ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00333814Updated Apr 14, 2011Results posted

A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment for Non-Infectious Intermediate or Posterior Uveitis

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Dexamethasone and dexamethasone in Intermediate Uveitis and Posterior Uveitis, sponsored by Allergan. Completed at 18 sites in 18 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-04-14.

Sponsored by Allergan (part of AbbVie) · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
229
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of an intravitreal implant of dexamethasone for the treatment of non-infectious intermediate or posterior uveitis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intermediate Uveitis
  • Posterior Uveitis
03

In context

Uveitis, Intermediate

56 studies on the registry are indexed under Uveitis, Intermediate; 2 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 229 is above the median of 36 across 42 interventional studies indexed under Uveitis, Intermediate.

Browse Uveitis, Intermediate studies →

Lead sponsor

Allergan is the lead sponsor of 505 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 93 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 91 (98%) have results posted.

First submitted before Allergan became part of AbbVie.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years or older with a diagnosis of chronic intermediate uveitis in at least one eye

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncontrolled systemic disease
  • Any active ocular infections
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
229 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    1

    Dexamethasone 350 µg

    Drug: Dexamethasone

  • Active comparator
    2

    Dexamethasone 700 µg

    Drug: dexamethasone

  • Sham comparator
    3

    Sham

    Drug: Sham injection

Interventions

  • Dexamethasone 350 µg; injection drug delivery system at Day 0

    Also known as: Posurdex®

  • Dexamethasone 700 µg injection drug delivery system at Day 0

    Also known as: Posurdex®

  • DrugSham injection

    Sham injection at Day 0

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patients With Vitreous Haze (Ocular Inflammation) Score of Zero

    Percentage of patients with Vitreous Haze Score of Zero at Week 8. Score is based on standardized scale of 0 to +4 where 0 equals no inflammation and +4 equals optic nerve head not visible (severe).

    Time frame: Week 8

Other outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patients With at Least a 15-Letter Improvement in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)

    Percentage of Patients with at least a 15-letter improvement in BCVA at Week 8 from Baseline. BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). The higher the number of letters read correctly, the better the vision (or visual acuity). An improvement in the number of letters read means that the vision has improved.

    Time frame: Week 8

  2. Percentage of Patients With at Least a 10-Point Improvement in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25)Score

    Percentage of patients with at least a 10-Point Improvement in the NEI-VFQ-25 over-all composite score at Week 8 from Baseline. The NEI-VFQ-25 consists of 25 vision-targeted questions plus one general health question resulting in a score of 0-100 (100 represents best functionality).

    Time frame: Week 8

07

Results

Posted Apr 14, 2011

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneDexamethasone 350 µgDexamethasone 700 µgSham
Started767776
Completed737371
Not completed345

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Patients With Vitreous Haze (Ocular Inflammation) Score of Zero

Percentage of patients with Vitreous Haze Score of Zero at Week 8. Score is based on standardized scale of 0 to +4 where 0 equals no inflammation and +4 equals optic nerve head not visible (severe).

Time frame:
Week 8
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Patients
Percentage of Patients With Vitreous Haze (Ocular Inflammation) Score of Zero
Percentage of PatientsDexamethasone 350 µgDexamethasone 700 µgSham
Percentage of Patients With Vitreous Haze (Ocular Inflammation) Score of Zero35.546.811.8
Other pre-specifiedPercentage of Patients With at Least a 15-Letter Improvement in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)

Percentage of Patients with at least a 15-letter improvement in BCVA at Week 8 from Baseline. BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). The higher the number of letters read correctly, the better the vision (or visual acuity). An improvement in the number of letters read means that the vision has improved.

Time frame:
Week 8
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Patients
Percentage of Patients With at Least a 15-Letter Improvement in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)
Percentage of PatientsDexamethasone 350 µgDexamethasone 700 µgSham
Percentage of Patients With at Least a 15-Letter Improvement in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)39.542.96.6
Other pre-specifiedPercentage of Patients With at Least a 10-Point Improvement in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25)Score

Percentage of patients with at least a 10-Point Improvement in the NEI-VFQ-25 over-all composite score at Week 8 from Baseline. The NEI-VFQ-25 consists of 25 vision-targeted questions plus one general health question resulting in a score of 0-100 (100 represents best functionality).

Time frame:
Week 8
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Patients
Percentage of Patients With at Least a 10-Point Improvement in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25)Score
Percentage of PatientsDexamethasone 350 µgDexamethasone 700 µgSham
Percentage of Patients With at Least a 10-Point Improvement in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25)Score40.850.715.9

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Dexamethasone 350 µg—6/74 (8.1%)58/74 (78.4%)
Dexamethasone 700 µg—7/76 (9.2%)61/76 (80.3%)
Sham—5/75 (6.7%)51/75 (68%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 17
Most frequent serious events
EventDexamethasone 350 µgDexamethasone 700 µgSham
Retinal DetachmentEye disorders0/742/762/75
CataractEye disorders1/740/761/75
Necrotising retinitisEye disorders1/740/760/75
Pupillary disorderEye disorders1/740/760/75
Small intestinal obstructionGastrointestinal disorders1/740/760/75
HIV test positiveInvestigations1/740/760/75
KetoacidosisMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/740/760/75
Pancreatic CarcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/740/760/75
Pulmonary embolismRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/740/760/75
Hypotony of eyeEye disorders0/740/761/75
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 21
Most frequent other events
EventDexamethasone 350 µgDexamethasone 700 µgSham
Conjunctival haemorrhageEye disorders13/7423/7616/75
Intraocular pressure increasedInvestigations17/7419/765/75
Eye PainEye disorders8/7411/7610/75
IridocyclitisEye disorders2/7411/765/75
UveitisEye disorders7/7410/7610/75
Ocular discomfortEye disorders3/7410/766/75
CataractEye disorders6/749/767/75
Ocular hypertensionEye disorders7/746/760/75
Conjunctival hyperaemiaEye disorders7/745/767/75
Visual acuity reducedEye disorders7/743/766/75

Baseline characteristics

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Dexamethasone 350 µgDexamethasone 700 µgShamTotal
<45 years394341123
Between 45 and 65 years32282787
>65 years56819
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Dexamethasone 350 µgDexamethasone 700 µgShamTotal
Female484651145
Male28312584
08

Study locations

18 sites
  • Dallas, Texas, United States
  • Sydney, Australia
  • Vienna, Austria
  • São Paulo, São Paulo/SP, Brazil
  • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Prague, Czech Republic
  • Paris, France
  • Heidelberg, Germany
  • Holargos, Greece
  • Hyderabad, India
  • Petah Tikva, Israel
  • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
  • Gdansk, Poland
  • Coimbra, Portugal
  • Johannesburg, South Africa
  • Madrid, Spain
  • Lausanne, Switzerland
  • London, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Lightman S, Belfort R Jr, Naik RK, Lowder C, Foster CS, Rentz AM, Cui H, Whitcup SM, Kowalski JW, Revicki DA. Vision-related functioning outcomes of dexamethasone intravitreal implant in noninfectious intermediate or posterior uveitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Jul 18;54(7):4864-70. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10981. PubMed 23761087 ↗
  • Naik RK, Rentz AM, Foster CS, Lightman S, Belfort R Jr, Lowder C, Whitcup SM, Kowalski JW, Revicki DA. Normative comparison of patient-reported outcomes in patients with noninfectious uveitis. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Feb;131(2):219-25. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamaophthalmol.102. PubMed 23411886 ↗
  • Lowder C, Belfort R Jr, Lightman S, Foster CS, Robinson MR, Schiffman RM, Li XY, Cui H, Whitcup SM; Ozurdex HURON Study Group. Dexamethasone intravitreal implant for noninfectious intermediate or posterior uveitis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 May;129(5):545-53. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.339. Epub 2011 Jan 10. PubMed 21220619 ↗

Related links

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of May 2006, a primary completion of Dec 2008 and a completion of Apr 2009. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Apr 2011, 2 years 4 months after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Nov 2009.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 2, 2006
First posted
Jun 6, 2006
Start
May 2006
Primary completionActual
Dec 2008
CompletionActual
Apr 2009
Results delay requested
Nov 30, 2009
Results first posted
Apr 14, 2011
Last update
Apr 14, 2011
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 14, 2011, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00333814
Lead sponsor
Allergan
First posted
Jun 6, 2006
Start date
May 2006
Primary completion
Dec 2008
Completion
Apr 2009
Results posted
Apr 14, 2011
Last update
Apr 14, 2011

Study contacts

Medical Director
study director · Allergan
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2011. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Dexamethasone

Start the discussion