi population: a community-based prospective study. J Health Popul Nutr. 2018 Mar 9;37(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s41043-018-0136-2. PubMed 29523194 ↗
  • Mullany LC, Shah R, El Arifeen S, Mannan I, Winch PJ, Hill A, Darmstadt GL, Baqui AH. Chlorhexidine cleansing of the umbilical cord and separation time: a cluster-randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2013 Apr;131(4):708-15. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2951. Epub 2013 Mar 18. PubMed 23509175 ↗
  • Arifeen SE, Mullany LC, Shah R, Mannan I, Rahman SM, Talukder MR, Begum N, Al-Kabir A, Darmstadt GL, Santosham M, Black RE, Baqui AH. The effect of cord cleansing with chlorhexidine on neonatal mortality in rural Bangladesh: a community-based, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet. 2012 Mar 17;379(9820):1022-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61848-5. Epub 2012 Feb 8. PubMed 22322124 ↗
  • Mullany LC, El Arifeen S, Winch PJ, Shah R, Mannan I, Rahman SM, Rahman MR, Darmstadt GL, Ahmed S, Santosham M, Black RE, Baqui AH. Impact of 4.0% chlorhexidine cleansing of the umbilical cord on mortality and omphalitis among newborns of Sylhet, Bangladesh: design of a community-based cluster randomized trial. BMC Pediatr. 2009 Oct 21;9:67. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-9-67. PubMed 19845951 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 5, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00434408
Lead sponsor
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Collaborators
Government of Bangladesh, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Save the Children, Shimantik
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 13, 2007
Start date
May 2007
Primary completion
Nov 2009
Completion
Nov 2010
Last update
Oct 5, 2022

Study contacts

Abdullah H Baqui, MBBS, DrPH
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Shams El Arifeen
principal investigator · International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2007. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion