A Phase 4 interventional study of NAVISTAR® THERMOCOOL® Catheter in Ventricular Tachycardia, sponsored by Biosense Webster, Inc.. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-04.
Sponsored by Biosense Webster, Inc. (part of Johnson & Johnson) · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
The primary objective is to provide additional corroborative safety and efficacy data for the Navistar ThermoCool catheter for the treatment of subjects with ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia.
This study is a prospective, non-randomized, single-arm, multi-center condition of approval evaluation. The device is currently FDA approved for commercial distribution. Subjects with ischemic ventricular tachycardia will be considered for the condition of approval study. This study will be conducted at up to 30 centers in a minimum of 249 evaluable subjects.
443 studies on the registry are indexed under Tachycardia, Ventricular; 120 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 249 is above the median of 64 across 269 interventional studies indexed under Tachycardia, Ventricular.
Browse Tachycardia, Ventricular studies →Biosense Webster, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 64 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.
Of its 26 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 24 (92%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Documented spontaneous episodes of sustained ventricular tachycardia (must satisfy one)
Exclusion Criteria:
Device: NAVISTAR® THERMOCOOL® Catheter
The primary objective is to provide additional, corroborative safety data for the NAVISTAR THERMOCOOL catheter for the treatment of subjects with sustained, monomorphic VT or incessant VT associated with coronary artery disease
The Percentage of Subjects That Expire From All-cause Mortality Within 12-months Post Ablation.
The long-term primary safety endpoint is the percentage of subjects that expire from all-cause mortality within 12-months post ablation.
Time frame: 12-month post ablation
The Percentage of Subjects Who Experienced Cardiovascular-specific Adverse Events (CSAE) Within Seven Days of the Ablation Procedure.
The acute primary safety endpoint is the percentage of subjects who experienced cardiovascular-specific adverse events (CSAE) within seven days of the ablation procedure.
Time frame: Seven days post ablation procedure
Percentage of Subjects Achieved Acute Success
Acute success was defined as the subjects receiving successful ablation of all targeted Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) and no recurrence prior to hospital discharge.
Time frame: Duration from post-procedure to hospital discharge, up to 2 days
Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved Chronic Effectiveness
Chronic effectiveness is defined as subjects without recurrence of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT) at 6 month follow-up. For subjects with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD), recurrences of SMVT were defined as appropriate ICD shock therapies. For subjects without ICDs, recurrences of SMVT were recorded in the follow-up visits form. Besides SMVT, recurrence of incessant VT was also captured in this study. Recurrence of incessant VT was recorded up to 6 month post ablation procedure but not beyond.
Time frame: 6-month follow up
Number of Subjects Achieved Long-term Efficacy Success
Long-term success is defined as patient-reported non-recurrence of Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) at the12-month, second year, and third year phone follow-ups.
Time frame: 3-year follow up
Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction at 6 Month From Baseline
Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) from baseline to 6 month follow up. LVEF is a measure of the percentage of blood leaving heart each time it contracts. Baseline LVEF data were collected at pre ablation procedure, at hospital discharge, and at the 6-month follow-up visit.
Time frame: 6-month follow up
The first subject was enrolled on April 3, 2007. Subject enrollment was completed on May 19, 2009 after reaching the minimum enrollment criteria of two hundred forty-nine (249) subjects. Subject follow-up was completed on June 8, 2012.
| Milestone | NAVISTAR THERMOCOOL Catheter |
|---|---|
| Started | 249 |
| Started study catheter | 233 |
| Completed | 145 |
| Not completed | 104 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 9 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 19 |
| Withdrew: Death | 61 |
| Withdrew: Not meet inclusion/exclusion criteria | 15 |
The long-term primary safety endpoint is the percentage of subjects that expire from all-cause mortality within 12-months post ablation.
| percentage of mortality | NAVISTAR THERMOCOOL Catheter |
|---|---|
| The Percentage of Subjects That Expire From All-cause Mortality Within 12-months Post Ablation. | 13.3 (0 to 17.5) |
Acute success was defined as the subjects receiving successful ablation of all targeted Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) and no recurrence prior to hospital discharge.
| Percentage of participants | NAVISTAR THERMOCOOL Catheter |
|---|---|
| Percentage of Subjects Achieved Acute Success | 74.9 |
The acute primary safety endpoint is the percentage of subjects who experienced cardiovascular-specific adverse events (CSAE) within seven days of the ablation procedure.
| percentage of Adverse Event | NAVISTAR THERMOCOOL Catheter |
|---|---|
| The Percentage of Subjects Who Experienced Cardiovascular-specific Adverse Events (CSAE) Within Seven Days of the Ablation Procedure. | 4.3 (0 to 7.2) |
Chronic effectiveness is defined as subjects without recurrence of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT) at 6 month follow-up. For subjects with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD), recurrences of SMVT were defined as appropriate ICD shock therapies. For subjects without ICDs, recurrences of SMVT were recorded in the follow-up visits form. Besides SMVT, recurrence of incessant VT was also captured in this study. Recurrence of incessant VT was recorded up to 6 month post ablation procedure but not beyond.
| Percentage of participants | NAVISTAR THERMOCOOL Catheter |
|---|---|
| Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved Chronic Effectiveness | 62.0 |
Long-term success is defined as patient-reported non-recurrence of Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) at the12-month, second year, and third year phone follow-ups.
| participants | Total | Reported Recurrence | Reported No Recurrence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12-Month Follow-up | 176 | 40 | 136 |
| 2-Year Follow-up | 161 | 48 | 113 |
| 3-Year Follow-up | 141 | 34 | 107 |
Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) from baseline to 6 month follow up. LVEF is a measure of the percentage of blood leaving heart each time it contracts. Baseline LVEF data were collected at pre ablation procedure, at hospital discharge, and at the 6-month follow-up visit.
| percentage of blood leaving the heart | NAVISTAR THERMOCOOL Catheter |
|---|---|
| Baseline (Pre-Ablation) | 30.6 ± 12.5 |
| 6-Month | 32.9 ± 11.53 |
| Change from Baseline | 0.9 ± 8.23 |
Collected over 3-year follow up. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| NAVISTAR THERMOCOOL Catheter | — | 37/233 (15.9%) | 177/233 (76%) |
| Event | NAVISTAR THERMOCOOL Catheter |
|---|---|
| Ventricular TachycardiaCardiac disorders | 8/233 |
| Congestive Heart FailureCardiac disorders | 5/233 |
| Urinary Tract Infection/Urinary Retention RetentionInfections and infestations | 5/233 |
| DeathCardiac disorders | 3/233 |
| Pericardial EffusionCardiac disorders | 3/233 |
| Renal FailureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 3/233 |
| MRSAInfections and infestations | 2/233 |
| PseudoaneurysmInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 2/233 |
| BradycardiaCardiac disorders | 1/233 |
| PalpitationsCardiac disorders | 1/233 |
| Event | NAVISTAR THERMOCOOL Catheter |
|---|---|
| Ventricular TachycardiaCardiac disorders | 68/233 |
| Congestive Heart FailureCardiac disorders | 50/233 |
| Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders | 22/233 |
| DeathInvestigations | 12/233 |
| Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator maintenanceCardiac disorders | 10/233 |
| Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator shock - Not Elsewhere ClassifiedCardiac disorders | 10/233 |
| HematomaInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 9/233 |
| PneumoniaInfections and infestations | 8/233 |
| SepsisInfections and infestations | 7/233 |
| Angina pectorisCardiac disorders | 6/233 |
All enrolled subjects who signed the informed consent form and were eligible for inclusion in the clinical study
| Age, Continuous(years) | NAVISTAR THERMOCOOL Catheter |
|---|---|
| Mean | 67.4 ± 9.8 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | NAVISTAR THERMOCOOL Catheter |
|---|---|
| Female | 15 |
| Male | 234 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants) | NAVISTAR THERMOCOOL Catheter |
|---|---|
| Asian | 0 |
| Black | 14 |
| Caucasian | 229 |
| Hispanic | 4 |
| Other | 2 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | NAVISTAR THERMOCOOL Catheter |
|---|---|
| United States | 249 |
No study locations are listed for this record.
The record gives a start of Jan 2007, a primary completion of Jun 2012 and a completion of Jun 2012. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
Results were first posted in Oct 2014, 2 years 4 months after primary completion.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.