ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00330668Updated Aug 14, 2020Results posted

Treatment of Children and Adolescents With Growth Failure Associated With Primary IGF-1 Deficiency

A Phase 3 interventional study of rh IGF-1 (mecasermin) in Growth Disorders, sponsored by Ipsen. Terminated at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 15 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-08-14.

Sponsored by Ipsen · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Unacceptable frequency of hypoglycemia observed at and above 200 ug/kg/day
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
114
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
4 Years to 15 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is an extension study to Tercica study MS301 (NCT00125164) and is intended to collect long term safety and efficacy data on the continued use of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-1 (rh IGF-1) in children and adolescents treated for primary IGF-1 deficiency (IGFD). The secondary objective is to use the data collected to learn more about the relationship of IGF-1 exposure to the promotion of normal growth and pubertal development.

Read the detailed description

Primary IGFD is a term that has been used to describe patients with intrinsic cellular defects in GH action. In this protocol, subjects that have completed one year of mecasermin treatment on Tercica protocol MS301 (NCT00125164) will be allowed to enroll in this extension study. All subjects were planned to receive treatment.

This is a Phase IIIb open-label, multi-center, parallel dose, extension study conducted in approximately 40 centers across the United States.

02

Conditions studied

  • Growth Disorders

Keywords

  • Insulin-like Growth Factor Deficiency
  • IGF-1
  • Short Stature
03

In context

Growth Disorders

227 studies on the registry are indexed under Growth Disorders; 25 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 114 is below the median of 413 across 143 interventional studies indexed under Growth Disorders.

Browse Growth Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Ipsen is the lead sponsor of 289 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Of its 26 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 22 (85%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 15 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Parents or legally authorized representatives must give signed before any trial related activities are conducted
  • Where required, assent of the subject will be appropriately documented prior to any study related activities
  • Completion of assessments at Visit 9 (Month 120 of Study MS301 [NCT00125164])

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Incomplete participation in MS301 (NCT00125164)
  • Known or suspected allergy to the trial product (mecasermin, recombinant human IGF-1 injection) or its formulation
  • Development or presence of a chronic condition except as approved by the Medical Monitor
  • Pregnancy
  • Any social or medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would be detrimental to either the subject or the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
114 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    All rhIGF-1 Subjects

    All subjects entering MS306 began recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-1 (rhIGF-1) twice a day (BID) treatment. Each subject treated in MS301 had an MS306 starting dose that was based on their dose at the completion of MS301 (i.e. subcutaneous injections of rhIGF-1 at 40, 80, or 120 micrograms \[μg\]/ kilogram \[kg\] BID). MS301 untreated control subjects were randomised in MS306 in a 1:1 ratio to a dose of either 80 or 120 μg/kg rhIGF-1 BID. Following Protocol Amendment 1, all subjects received either 80 or 120 μg/kg rhIGF-1 BID until the implementation of Protocol Amendment 2. Following Protocol Amendment 2, all subjects were first switched to receive subcutaneous injections of 160 μg/kg rhIGF-1 once a day (QD), followed by individual dose-escalation first to 200 μg/kg rhIGF-1 QD and subsequently to a targeted maximum dose of 240 μg/kg rhIGF-1 QD. Subjects were treated QD until the early termination of the study.

    Drug: rh IGF-1 (mecasermin)

Interventions

  • Patients from untreated arm for prior study MS301 (NCT00125164) were randomized to a dose of either 80 or 120 mcg/kg twice daily. For patients receiving active treatment in previous study MS 301 (NCT00125164), they started on a dose of 80 or 120 mcg/kg twice daily based on the dose reached at end of the previous study. Following a protocol amendment in May 2009, all patients were switched to once daily doses of 160 µg/kg, escalated to a targeted maximum dose of 240 µg/kg.

    Also known as: Increlex

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Height Velocity During BID Dosing Period

    Height was measured standing, without shoes, as the average of 3 measurements by the same observer identical technique with a Harpenden or other wall-mounted stadiometer at baseline and each study visit up to 3 years. Height velocity (during any interval of time (annualised) is computed as (height on date 2 - height on date 1)/(age on date 2 - age on date 1) where height is expressed as centimetres so that height velocity is expressed as centimetres per year (cm/yr). Height velocity is presented for subjects completing each year of BID treatment (i.e. Year 1 \[0-1 years\], Year 2 \[1-2 years\], Year 3 \[2-3 years\]).

    Time frame: At Years 1, 2 and 3 in BID dosing period.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Change From Baseline in Height Standard Deviation (SD) Score During BID Dosing Period

    Height was measured standing, without shoes, as the average of 3 measurements by the same observer using identical technique with a Harpenden or other wall-mounted stadiometer at baseline and each study visit up to 3 years. Height SD score was determined using the National Center for Health Statistics 2000 data as provided by the Center for Disease Control. The SD score was calculated as the patient value minus the mean divided by the standard deviation. The mean and the standard deviation vary depending on the age and sex of the child. Mean change from baseline in height SD score is presented for all subjects completing each year of BID treatment (i.e. Year 1 \[0-1 years\], Year 2 \[1-2 years\], Year 3 \[2-3 years\]).

    Time frame: At baseline and Years 1, 2 and 3 in BID dosing period.

  2. Mean Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) SD Score During BID Dosing Period

    BMI SD score was calculated using the National Center for Health Statistics 2000 data as provided by the Center for Disease Control. The SD score was calculated as the patient value minus the mean divided by the standard deviation. The mean and the standard deviation vary depending on the age and sex of the child. Mean change from baseline in BMI SD score is presented for all subjects completing each year of BID treatment (i.e. Year 1 \[0-1 years\], Year 2 \[1-2 years\], Year 3 \[2-3 years\]).

    Time frame: At baseline and Years 1, 2 and 3 in BID dosing period.

  3. Mean Change From Baseline in Bone Age During BID Dosing Period

    Radiographs of the left hand and wrist were taken on an approximately annual basis for determination of bone (skeletal) age. The films were sent to a central facility for standardised evaluation. Mean change from baseline in bone age is presented for all subjects completing each year of BID treatment (i.e. Year1 \[0-1 years\], Year 2 \[1-2 years\], Year 3 \[2-3 years\]).

    Time frame: At baseline and Years 1, 2 and 3 in BID dosing period.

  4. Mean Change From Baseline in Predicted Adult Height During BID Dosing Period

    Predicted adult heights were estimated using the Roche-Wainer-Theissen method which takes into account changes in age, height and bone age. Mean change from baseline in predicted adult height is presented for all subjects completing each year of BID treatment (i.e. Year 1 \[0-1 years\], Year 2 \[1-2 years\], Year 3 \[2-3 years\]).

    Time frame: At baseline and Years 1, 2 and 3 in BID dosing period.

07

Results

Posted Jun 27, 2011
Limitations and caveats
The study was terminated by the sponsor due to an unacceptably high incidence of hypoglycaemia observed in approximately 50% of the subjects receiving 200 μg/kg rhIGF-1 or greater QD.

Participant flow

All subjects that completed study MS301 (NCT00125164) were eligible to enter this Phase 3b, open-label, extension study in prepubertal and pubertal male and female subjects with growth failure associated with primary insulin-like growth factor-1 deficiency (IGFD). This study (MS306) was terminated early by the sponsor on 01 December 2009.

BID Dosing Period
Participant flow — BID Dosing Period
MilestoneAll rhIGF-1 Subjects
Started114
Completed78
Not completed36
Withdrew: Adverse event1
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up7
Withdrew: Non-compliance5
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject19
Withdrew: Sponsor's decision1
Withdrew: Other3
QD Dosing Period
Participant flow — QD Dosing Period
MilestoneAll rhIGF-1 Subjects
Started78
Completed0
Not completed78
Withdrew: Sponsor decision to terminate study74
Withdrew: Other1
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up2

Outcome measures

PrimaryHeight Velocity During BID Dosing Period

Height was measured standing, without shoes, as the average of 3 measurements by the same observer identical technique with a Harpenden or other wall-mounted stadiometer at baseline and each study visit up to 3 years. Height velocity (during any interval of time (annualised) is computed as (height on date 2 - height on date 1)/(age on date 2 - age on date 1) where height is expressed as centimetres so that height velocity is expressed as centimetres per year (cm/yr). Height velocity is presented for subjects completing each year of BID treatment (i.e. Year 1 \[0-1 years\], Year 2 \[1-2 years\], Year 3 \[2-3 years\]).

Time frame:
At Years 1, 2 and 3 in BID dosing period.
Reported as:
Mean · cm/year
Height Velocity During BID Dosing Period
cm/year120 μg/kg rhIGF-1 BID (MITT Population)
Year 17.7 ± 1.5
Year 26.1 ± 1.4
Year 35.9 ± 1.1
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Height Standard Deviation (SD) Score During BID Dosing Period

Height was measured standing, without shoes, as the average of 3 measurements by the same observer using identical technique with a Harpenden or other wall-mounted stadiometer at baseline and each study visit up to 3 years. Height SD score was determined using the National Center for Health Statistics 2000 data as provided by the Center for Disease Control. The SD score was calculated as the patient value minus the mean divided by the standard deviation. The mean and the standard deviation vary depending on the age and sex of the child. Mean change from baseline in height SD score is presented for all subjects completing each year of BID treatment (i.e. Year 1 \[0-1 years\], Year 2 \[1-2 years\], Year 3 \[2-3 years\]).

Time frame:
At baseline and Years 1, 2 and 3 in BID dosing period.
Reported as:
Mean · SD score/year
Mean Change From Baseline in Height Standard Deviation (SD) Score During BID Dosing Period
SD score/year120 μg/kg rhIGF-1 BID (MITT Population)
Year 10.5 ± 0.3
Year 20.7 ± 0.4
Year 30.9 ± 0.6
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) SD Score During BID Dosing Period

BMI SD score was calculated using the National Center for Health Statistics 2000 data as provided by the Center for Disease Control. The SD score was calculated as the patient value minus the mean divided by the standard deviation. The mean and the standard deviation vary depending on the age and sex of the child. Mean change from baseline in BMI SD score is presented for all subjects completing each year of BID treatment (i.e. Year 1 \[0-1 years\], Year 2 \[1-2 years\], Year 3 \[2-3 years\]).

Time frame:
At baseline and Years 1, 2 and 3 in BID dosing period.
Reported as:
Mean · SD score/year
Mean Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) SD Score During BID Dosing Period
SD score/year120 μg/kg rhIGF-1 BID (MITT Population)
Year 10.3 ± 0.5
Year 20.2 ± 0.5
Year 30.4 ± 0.5
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Bone Age During BID Dosing Period

Radiographs of the left hand and wrist were taken on an approximately annual basis for determination of bone (skeletal) age. The films were sent to a central facility for standardised evaluation. Mean change from baseline in bone age is presented for all subjects completing each year of BID treatment (i.e. Year1 \[0-1 years\], Year 2 \[1-2 years\], Year 3 \[2-3 years\]).

Time frame:
At baseline and Years 1, 2 and 3 in BID dosing period.
Reported as:
Mean · Years
Mean Change From Baseline in Bone Age During BID Dosing Period
Years120 μg/kg rhIGF-1 BID (MITT Population)
Year 11.2 ± 0.5
Year 22.3 ± 0.6
Year 33.4 ± 0.7
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Predicted Adult Height During BID Dosing Period

Predicted adult heights were estimated using the Roche-Wainer-Theissen method which takes into account changes in age, height and bone age. Mean change from baseline in predicted adult height is presented for all subjects completing each year of BID treatment (i.e. Year 1 \[0-1 years\], Year 2 \[1-2 years\], Year 3 \[2-3 years\]).

Time frame:
At baseline and Years 1, 2 and 3 in BID dosing period.
Reported as:
Mean · cm
Mean Change From Baseline in Predicted Adult Height During BID Dosing Period
cm120 μg/kg rhIGF-1 BID (MITT Population)
Year 12.7 ± 2.0
Year 23.9 ± 3.2
Year 33.7 ± 3.4

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected for the overall study (including both the BID and QD dosing periods) from Day 1 until early termination of the study (up to 4 years, 3 months).. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
All rhIGF-1 Subjects0/114 (0%)6/114 (5.3%)107/114 (93.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventAll rhIGF-1 Subjects
AppendicitisInfections and infestations1/114
CholelithiasisHepatobiliary disorders1/114
Forearm FractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/114
HypoglycaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/114
Otitis ExternaInfections and infestations1/114
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/114
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 35
Most frequent other events
EventAll rhIGF-1 Subjects
HypoglycaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders46/114
Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionInfections and infestations38/114
HeadacheNervous system disorders35/114
PyrexiaGeneral disorders28/114
Pharyngitis StreptococcalInfections and infestations23/114
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders23/114
InfluenzaInfections and infestations22/114
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations22/114
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders21/114
Abdominal Pain UpperGastrointestinal disorders20/114

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)All rhIGF-1 Subjects
Mean8.5 ± 2.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)All rhIGF-1 Subjects
Female32
Male82
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)All rhIGF-1 Subjects
Hispanic6
White100
Black1
Asian4
Native Hawaiian1
Other2
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Ipsen
    Paris, France
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Nov 2005, a primary completion of Feb 2010 and a completion of Mar 2010. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Jun 2011, 1 year 4 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 26, 2006
First posted
May 29, 2006
Start
Nov 2005
Primary completionActual
Feb 2010
CompletionActual
Mar 2010
Results first posted
Jun 27, 2011
Last update
Aug 14, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 14, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00330668
Lead sponsor
Ipsen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 29, 2006
Start date
Nov 2005
Primary completion
Feb 2010
Completion
Mar 2010
Results posted
Jun 27, 2011
Last update
Aug 14, 2020

Study contacts

Sr Vice President, Clinical Development and Medical Affairs
study director · Ipsen (formerly Tercica, Inc.)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Aug 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Mecasermin

Start the discussion