ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00340951Updated Jul 2, 2017

Can Immune Parameters Predict Acute and Chronic Rejection in Lung Recipients?

An observational study in Lung Transplantation, sponsored by National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS). Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-07-02.

Sponsored by National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) · Observational

Study type
Observational
Enrollment
400
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will evaluate the ability of lung transplant recipients to react to the transplanted organs. Previous research indicates that some immune tests can identify whether people are at risk for chronic rejection of transplanted lungs. Certain parameters, that is, physical properties involving the immune system, may cause acute chronic rejection of the lungs, which may lead to chronic rejection, a condition of scarring that worsens lung function. If such parameters can be identified and distinguished from those found in healthy subjects, information gained can help medical professionals to provide individualized treatments that work on the immune system. Short-term and long-term survival of lung transplant recipients may thus be improved.

Patients who will have or have had lung transplants will be recruited by clinical transplant coordinators. Normal control subjects will be recruited through flyers and newspaper advertisements.

Collection of blood samples will be done at Duke University Medical Center. Blood collections will be done of patients undergoing routine pretransplant and posttransplant blood tests, so no extra blood collections will be required. Control subjects will undergo three blood collections over an 8-week period. They will be compensated for their time in participating, at the rate of $5 for the initial blood draw, $10 for the second one, and $15 for the third one. A small amount of blood is involved, about 3 tablespoons. The blood cells and DNA (which contains genetic material) will be isolated for analysis. Patients' DNA samples collected will be identified by a code, and all other identifying information will be removed. The samples may be used in the future as new tests are developed.

This study will not have a direct benefit for participants. However, during the study, if it is found that any patients have an inherited risk for a disease likely to cause early death if the disease is not treated, then the researchers will attempt to notify those patients. Overall, it is hoped that information gathered will enhance researchers' understanding of what tests best identify patients at risk for developing chronic rejection of their transplanted lungs.

Read the detailed description

The aim of this study is to provide insight into the immune mechanisms involved in the pre- and posttransplant response of lung recipients to determine if short- and long-term graft outcome can be predicted and to allow for potential intervention. We have assembled a panel of assays that will test various functions of the immune response and investigate immune mechanisms involved in acute and chronic rejection (CR). Our overall hypothesis is that measurment of pre- and posttransplant immune response to donor HLA antigens/peptides can predict graft outcome. Our goal is to determine if immune parameters [ELISpot], intracellular T regulatory cells and ATP synthesis can identify lung recipients at high risk for developing AR and sub-clinical rejection. Sub-aim: To determine the correlation of cytokine genotypes with ELISpot results and T regulatory cell level and activity for recipients at high risk for developing acute rejection in comparison to a normal subject cohort. A second hypothesis is that recipients who experience an AR episode and remain responsive to donor antigen and those who show increased reactivity to donor HLA peptides are at high risk for developing CR. Our goal is to determine if the immune parameters (CFSE responder frequencies and response to donor peptides are assayed by CFSE, ELISpot, T regulatory cell level, and ATP synthesis) can identify lung recipients at high risk for developing CR and distinguish these immune parameters from a normal subject cohort. If successful, we will provide clinicians with the information necessary for individualization of immunosuppression intervention aimed at improving short and long-term graft outcome.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lung Transplantation

Keywords

  • Regulatory T Cells
  • Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome
  • Genetic Polymorphism
  • Innate Immunity
  • Transplantation
  • Lung Transplantation
03

In context

Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome

389 studies on the registry are indexed under Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome; 103 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 400 is above the median of 120 across 71 observational studies indexed under Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome.

Browse Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) is the lead sponsor of 183 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

  • INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

Adult patients undergoing transplant at Duke Medical Center are to be recruited as subjects.

In addition, investigators will recruit 80 adult control subjects from individuals who will not have lung disease and will not be on immunosuppression or from pre transplant subjects.

05

Study design

Enrollment
400 participants
06

Study locations

2 sites
  • Duke University Medical Center
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
  • NIEHS, Research Triangle Park
    Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, United States
07

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jun 2005 and a completion of Apr 2007. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 19, 2006
First posted
Jun 21, 2006
Start
Jun 23, 2005
Completion
Apr 13, 2007
Last update
Jul 2, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 2, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00340951
First posted
Jun 21, 2006
Start date
Jun 23, 2005
Completion
Apr 13, 2007
Last update
Jul 2, 2017
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2007. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion