An interventional study of Modified EGDT and Standard EGDT in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock, sponsored by National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS). Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2009-01-14.
Sponsored by National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to determine if there is equivalence between two different methods of treating patients with severe bloodstream infection called sepsis. We will randomly assign patients to one of two treatment methods. One of the treatment methods is the current standard of care and uses an infrared sensor on the end of a catheter to determine the adequacy of treatment. The second treatment method is identical to the first but instead of the infrared sensor a blood test that is performed as a part of standard care (with blood drawn from the catheter) will be used to determine the adequacy of treatment. This study will attempt to determine an easier method of guiding treatment.
1,899 studies on the registry are indexed under Sepsis; 462 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 300 is above the median of 105 across 896 interventional studies indexed under Sepsis.
Browse Sepsis studies →National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) is the lead sponsor of 19 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Procedure: Standard EGDT
Procedure: Modified EGDT
Early goal directed therapy with lactate clearance
Early goal directed therapy
Mortality
Time frame: In-hospital
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2009. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)