CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00341224Updated Jul 2, 2017

Steppin' Up: Positive Youth Development Program

A Phase 2 interventional study of Group-mentoring intervention in Mentoring, sponsored by Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-07-02.

Sponsored by Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

As an antidote to juvenile aggression and violence, which has increased in recent years, group mentoring offers a viable alternative to intensive one-on-one mentoring. However, no group-mentoring programs have been evaluated.

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of a school-based, group-mentoring intervention designed to prevent aggressive and deviant behavior among early adolescents.

Study participants will be incoming 6th grade students from two inner-city Baltimore middle schools and their parents. Approximately 1,400 students and their parents are expected to participate. All 6th grade students in these schools are eligible for the study.

Weekly student group-mentoring sessions are the principal component of this study. These groups will be held during the school day and will be designed to increase social skills and encourage academic engagement, restraint, and problem-solving. A master's level professional will direct and conduct these intervention activities, which will employ the use of field trips, cooperative games, discussion of real-life situations, and role playing.

Students will also complete a 1-hour written survey each fall and spring from grades 6-8 about the program and about attitudes and behaviors related to school involvement and staying healthy and safe. Study staff will contact participants' teachers and review their past and current school records, including attendance, grades, and disciplinary information.

Parents may be asked to participate in group meetings and will complete in-person or telephone interviews (about 20 minutes each) about similar information over a 3-year period (6th grade to 8th grade).

Read the detailed description

Group mentoring offers a potentially viable alternative to intensive one-on-one mentoring. However, no group mentoring programs have been evaluated. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of a school-based, group-mentoring intervention designed to prevent aggressive and deviant behavior among early adolescents. Two successive cohorts of incoming 6th grade students from two inner-city Baltimore middle schools and their parents will be randomized to comparison group or intervention group consisting of weekly group-mentoring sessions for youth and persuasive communication and small-group media-development projects for parents.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mentoring

Keywords

  • Aggression
  • Violence
  • Adolescents
  • Randomized Trial
  • Behavioral Intervention
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) is the lead sponsor of 416 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 10 (77%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

  • INCLUSION CRITERIA:

The population of interest for the randomized trial is 6th-grade students and their parents in two participating Baltimore middle schools. Participating schools are urban, inner-city schools located in neighborhoods with low SES and high rates of unemployment and crime.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)

Interventions

  • BehavioralGroup-mentoring intervention

    Group mentoring used to teach social skills to middle school students

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Student fighting

    Time frame: Immediate poste test, 12-month follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Academic engagement

    Time frame: Immediate post test, 12-month follow-up

07

Study locations

1 site
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), 9000 Rockville
    Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bailey SL, Flewelling RL, Rosenbaum DP. Characteristics of students who bring weapons to school. J Adolesc Health. 1997 Apr;20(4):261-70. doi: 10.1016/S1054-139X(96)00283-2. PubMed 9098729 ↗
  • DuRant RH, Krowchuk DP, Kreiter S, Sinal SH, Woods CR. Weapon carrying on school property among middle school students. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999 Jan;153(1):21-6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.153.1.21. PubMed 9894995 ↗
  • Ellickson PL, McGuigan KA. Early predictors of adolescent violence. Am J Public Health. 2000 Apr;90(4):566-72. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.4.566. PubMed 10754971 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 2, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00341224
Lead sponsor
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
First posted
Jun 21, 2006
Start date
Jul 23, 2003
Primary completion
Dec 9, 2009
Completion
Dec 9, 2009
Last update
Jul 2, 2017
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2009. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion