ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00321698Updated Aug 29, 2024Results posted

Radiation Therapy and Docetaxel in Treating Patients Who Are Undergoing Surgery for Localized Prostate Cancer

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Docetaxel+IMRT in Prostate Cancer, sponsored by OHSU Knight Cancer Institute. Terminated at 2 sites in United States. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-29.

Sponsored by OHSU Knight Cancer Institute · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Funding withdrawal
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as docetaxel, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving radiation therapy together with chemotherapy before surgery may make the tumor smaller and reduce the amount of normal tissue that needs to be removed.

PURPOSE: This phase I/II trial is studying the side effects and best dose of docetaxel when given together with radiation therapy and to see how well they work in treating patients who are undergoing surgery for high-risk localized prostate cancer.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of neoadjuvant radiotherapy and docetaxel in patients who are undergoing prostatectomy for high-risk localized prostate cancer.
  • Determine the pathologic response rate in patients treated at the phase II dose.

Secondary

  • Determine the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) short-term response rate in patients treated with this regimen.
  • Determine the long-term safety of this regimen prior to radical prostatectomy in these patients.
  • Determine the clinical response to this regimen by urologic examination of these patients.
  • Determine the surgical margin status at the time of prostatectomy in patients treated with this regimen.
  • Determine the effect of this regimen, in terms of Health-Related Quality of Life by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) and urinary symptom scores by the American Urological Association's measures, in these patients.
  • Determine the clinical progression-free rate in patients treated with this regimen.
  • Identify pretreatment predictors of response in these patients by examining tissue biomarkers in preserved pretreatment biopsy specimens.
  • Determine the biologic impact of this regimen on these patients by examining the prostatectomy specimens.
  • Collect frozen serum for future analysis of correlative biomarkers.
  • Compare the RNA content (gene expression profile) of pre- and post-treatment tumor specimens in order to describe the molecular impact of this regimen on prostate cancer.

OUTLINE: This is a phase I, dose-escalation study of docetaxel followed by a phase II study. All patients undergo a biopsy of the prostate to gather research-only specimens prior to the beginning of treatment.

  • Phase I: Patients undergo radiotherapy once daily, 5 days a week, for 5 weeks. Patients also receive docetaxel IV on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Approximately 4-6 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy, patients undergo a radical prostatectomy.

Cohorts of 3-6 patients receive escalating doses of docetaxel until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is determined. The MTD is defined as the dose preceding that at which 2 of 3 or 2 of 6 patients experience a dose-limiting toxicity. At least 6 patients are treated at the MTD.

  • Phase II: Patients undergo radiotherapy as in phase I. Patients also receive docetaxel at the MTD determined in phase I and then undergo prostatectomy as in phase I.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 42 patients will be accrued for this study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • adenocarcinoma of the prostate
  • stage II prostate cancer
  • stage III prostate cancer
03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

6,484 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,415 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 25 is below the median of 58 across 4,908 interventional studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

OHSU Knight Cancer Institute is the lead sponsor of 243 studies on the registry; 44 are open to participants now.

Of its 27 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 15 (56%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate

    • Localized disease, meeting 1 of the following staging criteria:

      • Clinical stage T2b (palpable bilateral movement) disease
      • Surgically resectable T3 disease
  • Meets any of the following high-risk* features:

    • PSA ≥ 15 ng/mL
    • Gleason grade ≥ 4+3 (4+3, 4+4, or 5+any, but not 3+4) NOTE: *High risk defined as > 50% chance of failure with local therapy
  • Plans to undergo prostatectomy as primary therapy
  • No evidence of lymph nodes ≥ 2 cm in diameter by pelvic CT scan

    • Scan only required in patients with a PSA ≥ 40 ng/mL
  • No evidence of bone metastases by bone scan

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Life expectancy ≥ 10 years
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2
  • White blood cell (WBC) > 3,000/mm\^3
  • Neutrophil count > 1,500/mm\^3
  • Platelet count > 100,000/mm\^3
  • Direct bilirubin normal
  • Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \< 2.0 times upper limit of normal (ULN) (1.5 times ULN if alkaline phosphatase [AP] > 2.5 times ULN)
  • Alkaline phosphatase (AP) \< 4.0 times ULN
  • No other serious medical condition that would preclude study treatment
  • No other malignancy within the past 5 years except nonmelanoma skin cancer
  • No peripheral neuropathy ≥ grade 2
  • No hypersensitivity to drugs formulated with polysorbate 80
  • No significant contraindications to corticosteroids
  • No history of scleroderma
  • No active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or IBD that is being medically treated

    • Inclusion of patients with a remote history of IBD is at the discretion of radiotherapist

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA; PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • No prior therapy for prostate cancer, including any of the following:

    • Conventional hormonal therapy (e.g., orchiectomy, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone therapy, antiandrogen therapy, or estrogen therapy)
    • External-beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy
    • Cryotherapy
    • Cytotoxic chemotherapy
  • No prior pelvic radiotherapy
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Phase I Dose 1-4

    Group 1=radiation only; Group 2=Docetaxel IV over 30mins, 10mg/m2; weekly x 5 weeks starting on day one of radiation; Group 3=Docetaxel IV over 30mins, 20mg/m2; weekly x 5 weeks starting on day one of radiation; Group 4=Docetaxel IV over 30mins, 30mg/m2; weekly x 5 weeks starting on day one of radiation Radiation: All men receive same radiation treatment protocol. External Beam, 45 Gy (1.8 Gy fractions), 5 per week (daily) x 5 weeks (25 fractions)

    Radiation: Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) · Drug: Docetaxel+IMRT

  • Experimental
    Phase II MTD Dose

    Phase II with no phase I dose-limiting toxicities=Docetaxel IV over 30mins, 30mg/m2; weekly x 5 weeks starting on day one of radiation Radiation: All men receive same radiation treatment protocol. External Beam, 45 Gy (1.8 Gy fractions), 5 per week (daily) x 5 weeks (25 fractions)

    Drug: Docetaxel+IMRT

Interventions

  • RadiationIntensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT)

    Group 1=radiation only; All men in all Arms/Groups receive same radiation treatment protocol. External Beam, 45 Gy (1.8 Gy fractions), 5 per week (daily) x 5 weeks (25 fractions)

    Also known as: Radiation therapy

  • DrugDocetaxel+IMRT

    Group 2=IV over 30mins, 10mg/m2; weekly x 5 weeks starting on day one of radiation; Group 3=IV over 30mins, 20mg/m2; weekly x 5 weeks starting on day one of radiation; Group 4=IV over 30mins, 30mg/m2; weekly x 5 weeks starting on day one of radiation; Phase II with no phase I dose-limiting toxicities=IV over 30mins, 30mg/m2; weekly x 5 weeks starting on day one of radiation Radiation: All men receive same radiation treatment protocol. External Beam, 45 Gy (1.8 Gy fractions), 5 per week (daily) x 5 weeks (25 fractions)

    Also known as: Chemotherapy with Radiation therapy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)

    Maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination radiation (45 Gy) and docetaxel. The dose of radiation will be fixed at 45 Gy while the dose of docetaxel will be escalated. The starting dose of docetaxel will be 10 mg/m2 and will be escalated in increments of 10 mg/m2 up to a dose of 30 mg/m2 the pre-planned ceiling). MTD will be the dose that is associated with no more than 1 dose limiting toxicity (DLT) up to 6 patients. The DLT will be defined as clinically significant grade 3 non-hematologic or grade 4 hematologic toxicity, attributable to the chemoirradiation. If 2 of 3 patients experience a DLT, dose escalation will stop and the previous dose level will be considered the MTD. If 1 of 3 has DLT, additional 3 patients will be enrolled at the same dose level. If none of the additional 3 patients has DLT, the dose escalation will continue. If 1 additional patient has DLT, the previous dose will be considered the MTD and dose escalation will be stopped.

    Time frame: 5 weeks

  2. Pathologic Response Rate at the Phase II Dose

    Pathologic response rate is determined post-prostatectomy by pathologist laboratory analyses. The TNM system is the most widely used cancer staging system. Most hospitals and medical centers use the TNM system as their main method for cancer reporting. In the TNM system: The T refers to the size and extent of the main/primary tumor. T1, T2, T3, T4: Refers to the size and/or extent of the main tumor. The higher the number after the T, the larger the tumor or the more it has grown into nearby tissues. T's may be further divided to provide more detail, such as T3a and T3b.

    Time frame: 4-6 weeks after study treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Prostate-specific Antigen Short-term Response Rate Measured as a Percentage Change in PSA

    All participants were combined for this assessment as pre-specified in the protocol. The percentage change for patients were determined from pre- and post- treatment PSA values. The mean percentage change in PSA will be reported. PSA will be monitored every 3-6 months during the first 5 years, then annually after surgery for up to 10 years

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-treatment) and 1 month after surgery (post-treatment)

  2. Long-term Safety

    An adverse event is any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure that may or may not be considered related to the medical treatment or procedure.

    Time frame: Regular intervals both study-related and clinical standard of care-related; assessed at end of study treatment. Average timeframe to follow safety was 1 year and includes all grade 3-4 adverse events

  3. Clinical Response to Treatment as Measured by Urologic Examination

    Biochemical Recurrence is defined as a detectable or rising PSA value after surgery that is 0.2 ng/mL or greater with a second confirmatory level of 0.2 ng/mL or greater.

    Time frame: Each participant was examined 3, 6, 9, 12 months, and annually for an average of 10 years after surgery.

  4. Surgical Margin Status at Time of Prostatectomy (Count of Subjects With Negative Surgical Margins)

    Pathologic response rate is determined post-prostatectomy by pathologist laboratory analyses. The TNM system is the most widely used cancer staging system. Most hospitals and medical centers use the TNM system as their main method for cancer reporting. In the TNM system: The M refers to whether the cancer has metastasized. This means that the cancer has spread outside of the primary tumor to other parts of the body.

    Time frame: 5 weeks

  5. Efficacy Assessed Using Health-Related Quality of Life by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite and Urinary Symptom Scores by American Urological Association's Measures

    Mean change in score from Baseline to 12-months pot-op. A single outcome, Health Related Quality of Life (QOL), was specified in the protocol. All 6 score means and confidence intervals are reported here as a single outcome; a separate row for each score. AUA Symptom Score is designed to measure lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) resulting from benign prostatic hyperplasia or other causes in men. Higher scores indicate more LUTS (scale 0-35). 1-7, mild; 8-19, moderate; 20-35, severe. EPIC quality of life instruments is a 32-item self-report questionnaire that measures the QOL of prostate cancer patients. 4 subscales measuring urinary (further consisting of two sub-components, EPIC Urinary Incontinence Score and EPIC Urinary Obstructive/Irritative Score), bowel, sexual and hormonal changes. Scores for each of the subscales, as well as for each sub-component within the Urinary sub scale, are transformed linearly to a 0-100 scale with higher scores representing better QOL.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 Months Post-Prostatectomy

  6. Clinical Progression-free Rate as Determined by <0.1ng PSA Results

    The estimated percentage of participants who were progression-free at 5 years per analyses of PSA results post-study treatment.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, 12 months and annually, up to 5 years

07

Results

Posted Dec 30, 2016
Limitations and caveats
Patient accrual was not completed due to the sponsor withdrawing funding.

Participant flow

Subject accrual from Urology clinics started in April 2006; annual follow-up of 22 VA, 3 Oregon Health \& Science University (OHSU) (25 total) subjects who completed ended in 2011; 10 year follow-up of these patients will be completed in 2021.

Phase I, Rad Only & Dose 1-3
Participant flow — Phase I, Rad Only & Dose 1-3
MilestonePhase I, Radiation OnlyPhase I, Dose 1Phase I, Dose 2Phase I, Dose 3Phase II, MTD Dose
Started33330
Completed33330
Not completed00000
Phase II, MTD Dose
Participant flow — Phase II, MTD Dose
MilestonePhase I, Radiation OnlyPhase I, Dose 1Phase I, Dose 2Phase I, Dose 3Phase II, MTD Dose
Started000013
Completed000013
Not completed00000

Outcome measures

PrimaryMaximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)

Maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination radiation (45 Gy) and docetaxel. The dose of radiation will be fixed at 45 Gy while the dose of docetaxel will be escalated. The starting dose of docetaxel will be 10 mg/m2 and will be escalated in increments of 10 mg/m2 up to a dose of 30 mg/m2 the pre-planned ceiling). MTD will be the dose that is associated with no more than 1 dose limiting toxicity (DLT) up to 6 patients. The DLT will be defined as clinically significant grade 3 non-hematologic or grade 4 hematologic toxicity, attributable to the chemoirradiation. If 2 of 3 patients experience a DLT, dose escalation will stop and the previous dose level will be considered the MTD. If 1 of 3 has DLT, additional 3 patients will be enrolled at the same dose level. If none of the additional 3 patients has DLT, the dose escalation will continue. If 1 additional patient has DLT, the previous dose will be considered the MTD and dose escalation will be stopped.

Time frame:
5 weeks
Reported as:
Number · mg/m^2
Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
mg/m^2Phase I Dose 1-4
Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)30
PrimaryPathologic Response Rate at the Phase II Dose

Pathologic response rate is determined post-prostatectomy by pathologist laboratory analyses. The TNM system is the most widely used cancer staging system. Most hospitals and medical centers use the TNM system as their main method for cancer reporting. In the TNM system: The T refers to the size and extent of the main/primary tumor. T1, T2, T3, T4: Refers to the size and/or extent of the main tumor. The higher the number after the T, the larger the tumor or the more it has grown into nearby tissues. T's may be further divided to provide more detail, such as T3a and T3b.

Time frame:
4-6 weeks after study treatment
Reported as:
Number · participants
Pathologic Response Rate at the Phase II Dose
participantsPhase II MTD Dose
Pathologic Stage pT2c7
Pathologic Stage pT3a3
Pathologic Stage pT3b3
SecondaryProstate-specific Antigen Short-term Response Rate Measured as a Percentage Change in PSA

All participants were combined for this assessment as pre-specified in the protocol. The percentage change for patients were determined from pre- and post- treatment PSA values. The mean percentage change in PSA will be reported. PSA will be monitored every 3-6 months during the first 5 years, then annually after surgery for up to 10 years

Time frame:
Baseline (pre-treatment) and 1 month after surgery (post-treatment)
Reported as:
Mean · percentage change
Prostate-specific Antigen Short-term Response Rate Measured as a Percentage Change in PSA
percentage changeAll Research Participants
Prostate-specific Antigen Short-term Response Rate Measured as a Percentage Change in PSA-49.1 (-60.3 to -36.7)
SecondaryLong-term Safety

An adverse event is any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure that may or may not be considered related to the medical treatment or procedure.

Time frame:
Regular intervals both study-related and clinical standard of care-related; assessed at end of study treatment. Average timeframe to follow safety was 1 year and includes all grade 3-4 adverse events
Reported as:
Number · grade 3-4 adverse events
Long-term Safety
grade 3-4 adverse eventsPhase I Dose 1-4Phase II MTD Dose
Long-term Safety98
SecondaryClinical Response to Treatment as Measured by Urologic Examination

Biochemical Recurrence is defined as a detectable or rising PSA value after surgery that is 0.2 ng/mL or greater with a second confirmatory level of 0.2 ng/mL or greater.

Time frame:
Each participant was examined 3, 6, 9, 12 months, and annually for an average of 10 years after surgery.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Clinical Response to Treatment as Measured by Urologic Examination
ParticipantsPhase I, Radiation OnlyPhase I, Dose 1Phase I, Dose 2Phase I, Dose 3Phase II, MTD Dose
Clinical Response to Treatment as Measured by Urologic Examination12025
SecondarySurgical Margin Status at Time of Prostatectomy (Count of Subjects With Negative Surgical Margins)

Pathologic response rate is determined post-prostatectomy by pathologist laboratory analyses. The TNM system is the most widely used cancer staging system. Most hospitals and medical centers use the TNM system as their main method for cancer reporting. In the TNM system: The M refers to whether the cancer has metastasized. This means that the cancer has spread outside of the primary tumor to other parts of the body.

Time frame:
5 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Surgical Margin Status at Time of Prostatectomy (Count of Subjects With Negative Surgical Margins)
ParticipantsPhase I Dose 1-4Phase II MTD Dose
Surgical Margin Status at Time of Prostatectomy (Count of Subjects With Negative Surgical Margins)913
SecondaryEfficacy Assessed Using Health-Related Quality of Life by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite and Urinary Symptom Scores by American Urological Association's Measures

Mean change in score from Baseline to 12-months pot-op. A single outcome, Health Related Quality of Life (QOL), was specified in the protocol. All 6 score means and confidence intervals are reported here as a single outcome; a separate row for each score. AUA Symptom Score is designed to measure lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) resulting from benign prostatic hyperplasia or other causes in men. Higher scores indicate more LUTS (scale 0-35). 1-7, mild; 8-19, moderate; 20-35, severe. EPIC quality of life instruments is a 32-item self-report questionnaire that measures the QOL of prostate cancer patients. 4 subscales measuring urinary (further consisting of two sub-components, EPIC Urinary Incontinence Score and EPIC Urinary Obstructive/Irritative Score), bowel, sexual and hormonal changes. Scores for each of the subscales, as well as for each sub-component within the Urinary sub scale, are transformed linearly to a 0-100 scale with higher scores representing better QOL.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 Months Post-Prostatectomy
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Efficacy Assessed Using Health-Related Quality of Life by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite and Urinary Symptom Scores by American Urological Association's Measures
units on a scaleAll Research Participants
AUA Symptom Score0.67 (-2.96 to 4.29)
EPIC Urinary Incontinence Score-36.52 (-51.38 to -21.67)
EPIC Urinary Obstructive/Irritative Score3.41 (-5.55 to 12.37)
EPIC Bowel1.45 (-6.42 to 9.33)
EPIC Hormonal0.00 (-6.42 to 6.42)
EPIC Sexual-36.26 (-48.84 to -23.68)
SecondaryClinical Progression-free Rate as Determined by <0.1ng PSA Results

The estimated percentage of participants who were progression-free at 5 years per analyses of PSA results post-study treatment.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, 12 months and annually, up to 5 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Clinical Progression-free Rate as Determined by <0.1ng PSA Results
percentage of participantsAll Research Participants
Clinical Progression-free Rate as Determined by <0.1ng PSA Results62.8 (41.9 to 83.6)

Adverse events

Collected over Timeframe to follow safety was up to 1 year, for an average of 133.84 days per subject.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Phase I, Radiation Only—0/3 (0%)0/3 (0%)
Phase I, Dose 1—3/3 (100%)0/3 (0%)
Phase I, Dose 2—3/3 (100%)0/3 (0%)
Phase I, Dose 3—3/3 (100%)0/3 (0%)
Phase II, MTD Dose—8/13 (61.5%)0/13 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPhase I, Radiation OnlyPhase I, Dose 1Phase I, Dose 2Phase I, Dose 3Phase II, MTD Dose
HyperglycemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/32/30/31/31/13
LymphapeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/30/31/31/35/13
Difficulty with ADLsGeneral disorders0/30/31/30/30/13
Hemoglobin (L)Blood and lymphatic system disorders0/31/30/31/30/13
PainSurgical and medical procedures0/30/31/30/30/13
HypophosphatemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/30/30/30/32/13
HypokalemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/30/30/30/30/13
HyponatremiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/30/30/30/30/13

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Phase I, Radiation OnlyPhase I, Dose 1Phase I, Dose 2Phase I, Dose 3Phase II, MTD DoseTotal
<=18 years000000
Between 18 and 65 years22231120
>=65 years111025
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Phase I, Radiation OnlyPhase I, Dose 1Phase I, Dose 2Phase I, Dose 3Phase II, MTD DoseTotal
Mean66.67 ± 8.1462.67 ± 7.6466.33 ± 4.9358.00 ± 6.5660.54 ± 4.5861.92 ± 5.89
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Phase I, Radiation OnlyPhase I, Dose 1Phase I, Dose 2Phase I, Dose 3Phase II, MTD DoseTotal
Female000000
Male33331325
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Phase I, Radiation OnlyPhase I, Dose 1Phase I, Dose 2Phase I, Dose 3Phase II, MTD DoseTotal
United States33331325
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Portland
    Portland, Oregon 97207, United States
  • OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
    Portland, Oregon 97239-3098, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Ohaegbulam KC, Post CM, Farris PE, Garzotto M, Beer TM, Hung A, Williamson CW. Safety and Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Docetaxel and Radiotherapy in Localized High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Results From a Prospective Pilot Study. Am J Clin Oncol. 2025 Feb 1;48(2):75-82. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001151. Epub 2024 Oct 30. PubMed 39473059 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 29, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00321698
Responsible party
Mark Garzotto, MD (Principal Investigator, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 4, 2006
Start date
Apr 21, 2006
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2009
Completion
Aug 18, 2023
Results posted
Dec 30, 2016
Last update
Aug 29, 2024

Study contacts

Mark Garzotto, MD
principal investigator · OHSU Knight Cancer Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion