CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00357877Updated Jun 14, 2017Results posted

Prevention of Adult Caries Study (PACS)

A Phase 3 interventional study of 10% w/v chlorhexidine acetate coating FDA IND #45466 and Placebo in Caries, Dental, sponsored by Tufts University. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-06-14.

Sponsored by Tufts University · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
983
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Adult tooth decay is an infectious disease that afflicts the majority of Americans aged 55 and older and is the most common chronic disease at midlife with an ever growing economic toll. Despite the fact that specific bacteria cause tooth decay, no FDA-approved anti-microbial treatment for decay is available to the American dental professional. The Prevention of Adult Caries Study (PACS) is a study designed to evaluate the efficacy of a topical, temporary, 10% w/v chlorhexidine dental coating in reducing new decay in adult dental patients at risk for decay.

Read the detailed description

The Prevention of Adult Caries Study (PACS) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III clinical trial conducted under F.D.A. Investigational New Drug license #45,466, with a target enrollment of 1000 at four clinical centers with vastly different populations. The centers participating in this proposed research are: Kaiser Permanente's Dental Plan in Portland, Oregon; Tufts University Dental Clinic in central Boston, Massachusetts; Delta Dental Massachusetts' Dental Clinic in Southborough, Massachusetts; and the dental clinic of the Tuba City Regional Health Care Corporation in Tuba City, Arizona. Kaiser Permanente's Center for Health Research in Portland, Oregon will act as the data-coordinating center, and Tufts University will act as the Administrative Center. This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy of a topical, temporary, 10% w/v chlorhexidine dental coating in reducing caries increment in at-risk adult dental patients. This study will treat participants in months 1(4 weekly applications) and 7(1 application) with final outcome measured at 13 months after randomization. Examiners were trained and certified before data collection started and were recalibrated annually. The primary outcome analysis in the intent -to- treat sample compares active to placebo group on the rank-normalized caries increment score, adjusting for examiner, age and age squared. Multiple imputation (data augmentation using MCMC) will be used to replace missing outcome. Planned secondary analysis examine the secondary caries increment outcomes using the same model, as well as parallel analyses in the per-protocol group. Safety of the coating will be evaluated by comparing development of resistant S. mutans or C. albicans as well as incidence of MedDRA-coded adverse events between the two arms.

02

Conditions studied

  • Caries, Dental

Browse trials for

03

In context

Dental Caries

1,109 studies on the registry are indexed under Dental Caries; 197 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 983 is above the median of 60 across 916 interventional studies indexed under Dental Caries.

Browse Dental Caries studies →

Lead sponsor

Tufts University is the lead sponsor of 225 studies on the registry; 24 are open to participants now.

Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 7 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years of age and older
  • at least 20 intact natural teeth, excluding third molars
  • 2 or more lesions, of which at least one must be a cavitated D2 or D3
  • willing and able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  • pregnant or planning to become pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study (breastfeeding is permitted)
  • use of fixed orthodontic appliances
  • allergic to any of the ingredients of the study medication
  • long-term antibiotic therapy
  • a history of, or currently active, radiation therapy for cancers of the head or neck
  • Sjögren's syndrome
  • advanced periodontitis
  • consumption of the equivalent of more than five servings of acidic or sugared drinks per day
  • having 10 or more lesions requiring restorative care at the time of the screening visit
  • remineralization therapy within one month of randomization
  • investigator discretion
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
983 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Dental Coating

    Dental coating with all ingredients except Chlorhexidine topically applied by dental professional supragingivally to the full dentition

    Other: Placebo

  • Active comparator
    Active Dental Coating

    10% w/v chlorhexidine acetate coating FDA IND #45466. Dental coating with all ingredients including Chlorhexidine topically applied by dental professional supragingivally to the full dentition

    Drug: 10% w/v chlorhexidine acetate coating FDA IND #45466

Interventions

  • Drug10% w/v chlorhexidine acetate coating FDA IND #45466

    Dental coating topically applied by dental professional supragingivally to the full dentition

    Also known as: CHX

  • OtherPlacebo
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total Net D12FS Caries Increment (Total of Non-cavitated Lesions (D1), Cavitated Lesions (D2) and Sound Surfaces (S))

    Study duration was too short to have progression from D2 (cavitated lesions) to D3 (cavitated lesions that involved dentin). D2 and D3 were treated equivalently for analysis. This measure is computed as the sum of weighted counts of transitions in tooth surface status (root and coronal surfaces combined) from randomization to the 13-month follow-up visit. Disease progression had a positive weight (e.g., S-to-D1 (sound to non-cavitated lesion) or D1-to-D2 (non-cavitated to cavitated lesion) = 1, S-to-D2 (sound to cavitated lesion)= 2). Reversal had a negative weight (e.g., D1-to-S = -1). No change, transitions to or from missing or unscorable, and impossible transitions had 0 weight. Incident fillings and crowns were treated the same as incident D2 lesions for purposes of scoring. More details of the transition weights may be found at Vollmer WM et al. (2010). Design of the Prevention of Adult Caries Study (PACS): a randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of a

    Time frame: (V1) to the 13 month follow-up visit

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cumulative Net D12FS Caries Increment

    This measure was computed similar to the total net D12FS increment, but separately scored and combined transitions from the baseline to 7-month visits and from the 7- to 13-month visits, rather than simply looking at the baseline to 13-month visits.

    Time frame: Visit 1, 7-month follow-up, 13-month follow-up

  2. Total Crude D12FS Caries Increment

    Computed analogous to the total net D12FS caries increment, but ignoring reversals (essentially assigned them zero weight). Computed only using baseline to 13-month visit data.

    Time frame: V1-13-month follow-up

  3. Cumulative Crude D12FS Caries Increment

    This is computed analogous to the cumulative net D12FS increment, but ignoring reversals by assigning them weights of zero.

    Time frame: Visit 1, 7-month follow-up, 13-month follow-up

07

Results

Posted Jun 14, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlacebo Dental CoatingActive Dental Coating (CHX)
Started493490
Completed467460
Not completed2630
Withdrew: Death21
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up2023
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject33
Withdrew: Administrative withdrawal11
Withdrew: Other02

Outcome measures

PrimaryTotal Net D12FS Caries Increment (Total of Non-cavitated Lesions (D1), Cavitated Lesions (D2) and Sound Surfaces (S))

Study duration was too short to have progression from D2 (cavitated lesions) to D3 (cavitated lesions that involved dentin). D2 and D3 were treated equivalently for analysis. This measure is computed as the sum of weighted counts of transitions in tooth surface status (root and coronal surfaces combined) from randomization to the 13-month follow-up visit. Disease progression had a positive weight (e.g., S-to-D1 (sound to non-cavitated lesion) or D1-to-D2 (non-cavitated to cavitated lesion) = 1, S-to-D2 (sound to cavitated lesion)= 2). Reversal had a negative weight (e.g., D1-to-S = -1). No change, transitions to or from missing or unscorable, and impossible transitions had 0 weight. Incident fillings and crowns were treated the same as incident D2 lesions for purposes of scoring. More details of the transition weights may be found at Vollmer WM et al. (2010). Design of the Prevention of Adult Caries Study (PACS): a randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of a

Time frame:
(V1) to the 13 month follow-up visit
Reported as:
Mean · weighted increment units/13 months
Total Net D12FS Caries Increment (Total of Non-cavitated Lesions (D1), Cavitated Lesions (D2) and Sound Surfaces (S))
weighted increment units/13 monthsPlaceboActive
Total Net D12FS Caries Increment (Total of Non-cavitated Lesions (D1), Cavitated Lesions (D2) and Sound Surfaces (S))2.43 ± 0.322.68 ± 0.32
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Active · Regression, Linear · p = 0.56 (No interim analyses were done and no adjustment made for multiple comparisons. Identical analyses were run on each imputed dataset, with results combined with SAS® PROC MIANALZE to obtain final p-values.) · Mean difference (net): 0.25 · 95% CI -0.60 to 1.11The primary outcome analysis included treatment and site as class variables and age and age-squared as continuous covariates.
SecondaryCumulative Net D12FS Caries Increment

This measure was computed similar to the total net D12FS increment, but separately scored and combined transitions from the baseline to 7-month visits and from the 7- to 13-month visits, rather than simply looking at the baseline to 13-month visits.

Time frame:
Visit 1, 7-month follow-up, 13-month follow-up
Reported as:
Mean · caries increment units/13 months
Cumulative Net D12FS Caries Increment
caries increment units/13 monthsPlacebo Dental CoatingActive Dental Coating (CHX)
Cumulative Net D12FS Caries Increment5.53 ± 0.425.88 ± 0.43
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Dental Coating vs Active Dental Coating (CHX) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.54 (No adjustment for multiple comparisons. Identical analyses were run on each imputed dataset, with results combined with SAS® PROC MIANALYZE to obtain final p-values.) · Mean difference (net): 0.35 · 95% CI -0.77 to 1.46Model included treatment and site as class variables and age and age-squared as continuous covariates.
SecondaryTotal Crude D12FS Caries Increment

Computed analogous to the total net D12FS caries increment, but ignoring reversals (essentially assigned them zero weight). Computed only using baseline to 13-month visit data.

Time frame:
V1-13-month follow-up
Reported as:
Mean · caries increment units/13 months
Total Crude D12FS Caries Increment
caries increment units/13 monthsPlacebo Dental CoatingActive Dental Coating (CHX)
Total Crude D12FS Caries Increment6.47 ± 0.275.96 ± 0.28
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Dental Coating vs Active Dental Coating (CHX) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.18 (No adjustment for multiple comparisons. Identical analyses were run on each imputed dataset, with results combined with SAS® PROC MIANALYZE to obtain final p-values.) · Mean difference (net): -0.51 · 95% CI -1.25 to 0.23treatment and site included as class variables and age and age-squared as continuous covariates.
SecondaryCumulative Crude D12FS Caries Increment

This is computed analogous to the cumulative net D12FS increment, but ignoring reversals by assigning them weights of zero.

Time frame:
Visit 1, 7-month follow-up, 13-month follow-up
Reported as:
Mean · caries increment units/13 months
Cumulative Crude D12FS Caries Increment
caries increment units/13 monthsPlacebo Dental CoatingActive Dental Coating (CHX)
Cumulative Crude D12FS Caries Increment11.39 ± 0.4210.72 ± 0.43
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Dental Coating vs Active Dental Coating (CHX) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.24 (No adjustment for multiple comparisons. Identical analyses were run on each imputed dataset, with results combined with SAS® PROC MIANALYZE to obtain final p-values.) · Mean difference (net): -0.68 · 95% CI -1.80 to 0.45Model included treatment and site as class variables, and age and age-squared as continuous covariates.

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were reported at any time throughout the study and were systematically screened for at the 6-month and 1-year visit.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo—31/493 (6.3%)87/493 (17.6%)
Active—28/490 (5.7%)84/490 (17.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 71
Most frequent serious events
EventPlaceboActive
Angina pectorisCardiac disorders0/4932/490
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/4932/490
Uterine leiomyomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/4932/490
Kidney infectionInfections and infestations2/4931/490
Acute myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders0/4931/490
AsthmaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/4931/490
Basal cell carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/4931/490
Benign pancreatic neoplasmNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/4931/490
Cervical vertebral fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/4931/490
ConcussionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/4931/490
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPlaceboActive
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations43/49330/490
Sensitivity of teethGastrointestinal disorders32/49326/490
Pharmaceutical product complaintSocial circumstances12/49328/490

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Placebo Dental CoatingActive Dental CoatingTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years463459922
>=65 years303161
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Placebo Dental CoatingActive Dental CoatingTotal
Mean42.8 ± 14.342.9 ± 14.342.8 ± 14.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Placebo Dental CoatingActive Dental CoatingTotal
Female242250492
Male251240491
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Placebo Dental CoatingActive Dental CoatingTotal
United States493490983
08

Study locations

4 sites
  • Tuba City Regional Health Care
    Tuba City, Arizona 86045-0600, United States
  • Tufts University School of Dental Medicine
    Boston, Massachusetts 02111, United States
  • Dental Services of Massachusetts
    Boston, Massachusetts 02129, United States
  • Center for Health Research
    Portland, Oregon 97227, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Papas AS, Vollmer WM, Gullion CM, Bader J, Laws R, Fellows J, Hollis JF, Maupome G, Singh ML, Snyder J, Blanchard P; PACS Collaborative Group. Efficacy of chlorhexidine varnish for the prevention of adult caries: a randomized trial. J Dent Res. 2012 Feb;91(2):150-5. doi: 10.1177/0022034511424154. Epub 2011 Dec 7. PubMed 22156917 ↗
  • Singh M, Papas A, Vollmer W, Bader J, Laws R, Maupome G, Snyder J, Blanchard P. Predictors of coronal caries progression in adults: results from the Prevention of Adult Caries Study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013 Dec;41(6):558-64. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12059. Epub 2013 Jul 9. PubMed 23834229 ↗
  • Banting DW, Amaechi BT, Bader JD, Blanchard P, Gilbert GH, Gullion CM, Holland JC, Makhija SK, Papas A, Ritter AV, Singh ML, Vollmer WM. Examiner training and reliability in two randomized clinical trials of adult dental caries. J Public Health Dent. 2011 Fall;71(4):335-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00278.x. Epub 2011 Aug 17. PubMed 22320292 ↗
  • Vollmer WM, Papas AS, Bader JD, Maupome G, Gullion CM, Hollis JF, Snyder JJ, Fellows JL, Laws RL, White BA; PACS Collaborative Research Group. Design of the Prevention of Adult Caries Study (PACS): a randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of a chlorhexidine dental coating for the prevention of adult caries. BMC Oral Health. 2010 Oct 5;10:23. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-10-23. PubMed 20923557 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 14, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00357877
Lead sponsor
Tufts University
Collaborators
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 28, 2006
Start date
Jul 2006
Primary completion
Aug 2009
Completion
Jun 2010
Results posted
Jun 14, 2017
Last update
Jun 14, 2017

Study contacts

Athena Papas, PhD DMD
principal investigator · Tufts University of Dental Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion