CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00410293Updated Dec 12, 2006

NT-proBNP in Acute Dyspnea: Effects on Treatment, Hospitalisation and Costs

An interventional study of NT-proBNP testing in Heart Failure and Dyspnea, sponsored by Erasmus Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2006-12-12.

Sponsored by Erasmus Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
500
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Diagnostic uncertainty in patients with complaints of shortness of breath presenting to the Emergency Department of a hospital may delay treatment and proper care. In patients with shortness of breath due to heart failure increased plasma levels of NT-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) can be demonstrated. The use of NT-proBNP as a biomarker for heart failure in patients presenting to the emergency department with dyspnea might improve care and reduce length of hospital stay.

To investigate the effect of NT-proBNP testing on patient care and time to discharge the NT-proBNP test will be randomized. In patients in the study group, the NT-proBNP plasma level is determined at admission and the physician in charge will immediately receive the result of the test. In patients in the control group blood will be sampled but the physician will recieve no information on the NT-proBNP plasma level.

In our study we will investigate the effect of introduction of NT-proBNP as biomarker for heart failure on treatment, time to discharge and costs.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure
  • Dyspnea

Keywords

  • Heart failure
  • Diagnostic
  • Natriuretic peptide
  • NT-pro B-type natriuretic peptide
  • Length of stay
  • Costs
03

In context

Dyspnea

656 studies on the registry are indexed under Dyspnea; 153 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 500 is above the median of 48 across 430 interventional studies indexed under Dyspnea.

Browse Dyspnea studies →

Lead sponsor

Erasmus Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 466 studies on the registry; 179 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Acute dyspnea as their most prominent complaint

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute dyspnea due to a trauma
  • Acute dyspnea due to cardiogenic shock
  • Renal failure requiring dialysis
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single
Enrollment
500 participants

Interventions

  • ProcedureNT-proBNP testing
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to discharge

  2. Cost of treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Duration of stay at the ED

  2. Proportion of patients admitted to the hospital

  3. Proportion of patients admitted to an intensive or coronary care unit

  4. Specialist consultations

  5. Medical treatment

  6. Diagnostic investigations

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Erasmus MC
    Rotterdam, 3015 CE, Netherlands
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 12, 2006, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00410293
Lead sponsor
Erasmus Medical Center
First posted
Dec 12, 2006
Start date
Dec 2004
Completion
Aug 2006
Last update
Dec 12, 2006

Study contacts

Anton H. van den Meiracker, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Erasmus Medical Center
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2006. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion