CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00355914Updated Nov 26, 2013Results posted

Effectiveness of Lumbar Facet Joint Nerve Blocks

An interventional study of Lumbar Facet Joint Nerve Block in Low Back Pain, sponsored by Pain Management Center of Paducah. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-11-26.

Sponsored by Pain Management Center of Paducah · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

  1. To demonstrate whether:

    i. Facet joint nerve blocks have therapeutic value beyond the duration of local anesthetic effect.

    ii. Adjuvant medications (Sarapin and Depo-steroids) provide additional relief of lumbar facet joint pain when used with facet joint nerve blocks.

  2. To demonstrate whether or not there are clinically significant improvements in function of patients who receive lumbar facet joint nerve block with or without Sarapin and Depo-steroids (Group II) compared to patients randomized to Group I who receive only local anesthetic blocks.
  3. To determine the adverse event profile in both groups.
Read the detailed description

Primary Outcome Measure(s) To demonstrate a clinically significant difference between the patients treated with adjuvants and those patients randomized to Group I in the pain status, physical, and psychological status and pain at 3, 6, 12, 18and 24 months post treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Low Back Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Lumbar Facet Joint Nerve Block
03

In context

Low Back Pain

2,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Low Back Pain; 482 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 120 is above the median of 60 across 2,268 interventional studies indexed under Low Back Pain.

Browse Low Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Pain Management Center of Paducah is the lead sponsor of 14 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Positive for facet joint pain with comparative local anesthetic blocks

Candidates are over 18 years of age

Subjects with a history of chronic, function limiting low back pain of at least six months in duration Subjects who are able to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this investigation Subjects who, in the opinion of the Investigator, are able to understand this investigation, co-operate with the investigational procedures and are willing to return to the center for all the required post-operative follow-ups The subject has not had recent surgical procedures within the last three months.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Negative or false-positive response to controlled comparative local anesthetic blocks

Narcotic use of greater than Hydrocodone 100 mg/day, Methadone 80 mg or Morphine 100 mg, or dose equivalent

Uncontrolled major Depression or uncontrolled psychiatric disorders

Uncontrolled or acute medical illnesses including coagulopathy, renal insufficiency, chronic liver dysfunction, progressive neurological deficit, urinary sphincter dysfunction, infection, increased intercranial pressure, pseudotumor cerebri, intercranial tumors, unstable angina, and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Chronic severe conditions that could interfere with the interpretations of the outcome assessments for pain and bodily function

Women who are pregnant or lactating

Subjects who have participated in a clinical study with an investigational product within 30 days of enrollment

Patients with multiple complaints involving concomitant hip osteoarthritis, will not be amenable to study due to the overlap of pain complaints.

Inability to achieve appropriate positioning and inability to understand informed consent and protocol History of adverse reaction to local anesthetic or anti-inflammatory drugs

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
120 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group 1 Without Steroids

    Lumbar Facet Joint Nerve Block with Local Anesthetic (0.5 mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine with/without 0.5 mL of Sarapin)

    Procedure: Lumbar Facet Joint Nerve Block

  • Experimental
    Group 2 With Steroids

    Lumbar Facet Joint Nerve Block with Local Anesthetic (0.5 mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine with/without 0.5 mL of Sarapin) and 0.15 mg of non-particulate betamethasone)

    Procedure: Lumbar Facet Joint Nerve Block

Interventions

  • ProcedureLumbar Facet Joint Nerve Block

    Lumbar Facet Joint Nerve Block

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Average Numeric Rating Scale

    Numeric rating scale represented 0 with no pain and 10 with the worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-treatment

  2. Oswestry Disability Index

    Oswestry Disability Index 2.0 (ODI): ODI score is ranged from 0 to 50. Total score is converted in to percent disability. ODI Scoring: 0% to 20% (minimal disability), 21%-40% (moderate disability), 41%-60% (severe disability), 61%-80% (crippled) and 81%-100% (may be bed bound or exaggerating their symptoms).

    Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-treatment.

07

Results

Posted Nov 26, 2013

Participant flow

The recruitment period lasted from November 2003 to July 2006.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGroup 1 Without SteroidsGroup II With Steroids
Started6060
Completed6060
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryAverage Numeric Rating Scale

Numeric rating scale represented 0 with no pain and 10 with the worst pain imaginable.

Time frame:
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-treatment
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Average Numeric Rating Scale
units on a scaleGroup IGroup II
Baseline8.2 ± 0.87.9 ± 1.0
3 months3.8 ± 1.33.5 ± 1.1
6 months3.6 ± 1.53.3 ± 0.8
12 months3.7 ± 1.73.5 ± 1.1
18 months3.5 ± 1.53.3 ± 1.0
24 months3.5 ± 1.53.2 ± 0.9
Statistical analysis
  • Group I vs Group II · t-test, 2 sided · p = >0.05 (Results were considered statistically significant if the P value was less than 0.05.)
PrimaryOswestry Disability Index

Oswestry Disability Index 2.0 (ODI): ODI score is ranged from 0 to 50. Total score is converted in to percent disability. ODI Scoring: 0% to 20% (minimal disability), 21%-40% (moderate disability), 41%-60% (severe disability), 61%-80% (crippled) and 81%-100% (may be bed bound or exaggerating their symptoms).

Time frame:
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-treatment.
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Oswestry Disability Index
units on a scaleGroup 1 Without SteroidsGroup II With Steroids
Baseline26.6 ± 4.625.9 ± 5.0
3 months12.7 ± 4.713.5 ± 5.6
6 months12.7 ± 4.712.2 ± 5.0
12 months12.3 ± 4.812.0 ± 5.4
18 months12.1 ± 5.011.2 ± 4.9
24 months12.0 ± 4.911.0 ± 4.8
Statistical analysis
  • Group 1 Without Steroids vs Group II With Steroids · t-test, 2 sided · p = >0.05 (Results were considered statistically significant if the P value was less than 0.05.)

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Group 1 Without Steroids—0/60 (0%)0/60 (0%)
Group II With Steroids—0/60 (0%)0/60 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Group 1 Without SteroidsGroup II With SteroidsTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years5153104
>=65 years9716
Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)Group 1 Without SteroidsGroup II With SteroidsTotal
Mean47 ± 1546 ± 1746.7 ± 15.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Group 1 Without SteroidsGroup II With SteroidsTotal
Female393372
Male212748
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Group 1 Without SteroidsGroup II With SteroidsTotal
United States6060120
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Ambulatory Surgery Center
    Paducah, Kentucky 42003, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Manchikanti L, Singh V, Falco FJ, Cash KA, Pampati V. Evaluation of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks in managing chronic low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial with a 2-year follow-up. Int J Med Sci. 2010 May 28;7(3):124-35. doi: 10.7150/ijms.7.124. PubMed 20567613 ↗
  • Manchikanti L, Singh V, Falco FJ, Cash KA, Pampati V. Lumbar facet joint nerve blocks in managing chronic facet joint pain: one-year follow-up of a randomized, double-blind controlled trial: Clinical Trial NCT00355914. Pain Physician. 2008 Mar-Apr;11(2):121-32. PubMed 18354721 ↗
  • Manchikanti L, Manchikanti KN, Manchukonda R, Cash KA, Damron KS, Pampati V, McManus CD. Evaluation of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks in the management of chronic low back pain: preliminary report of a randomized, double-blind controlled trial: clinical trial NCT00355914. Pain Physician. 2007 May;10(3):425-40. PubMed 17525777 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 26, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00355914
Lead sponsor
Pain Management Center of Paducah
Responsible party
Laxmaiah Manchikanti, MD (CEO, Pain Management Center of Paducah) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 25, 2006
Start date
Aug 2003
Primary completion
Jul 2006
Completion
Jul 2006
Results posted
Nov 26, 2013
Last update
Nov 26, 2013

Study contacts

Laxmaiah Manchikanti, MD
principal investigator · Ambulatory Surgery Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion