CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00333385Updated Jun 5, 2006

Continuous Versus Short Infusions of Ceftazidime in Cystic Fibrosis

A Phase 4 interventional study of ceftazidime in Cystic Fibrosis, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa and Pulmonary Exacerbation, sponsored by Association Nationale pour les Traitements A Domicile, les Innovations et la Recherche. Terminated at 15 sites in France. Open to participants aged 8 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2006-06-05.

Sponsored by Association Nationale pour les Traitements A Domicile, les Innovations et la Recherche · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
8 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this trial was to compare the safety and efficacy of courses of tobramycin and ceftazidime, administered intravenously as either thrice daily short infusions or 24 h continuous infusion, in cystic fibrosis patients with acute exacerbation of chronic pulmonary PA infection. In conventional treatment regimens, ceftazidime is administered in the form of thrice daily short infusions, but pharmacodynamic considerations suggest that continuous infusion could be more effective.

Read the detailed description

Each patient received two successive IV antibiotic courses during a period of pulmonary exacerbation. One of these courses was delivered as thrice daily 30-minute infusions of ceftazidime in 100 ml of 0.9% sodium chloride, and the other was delivered as a continuous infusion of ceftazidime in 230 ml of 0.9% sodium chloride, over 23 hours. The daily dose of ceftazidime was 200 mg/kg, with a maximum dose of 12 g. For ceftazidime continuous infusion, a loading dose of 60 mg/kg (maximum 2 g) was used. All patients also received tobramycin (10 mg/kg), in the form of one 30-minute infusion per day. Portable devices were used: Intermate® SV 200 (Baxter) for the 30-minute short infusions of ceftazidime and tobramycin, Infusor® LV10 (Baxter) for continuous infusion of ceftazidime.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cystic Fibrosis
  • Pseudomonas Aeruginosa
  • Pulmonary Exacerbation

Keywords

  • Ceftazidime
  • Continuous infusion
  • Antibiotic course
03

In context

Cystic Fibrosis

1,581 studies on the registry are indexed under Cystic Fibrosis; 190 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 120 is above the median of 36 across 1,034 interventional studies indexed under Cystic Fibrosis.

Browse Cystic Fibrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Association Nationale pour les Traitements A Domicile, les Innovations et la Recherche is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • patients with cystic fibrosis older than 8 years
  • with chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection of the respiratory tract
  • with at least 2 courses of IV antibiotic in the year before enrolment
  • at the time of a pulmonary exacerbation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • allergy to ceftazidime or tobramycin
  • bronchial colonization with Burkholderia cepacia
  • renal impairment
  • history of lung transplantation
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants

Interventions

  • Drugceftazidime
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) between the beginning and the end of the IV antibiotic course, expressed as a percentage of the predicted normal value

Secondary outcomes

  1. the interval between 2 successive IV antibiotic courses

  2. quality of life scores

  3. sputum collected at the beginning and the end of each antibiotic course

  4. plasma ceftazidime concentration at steady state (Css) for ceftazidime continuous infusion, and before (C trough), 30 minutes (Cmax) and 4 hours after (C4) the beginning of ceftazidime short infusion

  5. C-reactive protein, leukocytes and hepatic enzymes levels at the beginning and the end of each IV antibiotic course

07

Study locations

15 sites
  • CHU Grenoble
    Grenoble, 38043, France
  • Centre hospitalier Dr Schaffner
    Lens, 62307, France
  • Hopital Albert Calmette
    Lille, 59000, France
  • Hopital Jeanne de Flandre
    Lille, 59000, France
  • Hopital Sainte Marguerite
    Marseille, 13000, France
  • Assistance Publique des hopitaux de paris, Hopital Trousseau
    Paris, 75012, France
  • Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris, Hopital Cochin
    Paris, 75014, France
  • Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris, Hopital Necker
    Paris, 75015, France
  • Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris, Hopital Robert Debré
    Paris, 75019, France
  • Hopital Sud
    Rennes, 35056, France
  • Centre Héliomarin
    Roscoff, 29684, France
  • Hopital Hautepierre
    Strasbourg, 67000, France
  • Hopital Foch
    Suresnes, 92150, France
  • Hopital Larrey
    Toulouse, 31000, France
  • Hopital de Brabois
    Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, 54511, France
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 5, 2006, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00333385
Lead sponsor
Association Nationale pour les Traitements A Domicile, les Innovations et la Recherche
Collaborators
Vaincre la Mucoviscidose, GlaxoSmithKline, Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Roche Pharma AG
First posted
Jun 5, 2006
Start date
Oct 2001
Completion
Apr 2004
Last update
Jun 5, 2006

Study contacts

Dominique Hubert, MD
principal investigator · Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Mar 2001. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion