CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00317356Updated Apr 30, 2021Results posted

A Dose-finding Study of OPC-6535 in Patients With Active Ulcerative Colitis

A Phase 2 interventional study of OPC-6535(Tetomilast) in Colitis, Ulcerative, sponsored by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.. Terminated at 8 sites in Japan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-04-30.

Sponsored by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Efficacy was not cleared at US study
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
43
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to examine the safety and efficacy of OPC-6535 (tetomilast) and to determine its optimal dose by once-daily oral administration at 0, 12.5, 25, or 50 mg for 8 weeks in combination with a fixed oral dose of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) in patients with active ulcerative colitis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colitis, Ulcerative

Keywords

  • OPC-6535
  • ulcerative colitis
03

In context

Colitis

1,073 studies on the registry are indexed under Colitis; 131 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 43 is below the median of 60 across 771 interventional studies indexed under Colitis.

Browse Colitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. is the lead sponsor of 140 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with active ulcerative colitis
  • Patients who have been receiving an oral 5-ASA formulation at a fixed regimen and at a fixed dose
  • Either inpatient or outpatient

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have a history of intestinal resection (other than appendiceal resection)
  • Patients who have a complication of malignant tumor
  • Female patients who are pregnant, lactating, or possibly pregnant, or who wish to become pregnant during the study period
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double
Enrollment
43 participants (actual)

Interventions

  • DrugOPC-6535(Tetomilast)
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical Improvement Rate (Number of Subjects Showing Clinical Improvement/Number of Subjects Evaluated x 100) After 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration

    Definition of clinical improvement: Disease Activity Index (DAI) subscore for rectal bleeding improved to 0 or 1 and DAI subscore for mucosal appearance improved by at least 1 point from baseline

    Time frame: Weeks 4 and 8

Secondary outcomes

  1. Remission Rate (Number of Subjects Showing Remission/Number of Subjects Evaluated x 100) After 4 and 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration

    Definition of remission: DAI subscores for both rectal bleeding and mucosal appearance improved to 0

    Time frame: Weeks 4 and 8

  2. Mean Change From the Baseline in Total DAI Score After 4 and 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration

    DAI measures disease activity through assessment of 4 items/subscales: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, mucosal appearance at endoscopy, and physician's rating of disease activity. Each item of the score is assessed on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3; the total score ranges from 0 to 12 with a higher score representing greater severity. A negative change in mean score indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4 and 8

  3. Mean Change From the Baseline in DAI Subscores After 4 and 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration

    DAI measures disease activity through assessment of 4 items/subscales: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, mucosal appearance at endoscopy, and physician's rating of disease activity. Each item of the score is assessed on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3 with a higher score representing greater severity. A negative change in mean score indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4 and 8

  4. Mean Change From the Baseline in Total Clinical Activity Index (CAI) Score After 2, 4, and 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration

    CAI composed of 7 variables: number of stool weekly, blood in stools (weekly average), investigator's global assessment of symptomatic state, abdominal pain/cramps, temperature due to colitis, extraintestinal manifestations, and laboratory findings. The scores ranging from 0 to 29 points (higher scores meaning more severe disease).

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8

  5. Mean Change From the Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score After 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration

    The IBDQ has been frequently adopted in Japanese and overseas clinical assessments as a scale for evaluating the quality of life (QOL) of subjects with inflammatory bowel disease. The IBDQ score was calculated as the sum of the responses (each ranging from 1 to 7) to all 32 questions that address symptoms as a result of Crohn's disease: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function, and social function. Total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224 with a higher score indicating a better QOL.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

  6. Mean Change From the Baseline in IBDQ Subscale Scores After 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration

    The IBDQ has been frequently adopted in Japanese and overseas clinical assessments as a scale for evaluating the quality of life (QOL) of subjects with inflammatory bowel disease. The IBDQ includes 32 items, which are divided into four subscales: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, and each item is scored on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 (worst) to 7 (best). Total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224 with a higher score indicating a better QOL.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

  7. Clinical Improvement Rate After 4 Weeks of Study Drug Administration

    Definition of clinical improvement: DAI subscore for rectal bleeding improved to 0 or 1 and DAI subscore for mucosal appearance improved by at least 1 point from baseline

    Time frame: Week 4

07

Results

Posted Apr 30, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOPC-6535 12.5 mgOPC-6535 25 mgOPC-6535 50 mgPlacebo
Started11111011
Completed10998
Not completed1213
Withdrew: Adverse event0010
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy1103
Withdrew: Physician decision0100

Outcome measures

PrimaryClinical Improvement Rate (Number of Subjects Showing Clinical Improvement/Number of Subjects Evaluated x 100) After 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration

Definition of clinical improvement: Disease Activity Index (DAI) subscore for rectal bleeding improved to 0 or 1 and DAI subscore for mucosal appearance improved by at least 1 point from baseline

Time frame:
Weeks 4 and 8
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Clinical Improvement Rate (Number of Subjects Showing Clinical Improvement/Number of Subjects Evaluated x 100) After 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration
percentage of participantsOPC-6535 12.5 mgOPC-6535 25 mgOPC-6535 50 mgPlacebo
Clinical Improvement Rate (Number of Subjects Showing Clinical Improvement/Number of Subjects Evaluated x 100) After 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration27.3 (6.0 to 61.0)30.0 (6.7 to 65.2)50.0 (18.7 to 81.3)9.1 (0.2 to 41.3)
SecondaryRemission Rate (Number of Subjects Showing Remission/Number of Subjects Evaluated x 100) After 4 and 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration

Definition of remission: DAI subscores for both rectal bleeding and mucosal appearance improved to 0

Time frame:
Weeks 4 and 8
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Remission Rate (Number of Subjects Showing Remission/Number of Subjects Evaluated x 100) After 4 and 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration
percentage of participantsOPC-6535 12.5 mgOPC-6535 25 mgOPC-6535 50 mgPlacebo
Week 40.0 (0.0 to 30.8)0.0 (0.0 to 30.8)0.0 (0.0 to 36.9)9.1 (0.2 to 41.3)
Week 80.0 (0.0 to 28.5)9.1 (0.2 to 41.3)10.0 (0.3 to 44.5)9.1 (0.2 to 41.3)
SecondaryMean Change From the Baseline in Total DAI Score After 4 and 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration

DAI measures disease activity through assessment of 4 items/subscales: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, mucosal appearance at endoscopy, and physician's rating of disease activity. Each item of the score is assessed on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3; the total score ranges from 0 to 12 with a higher score representing greater severity. A negative change in mean score indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 4 and 8
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mean Change From the Baseline in Total DAI Score After 4 and 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration
score on a scaleOPC-6535 12.5 mgOPC-6535 25 mgOPC-6535 50 mgPlacebo
Week 4-2.5 ± 2.4-1.0 ± 3.0-5.0-2.3 ± 4.2
Week 8-2.6 ± 2.2-1.9 ± 3.4-3.8 ± 2.2-1.4 ± 2.3
SecondaryMean Change From the Baseline in DAI Subscores After 4 and 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration

DAI measures disease activity through assessment of 4 items/subscales: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, mucosal appearance at endoscopy, and physician's rating of disease activity. Each item of the score is assessed on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3 with a higher score representing greater severity. A negative change in mean score indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 4 and 8
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mean Change From the Baseline in DAI Subscores After 4 and 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration
score on a scaleOPC-6535 12.5 mgOPC-6535 25 mgOPC-6535 50 mgPlacebo
Rectal bleeding at Week 4-0.6 ± 0.8-1.0 ± 1.1-0.9 ± 0.7-0.4 ± 0.7
Rectal bleeding at Week 8-0.7 ± 0.9-0.9 ± 1.1-1.1 ± 0.9-0.5 ± 0.7
Mucosal appearance at Week 4-0.5 ± 0.6-0.3 ± 0.6-1.0-0.7 ± 1.2
Mucosal appearance at Week 8-0.7 ± 0.7-0.5 ± 0.7-0.8 ± 0.7-0.3 ± 0.7
Stool frequency at Week 4-0.4 ± 1.0-0.8 ± 1.2-0.8 ± 0.8-0.4 ± 0.7
Stool frequency at Week 8-0.5 ± 1.1-0.3 ± 1.3-0.6 ± 0.7-0.4 ± 0.8
Physician's rating of disease activity at Week 4-0.5 ± 0.7-0.7 ± 1.0-0.9 ± 0.7-0.4 ± 0.7
Physician's rating of disease activity at Week 8-0.5 ± 0.5-0.5 ± 0.9-1.0 ± 0.7-0.2 ± 0.8
SecondaryMean Change From the Baseline in Total Clinical Activity Index (CAI) Score After 2, 4, and 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration

CAI composed of 7 variables: number of stool weekly, blood in stools (weekly average), investigator's global assessment of symptomatic state, abdominal pain/cramps, temperature due to colitis, extraintestinal manifestations, and laboratory findings. The scores ranging from 0 to 29 points (higher scores meaning more severe disease).

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mean Change From the Baseline in Total Clinical Activity Index (CAI) Score After 2, 4, and 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration
score on a scaleOPC-6535 12.5 mgOPC-6535 25 mgOPC-6535 50 mgPlacebo
Week 2-1.2 ± 3.1-2.4 ± 3.7-1.8 ± 1.5-1.0 ± 1.8
Week 4-1.4 ± 2.3-2.6 ± 4.1-2.9 ± 2.3-1.1 ± 2.3
Week 8-1.9 ± 2.2-2.6 ± 3.9-3.4 ± 2.5-1.0 ± 2.5
SecondaryMean Change From the Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score After 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration

The IBDQ has been frequently adopted in Japanese and overseas clinical assessments as a scale for evaluating the quality of life (QOL) of subjects with inflammatory bowel disease. The IBDQ score was calculated as the sum of the responses (each ranging from 1 to 7) to all 32 questions that address symptoms as a result of Crohn's disease: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function, and social function. Total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224 with a higher score indicating a better QOL.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mean Change From the Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score After 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration
score on a scaleOPC-6535 12.5 mgOPC-6535 25 mgOPC-6535 50 mgPlacebo
Mean Change From the Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score After 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration22.5 ± 26.57.1 ± 44.316.0 ± 40.29.3 ± 32.9
SecondaryMean Change From the Baseline in IBDQ Subscale Scores After 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration

The IBDQ has been frequently adopted in Japanese and overseas clinical assessments as a scale for evaluating the quality of life (QOL) of subjects with inflammatory bowel disease. The IBDQ includes 32 items, which are divided into four subscales: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, and each item is scored on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 (worst) to 7 (best). Total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224 with a higher score indicating a better QOL.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mean Change From the Baseline in IBDQ Subscale Scores After 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration
score on a scaleOPC-6535 12.5 mgOPC-6535 25 mgOPC-6535 50 mgPlacebo
Bowel symptoms at Week 89.3 ± 12.24.5 ± 18.65.8 ± 13.44.5 ± 11.0
Systemic symptoms at Week 84.5 ± 5.6-1.1 ± 8.52.2 ± 7.00.0 ± 5.9
Emotional function at Week 85.5 ± 8.61.2 ± 12.95.8 ± 15.04.0 ± 10.9
Social function at Week 83.2 ± 6.12.5 ± 8.72.2 ± 7.20.7 ± 8.8
SecondaryClinical Improvement Rate After 4 Weeks of Study Drug Administration

Definition of clinical improvement: DAI subscore for rectal bleeding improved to 0 or 1 and DAI subscore for mucosal appearance improved by at least 1 point from baseline

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Clinical Improvement Rate After 4 Weeks of Study Drug Administration
percentage of participantsOPC-6535 12.5 mgOPC-6535 25 mgOPC-6535 50 mgPlacebo
Clinical Improvement Rate After 4 Weeks of Study Drug Administration12.5 (0.3 to 52.7)20.0 (0.5 to 71.6)14.3 (0.4 to 57.9)10.0 (0.3 to 44.5)

Adverse events

Collected over Treatment period (8 weeks). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
OPC-6535 12.5 mg0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)6/11 (54.5%)
OPC-6535 25 mg0/11 (0%)2/11 (18.2%)7/11 (63.6%)
OPC-6535 50 mg0/10 (0%)2/10 (20%)7/10 (70%)
Placebo0/11 (0%)1/11 (9.1%)8/11 (72.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventOPC-6535 12.5 mgOPC-6535 25 mgOPC-6535 50 mgPlacebo
Colitis ulcerativeGastrointestinal disorders0/112/112/101/11
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 41
Most frequent other events
EventOPC-6535 12.5 mgOPC-6535 25 mgOPC-6535 50 mgPlacebo
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders0/114/112/101/11
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/113/113/100/11
Blood creatine phosphokinase increasedInvestigations0/110/111/103/11
White blood cell count increasedInvestigations1/113/111/100/11
Colitis ulcerativeGastrointestinal disorders0/110/110/102/11
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders0/110/110/102/11
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/112/111/100/11
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations1/111/110/102/11
Upper respiratory tract inflammationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/111/110/100/11
Blood potassium decreasedInvestigations0/111/111/100/11

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)OPC-6535 12.5 mgOPC-6535 25 mgOPC-6535 50 mgPlaceboTotal
<=18 years00011
Between 18 and 65 years1111101042
>=65 years00000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)OPC-6535 12.5 mgOPC-6535 25 mgOPC-6535 50 mgPlaceboTotal
Female563519
Male657624
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)OPC-6535 12.5 mgOPC-6535 25 mgOPC-6535 50 mgPlaceboTotal
Japanese1111101143
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)OPC-6535 12.5 mgOPC-6535 25 mgOPC-6535 50 mgPlaceboTotal
Japan1111101143
08

Study locations

8 sites
  • Chubu Region, Japan
  • Chugoku Region, Japan
  • Hokkaido region, Japan
  • Kanto Region, Japan
  • Kinki Region, Japan
  • Kyushu Region, Japan
  • Shikoku Region, Japan
  • Touhoku Region, Japan
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 30, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00317356
Lead sponsor
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
First posted
Apr 24, 2006
Start date
May 2006
Primary completion
Aug 2007
Completion
Aug 2007
Results posted
Apr 30, 2021
Last update
Apr 30, 2021

Study contacts

Katsuhisa Saito
study director · Division of New Product Evaluation and Development

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion