CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00432601Updated Mar 22, 2016Results posted

Testing the Helpfulness of 2 Decision Aids for Prostate Cancer

An interventional study of type of decision aid in Prostate Cancer, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to male participants. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-03-22.

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Not applicable and Interventional

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,028
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to test different methods for communicating information about prostate cancer treatment to men. The investigators are studying how best to present information so men can make informed decisions about what prostate cancer treatment to undergo.

Read the detailed description

Background/Rationale: Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer related death among men in the United States, and accounts for 29% of all cancers diagnosed in men. Furthermore, approximately one in six men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer in their lifetime. Thus, 17% of male Veterans will be asked to make a decision about the treatment of their prostate cancer. The burden of this disease is further magnified when one considers that most patients will live for years following their diagnosis and with any adverse effects of therapy. Given that there have been no clinical trials showing that any prostate cancer treatment produces an increased likelihood of survival; men are asked to actively participate in treatment decisions. Previous research has revealed that men are often uninformed about their prostate cancer, particularly African American men and men with lower educational attainment. Thus, it is critical to develop and test decision aids that can help all men (especially men with low literacy skills) make an informed decision.

Objective(s): The goal of the study is to compare the impact of a plain language decision aid (DA) to a conventional DA on prostate cancer patients' decision making experience and communication with their physician.

Methods: This study is a randomized controlled trial. Men undergoing a prostate biopsy will be recruited at the time of biopsy and complete a baseline interview (at pre-biopsy or biopsy appointment). Those patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer will complete two additional interviews: at physician visit (diagnosis), and 7-10 days following physician visit (phone survey). The treatment discussion between patients and their physician will be audio recorded.

Major characteristics: All men, without a prior history of prostate cancer, undergoing a prostate biopsy will be screened for eligibility and enrolled by the study coordinator. Additional inclusion criteria include ability to speak English, provide informed consent, and have a PSA \< 20. Physicians can refuse to allow a patient participate in the study at the time of biopsy. Men will be recruited from 4 VA hospitals (Ann Arbor, Durham, Pittsburgh, and San Francisco) and randomized to receive one of two decision aid booklets (plain language vs. conventional).

Major variables and source(s) of data: All survey data will be collected from either face-to-face or phone interviews. The surveys include measures of literacy, numeracy, anxiety, preference for shared decision making, knowledge, treatment preferences, risk perceptions, perception of patient-physician communication, and confidence and satisfaction with the decision making process. All survey questions were read aloud and responses recorded.

Status: Recruitment began in September 2008 and concluded in May of 2012.

1552 men were approached to participate in the study with 1028 agreeing. 1023 completed the Time 1 interview. Of the 334 subjects eligible to continue with study activities, 285 subjects completed the Time 2 interview (biopsy results visit), and 244 completed the Time 3 phone interview.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • decision aid
  • prostate cancer
  • patient-physician communication
  • decision making
  • literacy
03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

6,370 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,400 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,028 is above the median of 58 across 4,822 interventional studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,733 studies on the registry; 396 are open to participants now.

Of its 206 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 180 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Men undergoing a prostate cancer biopsy at Ann Arbor, Durham, San Francisco, or Pittsburgh VAs. Additional inclusion criteria includes ability to speak English, provide informed consent, and have a PSA \< 20.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Prior history of prostate cancer

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,028 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm 1

    Patients will receive Michigan Cancer Consortium decision aid.

    Behavioral: type of decision aid

  • Active comparator
    Arm 2

    Patients will receive National Comprehensive Cancer Network decision aid.

    Behavioral: type of decision aid

Interventions

  • Behavioraltype of decision aid

    We will be comparing two decision aids (MCC vs. NCCN) in terms of their impact on decision making and patient-physician communication.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Knowledge

    Questions addressed the survival benefit and side effects associated with treatment options for localized prostate cancer.

    Time frame: Results visit (Time 2 - approximately 7-10 days after Time 1)

07

Results

Posted Mar 22, 2016

Participant flow

Time 1 to Time 2
Participant flow — Time 1 to Time 2
MilestoneArm 1 - MCCArm 2 - NCCN
Started510512
Completed141144
Not completed369368
Time 2 to Time 3
Participant flow — Time 2 to Time 3
MilestoneArm 1 - MCCArm 2 - NCCN
Started141144
Completed122122
Not completed1922

Outcome measures

PrimaryKnowledge

Questions addressed the survival benefit and side effects associated with treatment options for localized prostate cancer.

Time frame:
Results visit (Time 2 - approximately 7-10 days after Time 1)
Reported as:
Mean · percentage correct on a 12 item scale
Knowledge
percentage correct on a 12 item scaleArm 1 - MCCArm 2 - NCCN
Knowledge53 ± .0348 ± .03

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Arm 1 - MCC—0/510 (0%)1/510 (0.2%)
Arm 2 - NCCN—0/512 (0%)0/512 (0%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventArm 1 - MCCArm 2 - NCCN
SeizureNervous system disorders1/5100/512

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Arm 1Arm 2Total
Mean63.41 ± 5.8663.14 ± 6.0263.28 ± 5.94
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Arm 1Arm 2Total
Female000
Male5105121022
08

Study locations

4 sites
  • VA Medical Center, San Francisco
    San Francisco, California 94121, United States
  • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48113-0170, United States
  • VA Medical Center
    Durham, North Carolina 27705, United States
  • Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15240, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Levy MH, Back A, Benedetti C, Billings JA, Block S, Boston B, Bruera E, Dy S, Eberle C, Foley KM, Karver SB, Knight SJ, Misra S, Ritchie CS, Spiegel D, Sutton L, Urba S, Von Roenn JH, Weinstein SM. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: palliative care. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009 Apr;7(4):436-73. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2009.0031. No abstract available. PubMed 19406043 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 22, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00432601
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 8, 2007
Start date
Aug 2008
Primary completion
Sep 2012
Completion
Sep 2012
Results posted
Mar 22, 2016
Last update
Mar 22, 2016

Study contacts

Angela Fagerlin, PhD MA
principal investigator · VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion