CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00312000Updated Sep 8, 2008

Sequential Versus Combination Chemotherapy in Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma

A Phase 3 interventional study of capecitabine-irinotecan and capecitabine+irinotecan (1st line) in Advanced Colorectal Cancer, sponsored by Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2008-09-08.

Sponsored by Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
820
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Primary objective:To assess the efficacy, defined as overall survival, of sequential versus combination chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC).

Methodology Open, randomised multicenter phase III study. Randomisation by centre will be centralized. 820 patiënts with histologically proven advanced CRC; not amenable to curative surgery. Measurable or evaluable disease. Age 18 years and above. WHO performance status 0-2.

Test products:

Arm A: First line: capecitabine capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 orally b.i.d. on day 1-14 (q3),until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Second line: irinotecan 350 mg/m2 IV infusion on day 1 (q3),until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Third line: oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 IV infusion on day 1 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally b.i.d. on day 1-14 (q3). Arm B: First line: irinotecan 250 mg/m2 IV infusion in 30 minutes on day 1 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally b.i.d. on day 1-14 (q3), until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Second line: oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally b.i.d. on day 1-14 (q3), until progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Patients will be followed by CT-scan every 9 weeks for response while on treatment, or at any other moment when progression is suspected. After cessation of chemotherapy, patients will be followed every 3 months until death. Clinical and laboratory toxicity/symptomatology will be graded according to NCI common criteria.

Read the detailed description

Objectives: Primary objective:

To assess the efficacy, defined as overall survival, of sequential versus combination chemotherapy for advanced CRC.

Secondary objectives are to assess:

To assess Tumour response (CR, PR or SD) Progression free survival Quality of life Toxicity profile Methodology Open, randomised multicenter phase III study. Randomisation by centre will be centralized by IKC. Number of patients 820 Main criteria for inclusion Histology and staging disease

  • Histologically proven advanced CRC; not amenable to curative surgery;
  • Of Note: In case of a single metastasis, histological or cytological proof of colorectal carcinoma should be obtained prior to randomisation.
  • Measurable or evaluable disease. Serum CEA as the only parameter for disease activity is not allowed.

General conditions

  • Written informed consent;
  • Age 18 years and above;
  • WHO performance status 0-2;
  • Adequate bone marrow function (WBC > 3.0 x 109/L, platelets > 100 x 109/L, Hb > 6 mmol/L);
  • Adequate hepatic function: total bilirubin \< 1. 5 x upper normal limit, ASAT and ALAT \< 3 x upper normal limits (in case of liver metastases \< 5 x upper normal limits);
  • Adequate renal function: creatinin \< 1. 5 x upper normal limits. Other
  • Expected adequacy of follow-up.

Main criteria for exclusion General conditions

  • Pregnancy or lactation;
  • Patients (M/F) with reproductive potential not implementing adequate contraceptives measures.

Prior or current history

  • Prior chemotherapy for advanced disease; prior adjuvant chemotherapy is allowed, provided that the last drug administration took place more than 6 months prior to randomisation.
  • Serious concomitant diseases preventing the safe administration of chemotherapy or likely to interfere with the study assessments;
  • Serious active infections;
  • Inflammatory bowel disease or other diseases associated with chronic diarrhoea;
  • Previous extensive irradiation of pelvis or abdomen;
  • Other malignancies in the past 5 years with the exception of adequately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix or squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin.

Concomitant treatments

  • Concomitant (or within 4 weeks before randomisation) administration of any other experimental drug under investigation;
  • Concurrent treatment with any other anti-cancer therapy. Test product, dose and mode of administration Arm A First line: capecitabine

Every 3 weeks (q 3):

capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 orally b.i.d. on day 1-14. This schedule will be continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Continuation after 6 months without disease progression and/or severe toxicity at the investigator's discretion.

Second line: irinotecan

Every 3 weeks (q 3):

irinotecan 350 mg/m2 IV infusion on day 1. This schedule will be continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Continuation after 6 months without disease progression and/or severe toxicity at the investigator's discretion.

Third line: oxaliplatin plus capecitabine oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 IV infusion on day 1 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally b.i.d. on day 1-14. This schedule will be continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Continuation after 6 months without disease progression and/or severe toxicity at the investigator's discretion.

Arm B First line: irinotecan plus capecitabine

Every 3 weeks (q 3):

irinotecan 250 mg/m2 IV infusion in 30 minutes on day 1 2 hours after discontinuation of the infusion followed by capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally b.i.d. on day 1-14. This schedule will be continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Continuation after 6 months without disease progression and/or severe toxicity at the investigator's discretion.

Second line: oxaliplatin plus capecitabine

Every 3 weeks (q 3):

oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 IV infusion in 2 hours on day 1 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally b.i.d. on day 1-14. This schedule will be continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Continuation after 6 months without disease progression and/or severe toxicity at the investigator's discretion.

Duration of treatment and follow-up Treatment is continued until disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity. Patients will be followed by CT-scan every 9 weeks for response while on treatment, or at any other moment when progression is suspected. After cessation of chemotherapy, patients will be followed every 3 months until death. Death or progression should be reported whenever it occurs.

Criteria for evaluation Efficacy All patients will be included in the survival analysis (intent-to-treat). All patients receiving > 9 weeks of treatment (i.e. 3 cycles) will be considered evaluable for response, unless documented progression occurred earlier.

Safety profile Safety will be analysed in each treatment group. Patients having received > treatment doses are evaluable for toxicity. Evaluation will be performed by patient and by cycle on the intent-to-treat population. Clinical and laboratory toxicity/symptomatology will be graded according to NCI common criteria. The adverse events which are not reported in NCI common criteria will be graded as: mild, moderate, severe, life threatening.

Statistical methodology The expected median survival in Arm A (standard arm) is 14 months. It is anticipated that the median survival in Arm B (experimental arm) will be 19 months. 620 patients (310 in each arm) are needed to show this increase in median survival (>=0,05 and >=0,80).

Stratification parameters Patients will be stratified for the following parameters:

  • WHO performance status 0-1 vs 2
  • Serum LDH normal versus above normal
  • Prior adjuvant therapy versus no prior adjuvant therapy
  • Predominant localisation of metastases in the liver vs extrahepatic site(s)
  • Per participating institution
02

Conditions studied

  • Advanced Colorectal Cancer

Keywords

  • colorectal
  • cancer
  • capecitabine
  • irinotecan
  • oxaliplatin
03

In context

Colorectal Neoplasms

5,599 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms; 1,459 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 820 is above the median of 77 across 4,123 interventional studies indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms.

Browse Colorectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Histology and staging disease

    • Histologically proven CRC; advanced disease, not amenable to curative surgery;
    • Of Note: In case of a single metastasis, histological or cytological proof of colorectal carcinoma should be obtained prior to randomisation.
    • Measurable or evaluable disease; Serum CEA as the only parameter for disease activity is not allowed.
  • General conditions

    • Written informed consent;
    • Age 18 years and above;
    • WHO performance status 0-2;
    • Adequate bone marrow function(WBC > 3.0 x 109/L, platelets > 100 x 109/L, Hb > 6 mmol/L);
    • Adequate hepatic function: total bilirubin \< 1. 5 x upper normal limit, ASAT and ALAT \< 3 x upper normal limits; in case of liver metastases \< 5 x upper normal limits
    • Adequate renal function: creatinin \< 1. 5 x upper normal limits.
  • Other - Expected adequacy of follow-up.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • General conditions

    • Pregnancy or lactation;
    • Patients (M/F) with reproductive potential not implementing adequate contraceptives measures.
  • Prior or current history

    • Prior chemotherapy for advanced disease; prior adjuvant chemotherapy is allowed provided that the last administration was given > 6 months prior to randomisation.
    • Serious concomitant diseases preventing the safe administration of chemotherapy or likely to interfere with the study assessments;
    • Serious active infections;
    • Inflammatory bowel disease or other diseases associated with chronic diarrhoea;
    • Previous extensive irradiation of the pelvis or abdomen;
    • Other malignancies in the past 5 years with the exception of adequately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix or squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin.
  • Concomitant treatments

    • Concomitant (or within 4 weeks before randomisation) administration of any other experimental drug under investigation;
    • Concurrent treatment with any other anti-cancer therapy.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
820 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    1Capecitabine-irinotecan

    1st line- 2nd line (3rd line oxaliplatin plus capecitabine)

    Drug: capecitabine-irinotecan

  • Experimental
    2capecitabine plus irinotecan

    1st line (2nd line oxaliplatin plus capecitabine)

    Drug: capecitabine+irinotecan (1st line)

Interventions

  • Drugcapecitabine-irinotecan

    1. st line capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 orally b.i.d. on day 1-14 2. nd line q 3 w irinotecan 350 mg/m2 IV infusion on day 1

  • Drugcapecitabine+irinotecan (1st line)

    q 3 w irinotecan 250 mg/m2 IV infusion in 30 minutes on day 1 2 hours after discontinuation of the infusion followed by capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally b.i.d. on day 1-14

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall survival

    Time frame: study duration

Secondary outcomes

  1. Tumour response

    Time frame: study duration

  2. Progression free survival

    Time frame: study duration

  3. Quality of life

    Time frame: study duration

  4. Toxicity profile

    Time frame: study duration

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Koopman M, Antonini NF, Douma J, Wals J, Honkoop AH, Erdkamp FL, de Jong RS, Rodenburg CJ, Vreugdenhil G, Akkermans-Vogelaar JM, Punt CJ. Randomised study of sequential versus combination chemotherapy with capecitabine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin in advanced colorectal cancer, an interim safety analysis. A Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG) phase III study. Ann Oncol. 2006 Oct;17(10):1523-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl179. Epub 2006 Jul 27. PubMed 16873425 ↗
  • Koopman M, Antonini NF, Douma J, Wals J, Honkoop AH, Erdkamp FL, de Jong RS, Rodenburg CJ, Vreugdenhil G, Loosveld OJ, van Bochove A, Sinnige HA, Creemers GM, Tesselaar ME, Slee PHTJ, Werter MJ, Mol L, Dalesio O, Punt CJ. Sequential versus combination chemotherapy with capecitabine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin in advanced colorectal cancer (CAIRO): a phase III randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007 Jul 14;370(9582):135-142. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61086-1. PubMed 17630036 ↗
  • van Kessel CS, Samim M, Koopman M, van den Bosch MA, Borel Rinkes IH, Punt CJ, van Hillegersberg R. Radiological heterogeneity in response to chemotherapy is associated with poor survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Cancer. 2013 Jul;49(11):2486-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.03.027. Epub 2013 May 18. PubMed 23692811 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 8, 2008, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00312000
Lead sponsor
Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group
Collaborators
Koningin Wilhelmina Fonds, Sanofi, Hoffmann-La Roche
First posted
Apr 7, 2006
Start date
Jan 2003
Primary completion
Feb 2006
Completion
Dec 2006
Last update
Sep 8, 2008

Study contacts

C. J. A. Punt, Prof.Dr.
principal investigator · University Medical Center St. Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2008. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion