A Phase 2 interventional study of BIBW 2992 in Breast Neoplasms, sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim. Completed at 14 sites in 2 countries. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-12-31.
Sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim · Phase 2, Interventional, and Diagnostic
The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of BIBW 2992, a dual, irreversible EGFR- and HER2-inhibitor, in two cohorts of patients with HER2-negative breast cancer after failure of no more than three regimen of prior chemotherapy.
12,815 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,920 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 50 is below the median of 72 across 9,494 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.
Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →Boehringer Ingelheim is the lead sponsor of 2,297 studies on the registry; 56 are open to participants now.
Of its 166 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 121 (73%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Inclusion criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
high dose once daily
Drug: BIBW 2992
high dose once daily
Objective Response (OR)
OR is defined as complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) and was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.0 (RECIST). OR was primary endpoint only for Cohort B.
Time frame: Tumour assessments were performed at screening, week 8, week 16, week 24, and every 8 weeks thereafter.
Clinical Benefit (CB)
CB was defined as CR, PR or stable disease (SD) for a minimum of 4 months (modified CB) and was assessed according to RECIST 1.0 criteria. CB was primary endpoint only for Cohort A.
Time frame: Tumour assessments were performed at screening, week 8, week 16, week 24, and every 8 weeks thereafter.
Clinical Benefit (CB)
CB was defined as CR, PR or stable disease (SD) for a minimum of 4 months (modified CB) and was assessed according to RECIST 1.0 criteria. CB was secondary endpoint only for Cohort B as it was primary endpoint for Cohort A.
Time frame: Tumour assessments were performed at screening, week 8, week 16, week 24, and every 8 weeks thereafter.
Time to OR
The time to OR was the duration from the first treatment to the time when the measurement criteria for CR and/or PR were met according to RECIST 1.0 criteria.
Time frame: Tumour assessments were performed at screening, week 8, week 16, week 24, and every 8 weeks thereafter.
Duration of OR
Duration of OR was measured from the time the criteria for CR or PR (whichever was documented first) were first met until the first date that progressive disease or death was objectively documented.
Time frame: Tumour assessments were performed at screening, week 8, week 16, week 24, and every 8 weeks thereafter.
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time from the first treatment to the occurrence of tumour progression or death, whichever came first. It was assessed according to RECIST 1.0 criteria as well as by the investigators assessment. Median time results from unstratified Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Time frame: Tumour assessments were performed at screening, week 8, week 16, week 24, and every 8 weeks thereafter.
Overall Survival (OS)
OS is defined as time from randomisation to death.
Time frame: From randomisation to end of follow-up.
Significant Change in Cardiac Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
LVEF as measured by echocardiography or Multiple Gated Acquisition (MUGA) scan. MUGA scan is an useful noninvasive tool for assessing the function of the heart. Significant change in LVEF values was defined as \>=20 percent decrease from baseline or to below lower limit of normal, which was defined as 50 percent.
Time frame: Baseline and last assessment
Best Change From Baseline in ECOG Performance Status
Best change from baseline in ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status. ECOG is measured as score between 0 (fully active) and 5 (dead).
Time frame: baseline till end of treatment
Pre-dose Concentration of Afatinib in Plasma at Steady State on Day 29 (Cpre,ss,29)
Cpre,ss,29 represents the pre-dose concentration of afatinib in plasma at steady state on day 29.
Time frame: day 29
| Milestone | Cohort A | Cohort B |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 29 | 21 |
| Completed | 0 | 0 |
| Not completed | 29 | 21 |
| Withdrew: Progressive disease | 19 | 12 |
| Withdrew: Dose reduction toxicity ae | 8 | 7 |
| Withdrew: Other adverse event | 2 | 2 |
CB was defined as CR, PR or stable disease (SD) for a minimum of 4 months (modified CB) and was assessed according to RECIST 1.0 criteria. CB was secondary endpoint only for Cohort B as it was primary endpoint for Cohort A.
| Participants with CB | Cohort B |
|---|---|
| With CB | 1 |
| Without CB | 17 |
| missing | 3 |
The time to OR was the duration from the first treatment to the time when the measurement criteria for CR and/or PR were met according to RECIST 1.0 criteria.
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
Duration of OR was measured from the time the criteria for CR or PR (whichever was documented first) were first met until the first date that progressive disease or death was objectively documented.
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
PFS was defined as the time from the first treatment to the occurrence of tumour progression or death, whichever came first. It was assessed according to RECIST 1.0 criteria as well as by the investigators assessment. Median time results from unstratified Kaplan-Meier estimates.
| days | Cohort A | Cohort B |
|---|---|---|
| Progression-free Survival (PFS) | 52 (39 to 71) | 54 (50 to 112) |
OR is defined as complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) and was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.0 (RECIST). OR was primary endpoint only for Cohort B.
| Participants with OR | Cohort B |
|---|---|
| Objective Response (OR) | 0 |
CB was defined as CR, PR or stable disease (SD) for a minimum of 4 months (modified CB) and was assessed according to RECIST 1.0 criteria. CB was primary endpoint only for Cohort A.
| Participants | Cohort A |
|---|---|
| With CB | 3 |
| Without CB | 24 |
| missing | 2 |
OS is defined as time from randomisation to death.
| days | Cohort A | Cohort B |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Survival (OS) | NA (120 to NA) | 448 (310 to 537) |
LVEF as measured by echocardiography or Multiple Gated Acquisition (MUGA) scan. MUGA scan is an useful noninvasive tool for assessing the function of the heart. Significant change in LVEF values was defined as \>=20 percent decrease from baseline or to below lower limit of normal, which was defined as 50 percent.
| Participants | Cohort A | Cohort B |
|---|---|---|
| Significant Change in Cardiac Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) | 1 | 2 |
Best change from baseline in ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status. ECOG is measured as score between 0 (fully active) and 5 (dead).
| participants | Cohort A | Cohort B |
|---|---|---|
| improved | 1 | 0 |
| deteriorated | 15 | 13 |
Cpre,ss,29 represents the pre-dose concentration of afatinib in plasma at steady state on day 29.
| ng/mL | Cohort A | Cohort B |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-dose Concentration of Afatinib in Plasma at Steady State on Day 29 (Cpre,ss,29) | 33.1 ± 110 | 22.9 ± 64.7 |
Collected over First administration of trial medication until 28 days after last administration of trial medication. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A | — | 13/29 (44.8%) | 28/29 (96.6%) |
| Cohort B | — | 7/21 (33.3%) | 20/21 (95.2%) |
| Event | Cohort A | Cohort B |
|---|---|---|
| General physical health deteriorationGeneral disorders | 5/29 | 0/21 |
| DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders | 3/29 | 2/21 |
| NauseaGastrointestinal disorders | 0/29 | 2/21 |
| Malignant neoplasm progressionNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | 2/29 | 2/21 |
| VomitingGastrointestinal disorders | 2/29 | 0/21 |
| DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders | 2/29 | 1/21 |
| Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders | 0/29 | 1/21 |
| DysphagiaGastrointestinal disorders | 0/29 | 1/21 |
| Oesophageal stenosisGastrointestinal disorders | 0/29 | 1/21 |
| FatigueGeneral disorders | 0/29 | 1/21 |
| Event | Cohort A | Cohort B |
|---|---|---|
| DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders | 25/29 | 16/21 |
| RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 9/29 | 10/21 |
| NauseaGastrointestinal disorders | 13/29 | 5/21 |
| AcneSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 11/29 | 3/21 |
| FatigueGeneral disorders | 9/29 | 7/21 |
| Mucosal inflammationGeneral disorders | 9/29 | 6/21 |
| VomitingGastrointestinal disorders | 4/29 | 6/21 |
| Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders | 8/29 | 6/21 |
| Dry skinSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 8/29 | 4/21 |
| Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndromeSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 1/29 | 5/21 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Cohort A | Cohort B | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 54.3 ± 11.5 | 61.0 ± 14.3 | 57.1 ± 13.0 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Cohort A | Cohort B | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 29 | 21 | 50 |
| Male | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The record gives a start of Nov 2006 and a primary completion of May 2009. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
Results were first posted in Oct 2013, 4 years 5 months after primary completion.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Afatinib